請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28376
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周家蓓 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-che Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭羽哲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:06:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Shahin, Mohamed Y, “Pavement management for airports, roads, and parking lots”, New York : Chapman & Hall, 1994
2. US DOT/FAA, “Operational Life of Airport Pavements”, 2004.12 3. Kulkarni, R., K. Golabi, F.Finn, E. Alviti, and J.L. Nazareth., “Development of a Network Optimization System”, Vol I and II. Arizona DOT, Phoenix., 1980 4. 廖子凱,「影像處理應用於鋪面破壞辨識之研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,民國八十二年。 5. GAO, USA, “AIRFIELD PAVEMENT Keeping Nation’s Runways in Good Condition Could Require Substantially Higher Spending”, 1998 6. FAA, 'Airport Pavement Management Program(AC150_5380_7A)', 2006.9.1 7. http://www.apwa.net/About/SIG/MicroPaver/ 8. Schwartz, Charles W.; Witczak, Matthew W. Rada, Gonzalo R. (Pavement Consultancy Services) ; Rabinow, Scott D., “Integrated pavement management system for Kennedy international airport”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, v 118, n 5, Sep-Oct, 1992, p 666-685 9. http://www.airportseminar.com/airpav.htm 10. 劉耀斌、林志棟,「機場鋪面管理回顧與簡介」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,民國九十四年 11. 浜 昌志, 反町 容, 猪岡英夫, 「中部国際空港における舗装管理システム(CAPMS)の開発について」, こうえいフォーラム第14 号, 2006.1 12. Abaza, Khaled A. (Birzeit Univ., Dept. of Civil Engineering) , “Optimum flexible pavement life-cycle analysis model”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, v 128, n 6, November/December, 2002, p 542-549 13. George, k. P., A. S. Rajagopal, and L. K. Lim, “Models for Predictiong Pavement Deterioration”, Transportation Research Record, n 1215, 1989, p 1-7 14. Shahin, Mohamed Y., “New Techniques for Modeling Pavement Deterioration”, Transportation Research Record, n 1215, 1989, p 40-46 15. Yuan, Jie (Fugro South, Inc.); Mooney, Michael A., “Development of Adaptive Performance Models for Oklahoma Airfield Pavement Management System”, Transportation Research Record, n 1853, 2003, p 44-54 16. FAA , “GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR MAINTENANCE OF AIRPORT PAVEMENTS (AC150/5380-6A)”, 2003 17. 林美伶,「機場鋪面管理系統之研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,民國九十年六月 18. US DOT/FAA , “Operational Life of Airport Pavements”, 2004.12 19. FAA Office of Aviation Policy and Plans , “FAA AIRPORT BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS GUIDANCE”, 1999.12.15 20. 李穗玲、韓復華、汪進財(民88),「機場跑道起降順序最佳化模式之研究」,交通運輸,第十八期,頁1-20。 21. FAA, ”Airport Capacity and Delay (AC 150/5060-5)”, 1983. 22. Odoni, A. R., “Existing and Required Modeling Capabilities for Evaluating ATM Systems and Concepts”, 1997, pp. 23-48. 23. 戴佐敏、劉仲祥、李昀諭(民93),「機場模擬模式之建立與跑道容量分析」,運輸計畫季刊,第三十三卷,第三期,頁471-510。 24. Bielli, M., Calicchio, G., Nicoletti, B. asnd Ricciardelli, S., “The Air Traffic Flow Control Problem as an Application of Network Theory”, Computer and Ops. Res. Vol.9 No.4, pp.265-278, 1982. 25. Helme, M. P., and Lindsay, K., “Optimization of Traffic Flow to Minimized Delay in the National Airspace System”, IEEE. Pp.435-437, 1992/ 26. 周雅蕊,「流量管理之地面等候策略之研究」,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文,民國八十六年 27. 傅耀南,「機場跑道航管容量推估與飛航流量管制模式之研究」,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所博士論文,民國八十六年 28. European Organisation for the Safety of Air navigation, “Standard Inputs for EUROCONTROL Cost Benefit Analyses”, 2005.2 29. FAA Office of Aviation Policy and Plans, “Economic Values for FAA Investment and Regulatory Decisions”, 2004.12.31 30. 民用航空局,「中正國際機場道面整建策略及評估計畫—工程計畫書」,民國九十四年三月 31. 江東曉,「機場跑滑道停機坪維護成本分析」,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,民國九十五年 32. 黃書猛,「機場鋪面維修系統建立之研究」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國九十年 33. 陳治中,「智慧型機場剛性鋪面維修專家系統之應用」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國九十年 34. Keegan, Katherine (MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.); Murrell, Scott D.; Zummo, Guy; Rada, Gonzalo, “Assessment and rehabilitation of foreign object damage potential on airfield shoulder and blast pavements: Case of John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York”, Transportation Research Record, n 1915, 2005, p 105-111 35. Gendreau, Michel (Universite de Montreal); Soriano, Patrick, “Airport pavement management systems: An appraisal of existing methodologies”, Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice, v 32, n 3, Apr, 1998, p 197-214 36. Ravirala, Venkatesh (Rensselaer Polytech Inst); Grivas, Dimitri A., “State increment method of life-cycle cost analysis for highway management”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, v 1, n 3, Sep, 1995, p 151-159 37. GAO, USA , 'NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM: FAA Has Made Progress but Continues to Face Challenges in Acquiring Major Air Traffic Control Systems', 2005.6 38. Michael T. McNerney, Ph. D., P.E. and Robert Harrison, ”Full-Cost Approach to Airport Pavement Management”, 2000 39. Bruinsma, Peshkin, Wade, and Delatte, “ACCELERATED PRACTICES FOR AIRFIELD CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PLANNING PHASE”, TRB 2007 Annual Meeting 40. Peshkin, Wade, Bruinsma, and Delatte, “ACCELERATED PRACTICES FOR AIRFIELD CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE DESIGN PHASE”, TRB 2007 Annual Meeting 41. FAA, “Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements (AC 150/5380-6A)”, 2003.7 42. Bill Weiss, “Airport PMS geared to individual airports”, 2000.9 43. 游俊雄、傅耀南,「考慮混合機型下松山機場跑道容量推估之研究」,運輸計畫季刊,第二十九卷,第三期,頁439-464,民國八十九年 44. 韓復華、郭權鋒、戚文豪,「應用模擬模式推估松山機場容量之分析」,民航季刊,第四卷第一期,頁51-74,民國九十一年 45. Harris, R. M., “Model for Runway Capacity Analysis”, Report No. FAA-EM-73-5, Mclean, VA.: Mitre Co., 1974. 46. Hockaday, S. L. M. and Kanafani, A. K., “Development in Airport Capacity Analysis”, Transportation Research, Vol. 8, 1981, pp.171-180. 47. Jolitz, G. D., “Evaluation of a Mathematical Model for Use in Computing Control Load at ATC Facilities”, FAA, SRDS Report, No. RD-65-69, 1965. 48. Newell, G. F., “Airport Capacity and Delays”, Transportation Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1979, pp. 201-241. 49. Khaled A. Abaza, P.E., ”Optimum Flexible Pavement Life-Cycle Analysis Model”, JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2002.12 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28376 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 機場鋪面管理系統(APMS)已成為國際先進機場之鋪面道面管理輔助決策工具,透過鋪面破壞現況指標(PCI)與其他鋪面參考指標輔助,現有的APMS已能提供高度可信之養護與維修參考決策。而對於全世界之主要國際機場而言,自波音747問世以來所設計之跑道鋪面,至今多半已達到設計壽齡,也需重新進行全面性整建或養護之相關評估。機場道面之養護或整建,對於機場營運皆會產生程度不一之延誤,但機場鋪面之養護決策時常無法與機場營運相關因素配合,使得於養護面較佳之整建策略,未必對於機場運作最為有利。另外,不同之養護策略又將搭配不同之養護工作日,也將對機場運作造成一定程度之衝擊。在航空燃油成本居高不下之下,考量機場營運作業之養護或整建決策已成為未來發展之主流方向。
本研究乃針對雙跑道機場,考量鋪面整建與養護成本,以及不同期程內工程作業造成之航機延誤成本。針對機場跑道自整建後設計生命週期內,以固定頻率與鋪面破壞率形成兩養護策略,先評估不同策略下之鋪面生命週期成本,再搭配不同整建與養護策略所產生之航機延誤量,進而轉為航機延誤成本,並以淨現值與益本比等經濟分析方法進行評估。期藉由實證之方式,以台灣桃園國際機場為研究對象,引入其相關數值後,映證引入延誤成本之跑道整建策略為一可行且更具未來性之跑道整建評估方式。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Airport Pavement Management System (APMS) has been a useful tool for pavement management decision making. Moreover, existing APMS is capable of providing high reliable maintenance strategies by using pavement condition index (PCI) and other performance indices. Nowadays, most runway pavements in major international airports, designed for sustaining Boeing 747, are not only close to design life but also under maintenance and reconstruction (M&R) considerations. Different M&R strategies would make different levels of delay impacts on airport operations. Sometimes, M&R strategies couldn’t cooperate with airport operations, and the best strategies for pavement maintenance may have the negative effect on usual operations. Therefore, in this high oil price age, considering the delay impacts of different airport M&R strategies on airport operations becomes an important task.
This study evaluates different M&R strategies, which are applied at parallel runway airports in which only single runway is in maintenance. In addition, this study considers pavement M&R costs as well as aircraft delay costs induced by different M&R strategies and periods. The life cycle cost (LCC) of runway pavements after M&R measures is estimated based on two maintenance frequency considerations, i.e. fixed maintenance frequency and fixed PCI decreasing, and LCC of different M&R strategies are evaluated by comparing net price values (NPV) and benefit-cost ratios (B/C ratio). Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport is studied for demonstrating. The concept of taking aircraft delay cost into consideration when choosing M&R strategies is proved to be a feasible and innovative evaluation method. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:06:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94521512-1.pdf: 4851049 bytes, checksum: a0f461206442689ba7e27c7f5ca14b33 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 …………………………………………………………I
中文摘要 ……………………………………………… 111 英文摘要 …………………………………………………… V 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………………1 1.1 研究動機………………………………………………….…………………1 1.2 研究目的…………………………………………………………………….3 1.3 研究範圍…………………………………………………………………….4 1.4 研究內容與方法…………………………………………………………… 4 1.5 研究流程…………………………………………………………………….5 第二章 文獻回顧…………………………………………………………………………..7 2.1 機場鋪面管理系統…………………………………………………………..7 2.1.1 鋪面管理系統發展簡介……………………………………………7 2.1.2 機場鋪面管理系統之發展………………………………………..11 2.1.3 機場鋪面管理系統發展現況……………………………………………..13 2.1.4 我國機場鋪面管理系統現況……………………………………..16 2.2 鋪面生命週期預測與成本…………………………………………………18 2.2.1 鋪面生命週期概念………………………………………………..18 2.2.2 鋪面生命週期預測模式…………………………………………..19 2.2.3 鋪面生命週期成本………………………………………………...21 2.3 跑道容量與延誤預測……………………………………………………….22 2.3.1 跑道容量模式……………………………………………………...20 2.3.2 機場延誤成本預測………………………………………………...25 第三章 模式建構………………………………………………………………………27 3.1 跑道容量與延誤時間預測模式………………………………………… 27 3.1.1 基本概念與假設…………………………………………………27 3.1.2 跑道容量預測模式………………………………………………28 3.1.3 延誤時間預測模式………………………………………………29 3.2 PCI預測模式………………………………………………………………30 3.3 跑道生命週期成本………………………………………………………...31 3.3.1 生命週期成本概念……………………………………………….31 3.3.2 跑道生命週期成本……………………………………………….32 3.3.3 航機延誤成本…………………………………………………….32 3.4 經濟分析模式………………………………………………………………33 第四章 調查作業與參數設定……………………………………………………………35 4.1 機場調查作業………………………………………………………………35 4.1.1 調查作業說明……………………………………………………..35 4.1.2 調查結果…………………………………………………………..36 4.2 跑道容量參數設定與校估…………………………………………………38 4.2.1 參數設定…………………………………………………………..38 4.2.2 模式校估…………………………………………………………..39 4.3 成本參數……………………………………………………………………43 4.3.1 跑道生命週期成本參數…………………………………………..43 4.3.2 航機延誤成本……………………………………………………..44 4.4 PCI預測模式驗證………………………………………………………….45 第五章 整建策略分析…………………………………………………………………47 5.1 延誤成本觀點……………………………………………………………47 5.1.1 全面性重建……………………………………………………..47 5.1.2 加鋪整建………………………………………………………..50 5.2 考量延誤成本之經濟效益分析…………………………………………58 5.2.1 經濟效益之初探………………………………………………..58 5.2.2 全面性重建……………………………………………………..60 5.2.3 加鋪整建………………………………………………………..62 5.2.4 混合策略比較…………………………………………………..64 5.3 鋪面破壞觀點…………………………………………………………….66 5.3.1 全面性重建……………………………………………………...66 5.3.2 加鋪整建………………………………………………………..69 5.4 考量鋪面破壞之經濟效益分析………………………………………….74 5.4.1 全面性重建……………………………………………………...75 5.4.2 加鋪整建…………………………………………………………76 5.4.3 混合策略比較……………………………………………………80 5.5 小結………………………………………………………………………..82 第六章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………………83 6.1 結論………………………………………………………………………..83 6.2 建議………………………………………………………………………..84 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………85 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 考量延誤成本之跑道整建策略—以桃園國際機場為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Runway Reconstruction Strategies Determined by Delay Cost—Take Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport for Example | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 汪進財,郭振銘 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 機場鋪面管理系統,鋪面整建策略,鋪面生命週期成本,航機延誤成本, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Airport Pavement Management System (APMS),reconstruction and maintenance (M&R) strategy,pavement life cycle cost (LCC),delay cost, | en |
dc.relation.page | 88 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.74 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。