請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28614
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 辛炳隆 | |
dc.contributor.author | Zong-Ying Yang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 楊宗穎 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:14:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-08-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-08-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部份
行政院主計處(1996,2001)。中華民國行業標準分類第六版、第七版。台北市:行政院主計處。 行政院主計處(2000)。薪資與生產力統計年報。台北市:行政院主計處。 行政院勞工委員會(2002)。職類別薪資調查報告(附帶:事業單位辦理員工職業訓練時況調查)-資料時期:中華民國九十年七月。台北市:行政院勞工委員會。 行政院勞工委員會(2005)。勞動統計年報。台北市:行政院勞工委員會。 行政院勞工委員會(2006)。職類別薪資調查報告-資料時期:中華民國九十四年七月,頁(34)-(35)。台北市:行政院勞工委員會。 呂純櫻(1996)。壽險業辦理教育訓練之現況及其影響因素之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學勞工研究所,嘉義縣。 吳慧瑛、鄭琇仁(1998)。在職訓練與紅利分配之探討。台灣銀行季刊,第49卷第2期,頁280-302。 李宜萍(2004)。70%的企業競爭力正逐潮消失中--訓練貴?不訓練更貴!(觀念篇)。管理雜誌,第360期,頁74-83。 李誠、辛炳隆(2005)。強化我國職訓體系之研究。台北市:行政院經濟建設委員會。 辛炳隆、李健鴻(2006)。強化我國企業參與人才培訓之研究。台北市:行政院經濟建設委員會。 陳正倉、林惠玲、陳忠榮、莊春發(2003)。產業經濟學(初版)。台北市:雙葉書廊。 陳彥豪(2004)。訓練制度與訓練認知對員工職能提升、組織承諾與工作投入之影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班,高雄市。 郭金城(2002)。證券營業員教育訓練需求與影響因素之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學勞工研究所,嘉義縣。 單驥(1987)。台灣職業訓練現況分析及廠商辦理職業訓練因素之決定。收錄於劉克智主編,台灣人力資源論文集(頁363-392)。台北市:聯經。 彭百崇(2000)。勞動經濟學(初版)。台北市:華泰。 張原卿、吳麗瑩合著(2000)。個體經濟學(初版)。台北市:學富文化。 曹慧貞(2006)。知識經濟對職業訓練制度之挑戰及其因應。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學勞工研究所,台北市。 黃俊蓉(2005)。影響企業提供員工在職訓練因素之探討。未出版之碩士論文,中國文化大學勞動學研究所,台北市。 黃玲鳳(2003)。知識經濟下我國職業訓練政策之初探。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學勞工研究所,台北市。 黃麗璇、王雅鈴(2001)。員工在職訓練之成效分析-以新竹科學園區廠商為例。收錄於單驥、張明宗編,人力資源與台灣高科技產業發展(頁77-97)。桃園縣:國立中央大學台灣經濟發展研究中心。 劉賢靜(1996)。台灣一千家大企業辦理訓練之影響因素及訓練需求之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所,嘉義縣。 賴美秀(1993)。銀行業辦理訓練意願及相關因素之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學勞工研究所,嘉義縣。 簡建忠(1994)。台灣企業人力資源發展。勞資關係論叢,第1期,頁109-130。 外文部份 Anonymous (Feb 10, 2004). Training programme leads to increase in market share. Personnel Today, 8. Acemoglu, D. & Pischke, J.-M. (1998). Why do firm train? Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 79-119. Acemoglu, D. & Pischke, J.-M. (1999). Beyond Becker: Training in imperfect labour markets. Economic Journal, 109(453), Features, F112-F142. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Barron, J. M., Black, D. A., & Loewenstein, M. A. (1987). Employer size: The implications for search, training, capital investment, starting wages, and wage growth. Journal of Labor Economics, 5(1), 76-89. Belman, D. & Heywood, J. S. (1990). Market structure and worker quality. Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(2), 155-168. Black, D. A., Noel, B. J., & Wang, Z. (1999). On-the-job training, establishment size, and firm size: Evidence for economics of scale in the production of human capital. Southern Economic Journal, 66(1), 82-100. Brown, C., Hamilton, J., & Medoff J.(1990). Employers large and small. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Ehrenberg, R. G. & Smith R. S. (2003). Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy (8th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley. Eicher, T. S. & Kim, S. C. (1999). Market structure and innovation revisited: Endogenous productivity, training and market shares. Discussion papers in Economics at University of Washington, No.0075. Available from author’s website: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/eicher98market.html. Forrier, A. & Sels, L. (2003). Flexibility, turnover and training. International Journal of Manpower, 24(2), pp. 148-208. Gersbach, H. & Schutzler, A. (2001). A product market theory of worker training (2004 revised). IZA discussion paper No. 327. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Available from IZA website: http://www.iza.org/. Path: Publications; Discussion Papers. Guadalupe, M. (2005). Product market competition, returns to skill and wage inequality. IZA discussion paper No. 1556. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Available from IZA website: http://www.iza.org/. Path: Publications; Discussion Papers. Knoke, D. & Kalleberg, A. L. (1994). Job training in U.S. organization. American Sociological Review, 59(4), 537-546. Li, Y. (1992). Toward a theory of firms’ training and development behavior under externality: A game theoretic analysis and experimental evidence [Abstract]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona. Retrieved 2007/03/02, from ProQuest Digital Dissertation. Lynch, L. M. (Ed.). (1994). Training and the private sector: International comparisons. (National Bureau of Economic Research comparative labor market series). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lynch, L. M. & Black, S. E. (1998). Beyond the incidence of employer-provided training. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52(1), pp. 64-81. Majumdar, S. (2007). Market conditions and worker training: How does it affect and whom? Labour Economics, 14, 1-23. Mincer, J. (1988). Job training, wage growth, and labor turnover. NBER working paper NO. 2690. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. OECD (1996). The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: OECD. Retrieved 2007/02/20, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/8/1913021.pdf OECD (2002). Working party on employment and unemployment statistics: Harmonization of training statistics. Paris: OECD. Retrieved 2007/02/20, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/11/1943537.pdf Olson, L. (1986). Training trend: the corporate view. Training and Development Journal, 40(9), 32-35. Royalty, A. B. (1996). The effects of job turnover on the training of men and women. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 49(3), pp. 506-521. Schultz, T. W. (1960). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17. Stern, D. & Ritzen, J. M. M. (Eds.). (1991). Market failure in training? New economic analysis and evidence on training of adult employees. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Stevens, M. (1994). A theoretical model of on-the-job training with imperfect competition. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 46(4), 537-562. Stigler, G. J. (1962). Information in the labor market. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), pp. 94-105. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28614 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在過去探討「影響廠商辦理職業訓練之因素」的相關研究中,多半是從廠商內部的影響因素來探討,包括廠商本身的規模大小、廠商技術水準、廠商本身的員工流動率和員工教育程度等,而較少從廠商的外部環境(即市場)來探討。本研究主要即是從市場結構(包括產品市場和勞動市場)以及勞動市場供需狀況,來探討廠商職業訓練的投入情形。
透過行政院勞委會90年職類別薪資調查、行政院主計處90年工商及服務業普查和行政院主計處89年薪資與生產力統計年報此三者資料的合併,並以Tobit model對6466個廠商樣本進行迴歸分析,本研究發現: 1、產品市場集中度對廠商職業訓練支出具有正向且顯著的影響; 2、勞動市場集中度對廠商職業訓練支出具有負向且顯著的影響; 3、缺工率對廠商職業訓練支出具有正向且顯著的影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the pass, the related studies which discussed the factors of firm-provided training focused on the internal organization factors of firm, including its size, technical level, turnover rate of staff, and education level of staff and so on. It is rare to discuss this topic from the viewpoint of the external environment factors of firm. This study mainly discusses how market structure (both product market and labor market), labor demand and supply condition affect the density of firm-provided training.
By merging the 2001 training investigation data provided by Council of Labor Affairs of Executive Yuan, Taiwan, the 2001 industry, commerce and service census by Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of Executive Yuan, Taiwan and the yearbook of earnings and productivity statistics by Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of Executive Yuan, Taiwan in 2000, I have 6,466 samples and then use the Tobit model for the regression analysis. This study discovered as follows: 1. The concentration of product market has a positive and significant effect to the density of firm-provided training; 2. The concentration of labor market has a negative and significant effect to the density of firm-provided training; 3. The shortage of labor has a positive and significant effect to the density of firm-provided training. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:14:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R92341009-1.pdf: 414772 bytes, checksum: 3a6b22cd531e486dc0ab6755ebcdec28 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………Ⅰ
誌謝……………………………………………………………………Ⅱ 中文摘要………………………………………………………………Ⅲ 英文摘要………………………………………………………………Ⅳ 目錄……………………………………………………………………Ⅴ 圖目錄…………………………………………………………………Ⅶ 表目錄…………………………………………………………………Ⅷ 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………1 1.1 研究動機與目的……………………………………………1 1.2 研究流程……………………………………………………5 1.3 章節安排……………………………………………………6 第二章 理論分析與文獻回顧………………………………………7 2.1 市場結構對廠商職業訓練投入之影響……………………7 2.2 勞動市場供需狀況對廠商職業訓練投入之影響…………19 2.3 其他影響廠商職業訓練投入之因素………………………23 2.4 小結…………………………………………………………26 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………30 3.1 研究架構……………………………………………………30 3.2 研究假設……………………………………………………32 3.3 資料來源、處理與變數定義………………………………33 第四章 實證結果之分析……………………………………………38 4.1 樣本分析……………………………………………………38 4.2 迴歸分析……………………………………………………39 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………46 5.1 研究結論……………………………………………………46 5.2 研究建議……………………………………………………47 參考文獻………………………………………………………………48 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 市場結構與勞動市場供需狀況對廠商職業訓練投入之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effects of Market Structure, Labor Demand and Supply Condition to the Density of Firm-provided Training | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 于若蓉,黃芳玫 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 職業訓練,市場結構,HHI指標,缺工率,托比特模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | job training,market structure,Herfindahl-Hirschman index,labor shortage rate,Tobit model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 52 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國家發展研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 405.05 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。