請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28809完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇以文(Lily, I-wen Su) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chi-hua Hsiao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蕭季樺 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:23:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ahrens, Kathleen. 2002. When love is not digested: underlying reasons for source to target domain pairing in the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In the Proceedings of the First Cognitive Linguistics Conference, National Cheng-Chi University, Taiwan.
Barcelona, Antonio. 2000. On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroad, ed. by Antonio Barcelona, 31-58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Berlin, Brent, and Kay Paul. 1969. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press. Bhaya, Rukmini. 1985. Telling lies: some literary and other violations of Grice’s maxim of quality. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 14, 53-71. Blumberg, Mark S. 2002. Body heat: temperature and life on earth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Buck, Ross. 1988. The perception of facial expression: individual regulation and social coordination. Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces, ed. by Tomas R. Alley, 141-166. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bybee, Joan L., and Hopper Paul. 2001. Frequency and the emergence of language structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Cannon, Walter. 1929. Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Cano Mora, Laura. 2004. At the risk of exaggerating: how do listeners react to hyperbole? Anglogermanica Online 2003-2004. Chang, Kwang- chih. 1977. Introduction. Food in Chinese culture: anthropological and historical perspectives, ed. by Kwang- chih Chang, 3-21. New Haven: Yale University Press. Chang, Lili, Kehjiann Chen, and Churen Huang. 2000. Alternation across semantic field: a study of Mandarin verbs of emotion. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, ed. by Yung-O Biq, 61-80. Special Issue on Chinese Verbal Semantics. Chiang, Ting-Yi. 2004. Affective chunk of Mandarin Wo Juede (我覺得) and its discourse-pragmatic functions. Paper presented at ROCLING XVI: Student Workshop II. Chui, Kawai. 2000. Morphologization of the degree verb HEN. Language and Linguistics 1 (1), 45-59. Clark, Herbert H. 1994. Discourse in production. Handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. by Morton Ann Gernsbacher, 985-1021. San Diego: Academic. Clore, Gerald L., and Andrew Ortony. 1991. What more is there to emotion concepts than prototypes? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60, 48-50. Colston, Herbert L., and Jennifer O’Brien. 2000. Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: the pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse and Processes 30 (3), 179-199. Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Croft, William. 1990. Possible verbs and event structure. Meanings and prototypes: studies on linguistic categorization, ed. by Savas L. Tsohatzidis, 48-73. London: Routledge. _ _ _. 2001. Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Damasio, Antonio. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Orlando: Harcourt. Darwin, Charles. 1872. The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: J. Murray. Reprinted 1979: Julian Friedman. Davitz, Joel Robert. 1969. The language of emotion. New York: Academic Press. De Rivera, Joseph. 1977. A structural theory of the emotions. New York: International Universities Press. Dirven, Rene. 1995. Emotions as cause and the cause of emotions. The language of emotions, ed. by Susanne Niemeier and Rene Dirven, 55-83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Du Bois, Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino, and Susanna Cumming. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. Talking data: transcription and coding methods for language research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, 45-90. New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum. Ekman, Paul. 1971. Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. Nebraska symposium on motivation 19, ed. by James K. Cole, 207-283. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. _ _ _. 1972. Emotion in human face. New York: Pergamon Press. _ _ _. 1980. Biological and cultural contributions to body and facial movement in the expression if emotion. Explaining emotions, ed. by Amélie O. Rorty, 73-101. Berkeley: University of California Press. _ _ _. 1984. Expression and the nature of emotion. Approaches to emotion, ed. by Klaus R. Scherer and Paul Ekman, 319-344. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. _ _ _. 1999. Basic emotions. Handbook of cognition and emotion, ed. by Tim Dalgleish and Mick Power, 45-60. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. Enfield, Nick J., and Anna Wierzbicka. 2002. Introduction: the body is in description of emotion. Pragmatics and Cognition 10 (1/2), 1-25. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental spaces: roles and strategies. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute Technology Press. Fehr, Beverley, and Russell James A. 1984. Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113, 464-486. Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In universals in linguistic theory, ed. by E. Bach and R. T. Harms, 1-88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. _ _ _. 1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, ed. by C. Cogen, H. Thompson, G. Thurgood and K. Whistler, 123-131. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. _ _ _. 1977. The case for case reopened. Syntax and semantics 8: grammatical relations, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerrold M. Sadock, 59-81. Chicago: University of Chicago. Fillmore, Charles J., and Beryl T. Atkins. 1992. Toward a frame-based lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors. Frames, fields, and contrasts, ed. by Adrienne Lehrer and Eva Kittay, 75-102. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Fillmore, Charles J., and Paul Kay. 1993. Construction grammar coursebook. Berkeley: University of California Press. Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Catherine O’conner. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language 64, 501-38. Fischer, Agneta H. 1991. Emotion scripts: a study of the social and cognitive facets of emotions. Leiden: DSWO Press. Givón, Talmy. 1993. English grammar: a function-based introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Goatly, Andrew. forthcoming. Washing the brain: metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. _ _ _. 2005. Argument realization: the role of construction, lexical semantics and discourse factors. Construction grammars: cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, ed. by By Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried, 17-43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Grady, Joseph. 1997. Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D Dissertation in University of California, Berkeley. Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: speech act, ed. by Cole Peter and Morgan Jerry L, 41-58. New York: Academic Press. Györi, Gábor. 1995. Historical aspects of categorization. Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods: the expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics, ed. by Eugene H. Casad, 175-206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. _ _ _. 1998. Cultural variation in the conceptualization of emotion: a historical study. Speaking of emotions: conceptualization and expression, ed. by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Elzbieta Tabakowska, 99-124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Huang, Shuanfan. 1982. Chinese concept of a person— an essay on language and metaphysics. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 10 (1), 86-107. _ _ _. 2002. Tsou is different: a cognitive perspective on language, emotion, and body. Cognitive Linguistics 13 (2), 167-186. Huang, Shuping. 2005. Studying emotion metaphors in a taxonomic perspective. Unpublished manuscript. Izard, Carroll E. 1971. The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. James, William. 1884. What is an emotion? Mind 19:188-204. Johnson, Mark. 2006. Merleau-Ponty’s embodied semantics— from immanent meaning, to gesture, to language. EurAmerica 361 (1), 1-27. Johnson-Laird, Philip N., and Keith Oatley. 1989. The language of emotions: an analysis of a semantic field. Cognition and Emotion 3 (2), 81-123. Kidron, Yael, and Ron Kuzar. 2002. My face is paling against my will: emotion and control in English and Hebrew. Pragmatics and Cognition 10 (1/2), 129-157. Kitayama, Shinobu, and Hazel R. Markus. 1994. Introduction to cultural psychology and emotion research. Emotion and culture, ed. by Shinobu Kitayama and Hazel R. Markus, 1-19. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Kitayama, Shinobu, and Paula M. Niedenthal. 1994. Introduction. The heart’s eye: emotional influences in perception and attention, ed. by Shinobu Kitayama and Paula M. Niedenthal, 2-13. United Kingdom: Academic Press. Kövecses, Zoltan, and Güter Radden. 1998. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1), 37-77. Kövecses, Zoltan. 1990. Emotion concepts. New York: Springer-Verlag. _ _ _. 2000. Metaphor and emotion: language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kreuz, Roger J., Roberts Richard M., Johnson B. K., and Bertus E. L. 1996. Figurative language occurrence and co-occurrence in contemporary literature. Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics, ed. by Roger J. Kreuz and Mary S. MacNealy, 83-97. New Jersey: Ablex. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, George, and Zoltan Kövecses. 1987. The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. Cultural models in language and thoughts, ed. by Dorothy Holland and Naomi Quinn, 195-221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol 1: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press. _ _ _. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol 2: descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press. _ _ _. 1998. Conceptualization, symbolization and grammar. The new psychology of language, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 1-39. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. California: University of California Press. Lin, Dongyi. 2006. The language of emotion in Kavalan. M. A. Thesis in National Taiwan University. Lutz, Catherine. 1982. The domain of emotion words in Ifaluk. American Ethnologist 9 (1), 113-128. Lyons, William. 1980. Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Magna, Arnold. 1960. Emotion and personality. New York: Columbia University Press. Marr, David. 1982. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman. McCarthy, Michael, and Ronald Carter. 2004. “There’s millions of them”: hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 149-184. Minsky, Marvin. 1975. A framework of representing knowledge. The psychology of computer vision, ed. by Patrick H. Winston, 211-277. New York: McGraw-Hill. Norrick, Neal R. 2004. Hyperbole, extreme formulation. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 1727-1739. Oatley, Kieth. 1987. Editorial: cognitive science and the understanding of emotions. Cognition and Emotion 1 (3), 209-216. Ortony, Andrew, Gerald L. Clore, and Mark A. Foss. 1987. The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cognitive Science 11, 341-64. Peirce, Charles S. 1940. The philosophy of Peirce: selected writing, ed. by Justus Buchler. London: Kegan Paul. Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9, 219-229. Purcell, William M. 1990. Tropes, transsumptio, assumption, and the redirection of studies in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 5 (1), 35-53. Ravazzoli, Flavia. 1978. I meccanismi linguistici dell’iperbole. Retorica e critica letteraria, ed. by Ritter Santini, L., and Raimondi E, 69-86. Bologna: Societa editrice il Mulino. Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit metaphor. Metaphor and thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 284-297. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. _ _ _. 1993. The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. Metaphor and thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 164-201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, ed. by Timothy E. Moore, 111-144. New York: Academic Press. Russell, James. 1991. In defense of a prototype approach to emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (1), 37-47. Schachter, Stanley, and Jerome Singer. 1962. Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional states. Psychological Review 69, 379-99. Smith, John. 1657. Mysterie of rhetorique. London: E. Cotes for George Everzden. Solomon, Robert C. 2002. Back to basics: on the very idea of “basic emotions”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 32 (2), 115-144. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. Spitzbardt, Harry. 1963. Overstatement and understatement in British and Ameican English. Philologica Pragensia 6, 277-286. Stocker, Michael, and Elizabeth Hegeman. 1992. Valuing emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Su, Lily I-wen. 2000. Mapping in thought and language as evidenced in Chinese. Chinese Studies 18, 395-424. _ _ _. 2002. What can metaphor tell us about culture? Language and Linguistics 3(3), 589-614. Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12, 49-100. _ _ _. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics vol 1: concept structuring systems. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute Technology Press. Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jorg Schmid. 1996. An introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. England: Longman. Weng, Chuan-hui. 2005. The permissive, causative and passive readings of Rang. M.A. Thesis in National Tsing-Hua University. White, Geoffrey M. 1979. Some social uses of emotion language: a Melanesian example. Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association. Ohio: Cincinnati. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1972. Semantic primitives. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaum. _ _ _. 1994. Emotion, language, and cultural scripts. Emotion and culture, ed. by Shinobu Kitayama and Hazel R. Markus, 133-196. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. _ _ _. 1996. Semantics: primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. _ _ _. 1999. Emotion across language and culture: diversity and universals. New York: Cambridge University Press. Wilson, Deirdre. 2003. Relevance theory and lexical pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics / Rivista di Linguistica 15 (2), 273-291. Special Issue on Pragmatics and the Lexicon. Reprinted in 2004 UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan. Ye, Zhengdao. 2002. Different modes of describing emotions in Chinese: bodily changes, sensations, and bodily images. Pragmatics and Cognition 10 (1/2), 307–339. Yu, Ning. 1995. Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10 (2), 59-92. _ _ _. 2002. Body and emotion: body parts in Chinese expression of emotion. Pragmatics and Cognition 10 (1/2), 341–367. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28809 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 情緒是理解認知心智運作的重要窗口，本研究指在探討情緒如何在漢語口語中呈現及概念化。研究結果顯示，情緒藉由數種不同的高頻句式結構呈現，其中有些句構幾乎專為情緒所使用，有些則和其它語意範疇共用，包括結果事件、使動事件、狀態描述。這些情緒句構分別強調了情緒事件的不同原素及階段性。再者，情緒也透過隱喻呈現，利用不同的來源領域概念，例如食物及植物，呈現了漢語的獨特用法。最後，誇飾法的情緒表達不僅與中文句型結構相關，也同使利用了隱喻機制，使說話者達到強調說話效果及意義之目的。
口語中有幾個高頻的情緒句構，分別為Zhixia Construction of Emotion 、DE-yangzi Construction of Emotion、Degree DE Construction of Emotion、Manner DE Construction of Emotion、RANG Construction of Emotion以及 HEN Construction of Emotion。這些句構分別有其句式與意義的聯結。第一個句構，即Zhixia Construction of Emotion，幾乎只應用於情緒表達，其餘句構則是共用於多種不同的語意範疇。這顯示了中文的情緒表達與其它語意範疇，包括結果事件、使動事件、狀態描述等等，共享相同的句式結構。 這些情緒句構聚合於一個認知的情緒事件結構，該結構是一個動態過程，包含了起因、情緒以及反應三部份。這六個常用的情緒句構分別突顯了不同原素及階段，使說話者在描述情緒事件時能夠從這些句構中選擇適當的觀點。此外，這些情緒句構展現了三種形式的力量動態: 開啟新的動作、延續原本的動作、開始休止狀態。由此可見，力量不僅能驅動與情緒相關的行為表現，亦能中止原本的情緒狀態。 情緒表達也借用了隱喻機制。建立在管道譬喻的基礎上，我們發現了幾種不同的隱喻主題: 情緒是食物、情緒是有機體、情緒是狀態。在有機體及狀態這兩種概念中，基層範疇的物體可以進一步做為來源領域。情緒是有機體包含了情緒是植物、情緒是生命體；情緒是狀態則涵蓋了情緒是液體、情緒是地點、情緒是生理反應。其中，我們認為食物、植物及生理反應中的氣這三種概念的使用是受到文化影響，因為他們反映了中文社會對飲食習俗及傳統醫學的注重，這層文化因素深化進而顯現於語言形式中。此外，多樣的來源領域以及情緒事件三階段之間的對應，其關聯為來源領域中與功能相關的成份最常用來表示情緒事件中起因;要素及特質相關的成分則用以表示情緒狀態;功能、要素及特質三種組成皆可以表達反應。 隱喻也與誇飾法緊密聯結。漢語口語中的情緒誇飾主要透過兩個方式呈現，分別為句法結構及隱喻。句法結構包括了三種機制:句式重覆、最高級副詞及中文特有的結果複合動詞。至於隱喻的使用，我們認為隱喻提供了真實世界以及話語之間的想像空間，這是誇飾的基礎之一。誇飾的研究也顯示出說話者傾向選擇能增加說話功效的策略，因此，擴大事實強度類型的誇飾使用頻率超過減弱事實強度類型的誇飾。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Emotion has long been an interest for researchers in different fields. In the realm of linguistics, the rise of cognitive linguistics has opened a new page of research on emotion because it is regarded as a rich source to understand cognitive processing and conceptualization. This present study, thus, investigates the language of emotion in Mandarin so as to explicate how emotion is conceptualized in discourse.
We first delve into emotion constructions of pervasive occurrences in Mandarin discourse. Six frequently-occurring constructions are represented, including Zhixia Construction of Emotion, DE-yangzi Construction of Emotion, Degree DE Construction of Emotion, Manner DE Construction of Emotion, RANG Construction of Emotion and HEN Construction of Emotion. These constructions are based on different syntactic devices, stretching from one pole mostly specific to emotion events, to the other pole applicable to a wide variety of semantic fields, such as resultative events, causative events and stative description. Emotion, in other words, can be expressed by syntactic patterns exclusively unique to itself and those shared with other semantic fields. These emotion constructions converge on a systematic structure, and that allows us to register a prototypical Chinese emotion event structure encompassing three stages in a dynamic sequence: [Cause], [Emotion] and [Reaction]. It is demonstrated each emotion construction has a reason for existence in that it profiles different elements and stages of the emotion event structure. Further, we observe that these constructions altogether exhibit three categories of force dynamic patterns in the physical-metaphorical domain, including onset causing of action, extended causing of action and onset causing of rest. In addition to constructional devices, emotion is richly expressed via metaphor. With conduit metaphor as bedrock, three different types of metaphors are distinguished, including EMOTION IS FOOD, EMOTION IS ORGANISM and EMOTION IS STATE. Within the domain of ORGANISM and STATE, entities in basic levels are further employed as source domains to conceptualize emotion. For EMOTION IS ORGANISM, it includes EMOTION IS PLANT and EMOTION IS ANIMATE BEING; for EMOTION IS STATE, it includes EMOTION IS FLUID, EMOTION IS LOCATION and PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS FOR EMOTION. Among these, EMOTION IS PLANT, EMOTION IS FOOD and emotion as QI subsumed in PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS FOR EMOTION are particular to Mandarin because these expressions reveal the culture tradition on food and Chinese medicine. Moreover, regarding mapping relations between the various source domains and the target domain of EMOTION, it is shown that while function of a source domain is mostly utilized to code causation of an emotion event, essence and quality are particularly favored for emotional states, and all the three elements— essence, quality and function—are available to be transferred to conceptualize reactions. For the last issue, hyperbolic emotion expressions, a variety of linguistic manners falling into to two categories are utilized: syntactic devices and metaphorical strategies. The syntactic devices include polysyndeton, extreme case formulations and resultative verb compounds. As for metaphor, we suggest that as a conceptual process of reality rather than reality itself, it is the imaginativeness that makes metaphor a useful resource for hyperbole. In addition, on the face of an overwhelming majority of intensification-type of hyperbole, people are disposed to intensity that can relevantly strengthen forces and effects of emotions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:23:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R93142002-1.pdf: 797142 bytes, checksum: 2a0f7fa6b7a8f5f8e484e07ae5e9662b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements………i
English Abstract………ii Chinese Abstract………iv Table of Contents………vi List of Tables and Figures………xi Abbreviations and Transcription Conventions………xii Chapter 1 Introduction………1 1.0 An Overview………1 1.1 Aim and Scope………2 1.2 Research Questions………3 1.3 Methodology………5 1.3.1 Database and Data Identification………5 1.3.2 Construction Grammar………7 1.3.3 Definition of Emotion………7 1.4 Organization………9 Chapter 2 Literature Review………10 2.0 Nature of Emotion………10 2.1 Is Emotion Nature- or Nurture- Oriented?………13 2.2 The Debate on Basic Emotions………14 2.3 What Constitutes Emotion?………16 2.4 Conceptualization of Emotion………18 2.4.1 Metaphor and Metonymy………21 2.4.2 Force Dynamics………26 2.4.3 Conceptualization of Causality………28 2.5 Culture in Emotion ………30 Chapter 3 Emotion Constructions………33 3.0 Introduction ………33 3.1 Highly-occurring Emotion Constructions………33 3.2 The Pattern of Zhixia Expressions ………38 3.2.1 Zhixia Construction of Emotion ……… 3.2.2 Semantic Constraint of Zhixia Construction of Emotion………41 3.3 The Pattern of DE-yangzi Expressions………42 3.3.1 DE-yangzi Construction of Emotion………43 3.3.2 Semantic Constraint of DE-yangzi Construction of Emotion………44 3.4 The Pattern of Degree DE Expressions………44 3.4.1 Degree DE Construction of Emotion………45 3.4.2 Semantic Constrain of Degree DE Construction of Emotion………46 3.4.3 Metaphorical Basis of Degree DE Construction of Emotion………47 3.5 The Pattern of Manner DE Expressions………48 3.5.1 Manner DE Construction of Emotion………48 3.5.2 Semantic Constraint of Manner DE Construction of Emotion………50 3.6 The Pattern of RANG Expressions………50 3.6.1 RANG Construction of Emotion………52 3.6.2 Semantic Constraint of RANG Construction of Emotion………53 3.7 The Pattern of HEN Expressions……… 3.7.1 HEN Construction of Emotion………56 3.7.2 Semantic Constraint of HEN Construction of Emotion………57 3.7.3 Variation of HEN Construction of Emotion……58 3.8 Emotion Verbs as Complement-taking Verbs………59 3.9 Conclusion………61 Chapter 4 Chinese Emotion Event Structure………62 4.0 Introduction………62 4.1 Event Structures and Linguistic Manifestation……63 4.1.1 Overview of Frame………63 4.1.2 Overview of Script………66 4.2 Croft’s Prototypical Causative Event Model………68 4.3 A Chinese Emotion Event Structure ………70 4.3.1 Lakoff and Kövecses’s ANGER Event Structure………70 4.3.2 Chinese Emotion Event Structure………72 4.4 Profiling of Emotion Constructions………80 4.5 Force Dynamics of Emotion Constructions………87 4.5.1 Mechanism of Force Dynamics………88 4.5.2 Discussion……….88 4.6 Conclusion………92 Chapter 5 Metaphors in Emotion Event Structure………94 5.0 Introduction………94 5.1 Conduit Metaphor: EMOTION IS OBJECT ………95 5.1.1 Dimensional Attribute………99 5.1.2 Texture Attribute ………100 5.1.3 Temperature.………101 5.1.4 Contagious Property………103 5.1.5 Horizontal Surface………103 5.2 Metaphors for Emotions………104 5.2.1 EMOTION IS FOOD………104 5.2.2 EMOTION IS ORGANISM………107 5.2.2.1 EMOTION IS PLANT………107 5.2.2.2 EMOTION IS ANIMATE BEING………109 5.2.3 EMOTION IS STATE………111 5.2.3.1 EMOTION IS FLUID………111 5.2.3.2 EMOTION IS LOCATION………114 5.2.3.3 PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS FOR EMOTION………116 5.3 Discussion………121 5.3.1 Culture in Conceptualization of Emotion……121 5.3.2 Aspects of the Source Domains that Get Mapped………123 5.4 Conclusion………129 Chapter 6 Hyperbolic Emotion Expressions………130 6.0 Introduction………130 6.1 Previous Studies on Hyperbole………130 6.1.1 Hyperbole and Metaphor………132 6.1.2 A Discourse Approach to Hyperbole………133 6.1.3 Pragmatic Function of Irony and Hyperbole…140 6.2 Criteria for Hyperbolic Expressions………135 6.3 Syntactic Features of Hyperbolic Emotion Expressions………136 6.3.1 Polysyndeton………137 6.3.2 Extreme Case Formulations- Superlatives………141 6.3.3 Resultative Verb Compounds………144 6.4 Hyperbole Through Metaphor………146 6.4.1 Conventionalized Idioms………150 6.4.2 Via Physiological Effects………151 6.5 Discussion.………155 6.5.1 Why Metaphor?………156 6.5.2 Motivations for Using Hyperboles………157 6.6 Conclusion………158 Chapter 7 Conclusion………159 7.0 Recapitulation………159 7.1 Implication………162 7.2 Further Research………163 References………165 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 誇飾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情緒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 句構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 事件結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 隱喻 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | event structure | en |
| dc.subject | hyperbole | en |
| dc.subject | metaphor | en |
| dc.subject | construction | en |
| dc.subject | emotion | en |
| dc.title | 漢語口語之情緒語言 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Language of Emotion in Mandarin Discourse | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃宣範(Shuanfan Huang),畢永峨(Yung-O Biq) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 情緒, 句構, 事件結構, 隱喻, 誇飾, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | emotion, construction, event structure, metaphor, hyperbole, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 171 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 語言學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 778.46 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。