請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29586完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李吉仁 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chih-Hung Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃至弘 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T01:11:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
吳建銘,2001,企業內部創業對組織績效影響之實證研究,國立成功大學工業 管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 周信成,2004,台灣筆記型電腦產業垂直整合策略之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 柯國華,2006,企業成長策略之研究─以明基集團為例,國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 唐人璠,2003,企業多角化內部創業經營策略之研究:以電信業工程部門為例,國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 許戎岑,2003,專業電子製造服務廠商之垂直整合策略分析,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 莊文豊,2004,內部創業模式之研究:以A公司為例,私立中原大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 陳昭霖,2004,組織特性與內部創業精神之研究,私立淡江大學管理科學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 梁哲國,2002,大型半導體公司內部創業之個案研究:以策略理論為分析工具,國立交通大學管理科學學程碩士班未出版之碩士論文。 張文勤,2004,國內高科技企業創投之有效營運模式探討,國立台灣大學財務金融學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 張永昇,1992,組織創業活動之研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 張敏聰,2005,B公司數位相機事業部門創業過程研究,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程未出版之碩士論文。 黃釩哲,2003,策略興業與成長: 以華邦電子為個案研究,國立清華大學高階經營管理碩士班未出版之碩士論文。 黃裕國,2003,從風險管理探討企業成長中Corporate Venture的角色-以明基電通為例,國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 楊光立,2001,企業創業策略之研究─以中華電信研究所為例,私立元智大學管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 廖珮如,2000,衍生型態組織適用情境之研究--以上市、上櫃公司之內部創業行為為例,私立銘傳大學國際企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 樂姿岑,2005,企業興業精神與新事業發展之個案研究,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 鄧國良,2006,以企業創投觀點探討組織創業精神之管理模式-以IC設計產業為例,國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 劉恆逸,2004,企業創業投資與能耐基礎成長策略:理論整合與實證研究,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所未出版之博士論文。 戴孜青,2005,高科技企業創投之策略型態與投資後管理,國立清華大學科技管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 羅偉特,2006,台灣企業創投可行模式之研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 廖志德,2006,「看鴻海如何挑戰財富金字塔」,WBSA企劃人俱樂部,1月20日。 趙郁文,2007,「企業興業」,公司興業活動論壇,6月2日。 鄭吉峰,2007,「台灣企業進行轉投資的現況與分析」,公司興業活動論壇資料,6月2日。 英文文獻 Admati, A. R., and Pfleiderer, P. 1994. Robust Financial Contracting and the Role of Venture Capitalists. Journal of Finance, 49(2):371-402. Ahuja, G., and Lampert, C. M. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7):521-543. Bain, J. S. 1956. Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bettis, R. A. 1981. Performance Differences in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2(4):379-393. Berger, P., and Ofek, E., 1995. Diversification Effect on Firm Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1):39-65. Biggadike, R. 1979. The Risky Business of Diversification. Harvard Business Review, 57(3):103-111. Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in Multinational Corporations: the Characteristics of Subsidiary Initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3):207-229. Birkinshaw, J., and Hill, S. A. 2005. Corporate Venturing Units: Vehicles for Strategic Success in the New Europe. Organizational Dynamics, 34(3):247-257. Block, Z., and MacMillan, I. 1993. Corporate Venturing: Creating New Business Within the Firm. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Burgelman, R. A. 1983. Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management: Insights from a Process Study. Management Science, 29(12): 1349-1364. Capron, L., and Hulland, J. 1999. Redeployment of Brands, Sales Forces, and General Marketing Management Expertise Following Horizontal Acquisitions: A Resource-Based View. Journal of Marketing, 63(2): 41-54. Chesbrough, H. W. 2002. Making Sense of Corporate Venture Capital. Harvard Business Review, 80(3):90-99. Christensen, C. M., Johnson, M. W., and Rigby, D. K. 2002. Foundations for Growth: How to Identify and Build Disruptive New Businesses. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3):22-31. Christensen, H. K., and Montgomery, C. A. Corporate Economic Performance: Diversification Strategy versus Market Structure. Strategic Management Journal, 2(4):327-343. Chung, K. H., and Pruitt, S. W. 1994. A Simple Approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management, 23(3):70-74. Covin, J. G., and Slevin, D. P. 1988. The Influence of Organization Structure on the Utility of an Entrepreneurial Top Management Style. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3):217-234. Datta, D. K. 1991. Organizational Fit and Acquisition Performance: Effects of Post-Acquisition Integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12(4):281-297. D’Aveni, R. A., and Ilinitch, A. V. 1992. Complex Patterns of Vertical Integration in the Forest Products Industry: Systematic and Bankruptcy risk. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3):596-625. D’Aveni, R. A., and Ravenscraft D. J. 1994. Economies of Integration Versus Bureaucracy Costs: Does Vertical Integration Improve Performance? Academy of Management Journal, 37(5):1167-1206. Dunne, P., and Hughes, A. 1994. Age, Size, Growth and Survival: UK Companies in the 1980s. Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2):115-139. Dushnitsky, G., and Lenox, M. J. 2006. When Does Corporate Venture Capital Investment Create Firm Value? Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6):753-772. Evans, D. S. 1987. The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4):567-592. Farjoun, M. 1998. The Independent and Joint Effects of the Skill and Physical Bases of Relatedness in Diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7):611-630. Gary, M. S. 2005. Implementation Strategy and Performance Outcomes in Related Diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7):643-664. George, R., and MacMillan I. C. 1985. Corporate Venturing: Venture Management Challenges. Journal of Business Strategy, 6(2):85-91. Gompers, P., and Lerner, J. 1998. The Determinants of Corporate Venture Capital Success: Organizational Structure, Incentives, and Complementarities. NBER #6725: Cambridge, MA. Green, J. R. 1974. Vertical Integration and Assurance of Markets. Discussion Paper no.383, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Guth, W. D., and Ginsberg A. 1990. Guest Editors’ Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5):5-15. Harrigan, K. R. 1985. Vertical Integration and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2):397-425. Hill, C. W. L., and Hoskisson, R. E. 1987. Strategy and Structure in the Multiproduct Firm. Academy of Management Review, 12(2):331-341. Kanter, R. M. 1989. Swimming in Newstreams: Mastering Innovation Dilemmas, California Management Review, 31(4):45-69. Kuratko, D. F., Montagno, R. V., and Hornsby, J. S. 1990. Developing an Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument for and Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5):49-58. Larsson, R., and Finkelstein, S. 1994. Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: A Case Survey of Synergy Realization. Organization Science, 10(1):1-25. Lins, K., and Servaes, H. 2002. Is Corporate Diversification Beneficial in Emerging Markets? Financial Management, 31(2):5-32. MacMillan, I. C., Block, Z. and Narasimha, P. N. S. 1986. Corporate Venturing: Alternatives, Obstacles Encountered, and Experience Effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(2):177-191. McGrath, R. G., Keil, T., and Tukiainen, T. 2006. Extracting Value from Corporate Venturing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(1):50-56. Miller, D., and Friesen, P. H. 1982. Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1):1-25. Mintzberg, H., and Quinn, J. 1996. The Strategy Process: Concepts, Context, Cases. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. Panzar, J. C., and Willig, R. D. 1981. Economies of Scope. American Economic Review, 71(2):268-272. Prahalad, C. K., and Bettis, R. A. 1986. The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage Between Diversity and Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6):485-501. Porter, M. E. 1980. Industry Structure and Competitive Strategy: Keys to Profitability. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(4):30-41. Quinn, J. B., Doorley, T. L., and Paquette, P. C. 1990. Technology in Services: Rethinking Strategic Focus. MIT Sloan Management Review, 31(2):79-87. Robins, J., and Wiersema, M. F. 1995. A Resource-Based Approach to the Multibusiness Firm: Empirical Analysis of Portfolio Interrelationships and Corporate Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4):277-299. Rumelt, R. P. 1982. Diversification Strategy and Profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 3(4):359-369. Salop, S. C., and Scheffman, D. T. 1983. Raising Rivals' Costs. American Economic Review, 73(2):267-271. Schildt, H. A., Maula, M. V. J., and Keil, T. 2005. Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4):493-515. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Sharma, P., and Chrisman, J. J. 1999. Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3):11-27. Siegel, R., Sigel, E., and MacMillan, I. C. 1988. Corporate Venture Capitalists: Autonomy, Obstacles, and Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(3):233-247. Simon, M., Houghton, S. M., and Gurney, J. 1999. Succeeding at Internal Corporate Venturing: Roles Needed to Balance Autonomy and Control. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(2):145-159. Vernon, J. M., and Graham, D. A. 1971. Profitability of Monopolization by Vertical Integration. Journal of Political Economy, 79(4):924-925. Vesper, K. H. 1985. A New Direction or Just a New Label? In J. J. Kao and S. S. Stevenson (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: What It Is and How to Teach It, :62-76 Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Zahra, S. A. 1991. Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4):259-284. 網站部份 104人力銀行 (www.104.com.tw) 中華民國創業投資商業同業公會 (www.tvca.gov.tw) 公開資訊觀測站 (newmops.tse.com.tw) 台灣經濟新報 (www.tej.com.tw) 財政部稅賦署 (www.dot.gov.tw) 統一超商 (www.7-11.com.tw) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29586 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 追求成長與永續經營是企業經營者的核心挑戰,自80年代後,企業透過創業投資活動進行新事業發展與策略佈局的需要性,逐漸受到實務界與學術界的重視。過去的研究指出公司在進行創投活動時,若能有明確的與母公司策略相連結的目標,其投資績效應不亞於獨立在外的創投公司,但是,企業創業投資對母公司的價值創造是否有正向的助益?不同的策略佈局,是否對母公司的價值創造有不同的影響?仍有待吾人做更進一步的探究。
本論文先藉由文獻回顧了解現有之理論發展與架構後,歸納出相關多角化與垂直佈局兩種企業創業投資佈局特質,與創投子公司在投資活動中應扮演經營監管之角色,並據以建立實證假說。本研究以台灣科技產業與傳統產業市值前50大上市公司中,設立專屬創投子公司之企業為研究樣本,透過經濟計量分析驗證(1)投資程度、(2)不同的投資佈局特質,以及(3)創投子公司在投資活動中之比重,對母公司價值之影響。此外,在實證分析的同時,本研究根據每種假設情境引入不同個案,期望能與統計結果產生相互回應之效。 本研究發現母公司越是投資於與本業相關之新事業,因彼此能共享資源、能力而有較高的機會產生綜效,將能正向提升母企業的價值;另一方面,本研究發現科技產業的系統廠商傾向於透過企業創投活動進行垂直佈局,以提高價值鏈的營運效能,從而提升母公司的價值;最後,母公司透過成立創投子公司進行創投活動,由於有專責單位監督以及創投相似之財務紀律,進行對標的事業之審核與監督管理,將有助於提升母公司價值。根據以上研究結果,我們提出研究意涵與對未來研究的建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Sustaining corporate growth has been a central task for general management. Of great importance and attention, both in the practitioner world and in academic research, is how to implement corporate venturing investments (CVIs) function to grow new businesses and sustain growth. Previous research suggests that the performance of CVIs will be as successful as those invested by independent venture capitalists if they have a clear strategic link to the corporate development. However, there are scant empirical studies investigating the extent of impact on the corporate value due to differential strategies of CVIs. Specifically, the present research intends to explore the impact of CVIs on the parent firm’s value and the extent of differential value impact attributable to the way of configuring CVIs with respect to the parent firms.
Based on the literature in diversification strategies and CVIs research, we establish several testable hypotheses concerning the impact of (1) the extent of investments, (2) vertical and related investments, and (3) the extent of investments made by their venture capital arms on corporate value. We took the CVIs made by the top fifty publicly listed companies, based on their market capitalization, in Taiwan as empirical context. In addition, we undertook several case-based explorations to enhance result presentation from econometric analysis. Our empirical results show that the making investments that are related to the focal firm’s value will be positively associated with the parent firm’s value due to potential synergy creation between new ventures and the existing businesses. Furthermore, we also found that system integrators in the technology-based industries who invest more in their vertical value chain will positively affect company value. Finally, making new venture investments through venture capital companies reveal positive impact on the investing firm’s value as these collaborating partners would bring up rigorous investment evaluation, market discipline and scrutiny to improve the success likelihood of new ventures. Implications of these results to practices and future research are also discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T01:11:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94724106-1.pdf: 539925 bytes, checksum: 571cabba43bb62a5924126402fe856f6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘 要 II 英文摘要 III 目 錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 2 第三節 論文章節架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 企業興業精神 6 第二節 企業創業投資 8 第三節 企業創業活動佈局方式與運作 10 第四節 台灣企業創投之現況與文獻探討 15 第三章 研究方法 25 第一節 研究架構 25 第二節 研究假說 26 第三節 研究對象 28 第四節 資料蒐集 28 第五節 研究變數 31 第六節 分析方法 34 第四章 研究結果 35 第一節 敘述統計分析 35 第二節 相關分析 38 第三節 迴歸分析 40 第四節 結果討論 43 第五章 結論與建議 52 第一節 研究結論 52 第二節 研究限制 54 第三節 研究建議 55 參考文獻 57 中文文獻 57 英文文獻 59 網站部份 65 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 企業創業投資 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公司價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 相關多角化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 垂直佈局 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Vertical Integration | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate Venturing Investments | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate Value | en |
| dc.subject | Related Diversification | en |
| dc.title | 企業創業投資與企業價值關係之實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Empirical Investigation on the Relationship between Corporate Venturing Investment and Corporate Value | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝明慧,曲祉寧 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 企業創業投資,公司價值,相關多角化,垂直佈局, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Corporate Venturing Investments,Corporate Value,Related Diversification,Vertical Integration, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 65 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 527.27 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
