請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29457完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王泰昌(Taychang Wang),劉嘉雯(Chiawen Liu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chian-Ying Jue | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 朱倩瑩 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T01:07:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
一、 中文部分 丁蓓蓓,2005,我國公司治理與獨立董事監察人制度之硏究,國立台灣大學財務金融組EMBA碩士論文。 朱思穎,2004,董事會、監察人特徵與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 林育雅,1993,我國上市公司董事會特性與盈餘操縱現象之研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 林家靜,1993,公司治理、盈餘管理與投資人報酬之關連性研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 周淑貞,1995,管理當局持股比率與管理當局盈餘預測準確度、盈餘管理關係之實證研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 陳家慧,2000,我國上市公司管理機制與盈餘管理相關性之實證研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 董豐本,2005,公司治理、現金增資承銷方式與盈餘管理,輔仁大學管理學研究 所碩士論文。 葉淑玲,2004,我國上市公司自願性聘任獨立董監事動機之研究,國立台北大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 蔡示強,2005,影響獨立董監比例因素之探討,中國文化大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 歐陽達德,2002,台灣上市公司現金增資前後之盈餘管理,國立中山大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。 戴家偉,2005,董事會成員特質對盈餘管理影響之實證研究,國立台北大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 謝宜昇,2000,上市公司現金增資與盈餘行為之研究,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 二、 英文部分 Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (March): 69–87. Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, G. Peters, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (September): 17–32. Abbott, L. J., and S. Parker. 2000. Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (Fall): 47–66. Agrawal, A., and S. Chadha. 2005. Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Journal of Law and Economics 48 (October): 371–406. Anderson, R. C., S. A. Mansi, and D. M. Reeb. 2004. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (September): 315–342. Archambeault, D., and F. T. DeZoort. 2001. Auditor opinion shopping and the audit committee: An analysis of suspicious auditor switches. International Journal of Auditing 46 (May): 33–52. Beasley, M. S., and S. E. Salterio. 2001. The relationship between board characteristics and voluntary improvements in audit committee composition and expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (winter): 539–570. Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (October): 443–465. Bedard J., S. M. Chtourou, and L. Courteau. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (September): 13–35. Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees. 1999. Report and recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committees. Bradbury, M. E., Y. T. Mak, and S. M. Tan. 2004. Board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and abnormal accruals. SSRN working paper. Bryan, D. M., C. Liu, and S. L. Tiras. 2004. The influence of independent and effective audit committees on earnings quality. SSRN working paper. Carcello, J. V., C. W. Hollingsworth, K. April, and T. L. Neal. 2006. Audit committee financial expertise, competing corporate governance mechanism, and earnings management. SSRN working paper. Carcello, J. V., and T. L. Neal. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going-concern reports. The Accounting Review 78 (January): 95–117. Chtourou, S. M., J. Bedard, and L. Courteau. 2001. Corporate governance and earnings management. SSRN working paper. Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of financial economics 51 (March): 371–406. Dechow, P. M., and I. D. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (October): 35–59. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (Spring): 1–36. DeFond, M. L., R. N. Hann, and X. Hu. 2005. Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of board of directors? Journal of Accounting Research 43 (May): 153–193. Dhaliwal, D., V. Naiker, and F. Navissi . 2006. Audit committee financial expertise, corporate governance and accruals quality: an empirical analysis. SSRN working paper. Farber, D. 2005. Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review 80 (April): 539–561. Felo, A. J., K. Srinivasany, and S. A. Solieri. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and the perceived quality of financial reporting: an empirical analysis. SSRN working paper. Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79 (Octorber): 967–1010. Gerety, M., and K. Lehn. 1997. The causes and consequences of accounting fraud. Managerial and Decision Economics 18 (November/December): 587–599. Gul, F. A., and S. Leung. 2004. Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23 (October): 351–379. Jensen, M. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48 (July): 831–880. Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Autumn): 193–228. Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (August): 375–400. Lee, H. Y., V. Mande, and R. Ortman. 2004. The effect of audit committee and board of director independence on auditor resignation.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (September): 131–146. Lipton, M., and J. W. Lorsch. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48 (November): 59–77. McMullen, D. A., and K. Raghunandan. 1996. Enhancing audit committee effectiveness. Journal of Accountancy 182 (August): 79–81. McNichols, M. 2002. Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement ): 61–69. Menon, K., and J. D. Williams. 1994. The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 13 (Summer): 121–139. Qin, B. 2006. The influence of audit committee financial expertise on earnings quality: U.S. evidence. SSRN working paper. Raghunandan. K., W. J. Read, and D. V. Rama. 2001. Audit committee composition, “gray directors,” and interaction with internal auditing. Accounting Horizons 15 (January): 105–118. Rosenstein, S., and J. G. Wyatt. 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26 (August): 175–191. SEC. 2003. Final rules: Disclosure required by sections 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (January). Vera-Munoz, S. C. 2005. Corporate governance reforms: redefined expectations of audit committee responsibilities and effectiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 62 (December): 115–127 Xie, B., and W. N. Davidson. 2001. Earnings management and corporate governance: The roles of the board and the audit committee. SSRN working paper. Zhou, J., and R. Elder. 2003. Audit quality and earnings management by seasoned equity offering firms. Working Paper, Binghamton University . Zhang, Y., J. Zhou, and N. Zhou. 2007. Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26 (May/June): 300–327 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29457 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在現行的台灣法律規定下,大多鼓勵或是要求公司設置獨立董事和獨立監察人,像是上市審查準則、上櫃審查準則、以及上市上櫃公司治理實務守則和新修正的證券交易法,其中在上市審查準則以及上櫃審查準則中,更特別要求獨立董事以及獨立監察人的專業知識背景;在上市及上櫃審查準則中規定:獨立董監事必須具備五年以上的商務、法律、財務、或公司業務所需之工作經驗,且獨立董事及獨立監察人中各至少應有一人為會計或是財務專業人士;可見獨立董監事要發揮其監督公司經營者的功能,必須有相關的專業知識。 因此本研究參考Dhaliwal et al.(2006)的研究架構,探討獨立董監事專業知識背景和財務報導品質之間的關係;本研究財務報導品質的衡量是採用應計品質,所謂應計品質是採用Dhaliwal et al.(2006)研究中修改過的modified version of Dechow and Dichev Model,依據該模型所求出的依變數殘差標準差來表示,而獨立董監事專業知識背景則是區分成三類:會計、財務金融、營運管理。此外加入兩項與公司治理相關的變數,董事會治理強度以及監察人治理強度。研究結果顯示,當公司有良好的董事會治理時,若獨立董監事中,至少有一位是屬於會計專業人士時,該公司的應計品質會較好;而當公司有良好董事會治理,且至少有一位獨立董監事是屬於財務金融專業人士時,公司的應計品質也會較好,但是獨立董監事的營運管理背景則與應計品質之間沒有關係。本研究結論亦支持上市上櫃審查準則有關獨立董監的資格要求,獨立董監事中至少各有一位為會計或財務背景。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Under current Taiwan laws, many of them regulate or encourage the company to select independent directors and independent supervisors, for example the Criteria for Review of Securities Listings, Criteria for Review of Securities over-the-counter listings, Listed and over-the-counter corporate governance practice rule, and the securities and exchange law.
Criteria for Review of Securities Listings and over-the-counter listings especially require that independent directors and independent supervisors should have professional knowledge. These criteria regulate that independent directors and independent supervisors must have over-five-years work experience related to commerce, law, finance, or company business and at least one of the independent directors and independent supervisors should be the accounting expert or financial expert. It is that the independent directors and independent supervisors must have related expertise to oversee corporate management. This study is to discuss the relationship between professional knowledge of independent directors and supervisor and financial reporting quality according to the research of Dhaliwal et al. (2006). In this study, I use the accruals quality to measure the financial reporting quality, and divide the expertise into three categories, including accounting expert, financial expert, and management expert. Beside that this study also considers two corporate governance factors, board governance and supervisor governance. The result shows that under the better board governance, the accounting expert and financial expert of independent directors and supervisors are positively related to better accruals quality. The result also supports the Criteria for Review of Securities Listings and over-the-counter listings. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T01:07:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94722046-1.pdf: 527928 bytes, checksum: 4ab49a15df44effbb97cf19e5416b24d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
中試委員會審定書 ⅰ 志謝 ⅱ 中文摘要 ⅲ 英文摘要 ⅳ 目錄 ⅵ 圖目錄 ⅷ 表目錄 ⅸ 第一章 緒論.........................................................................................1 第一節研究動機..........................................................................1 第二節研究目的..........................................................................3 第三節研究架構..........................................................................4 第二章 文獻探討................................................................................6 第一節 審計委員會與財務報導品質........................................6 第二節 公司治理與財務報導品質...........................................11 第三節 台灣獨立董事以及獨立監察人..................................14 第三章 研究設計..............................................................................17 第一節研究假說........................................................................17 第二節實證模型與變數之定義衡量........................................18 第三節資料來源及樣本選取標準............................................32 第四章 實證結果與分析..................................................................36 第一節 樣本分析與敘述性統計..............................................36 第二節 實證結果分析..............................................................52 第五章 研究結論與限制..................................................................75 第一節研究結論........................................................................75 第二節研究限制.......................................................................76 參考文獻...........................................................................................78 一、中文部分...........................................................................78 二、英文部分............................................................................79 附錄一,獨立董監事的專業知識背景需交叉互相參照................83 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 監察人治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 獨立董事 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 獨立監察人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 應計品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 董事會治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | supervisor governance | en |
| dc.subject | independent director | en |
| dc.subject | independent supervisor | en |
| dc.subject | accruals quality | en |
| dc.subject | board governance | en |
| dc.title | 應計品質和獨立董監事專業知識背景的關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The relationship between accruals quality and professional knowledge of independent director and supervisor | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.advisor-orcid | ,劉嘉雯(acliu@ntu.edu.tw) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪玉舜(yushun Hung) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 獨立董事,獨立監察人,應計品質,董事會治理,監察人治理, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | independent director,independent supervisor,accruals quality,board governance,supervisor governance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 82 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 515.55 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
