請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28278完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉懷勝(Hwai-Shen Liu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Tin Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張亦廷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:04:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. K. M. Ulmer. Protein engineering. Science. 219 (4585), p. 666-671.(1983)
2. L. Alberghina. Protein engineering in industry biotechnology. Harwood Academic publisher, Amsterdam.(2000) 3. B. Nolting. Protein Folding Kinetics. 2nd ed., Springer, New York.(2006) 4. N. A. Campbell, J. B. Reece, L. G. Mitchell, M. R. Taylor. Biology : concepts & connections, 4th ed., p. 45, Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco. (1996) 5. S. Misawa, I. Kumagai. Refolding of therapeutic proteins produced in Escherichia coli as inclusion bodies. Biopolymers (Peptide Science). 51, p. 297-307.(1999) 6. C. M. Dobson. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature. 426, p. 884-890.(2003) 7. J. F. Kane, D. L. Hartley. Formation of recombinant protein inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli. Trends in Biotechnology. 6 (5), p. 95-101.(1988) 8. R. H. Pain. Mechanisms of protein folding. Oxford University Press, New York.(1994) 9. H. Neurath, J. P. Greenstein, F. W. Putnam, J. A. Erickson. The chemistry of protein denaturation. Chemical Reviews. 34 (2), p. 157-265.(1944) 10. J. C. B. Anfinsen, M. L. Anson, J. T. Edsall, F. M. Richards. Advances in protein chemistry. Vol. 23, Academic Press, New York. p. 173-178.(1968) 11. J. C. B. Anfinsen, M. L. Anson, J. T. Edsall, F. M. Richards. Advances in protein chemistry. Vol. 23, Academic Press, New York. p. 159-173.(1968) 12. J. C. B. Anfinsen, M. L. Anson, J. T. Edsall, F. M. Richards. Advances in protein chemistry. Vol. 23, Academic Press, New York. p. 182-187.(1968) 13. M. K. Campbell, 林順富, 陳師瑩, 顏瑞鴻, 蕭慧美. 生物化學. 3rd ed., 偉明, 台北. p. 123.(2001) 14. C. B. Anfinsen. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science. 181 (4096), p. 223-230.(1973) 15. M. Matsubara, D. Nohara, E. Kurimoto, Y. Kuroda, T. Sakai. 'Loose folding' and 'delayed oxidation' procedure successfully applied for refolding of fully reduced hen egg white lysozyme. Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin 41 (7), p. 1207-1210.(1993) 16. 廖慧媚. 復性緩衝液中氧化還原對溶菌(酉每)復性之研究. 台灣大學碩士論文.(2003) 17. R. Rudolph, S. Fischer. Process of obtaining renatured protein. U. S. Patent. 493343.(1990) 18. B. Fischer, B. Perry, I. Summer, P. Goodenough. A novel sequential procedure to enhance the renaturation of recombinant protein from Escherichia coli inclusion bodies. Protein Engineering. 5, p. 593-596.(1992) 19. S. Katoh, M. Terashima, H. Kishida, H. Yagi. Refolding efficiency of lysozyme in fed-batch system. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 30 (5), p. 964-966.(1997) 20. Y. Katoh, M. Farshbaf, N. Kurooka, D. Nohara, S. Katoh. High yield refolding of lysozyme and carbonic anhydrase at high protein concentrations. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 33 (5), p. 773-777.(2000) 21. 高敏展. 週期性饋料復性法對溶菌(酉每)復性行為之研究. 台灣大學碩士論文.(2002) 22. Y. Maeda, H. Yamada, T. Ueda, T. Imoto. Effect of additives on the renaturation of reduced lysozyme in the presence of 4M urea. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection. 9 (5), p. 461-465.(1996) 23. M. Yasuda, Y. Murakami, A. Sowa, H. Ogino, H. Ishikawa. Effect of additives on refolding of a denatured protein. Biotechnology Progress 14, p. 601-606.(1998) 24. A. P. J. Middelberg. Preparative protein refolding. Trends in Biotechnology. 20 (10), p. 437-443.(2002) 25. Y. Maeda, H. Koga, H. Yamada, T. Ueda, T. Imoto. Effective renaturation of reduced lysozyme by gentle removal of urea. Protein Engineering. 8 (2), p. 201-205.(1995) 26. S. M. West, J. B. Chaudhuri, J. A. Howell. Improved protein refolding using hollow-fibre membrane dialysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 57 (5), p. 590-599.(1998) 27. A. J. Hagen, T. A. Hatton, D. I. C. Wang. Protein refolding in reversed micelles. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 35, p. 955-965.(1990) 28. A. Jungbauer, W. Kaar, R. Schlegl. Folding and refolding of proteins in chromatographic beds. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 15, p. 487-494.(2004) 29. X. Geng, X. Chang. High-performance hydrophobic interaction chromatography as a tool for protein refolding. Journal of Chromatography A. 599 (1-2), p. 185-194.(1992) 30. E. F. Osserman, R. E. Canfield, S. Beychok. Lysozyme. Academic Press, New York.(1972) 31. C. C. F. Blake, D. F. Koenig, G. A. Mair, A. C. T. North, D. C. Phillips, V. R. Sarma. Structure of hen egg-white lysozyme. Nature. 206, p. 757-761.(1965) 32. B. van den Berg, E. W. Chung, C. V. Robinson, C. M. Dobson. Characterisation of the dominant oxidative folding intermediate of hen lysozyme Journal of Molecular Biology 290 (3), p. 781-796.(1999) 33. C. M. Dobson, P. A. Evans, S. E. Radford. Understanding how proteins fold: the lysozyme story so far. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 19 (1), p. 31-37.(1994) 34. 楊美桂. 微生物學. 藝軒, 台北. p. 30.(2003) 35. R. H. Garrett, C. M. Grisham. Biochemistry. Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth.(1995) 36. C. M. Dobson. Principles of protein folding, misfolding and aggregation. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 15, p. 3-16.(2004) 37. A. Matagne, S. E. Radford, C. M. Dobson. Fast and slow tracks in lysozyme folding: Insight into the role of domains in the folding process. Journal of Molecular Biology. 267 (5), p. 1068-1074.(1997) 38. B. van den Berg, E. W. Chung, C. V. Robinson, P. L. Mateo, C. M. Dobson. The oxidative refolding of hen lysozyme and its catalyst by protein disulfide isomerase. Embo Journal. 18 (17), p. 4794-4803.(1999) 39. M. E. Goldberg, R. Rudolph, R. Jaenicke. A kinetic study of the competition between renaturation and aggregation during the refolding of denatured-reduced egg white lysozyme. Biochemistry. 30 (11), p. 2790-2797.(1991) 40. R. Rudolph, G. Zettlmeissl, R. Jaenicke. Reconstitution of lactic dehydrogenase. Noncovalent aggregation vs. reactivation. 2. Reactivation of irreversibly denatured aggregates. Biochemistry. 18 (25), p. 5572-5575.(1979) 41. B. Raman, T. Ramakrishna, C. M. Rao. Refolding of denatured and denatured/reduced lysozyme at high concentrations. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 271 (29), p. 17067-17072.(1996) 42. D. L. Hevenhan, E. De Bernardez Clark. Oxidative Renaturation of Lysozyme at High Concentrations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 54 (3), p. 221-230.(1997) 43. W. Shalongo, R. Ledger, M. V. Jagannadham, E. Stellwagen. Refolding of denatured thioredoxin observed by size-exclusion chromatography. Biochemistry. 26 (11), p. 3135-3141.(1987) 44. W. Shalongo, M. V. Jagannadham, C. Flynn, E. Stellwagen. Refolding of denatured ribonuclease observed by size exclusion chromatography. Biochemistry. 28 (11), p. 4820-4825.(1989) 45. M. H. Werner, G. M. Clore, A. M. Gronenborn, A. Kondoh, R. J. Fisher. Refolding proteins by gel filtration chromatography. FEBS Letters. 345, p. 125-130.(1994) 46. B. Batas, J. B. Chaudhuri. Protein refolding at high concentration using size-exclusion chromatography. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 50, p. 16-23.(1996) 47. S. S. S. Wang, C.-K. Chang, H.-S. Liu. Step change of mobile phase flow rates to enhance protein folding in size exclusion chromatography. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 29 (1-2), p. 2-11.(2006) 48. S. S. S. Wang, C.-K. Chang, H.-S. Liu. Effect of sample loop dimension on lysozyme refolding in size-exclusion chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.104.(2007) 49. S. R. Harrowing, J. B. Chaudhuri. Effect of column dimensions and flow rates on size-exclusion refolding of β-lactamase. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods. 56, p. 177-188.(2003) 50. E. M. Fahey, J. B. Chaudhuri, P. Binding. Refolding and purification of a urokinase plasminogen activator fragment by chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 737 (1-2), p. 225-235.(2000) 51. Z. Gu, X. Zhu, S. Ni, H. Zhou, Z. Su. Inhibition of aggregation by media selection, sample loading and elution in size exclusion chromatographic refolding of denatured bovine carbonic anhydrase B. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods 56, p. 165-175.(2003) 52. Y. G. Gao, Y. X. Guan, S. J. Yao, M. G. Cho. Lysozyme refolding at high concentration by dilution and size-exclusion chromatography. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE. 4 (2), p. 136-141.(2003) 53. B. Batas, J. B. Chaudhuri. The influence of operational parameters on lysozyme refolding using size-exclusion chromatography. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering. 24, p. 255-259.(2001) 54. Q. Bai, Y. Kong, C. Dong, X. Geng. Studies on the refolding of the reduced-denatured insulin with size exclusion chromatography. Science in China, Series B: Chemistry. 48 (SUPPL), p. 55-59.(2005) 55. C. Wang, L. Wang, X. Geng. Renaturation of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor produced from Escherichia coli using size exclusion chromatography. Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies. 29 (3), p. 203-217.(2006) 56. Z. Gu, Z. Su, J.-C. Janson. Urea gradient size-exclusion chromatography enhanced the yield of lysozyme refolding. Journal of Chromatography A. 918, p. 311-318.(2001) 57. Z. Gu, M. Weidenhaupt, N. Ivanova, M. Pavlov, B. Xu, Z.-G. Su, J.-C. Janson. Chromatographic methods for the isolation of, and refolding of proteins from, Escherichia coli inclusion bodies. Protein Expression and Purification. 25, p. 174-179.(2002) 58. 陳淨, 劉永東, 李京京, 蘇志國. 液固層析輔助蛋白質從變性態恢復到活性態. 化工學報. 57 (8), p. 1802-1809.(2006) 59. D. Batas, J. B. Chaudhuri. Protein refolding at high concentration using size-exclusion chromatography. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 50 (1), p. 16-23.(1996) 60. B. Batas, H. R. Jones, J. B. Chaudhuri. Studies of the hydrodynamic volume changes that occur during refolding of lysozyme using size-exclusion chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 766 (1-2), p. 109-119.(1997) 61. M. Gauthier, P. A. Patston. Reactivation of C1-inhibitor polymers by denaturation and gel-filtration chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry. 248, p. 228-233.(1997) 62. B. Batas, J. B. Chaudhuri. Considerations of sample application and elution during size-exclusion chromatography-based protein refolding. Journal of Chromatography A. 864, p. 229-236.(1999) 63. C. Muller, U. Rinas. Renaturation of heterodimeric platelet-derived growth factor from inclusion bodies of recombinant Escherichia coli using size-exclusion chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 855, p. 203-213.(1999) 64. B. Batas, J. B. Chaudhuri. Considerations of sample application and elution during size-exclusion chromatography-based protein refolding. Journal of Chromatography A. 864 (2), p. 229-236.(1999) 65. E. M. Fahey, J. B. Chaudhuri, P. Binding. Refolding and purification of a urokinase plasminogen activator fragment by chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B. 737 (1-2), p. 225-235.(2000) 66. I. Garcia-Saez, R. H. A. Plasterk. Purification of the Caenorhabditis elegans transposase Tc1A refolded during gel filtration chromatography. Protein Expression and Purification. 19, p. 355-361.(2000) 67. B. Batas, J. B. Chaudhuri. The influence of operational parameters on lysozyme refolding using size-exclusion chromatography. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering. 24 (4), p. 255-259.(2001) 68. Z. Y. Gu, Z. G. Su, J. C. Janson. Urea gradient size-exclusion chromatography enhanced the yield of lysozyme refolding. Journal of Chromatography A. 918 (2), p. 311-318.(2001) 69. Z. Y. Gu, M. Weidenhaupt, N. Ivanova, M. Pavlov, B. Z. Xu, Z. G. Su, J. C. Janson. Chromatographic methods for the isolation of and refolding of proteins from, Escherichia coli inclusion bodies. Protein Expression and Purification. 25 (1), p. 174-179.(2002) 70. Z. Y. Gu, X. N. Zhu, S. W. Ni, H. M. Zhou, Z. G. Su. Inhibition of aggregation by media selection, sample loading and elution in size exclusion chromatographic refolding of denatured bovine carbonic anhydrase B. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods. 56 (1-3), p. 165-175.(2003) 71. S. R. Harrowing, J. B. Chaudhuri. Effect of column dimensions and flow rates on size-exclusion refolding of beta-lactamase. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods. 56 (1-3), p. 177-188.(2003) 72. H.-S. Liu, C.-K. Chang. Chaperon solvent plug to enhance protein refolding in size exclusion chromatography. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 33, p. 424-429.(2003) 73. R. Schlegl, G. Iberer, C. Machold, R. Necina, A. Jungbauer. Continuous matrix-assisted refolding of proteins. Journal of Chromatography A. 1009 (1-2), p. 119-132.(2003) 74. H. Lanckriet, A. P. J. Middelberg. Continuous chromatographic protein refolding. Journal of Chromatography A. 1022 (1-2), p. 103-113.(2004) 75. S. S. S. Wang, C. K. Chang, M. J. Peng, H. S. Liu. Effect of glutathione redox system on lysozyme refolding in size exclusion chromatography. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 84 (1 C), p. 18-27.(2006) 76. 張哲魁. 以大小排阻層析法進行蛋白質復性之研究. 台灣大學博士論文.(2005) 77. R. Stevens, L. Stevens, N. C. Price. The stabilities of various thiol compounds used in protein purifications. Biochemical Education. 11 (2), p. 70.(1983) 78. M. R. Rahimpour, A. Azarpour. Simulation of a urea thermal hydrolysis reactor. Chemical Engineering Communications. 192 (2), p. 155-167.(2005) 79. 劉紅妮, 龔波林, 耿信篤. 離子交換色譜對溶菌(酉每)複性的色譜條件優化. 西北大學學報(自然科學網路版). 2 (11), p. 0109.(2004) 80. D. M. Rothwarf, H. A. Scheraga. Equilibrium and kinetic constants for the thiol-disulfide interchange reaction between glutathione and dithiothreitol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 89 (17), p. 7944-7948.(1992) 81. 張學凱. 復性緩衝液中的成份變化對蛋白質復性之研究. 台灣大學碩士論文.(2004) 82. 張棨翔. 二硫代蘇糖醇對溶菌(酉每)變性及復性程式之影響. 台灣大學碩士論文.(2007) 83. N. Shimaki, K. Ikeda, K. Hamaguchi. Interaction of urea and guanidine hydrochloride with lysozyme. The Journal of Biochemistry. 70, p. 497-508.(1971) 84. B. Batas, H. R. Jones, J. B. Chaudhuri. Studies of the hydrodynamic volume changes that occur during refolding of lysozyme using size-exclusion chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 766, p. 109-119.(1997) 85. B. J. Park, C. H. Lee, S. Mun, Y. M. Koo. Novel application of simulated moving bed chromatography to protein refolding. Process Biochemistry. 41, p. 1072-1082.(2006) 86. M. Goto, Y. Hashimoto, T.-a. Fujita, T. Ono, S. Furusaki. Important parameters affecting efficiency of protein refolding by reversed micelles. Biotechnology Progress 16, p. 1079-1085.(2000) 87. R. E. Benesch, R. Benesch. The acid strength of the -SH group in cysteine and related compounds. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 77 (22), p. 5773-6090.(1955) 88. J. C. Moore. Gel permeation chromatography I, new method for molecular weight distribution of high polymers. Journal of Polymer Science. Part B, Polymer letters. 2, p. 835-843.(1964) 89. W. W. Yau, J. J. Kirkland, D. D. Bly. Modern size-exclusion liquid chromatography : Practice of gel permeation and gel filtration chromatography. Wiley, New York. p. 21.(1979) 90. W. W. Yau, J. J. Kirkland, D. D. Bly. Modern size-exclusion liquid chromatography : Practice of gel permeation and gel filtration chromatography. Wiley, New York. p. 23.(1979) 91. Z. Li, Y. Gu, T. Gu. Mathematical modeling and scale-up of size-exclusion chromatography. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2 (2), p. 145-155.(1998) 92. W. W. Yau, J. J. Kirkland, D. D. Bly. Modern size-exclusion liquid chromatography : Practice of gel permeation and gel filtration chromatography. Wiley, New York. p. 53-95.(1979) 93. M. Netopilik. Relations between the separation coefficient, longitudinal displacement and peak broadening in size exclusion chromatography of macromolecules. Journal of Chromatography A. 978 (1-2), p. 109-117.(2002) 94. A. C. Ouano, J. A. Barker. A computer simulation of linear gel permeation chromatography. Separation science. 8 (6), p. 673-699.(1973) 95. B. Zelic, B. Nesek. Mathematical modeling of size exclusion chromatography. Engineering in Life Sciences. 6 (2), p. 163-169.(2006) 96. J. R. Conder. Peak distortion in chromatography. Part 1: Concentration-dependent behavior. Journal of High Resolution Chromatography. 5 (7), p. 341-348.(1982) 97. J. R. Conder. Peak distortion in chromatography. Part 2: Kinetically controlled factors. Journal of High Resolution Chromatography. 5 (8), p. 397-403.(1982) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28278 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 大小排阻層析法(size exclusion chromatography, SEC)近十年來被應用於蛋白質的復性皆有不錯的效果,其優點在於SEC管柱的多孔性膠體不會與蛋白質起化學反應,純粹只是利用膠體的孔洞,將不同構形的蛋白質分離。雖然以SEC進行蛋白質復性能降低在管柱內聚集體的生成,但SEC蛋白質復性仍需考慮兩個重點:(1)管柱前端聚集;(2)正確雙硫鍵的形成。前者影響到質量回收率,後者影響到活性回收率的優劣。由實驗結果發現,復性緩衝液的尿素濃度對質量回收率有很大的影響,尿素濃度越高,質量回收率越高(6 M以上可達94 %);而復性緩衝液的pH值對活性回收率相關,在pH約10.5時,活性回收率達最大值(約70 %)。
本論文主要探討SEC蛋白質復性的操作條件,分成三個部分作討論:(1)變性程序的變因對SEC蛋白質復性的影響;(2)復性程序的變因對SEC蛋白質復性的影響;(3)以數學程式來模擬蛋白質於SEC中分離的層析圖。在第一部分中,討論經過不同變性時間以及不同變性蛋白質濃度以SEC進行復性所得的復性效果,實驗結果發現,蛋白質經過變性時間越長,復性活性越差,而蛋白質操作濃度在1~10 g/L時,質量回收率和活性回收率並無太大的差異(分別為70~75 %以及30 %),當濃度達20 g/L時,質量回收率和活性回收率才有稍微明顯地下降(分別為61 %以及24 %)。第二部分中,我們討論了復性緩衝液的流速、尿素濃度以及pH值對SEC復性效果的影響,低流速可獲得較佳的活性回收率,高流速可獲得較高的質量回收率,而提高尿素濃度可有效抑制聚集體的生成,適當的pH可獲得較高的活性回收率。第三部分我們用Matlab程式模擬蛋白質經SEC分離後的層析圖,已可預測在不同流動相流速下原態蛋白質析出的層析圖。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In recent decades, protein refolding by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) has been proven feasible in terms of its good mass recovery and activity recovery. One of the advantages of SEC is that there is no chemical interaction between protein and the column matrix. In addition, the porous property enables SEC to separate the protein with various conformations. Protein refolding by SEC can minimize the formation of aggregates with careful consideration of the following two important aspects: (1) the formation of aggregates in the inlet tubing prior to column, and (2) the formation of correct disulfide bond in refolding protein. The former is related to protein mass recovery, while the latter is crucial to activity recovery. From the experimental results, it can be concluded that the urea concentration in the refolding buffer has a significant effect on mass recovery as demonstrated by the higher urea concentration yielding higher mass recovery (up to 94 % when urea concentration is higher than 6 M). The pH value of the refolding buffer also affects the recovery of refolded protein significantly with the maximum activity of recovery of 70 % at pH 10.5.
This research work mainly focuses on the effects of operating variables of SEC on protein refolding, and can be divided into three parts: (1) the effect of denaturation process on SEC protein refolding; (2) the effect of renaturation process on SEC protein refolding; (3) the simulation of the elution profile of native protein in SEC. In the first part, the influences of the duration of denaturation and the concentration of denatured protein on SEC protein refolding process are discussed. Our experimental results indicated that the activity recovery was decreased with increasing denaturation time. When protein concentrations were within 1 to 10 g/L, the mass recovery ranged from 70% to 75 % and the activity of recovery roughly remained constant (30 %). However, when the concentration of denatured protein reached 20 g/L, the mass recovery and the activity recovery of refolded protein were dropped to 61 % and 24%, respectively. In the second part, low mobile phase velocity led to the better activity recovery, while high velocity resulted in higher mass recovery. It was found that elevating urea concentration in refolding buffer suppress formation of aggregates, and appropriate choice of pH, for example, pH 10.5, enhanced the activity recovery. Finally, a program using the Matlab software was devised to describe the chromatogram of the native protein in the SEC column. Results demonstrated that, via the program we developed, the elution profiles of the native protein under different mobile velocities could be simulated in a reasonable manner. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:04:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94524035-1.pdf: 2527803 bytes, checksum: f11ad3d8262f3edb73727a62b501b908 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
ABSTRACT II 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 XIII 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2-1蛋白質工程 3 2-2蛋白質結構 5 2-3穩定蛋白質的作用力 11 2-4生體內(in vivo)蛋白質摺疊程序 14 2-5生體外(in vitro)蛋白質摺疊程序 15 2-6蛋白質的變性 17 2-7蛋白質的復性(renaturation)和再摺疊(refolding) 18 2-8蛋白質復性操作程序 21 2-8-1直接稀釋法 22 2-8-2透析法 23 2-8-3逆微胞法(reverse micelles) 25 2-8-4層析法 26 2-9溶菌(酉每) 29 2-9-1溶菌(酉每)的簡介 29 2-9-2溶菌(酉每)的構造 29 2-9-3溶菌(酉每)的活性測定 32 2-9-4溶菌(酉每)復性動力學 35 2-10以大小排阻層析進行蛋白質復性 39 第三章 實驗裝置、藥品、試劑配製步驟、操作程序以及數據計算 51 3-1實驗裝置 51 3-1-1高效能液相層析儀(HPLC) 51 3-1-2其它實驗裝置 51 3-2實驗藥品 53 3-3實驗試劑配製步驟 55 3-4實驗操作程序 58 3-4-1 SEC蛋白質復性操作程序 58 3-4-2 SEC樣品注射閥至管柱前端聚集體的偵測 59 3-4-3直接稀釋法進行蛋白質復性操作的程序 60 3-5實驗數據計算 60 3-5-1蛋白質復性質量回收率 61 3-5-2蛋白質復性活性 62 第四章 經過不同變性時間對SEC蛋白質復性效果之影響 64 4-1實驗動機 64 4-2經過不同變性時間的蛋白質在SEC蛋白質復性程序的效果 65 4-2-1實驗方法 66 4-2-2實驗結果與討論 67 4-3 結論 73 第五章 不同蛋白質濃度對SEC復性效果之影響 74 5-1實驗動機 74 5-2不同蛋白質濃度對SEC復性效果 74 5-2-1實驗方法 74 5-2-2實驗結果與討論 75 5-3不同蛋白質濃度於SEC管柱前端聚集之討論 78 5-3-1實驗方法 79 5-3-2實驗結果與討論 79 5-4結論 80 第六章 SEC流動相流速對蛋白質復性的影響 82 6-1實驗動機 82 6-2 SEC流動相流速對蛋白質復性的效果 82 6-2-1實驗方法 82 6-2-2實驗結果與討論 83 6-3 SEC流動相流速對管柱前端聚集體的影響 86 6-3-1實驗方法 86 6-3-2實驗結果與討論 86 6-4結論 87 第七章 復性緩衝液中尿素濃度對SEC蛋白質復性的影響 89 7-1實驗動機 89 7-2復性緩衝液中尿素濃度對SEC蛋白質復性效果的影響 90 7-2-1實驗方法 90 7-2-2實驗結果與討論 90 7-3復性緩衝液中尿素濃度以及流動相流速對SEC蛋白質復性的影響 95 7-3-1實驗方法 95 7-3-2實驗結果與討論 95 7-4復性緩衝液中尿素濃度對SEC管柱前端聚集現象的影響 100 7-4-1實驗方法 100 7-4-2實驗結果與討論 100 7-5結論 101 第八章 復性緩衝液中pH值對SEC蛋白質復性的影響 103 8-1實驗動機 103 8-2復性緩衝液中pH值對SEC蛋白質復性之影響 105 8-2-1實驗方法 105 8-2-2實驗結果與討論 106 8-3復性緩衝液中pH值以及流動相流速對SEC蛋白質復性之影響 112 8-3-1實驗方法 112 8-3-2實驗結果與討論 112 8-4復性緩衝液中pH值對SEC管柱前端聚集現象之影響 117 8-4-1實驗方法 117 8-4-2實驗結果與討論 117 8-5結論 118 第九章 以Matlab程式語言模擬SEC蛋白質復性 120 9-1動機 120 9-2 SEC數學理論 121 9-2-1 SEC分離機制 121 9-2-2 SEC數學模型 128 9-3 SEC程式撰寫流程 132 9-4模擬結果 139 9-4-1參數對波峰的影響 140 9-4-2實驗值與模擬值的比較 144 第十章 結論 151 參考文獻 153 附錄 161 附錄A 不同變性蛋白質濃度經過不同變性時間再以SEC進行蛋白質復性程序 161 附錄B 流動相黏度改變對SEC蛋白質波峰的影響 165 附錄C 二成分樣品的SEC模擬層析圖 169 附錄D 樣品於管柱內發生反應的SEC模擬層析圖 171 附錄E Matlab程式 174 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 蛋白質復性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 溶菌(酉每) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 大小排阻層析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Matlab 程式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | lysozyme | en |
| dc.subject | Matlab program | en |
| dc.subject | protein refolding | en |
| dc.subject | size exclusion chromatography | en |
| dc.title | 大小排阻層析法操作程序對蛋白質復性之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Protein Refolding by Size Exclusion Chromatography | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王勝仕,賴進此,吳聲祺 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 溶菌(酉每),大小排阻層析,蛋白質復性,Matlab 程式, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | lysozyme,size exclusion chromatography,protein refolding,Matlab program, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 160 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 化學工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 化學工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
