請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29059完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊永明 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsiang-Yin Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林香吟 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:37:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-02-21 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文文獻
一、資料 丘宏達編輯，陳純一助編，《現代國際法參考文件》（台北：三民，1996） 行政院海岸巡防署編印，《亞洲主要國家海域法令彙編》（台北：海巡署，2006） 浦野起央、劉甦朝、植榮邊吉共編，《釣魚臺群島(尖閣諸島)問題硏究資料匯編》， （香港：勵志出版社，2001） 陳鴻瑜，《東南亞各國海域法律條約及條約彙編》（台北：三民書局，1997） 傅崑成編校，《海洋法相關公約及中英文索引》（廈門：廈門大學出版社，2005） 二、專書 丘宏達，《現代國際法》（第二版）（台北：三民書局，2006）。 尹章華，《國際海洋法》（台北：文笙書局，2003） 行政院海洋事務推動委員會編印，《海洋政策白皮書》（台北：行政院研考會，2006） 朱奇武，《中國國際法的理論與發展》（北京：法律出版社，1998年） 高健，《島嶼主權和海洋劃界國際法案例選評》（北京：測繪出版社，1999） 邵沙平主編，《國際法院新近案例研究（1990-2003）》（北京：商務印書館，2006） 俞寬賜，《國際法新論》（台北：啓英文化，2002） 姜皇池，《國際海洋法（上冊）》（台北：學林文化，2004） ──，《國際海洋法（下冊）》（台北：學林文化，2004） 馬英九，《從新海洋法論釣魚臺列嶼與東海劃界問題》（台北：正中書局，1986) 高建軍，《中國與國際海洋法》（北京：海洋出版社，2004） ──，《國際海洋劃界論》（北京：北京大學出版社，2005） 高偉濃，《國際海洋法與太平洋地區管轄權》（廣州：廣東高等教育出版社，1999） 袁古潔，《國際海洋劃界的理論與實踐》（北京：法律出版社，2001） 陳荔彤，《海洋法論》（台北：元照，2002） 陳德恭，《現代國際海洋法》（北京：中國社會科學出版社，1988） 許惠祐主編，《台灣海洋》（台北：行政院海岸巡防署，2005） 傅崑成，《海洋法專題研究》（廈門：廈門大學出版社，2004） 黃異，《海洋秩序與國際法》（台北：學林文化，2000年） 趙理海，《海洋法問題研究》（北京：北京大學出版社，1996） 鄭海麟，《從歷史與國際法看釣魚台主權歸屬》（台北：海峽學術出版社，2003） 鞠德源，《釣魚島正名》（北京：昆侖出版社，2006） 三、博碩士論文 梁熙喆，《從國際海洋劃界原則和實踐論中國EEZ和大陸架劃界問題─以黃海和東中國海劃界問題為中心》（國立台灣大學法律學研究所博士論文，2006） 楊永明，《大陸礁層與專屬經濟區之衡平劃界》（國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文，1988） 四、期刊論文 丘宏達，「釣魚台列嶼主權爭執問題及其解決方法之研究」，《中國國際法與國際事務年報》第10卷，頁21-59。 王玉瑋，「島嶼在國際海洋劃界中的作用」，《河南省政法管理幹部學院學報》，2002年第2期，頁115-119。 王澤林，「試析聯合國海洋法公約中的島嶼制度」，《華中科技大學學報（社會科學版）》，2006年第1期，頁51-55。 宋燕輝，「由國際法觀點論沖鳥礁法律地位暨我國籍漁船『龍榮二號』在沖鳥礁日本所主張EEZ被扣罰款事件之適法性問題」，收錄於：陳隆志教授古稀祝壽論文集編輯委員會編，《民主、和平與人權：陳隆志教授古稀祝壽論文集》（台北：台灣國際法學會出版，元照經銷商，2006），頁55-105。 ──，「東海漁業糾紛與解決之道」，《戰略安全研析》，第3期，頁6-9。 吳卡，「中日『沖之鳥』爭端的國際法分析」，《雲南大學學報法學版》，第19卷第2期，2006年3月，頁111-114。 李金明，「中法勘界鬥爭與北部灣海域劃界」，《南洋問題研究》，2002年第2期（總第102期），76-89。 李明峻，「台灣的領土紛爭問題─在假設性前提下的探討」，《台灣國際法季刊》第1卷第2期（2004），頁61-111。 姜皇池，「論島嶼制度」，收錄於：陳隆志教授古稀祝壽論文集編輯委員會編，《民主、和平與人權：陳隆志教授古稀祝壽論文集》（台北：台灣國際法學會出版，元照經銷商，2006），頁107-137。 ──，「從東亞實踐論台日漁業爭端可能解決方案」，《中華國際法與超國界法評論》第1卷第2期（2005），頁311-382。 ──，「以台灣為本位的國際法思考：歷史回顧與未來展望」《國立台灣大學法學論叢》第29卷第3期（2000），頁43-88。 俞寬賜，「釣魚台主權爭端之經緯與法理」，《中國國際法與國際事務年報》第5卷，頁33-46。 袁古潔，「島嶼在大陸架劃界中的法律地位」，《中央政法管理幹部學院學報》，1996年第2期，頁20-22。 高健軍，「中國的海洋劃界問題」，收錄於周忠海主編，《中國的和平發展與國際法》（北京：中國政法大學出版社，2006年），頁194-208。 ──，「論沖繩海槽在中日東海大陸架劃界中的作用」，《武大國際法評論》，2004年第2卷，頁94-112。 陳德恭，「海洋法中的島嶼制度」，收錄於：趙理海主編，《當代海洋法的理論與實踐》（北京：法律出版社，1987），頁235-253。 陳荔彤，「台灣之海域紛爭」，《台灣國際法季刊》，第1卷第2期，頁113-150。 張海文，「島嶼在國家間海上劃界的效力」，《海上法苑》，頁58-63。 張麟徵，「維護主權要有行動：談釣魚台糾紛之解決」，《海峽論壇》，2005年第175期，頁36-40。 傅崐成，「中國周邊大陸架的劃界方法與問題」，《中國海洋大學學報》(社會科學版)，2004年第3期，頁5-12。 五、網路資料 國際先驅導報，「北部灣劃界不涉及島嶼主權，白龍尾島劃歸越南」，新浪網， http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2004-08-05/14403937262.shtml (2007/06/05) 吳蔚，「中越北部灣劃界，雙方海域面積相當」 http://www.gdga.gov.cn:82/gate/big5/210.76.65.131/xwtd/gnzdxw/t20040804_20609.htm (2007/06/05) 貳、英文文獻 一、資料 North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) (Judgment of 20 February 1969), ICJ Report (1969) Arbitration between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the French Republic on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf (Decision of 30 June 1977), 18 International Legal Materials (1979), pp.397-461. Report of International Arbitral Award (1977) Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) (Judgment of 24 February 1982), ICJ Report (1982) Case Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada/ United States of America) (Judgment of 12 October 1984), ICJ Report (1984) Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta) (Judgment of 3 June 1985), ICJ Report (1985) Arbitration Tribunal for the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Guinea and Guinea-Bissau (Award of 14 February 1985), 25 International Legal Materials (1988), pp. 251-307. Report of International Arbitral Award (1985) Court of Arbitration for the Delimitation of Maritime Areas between Canada and France: Decision in Case Concerning Delimitation of Maritime Areas (St. Pierre and Miquelon) (June 10 1992), 31 International Legal Materials (1992), pp. 1145-1219. Report of International Arbitral Award (1992) Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayan (Denmark v. Norway) (Judgment of 14 June 1993), ICJ Report (1993) Permanent Court of Arbitration: Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration (First Stage: Territorial Sovereignty and Scope of Dispute) (October 9, 1998), 40 International Legal Materials (2001), pp. 900-982. Report of International Arbitral Award (1998) Permanent Court of Arbitration: Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration (Second Stage: Maritime Delimitation) (December 17, 1999), 40 International Legal Materials (2001), pp. 983-1019. Report of International Arbitral Award (1999) Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Judgment of 16 March, 2001), ICJ Report (2001) 二、專書 Ahnish, Faraj Abdullah, The International Law of Maritime Boundaries and the Practice of States in the Mediterranean Sea (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993) Blake, Gerald H. ed., Maritime Boundaries (London and New York: Routledge, 1994) Bowett, Derek W., The Legal regime of Islands in International Law (New York: Oceana Publications, 1979) Brown, E. D., The International Law of the Sea Volume I Introductory Manual (Aldershot/Brookfield USA/Singapore/Sydney: Dartmouth, 1994) ──, The International Law of the Sea Volume II Documents, Cases and Tables (Aldershot/Brookfield USA/Singapore/Sydney: Dartmouth, 1994) Churchill, R. R. & A. V. Lowe, The Law of the Sea (Third Edition) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999) Charney, Jonathan J. & Lewis M. Alexander ed., International Maritime Boundaries Volume I (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993) ──, International Maritime Boundaries Volume II (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993) ──, International Maritime Boundaries Volume III (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004) Charney, Jonathan I. & Robert W. Smith ed., International Maritime Boundaries Volume IV (The Hague/ London/ New York: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2002) Colson, David A. & Robert W. Smith ed., International Maritime Boundaries Volume V (Leiden/ Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005) Crawford, James & Donald R. Rothwell, The Law of the Sea in the Asian Pacific Region (Dordrecht/London/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, 1995) Elferink, Alex G. Oude, The Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation: A case study of the Russian Federation (Dordrecht/London/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, 1994) Greenfield, Jeanette, China’s Practice in the Law of the Sea (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992) Han-Yi, Shaw, The Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands Dispute: Its History and an Analysis of the Ownership Claims of the P.R.C., R.O.C., and Japan. (Baltimore, MD: School of Law, University of Maryland, 1999) Jagota, S. P., Maritime Boundary (Dordrecht/London/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985) Jayewardene, Hiran W., The Regime of Islands in International Law (Dordrecht/ London/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1990) Johnston, Douglas M. & Phillip M. Saunders, Ocean Boundary Making: Regional Issues and Developments (New York: Croom Helm, 1988) Kapoor, D. & A. Kerr, A guide to Maritime Boundary Delimitation (Toronto: Carswell, 1986) Keyuan, Zou, Law of the Sea in East Asia: Issues and Prospects (London and New York: Routledge, 2005) Kittichaisaree, Kriangsak, The Law of the Sea and Maritime Boundary Delimitation in South-East Asia (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1987) Knight, Gary & Hungdah Chiu, The International Law of the Sea: Cases, Documents, and Readings (London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science and Unifo Publishers, 1991) Kuen-Chen, Fu, Equitable Ocean Boundary Delimitation (Taipei: 123 Information company, 1989) Lo, Chi-kin, China’s Policy towards Territorial Disputes: the Case of the South China Sea Islands (London and New York: Routledge, 1989) Nordquist, Myron H. ed., United Nations Convention on The Law of The Sea 1982: A Commentary III (The Hague/ London/ Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995) Prescott, J. R. V., The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World (London and New York: Methuen, 1985) Symmons, Clive R., The Maritime zones of Islands in International Law (Hague/ Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, 1979) Valencia, Mark J., Jon M. Van Dyke & Noel A. Ludwig, Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea, (The Hague Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publidher, 1997) Valencia, M. & D. Johnson, Pacific Ocean Boundary Problems Status and Solutions (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991) Weil, Prosper, The Law of Maritime Delimitation—Reflections (Cambridge: Grotius Publications Limited, 1989) 三、期刊論文 Antunes, Nuno Sergio Marques, “The Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration: First Stage—The Law of Title to Territory Re-averred,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 48 (1999) , pp.362-386. ──, “The 1999 Eritrea-Yemen Maritime Delimitation Award and the Development of International Law,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 50 (2001), pp. 299-344. Beazley, P. B., “Reefs and the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law, Vol. 6, No. 4 (1991) , pp. 281-312. Bowett, Derek, “Islands, Rocks, Reefs, and Low-Tide Elevations in Maritime Boundary Delimitions,” in Jonathan J. Charney & Lewis M. Alexander ed., International Maritime Boundaries Volume I (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993), pp. 131-151. Brown, E. D., “The Significance of a Possible EC EEZ for the Law Relating to Artificial Islands, Installations, and Structures, and to Cables and Principles, in the Exclusive Economic Zone,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 23, No. 2/3 (1992) , pp. 115-144. Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., “The U.S. Role in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu (Senkaku) Islands, 1945-1971,” The China Quarterly, No. 161 (2000), pp. 95-123. Clagett, Brice M., “Competing Claims of Vietnam and China in the Vanguard Bank and Blue Dragon Areas of the South China Sea,” Oil and Gas Law and Taxation Review, Vol. 13, Issue 10. (1995) , pp. 375-388. Charney, Jonathan I., “Progress in International Maritime Boundary Delimitation Law,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 88 (1994) , pp. 227-256. ──, “Central East Asian Maritime Boundaries and the Law of the Sea,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 89, No. 4 (1995) , pp. 724-749. ──, “Rocks that Cannot Sustain Human Habitation,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 4 (1999) , pp. 863-878. Churchill, R. R., “The Greenland-Jan Mayen Case and its Significance for the International Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol. 9, No. 1 (1994) , pp. 1-29. Churchill, Robin, “United Kingdom accession to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol. 13, No. 2 (1998) , pp. 263-273. Donald, John & Alison Williams, “Understanding Maritime Jurisdictional Disputes: The East China Sea and Beyond,” Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 59, No. 1 (2005) , pp.135-156. Dubner, Dr. Barry Hart, “The Spratly “Rocks” Dispute – A “Rockapelago” Defies norms of International Law,” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, No. 9 (1995) , pp. 291-331. Dzidzornu, David M. & Stuart B. Kaye, “Conflicts over Maritime Boundaries: The 1982 United Nations Law of the Sea Convention Provisions and Peaceful Settlement,” Ocean Yearbook 16 (University of Chicago, 2002), pp. 541-607. Dzurek, Daniel J., “Southeast Asian Offshore Oil Disputes,” Ocean Yearbook 11 (University of Chicago Press, 1994) , pp. 157-178. Elferink, Alex G. Oude, “The Islands in the South China Sea: How Does Their Presence Limit the Extent of the High Sea and the Area and the Maritime Zones of the Mainland Coasts?” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 32, No. 2 (2001) , pp. 169-190. Egede, Edwin, “Submission of Brazil and Article 76 of The Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) 1982,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol. 21, No. 1 (2006) , pp. 33-55. Gjetnes, Marius, “The Spratlys: Are They Rocks or Islands?” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 32, No. 2 (2001) , pp. 191-204. Highet, Keith & George Kahale, “International Decisions,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 88 (1994) , pp. 105-133. Hodgson, Robert D., “Islands: Normal and Special Circumstances,” in John King Gamble, Jr. & Giulio Pontecorvo ed. Law of the Sea: The Emerging Regime of the Oceans (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1974), pp. 137-199. James, C. Hsiung, “Sea Power, the Law of the Sea, and the Sino–Japanese East China Sea Resource War” American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 27 (2005) , pp. 513-529. Karl, Donald E., “Islands and the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf: A Framework for Analysis,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 71, No 4 (1977) , pp. 642-673. Keyuan, Zou, “Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Gulf of Tonkin,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 30, No. 3 (1999) , pp. 235-254. ──, “Historic Rights in International Law and in China’s Practice,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 32, No. 2 (2001) , pp. 149-168. ──, “The Sino-Vietnamese Agreement on Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Gulf of Tonkin,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 36, No. 1 (2005) , pp. 13-24. Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “The Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration: Landmark Progress in the Acquisition of Territorial Sovereignty and Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 32, No. 1 (2001), pp. 1-25. ──, “The Qatar v. Bahrain Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions Case,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 33, No. 3/4 (2002), pp. 227-262. Larkin, Bruce D., “East Asian Ocean Security Zones,” Ocean Yearbook 2 (University of Chicago, 1980) , pp. 282-301. Lavalle, Roberto, “Not Quite a Sure Thing: The Maritime Areas of Rocks and Low-Tide Elevations Under the UN Law of the Sea Convention,” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol. 19, No. 1 (2004) , pp. 43-69. Overbeek, Walter van, “Article 121(3) LOSC in Mexican State Practice in the Pacific,” International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law, Vol. 4, No. 4 (1989) , pp. 252-267. Oxman, Bernard H., “International Decisions,” The American Journal of International law, Vol. 96, No. 1 (2002) , pp. 198-210. Paik, Jin-Hyun, “East Asia and the Law of the Sea” in James Crawford and Donald R. Rothwell ed. The Law of the Sea in the Asian Pacific Region (Dordrecht/ Boston/ London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995), pp. 7-19. ──, “Maritime Security in East Asia: Major Issues and Regional Responses,” Journal of International and Area Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2 (2005) , pp. 15-29. Park, Choon-ho, “Offshore Oil Development in the China Seas: Some Legal and Territorial Issues,” Ocean Yearbook 2 (University of Chicago, 1980) , pp. 302-316. Prescott, Victor & Gillian Triggs, “Islands and Rocks and their Role in Maritime Delimitation,” in David A. Colson & Robert W. Smith ed., International Maritime Boundaries Volume V (Leiden/ Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. Rau, Robert L., “Maritime Security Developments in East and Southeast Asia: Association of Southeast Asian Nations, China, and Japan Major Participants,” Ocean Yearbook 11 (University of Chicago, 1994) , pp. 426-441. Rahman, M. Habibur, “The Impact of The Law of The Sea Convention on The Regime for Islands: Problems for The Coastal State in Asserting Claims to “New-Born” Islands in Maritime Zones,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 2 (1985) , pp. 368-376. Roy, Denny, “The Sources and Limits of Sino-Japanese Relations,” Survival, Vol. 47, No. 2 (2005) , pp. 191-214. Steven, Wei Su, “The Tiaoyu Islands and Their Possible Effect on the Maritime Boundary Delimitation between China and Japan,” Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 3 (2004) , pp. 385-420. ──, “The Territorial Dispute over the Tiaoyu/Senkaku Islands: An Update,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 36, No. 1 (2005), pp. 45-61. Tanaka, Yoshifumi, “Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Qatar/Bahrain Case,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 52 (2003), pp. 53-80. Thao, Nguyen Hong, “Maritime Delimitation and Fishery Cooperation in the Tonkin Gulf,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 36, No. 1 (2005) , pp. 25-44. Townsend-Gault, Ian, “Preventive Diplomacy and Pro-Activity in the South China Sea,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 20, No. 2 (1998) , pp. 171-189. Van Dyke, Jon M. & Robert A. Brooks, “Uninhabited Islands: Their Impact on the Ownership of the Oceans’ Resources,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 12, No. 3/4 (1983), pp. 265-300. Van Dyke, Jon M. & Dale L. Bennett, “Islands and the Delimitation of Ocean Space in the South China Sea,” Ocean Yearbook 10 (University of Chicago Press, 1993) , pp. 54-89. Van Dyke, Jon M., “The Role of Islands in Delimiting Maritime Zones: The Case of the Aegean Sea, Ocean Yearbook 8 (University of Chicago Press, 1989), pp. 44-69. ──, “Disputes over Islands and Maritime Boundaries in East Asia,”《台灣海洋法學報》第5卷第1期，頁137-208。 Valencia, Mark J, “Northeast Asia: Petroleum Potential, Jurisdictional Claims, and International Relations,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 20, No. 1 (1989), pp. 35-61. ──, “Regional Maritime Regime Building: Prospects in Northeast and Southeast Asia,” Vol. 31, No. 3 (2000) , pp. 223-247. ──, “Asia, the Law of the Sea and International Relations,” International Affairs Vol. 73, No. 2 (2003) , pp. 263-282. Valencia, Mark J. & Yoshihisa Amae, “Regime Building in the East China Sea,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 34, No. 2 (2003) , pp. 189-208. Zhiguo, Gao, “The Scope and Principles of Maritime Cooperation in Asia and the Pacific,” Ocean Yearbook 16 (University of Chicago, 2002) , pp. 533-540. 四、網路資料 Encyclopedia of the Orient, Jerba, http://lexicorient.com/e.o/jerba.htm (2007/04/02) Kosuke Takahashi, “Gas and Oil Rivalry in the East China Sea,” Asian Times, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Japan/FG27Dh03.html (2007/07/15) NOAA Aquaculture, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/mediacenter/aquaculture/docs/12a_USCOP%20EEZ%20Map%203.pdf (2007/05/30) “Proclamation 5030 by the President of the United States of America on the Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States of America, 10 March 1983.” http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/USA_1983_Proclamation.pdf (2007/05/30) “The Basic View on the Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands” in The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/senkaku.html (2007 /06/ 06) Van Dyke, Jon M., “Legal Status of Islands – with Reference to Article 121(3) of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” paper presented in Seoul, Korea, December 9, 1999, http://web.archive.org/web/20011102113630/www.hawaii.edu/law/facpubs/KoreanPaper-Islands12999.htm (2007/02/01) Wikipedia, Clipperton Island, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipperton_Island (2007/05/30) Wikipedia, East China Sea, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_China_Sea 2007/06/01) Wikipedia, Filfla, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filfla (2007/04/20) Wikipedia, Guadalupe Island, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guadalupe_Island (2007/05/30) Wikipedia, Japan, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan (2007/07/10) Wikipedia, Nantucket Islands, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nantucket,_Massachusetts (2007/04/20) Wikipedia, Okinotorishima, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okinotorishima (2007/06/05) Wikipedia, Revillagigedo Islands, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revillagigedo_Islands (2007/05/30) Wikipedia, Rocas Alijos, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocas_Alijos (2007/05/30) Wikipedia, Rockall, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockall (2007/06/03) Wikipedia, Saint Peter and Paul Rocks, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Peter_and_Paul_Rocks (2007/06/05) Wikipedia, Ushant, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ushant (2007/04/02) 參、日文文獻 一、網路資料 「今にも沈みそうな沖ノ鳥島だが、本当に島といっていいのか？」，沖ノ鳥島領有71周年記念企画，http://homepage3.nifty.com/boumurou/island/sp01/law.html#EEZ (2007/06/01) 「日本政府は沖ノ鳥島の周囲に排他的経済水域を設置しているが、これは国際的に認められているのか？」，沖ノ鳥島領有71周年記念企画，http://homepage3.nifty.com/boumurou/island/sp01/law.html#EEZ (1007/06/01) 「京浜河川事務所」，http://www.keihin.ktr.mlit.go.jp/okinotori_island/index.htm (2007/06/01) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29059 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 島嶼所享有海域空間的能力及其對國際海洋疆界線的影響，在1982年《海洋法公約》的單一條文出現之前，即為長期具有爭議性的問題，尤其是島嶼在海域劃界中的效力問題更是國際法關注的焦點。《海洋法公約》中的「島嶼制度」確定了島嶼的定義及島嶼所享有的海域空間，但條文本身的規範過於簡單而導致了適用上的困難。此外，《海洋法公約》並沒有針對島嶼在海域劃界中的地位做出任何規定，而使得島嶼劃界效力問題只能留給習慣法解決。根據廣泛的國際司法案例及國家實踐，島嶼的劃界效力大致上可分為全效力、部分效力及零效力，而不同的劃界效力則取決於島嶼性質、島嶼位置及政經考量、交換價值、有主權爭議等其它因素。本文最後並試圖以島嶼制度的規定，及相關國際司法判例和雙邊劃界協定的實踐，探討釣魚台群島在東海海域劃界中所應享有之劃界地位，並主張釣魚台群島可能享有的劃界效力為零效力或至多僅具有12海里海域，以期為極為複雜的東海劃界困局提供解決前景。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The capacity of islands to generate maritime zones and to influence the location of international maritime boundaries was a long-term dispute long before a single provision in the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Particularly, the problem of the effect of the islands' delimitation in the sea had attracted the attention of international law. Regime of Islands in the UNCLOS has confirmed the legal definition of an island and its entitlement. However, the rules of the provision are too simple to be applied. In addition, the UNCLOS leaves open the function of the islands in the maritime delimitation. Therefore, the effect of the islands’ delimitation can only be found in the customary law. According to the numerous international judicial legal precedents and state practices, it is full effect, partial effect and zero effect that the islands could possibly obtain in delimitation, and it is the nature and position of the islands and other factors including economic and political consideration, trade-off value, disputed islands and so on that influence the effect of the islands’ delimitation in the sea. At last, this essay attempts to analysis the possible effect of Diaoyutai Islands in the maritime delimitation of the East China Sea in terms of the regime of islands in the UNCLOS and international judicial legal precedents and bilateral agreements concerning maritime boundaries involved. Both case law and state practices seem to suggest that the most appropriate and most likely effect of Diaoyutai Islands on the delimitation of the East China Sea may be no effect or at most be limited to circa 12 nautical miles. This value, if accepted, could certainly help to bring some solution to the complicated deadlock of the maritime delimitation in the East China Sea. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:37:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94322030-1.pdf: 12925475 bytes, checksum: b7a8e9505ebe7b7d891982683c0a03b4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………i
謝辭………………………………………………………………………ii 中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………iii 英文摘要 ………………………………………………………………iv 目錄………………………………………………………………………v 圖目錄 …………………………………………………………………xi 表目錄…………………………………………………………………xiii 第一章、緒論……………………………………………………………1 第一節、島嶼影響國際海域劃界的發展………………………………………1 壹、國際海域劃界的發展…………………………………………………1 貳、島嶼的海域爭奪戰……………………………………………………2 参、國際司法判例與國家實踐的狀況……………………………………4 肆、海域劃界的相關著作…………………………………………………6 第二節、島嶼的爭議與研究動機………………………………………………7 壹、島嶼制度的爭議………………………………………………………8 貳、島嶼在海域劃界中的效力問題………………………………………8 参、研究動機………………………………………………………………9 肆、案例觀察─釣魚台群島在東海劃界中的地位………………………10 第三節、研究目的與研究架構…………………………………………………11 壹、研究目的………………………………………………………………11 貳、研究方法………………………………………………………………12 参、研究範圍與限制………………………………………………………13 肆、研究架構………………………………………………………………14 第二章、聯合國海洋法公約的島嶼制度………………………………17 第一節、島嶼制度………………………………………………………………17 壹、島嶼制度的歷史簡介…………………………………………………18 一、海牙國際法編纂會議…………………………………………………19 二、國際法委員會…………………………………………………………20 三、第一次海洋法會議……………………………………………………20 四、海床委員會……………………………………………………………21 五、第三屆海洋法會議……………………………………………………24 貳、島嶼制度的規定與分析………………………………………………30 一、島嶼的定義……………………………………………………………32 二、維持人類居住的標準 ………………………………………………35 三、維持本身經濟生活的標準 …………………………………………39 四、小結……………………………………………………………………43 第二節、其他類似島嶼陸地區域的法律地位 ………………………………47 壹、岩礁……………………………………………………………………47 貳、低潮高地………………………………………………………………49 参、人工島嶼………………………………………………………………52 肆、礁石……………………………………………………………………54 第三章、論島嶼在海域劃界中的效力…………………………………58 第一節、島嶼作為劃界中的特殊情況…………………………………………59 壹、相關公約的劃界規定探討……………………………………………59 一、1958年《領海及鄰接區公約》及《大陸礁層公約》…………………60 二、1982年《聯合國海洋法公約》………………………………………61 貳、島嶼作為劃界中的特殊情況或相關情況……………………………63 第二節、影響島嶼劃界效力之因素……………………………………………66 壹、海洋法會議的相關提案………………………………………………66 貳、影響島嶼劃界效力因素之分析………………………………………69 一、島嶼性質………………………………………………………………70 二、島嶼位置………………………………………………………………71 三、其他考量………………………………………………………………75 第三節、論島嶼在海域劃界中的效力…………………………………………78 壹、全效力…………………………………………………………………79 貳、部分效力………………………………………………………………81 一、縮減效力………………………………………………………………81 二、半效力…………………………………………………………………81 三、飛地或半飛地…………………………………………………………84 参、零效力…………………………………………………………………87 肆、避免方法─共同開發區………………………………………………89 第四節、小結……………………………………………………………………89 第四章、從國際司法判例論島嶼在海域劃界中的地位………………93 第一節、涉及島嶼劃界的國際司法判例………………………………………96 壹、1977年《英法大陸礁層案》 …………………………………………96 一、簡介……………………………………………………………………97 二、島嶼的劃界效力………………………………………………………99 貳、1982年《利比亞與突尼西亞大陸礁層案》………………………102 一、簡介…………………………………………………………………102 二、島嶼的劃界效力……………………………………………………106 参、1984年《緬因灣案》………………………………………………108 一、簡介…………………………………………………………………108 二、島嶼的劃界效力……………………………………………………111 肆、1985年《利比亞與馬爾他大陸礁層案》……………………………114 一、簡介…………………………………………………………………114 二、島嶼的劃界效力……………………………………………………118 伍、1985年《幾內亞與幾內亞比索海域劃界案》………………………118 一、簡介…………………………………………………………………118 二、島嶼的劃界效力……………………………………………………121 陸、1999年《厄利垂亞與葉門仲裁案》…………………………………123 一、簡介…………………………………………………………………123 二、島嶼的劃界效力……………………………………………………127 柒、2001年《卡達與巴林海域劃界案》…………………………………129 一、簡介…………………………………………………………………129 二、島嶼的劃界效力……………………………………………………134 第二節、小結…………………………………………………………………139 壹、全效力………………………………………………………………139 貳、部分效力……………………………………………………………140 參、零效力………………………………………………………………141 第五章、從國家實踐論島嶼在海域劃界中的地位…………………145 第一節、從國家行為論島嶼的向海劃界問題………………………………145 壹、美國…………………………………………………………………145 貳、墨西哥………………………………………………………………147 參、法國…………………………………………………………………149 肆、巴西…………………………………………………………………150 伍、日本…………………………………………………………………152 陸、小結…………………………………………………………………155 第二節、從雙邊劃界協議論島嶼在鄰國間劃界的效力問題………………156 壹、近岸島嶼……………………………………………………………156 一、格陵蘭與冰島間海域劃界協議：格里姆賽………………………157 二、伊朗與沙烏地阿拉伯大陸礁層劃界：哈爾克島…………………159 三、伊朗和卡達大陸礁層劃界協議：雙方所有島嶼…………………160 貳、離岸島嶼……………………………………………………………162 一、澳大利亞與紐西蘭海域劃界協議：諾曼斯海域的島嶼…………162 二、馬來西亞與印尼大陸礁層劃界：南吐納群島……………………165 三、愛爾蘭與英國大陸礁層劃界協議：羅科爾………………………166 参、中區島嶼……………………………………………………………169 一、日本與南韓大陸礁層北部劃界協議：對馬島……………………170 二、中國與越南北部灣劃界協議：白龍尾島…………………………171 三、義大利與突尼西亞大陸礁層劃界協議：義大利四小島…………174 四、巴林與沙烏地阿拉伯大陸礁層劃界協議：主權爭議島嶼………175 肆、分離島嶼……………………………………………………………177 一、印度與馬爾地夫海域疆界協議：米尼科伊島……………………177 二、澳大利亞與巴布亞新幾內亞劃界協議：澳大利亞六小島………179 伍、有主權爭議之島嶼…………………………………………………181 一、加拿大和丹麥大陸礁層劃界：漢斯島……………………………182 二、印度與斯里蘭卡歷史性水域疆界協議：卡恰提姆………………183 陸、小結…………………………………………………………………185 第六章、論釣魚台在東海劃界中之地位……………………………187 第一節、釣魚台在東海的概述………………………………………………187 第二節、釣魚台的主權爭議與劃界主張……………………………………194 壹、釣魚台列嶼主權爭議………………………………………………197 一、日本的主張…………………………………………………………197 二、中華民國與中華人民共和國的主張………………………………199 貳、相關各方的劃界主張………………………………………………201 一、日本的立場…………………………………………………………202 二、中華人民共和國的立場……………………………………………203 三、中華民國的立場……………………………………………………205 第三節、論釣魚台群島在東海海域的劃界效力……………………………208 壹、論釣魚台群島的島嶼性質…………………………………………208 貳、論釣魚台群島的劃界效力…………………………………………211 參、小結…………………………………………………………………216 第七章、結論…………………………………………………………210 參考文獻………………………………………………………………223 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 論島嶼在海域劃界中之地位
─兼論釣魚台及其東海劃界問題 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Islands in the Maritime Boundary Delimitation
─A Case Study on the Disputes over the Diaoyutai Islands and the Maritime Delimitation in the East China Sea | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張麟徵,陳純一 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 海洋法公約,島嶼,劃界效力,釣魚台群島,東海, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | UNCLOS,islands,effect,Diaoyutai Islands,East China Sea, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 233 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-25 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 12.62 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。