請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29622完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 朱瑞玲(Ruey-Ling Chu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shih-Yin Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張詩音 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T01:12:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-27 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 朱瑞玲、李露芳（2002）。「師生衝突的知覺與因應：面子乎？權威乎？」。第四屆華人心理學家國際學術研討會暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會（台北南港）之口頭報告論文。
何友輝、陳淑娟、趙志裕（1991）。關係取向：為中國社會心理方法論求答案。見楊國樞、黃光國（主編）：「中國人的心理與行為」，頁79-66。台北：桂冠圖書公司。 李敏龍、楊國樞（1998）。中國人的忍：概念分析與實徵研究。「本土心理學研究」， 10，3-68，台北：桂冠圖書公司。 林岳宏（2006）。「文化、人格及認知行為的關係：個人層次的探討」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 洪惟仁（2002）。台灣的語言政策何去何從。見施正鋒（主編）：「各國語言政策──多元文化與族群平等」，頁501-542。臺北市：行政院客家委員會。 陸洛（2003）。人我關係之界定－「折衷自我」的現身。「本士心理學研究」，20， 139-207。 莊耀嘉、楊國樞（1997）。角色規範的認知結構。「本土心理學研究」，7，282-338。 黃光國（1988）。人情與面子：中國人的權利遊戲。見黃光國（主編）：「中國人的權利遊戲」，頁7-55。台北：巨流圖書公司。 黃光國（1995）。「知識與行動：中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋」。台北：心理出版社。 黃光國（2005）。「儒家關係主義：文化反思與典範重建」。台北：國立台灣大學出版中心。 黃囇莉（1999）。「人際和諧與衝突：本土化的理論與研究」。台北：桂冠圖書公司。 彭泗清（1993）。埋怨與解怨：中國人人際不滿情緒表達方式的初步探折。見李慶善（主編）：「中國人社會心理研究論集」，頁171-192。香港：香港時代文化出版公司。 費孝通（1948）。「鄉土中國」。上海：觀際社。 楊宜憓（1999）。「台灣大學生的情緒經驗與社會關係」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 楊國樞（2005）。華人社會取向的理論分析。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳（主編）：「華人本土心理學」，頁173-214。台北：遠流。 劉丁瑋（2002）。「台灣大學生對他人情緒的評估與社會關係」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 Barrett, L. F., Robin, L., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Eyssell, K. M. (1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 555-578. Bond, M. H. (1993). Emotions and their expression in Chinese culture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17, 245-262. Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford Press. Bulter, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3, 48-67. Butler, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion, 7, 30-48. Clark, M. S., & Brissette, I. (2000). Relationship beliefs and emotion: Reciprocal effects. In N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead, & S. Bem (Eds.), Emotions and belief (pp. 212-240). New York: Cambridge University Press. Clark, M. S., & Finel, E. J. (2005). Willingness to express emotion: The impact of relationship type, communal orientation, and their interaction. Personal Relationships, 12, 169-180. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24. Clark, M. S., & Taraban, C. B. (1991). Reactions to and willingness to express emotion in two types of relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 324-336. Clore, G. C. (1994). Why emotions are felt. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 103-111). NY: Oxford University Press. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668-678. Costa, P. T., & MaCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13. Darwin, C. (1872/1999). The expression of the emotions in man and animals (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. De Rivera, J., & Grinkis, C. (1986). Emotion as social relationships. Motivation and Emotion, 10, 351-369. Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole(Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 207-283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169-200. Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Understanding faces and feelings. New York, NY: Henry Holt. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969a). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32, 88-106. Eknan, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969b). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across culture in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124-129. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: prentice Hall. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., O’Sullivan, M., Chan, A., Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis, I., Heider, K., Krause, R., LeCompte, W.A., Pitcairn, T., Ricci-Bitti, P.E., Scherer, K., Tomita, M., & Tzavaras, A. (1987). Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 712-717. Ekman, P., & Heider, K. G. (1988). The universality of a contempt expression: A replication. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 303-308. Ekman, P., & Oster, H. (1979). Facial expression of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 527-554. Ekman, P., Soreseon, E. R., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164(3875): 86-88. Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,128, 203-235. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press. Fok, H. K., Hui, C. M., Bond, M. H., Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (in press). Integrating personality, context, relationship into the model of display rules. Journal of Research in Personality. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotion in psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Frijda, N. H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In S. Kitayama & H. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 51-87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Goa, G., Tine-Toomey, S., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1996). Chinese communication processes. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 280-293). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271-299. Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 214-219. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281-291. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1995). Facets of emotional expressivity: Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 555-568. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation process: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362. Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. (1993). Emotional suppression: Physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 970-986. Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. (1997). Hiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 95-103. Gross, J. J., Richards, J. M., & John, O. P. (2006). Emotion regulation in everyday life. In D. K. Snyder, J. A. Simpson & J. N. Hughes (Eds.), Emotion regulation in couples and families: Pathways to dysfunction and health (pp. 13-35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism–collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510–543. Gudykunst, W. B., & Ting-Toomy, S. (1988). Culture and affective communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 384-400. Hall, E. T. (1976/1977). Beyond culture. NY: Anchor Books. Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage. Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychosocial homeostasis and jen: Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73, 23-44. Izard, C. (1971). The Face of Emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Johnson, J. R. (2007). Belief about the emotions of self and others among Asian American and non-Asian American students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 270-283. Keltner, D., & Buswell, B. N. (1997). Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 250-270. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 505-521. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2001). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. In W. G.. Parrott (Ed.), Emotions in social psychology (pp. 175-184). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. Kim, M., Shin, H., & Cai, D. (1998). Cultural influences on the preferred forms of requesting and re-requesting. Communication Monographs, 65, 47–66. Kitayama, S., Karasawa, M., & Mesquita, B. (2004). Collective and personal processes in regulating emotions: Emotion and self in Japan and the United States. In P. Philippot & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), The regulation of emotion (pp. 251-273). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum. Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Goodfeelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 93-124. Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa M. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 890-903. Kleinman, A. (1980). Patients and healers in the context of culture. Los Angeles, Ca: University of California Press. Klinberg, O. (1938). Emotional expression in Chinese Literature. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 33, 517-520. Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051. Lu, L., & Yang, K. S. (2006). Emergence and composition of the traditional-modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Taiwanese societies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 167-175. Manaster, G. J., Cleland, C. C., & Brooks, J. (1978). Emotions as movement in relation to others. Journal of Individual Psychology, 34, 244-253. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implicatoins for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implication for selves and the theory of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 569-579. Matsumoto, D. (1990). Cultural similarities and differences in display rules. Motivation and Emotion, 14, 195-214. Matsumoto, D. (1992). American-Japanese cultural differences in the recognition of universal facial expressions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 72-84. Matsumoto, D. (2001). Culture and emotion. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 171-194). New York: Oxford University Press. Matsumoto, D. (2006). Are cultural differences in emotion regulation mediated by personality traits? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 421-437. Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1989). American-Japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 143-157. Matsumoto, D., Takeuchi, S., Andayani, S., Kouznetsova, N., & Krupp, D. (1998). The contribution of individualism vs. collectivism to cross-national differences in display rules. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 147-165. Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., Hirayama, S., & Petrova, G. (2005). Development and validation of a measure of display rule knowledge: The display rules assessment inventory. Emotion, 5, 12-40. Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992) Cultural variations in emotion: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 197-294. McCrae, R. R. (2000). Trait psychology and revival of personality and culture studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 10-31. McCrae, R. R. (2004). Human nature and culture: A trait perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 3-14. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139-153). New York: Guilford. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215. McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547-561. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72. Pittam, J., Gallois, C., Iwawaki, S., & Kroonenberg, P. (1995). Australian and Japanese concepts of expressive behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 451-473. Plutchik, R. (1982). A psychoevolutionary theory of emotions. Social Science Information, 21, 529-553. Richards, J., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178. Russell, J.A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expressions? A review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102-141. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological constructions of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145-172. Russell, J. A., & Yik, M. (1996). Emotion among the Chinese. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 166-188). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., & Dzokoto, V. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 582-593. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591. Singelis, T. M., Bond, M. H., Sharkey, W. F., & Lai, C. S. Y. (1999). Unpacking culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability: The role of self-construals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 315-341. Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275. Tomkins S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness. New York: Springer Pub. Co. Triandis, H. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-Cultural Research, 27, 155-180. Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Triandis, H. (2001). Individualism and Collectivism: Past, present, and future. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 35-50). New York: Oxford University Press. Triandis, H. C., Botempt, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-in-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338. Triandis, H. C., Chan, D. C.-S., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Iwao, S., & Sinha, J. B. P. (1995). Multimethod probes of allocentrism and idiocentrism. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 461-480. Triandis, H. C., Leung, K., Villareal, M. J., & Clack, F. L. (1985). Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 395-415. Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020. Trubinsky, P., Ting-Toomey, S., & Lin, S. (1991). The influence of individualism–collectivism and self-monitoring on conflict styles. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 65–84. Tsai, J. Levenson, R. W., & McCoy, K. (2006). Cultural and temperamental variation in emotional response. Emotion, 6, 484-497. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235. Waxer, P. H. (1985). Video ethology: Television as a data base for cross-cultural studies in nonverbal displays. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 111-120. Yik, M. S. M., & Russell, J. A. (2003). Chinese affect circimplex: I. Structure of recallec momentary affect. Asian Journal of social Psychology, 6, 185-200 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29622 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 過去研究指出，關係是影響華人情緒表現的重要因素之一。本研究進行兩個實徵研究，探討台灣大學生對各關係對象之「規範的」與「理想的」情緒表現。研究一以父母、手足、好朋友、老師及認識的人等五種關係，探討個體對各關係對象之「規範的」情緒表現，以揭示台灣大學生的情緒表露規則；並檢驗個人對不同關係對象之情緒表現是否有文化與性格之個別差異。結果顯示，台灣大學生對不同關係對象之情緒表露規則呈現關係的「親近梯度」，即與對象之關係品質愈好，情緒表現應該愈明顯而外放。檢驗個人文化傾向、性格及與對象之關係品質是否影響個人對不同關係對象之情緒表現，結果顯示，關係品質可預測對絕大多數關係對象之情緒表現，但是文化與性格的影響效果相對較小。研究二以正向親和、正向疏離、負向親和及負向疏離四種社會性情緒探討個體對五種關係對象「理想的」情緒表現，結果亦顯示情緒表現隨著關係親疏而愈來愈壓抑。以個人文化傾向、性格及與關係對象之關係品質，預測個體對不同關係對象之理想的情緒表現，結果發現個人對不同關係對象想要表現之情緒，受到個人文化傾向、性格及關係品質之影響，而且影響程度不一：對家人的情緒表現主要受集體主義與互依自我之影響，尤其是親和情緒表現；對好朋友的情緒表現受外向性之影響；對老師及認識的人之情緒表現，主要取決於關係品質的好壞。本研究以過去的文獻與發現來討論研究結果，並於最後提出研究的限制與未來可行之研究方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Literature shows that relationship is one of the significant factors that influence the expressions of emotion of Chinese. This study conducted two empirical researches to investigate how Taiwanese students express “normative” and “ideal” expressions of emotion in different relationships. Study 1 used five relationships－parent, sibling, close friend, teacher/professor, and acquaintance－to investigate the normative expression of emotion of Taiwanese students, aiming to reveal the display rules of them, and examine if there were cultural and personality differences in expressions of emotion in every relationship. Results show that the association between the expression of emotion and the quality of relationship is a “closeness gradient”, which means the expressions of emotion should be more manifest when expressing them to someone with whom the expresser has a higher quality of relationship. The regression analysis reveals that the quality of relationship could positively predict expressions of emotions in most relationships and the impact of culture and personality is little. Study 2 investigated the “ideal” expressions of positive-engaging, positive-disengaging, negative-engaging, and negative-disengaging emotions in five relationships. Results still show that expressers suppress more expressions of emotion to someone with whom they have lower quality of relationship. Testing the individual difference in expressions of emotion in every relationship, in addition to the positive impact of the quality of relationship, there are cultural and personality differences in expressions of emotion in various relationships: the expressions of emotion to family are positively predicted by collectivism and independent self, especially in engaging emotions; the expressions of emotion to close friends are positively influenced by extraversion; the expressions of emotion to teachers and acquaintances are largely determined by the quality of relationship. This study discussed these findings with literatures and suggested the possible limitations and practicable orientation of researches in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T01:12:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R93227114-1.pdf: 757513 bytes, checksum: acdbf51a8d25b8277ade0d867874eade (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 前言 1 第二節 情緒的功能與分類 2 第三節 情緒調節與情緒表現 5 第四節 情緒表現的普同性與文化差異 8 第五節 華人的人際關係 13 第六節 人際關係與情緒表現 17 第七節 情緒表現與文化的關係 24 第八節 情緒表現與性格的關係 31 第九節 研究目的 32 第二章 研究一 35 第一節 方法 35 第二節 結果 38 第三節 討論 44 第三章 研究二 49 第一節 方法 49 第二節 結果 51 第三節 討論 58 第四章 綜合討論 64 參考文獻 74 附表 83 附錄 85 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 外向性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情緒表現 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 文化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 性格 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 集體主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 互依自我 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | relationship | en |
| dc.subject | extraversion | en |
| dc.subject | independent self | en |
| dc.subject | collectivism | en |
| dc.subject | personality | en |
| dc.subject | culture | en |
| dc.subject | expressions of emotion | en |
| dc.subject | emotional expressivity | en |
| dc.title | 人際關係中的情緒表現 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Expressions of Emotion in Relationships | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林以正(Yi-Cheng Lin),林烘煜(Hung-Yu Lin),葉光輝(Kuang-Hui Yeh) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 關係,情緒表現,文化,性格,集體主義,互依自我,外向性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | relationship,emotional expressivity,expressions of emotion,culture,personality,collectivism,independent self,extraversion, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 89 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 739.76 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。