請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28266
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 葉素玲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hao-Hsiang You | en |
dc.contributor.author | 游皓翔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:03:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action. In H. Heuer & A. Sanders (Eds.), Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action: Perspectives on perceptionand action (pp. 395-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M.I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631-682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Anderson, A. K., & Phelps, E. A. (2001). Lesions of the human amygdale impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature, 411, 305–309. Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness: global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4, 292-309. Braun, J., & Sagi, D. (1990). Vision outside the focus of attention. Percept Psychophysics 48, 45-58. Chen, K. M., You, H. H., & Yeh, S. L. (2007). Subjective time expansion through cross-modal integration. Journal of Vision, 7, 126c. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215. Deahaene, S., Changeux, J-P. (2004). Neuronal mechanisms for access to consciousness. In M Gazzaniga ed. The Cognitive Neurosciences, (3rd ed., pp. 1145-1157). New York: Norton. Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204-211. Dehaene, S., Sergent, C., & Changeux, J-P. (2003). A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8520-8525. Driver, J. (1997). Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature, 381, 66-68. Driver, J., & Spence, C. J. (1999). Crossmodal links in spatial attention. In G.W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, Space, and Action (pp. 130-149). Oxford University Press. Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297. Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Percept Psychophys, 40, 225-240. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh., Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 583-597. Evans, K. K., & Treisman, A. (2006). Role of attention in visual-auditory crossmodal interactions. Journal of Vision, 6, 388a. Frassinetti, F., Bolognini, N., & Làdavas, E. (2002). Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Experimental Brain Research, 147, 332-343 Giard, M.H., & Peronnet, F. (1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 473-490. Ho, C., Mason, O., & Spence, C. (2007). An investigation into the temporal dimension of the Mozart effect: Evidence from the attentional blink task. Acta Psychologica, 125, 117-128. Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature, 290, 91-97. Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of S-S and S-R consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 688-714. Ledoux, J. E. (2002). The synaptic self. New York: Viking. Lo, S. Y., & Yeh, S. L. (2005). Dissociating attention from required processing time. Journal of Vision, 5, 157a. Macaluso, E., & Driver, J. (2005). Multisensory spatial interactions: a window on functional integration in the human brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 28, 264-271. Macaluso, E., Frith, C. D., & Driver, J. (2000). Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. Science, 289, 1206-1208. Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., & Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475-501. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional Blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. W. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748. Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 339-352. Moore, C. M., Grosjean, M., & Lleras, A. (2003). Using inattentional blindness as an operational definition of unattended: The case of surface completion. Visual Cognition, 10, 299-318. Moore, C. M., Lleras, A., Grosjean, M., & Marrara, M. T. (2004). Using inattentional blindness as an operational definition of unattended: The case of a response-end effect. Visual Cognition, 11, 705-719. Morris, J. S., Friston, K. J., Buchel, C., Frith, C. D., Young, A. W., Calder, A. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain, 121, 47–57. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Őhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466–478. Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2005). The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 16, 265-269. Phelps, E. A., Ling, S., & Carrasco, A. (2006) Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science, 17, 292-299. Rock, I., Linnett, C. M., Graint, P., & Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: result of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502-534. Rowland, B. A., Quessy, S., Stanford, T. R., & Stein, B. E. (2007). Multisensory integration shortens physiological response latencies. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5879-5884. Schroeder, C. E., Lindsley, R. W., Specht, C., Marcovici, A., Smiley, J. F., & Javitt, D. C. (2001). The Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 1322-1327. Sergent, C., Baillet, S., & Dehaene S. (2005). Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1391-1400. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2002). Visual illusory induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 147-152. Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Jr., Mewaldt, S. R., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time:Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 16–22. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304. Stanford, T. R., Quessy, S., & Stein, B. E. (2005). Evaluating the operations underlying multisensory integration in the cat superior colliculus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 6499-6508. Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). The merging of the senses. Boston, MA: MIT Press. Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Houghton, G. (1998). Action-based mechanisms of attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological, 353, 1385-1393. Todd, J. J., Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2005). Visual short-term memory load suppresses temporo-parietal junction activity and induces inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 16, 965-972. Treisman, A. (1988). Preattentive processing in vision. In Z.W.Pylyshyn (Ed.), Computational Processes in Human Vision: An Interdisci -plinary Perspective, (pp. 341-369). New Yersey. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. Treisman, A. M. & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48. Tse, P. U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1171-1189. Tsuchiya, N. & Koch, C. (2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1096-1101. Turatto, M., Benso, F., Facoetti, A., Galfano, G., Mascetti, G. G., & Umiltà, C. (2000). Automatic and voluntary focusing of attention, Perception & Psychophysics , 62, 935-952. Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 30, 829-841. Vuilleumier, P., & Pourtois, G. (2007). Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychologia, 45, 174-194. Vuilleumier, P., & Schwartz, S. (2001). Beware and be aware: Capture of spatial attention by fear-related stimuli in neglect. NeuroReport, 12, 1119–1122. Watanabe, K., & Shimojo, S. (1998). Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events. Perception, 27, 1041-1054. Whalen, P.J., Rauch, S.L., Etcoff, N.L., McInerney, S.C., Lee, M.B., & Jenike, M.A. (1998). Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 411–418. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 : A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp.13-74). Hove, England: Psychology Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28266 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去研究所發現的各種視聽交互作用中,視覺刺激總是能被觀察者注意到的。如果觀察者無法主觀意識到視覺刺激,那麼視聽交互作用是否還有可能發生呢?本研究使用改良的不注意視盲典範(Moore & Egeth , 1997),並在不注意背景呈現時同步加入了一個聲音來檢驗聲音是否會影響背景的處理歷程。實驗一中,不注意的背景是由兩群不同方向的Gabor所組成,透過質地區隔可以顯示出鐵軌錯覺中的兩條V型鐵軌,參與者被要求對前景中的兩條水平線段做長度判斷。在一半的嘗試中同步呈現了一個聲音,另一半則否。結果發現加了聲音的嘗試,參與者對於線段的判斷發生了鐵軌錯覺,也就是完成了背景質地區隔的不注意處理;不加聲音的則沒有發生鐵軌錯覺。實驗二、三、四中,我們檢驗了三個關於此機制的假設,結果支持為視聽整合所造成。我們在實驗五、六中進一步檢驗了與反應端處理有關的賽門效果,也發現聲音可以促成此效果。綜合這些結果可知:與不注意背景同步呈現的聲音不只加速了低階的不注意處理歷程(質地區隔);也促使了反應端的賽門效果, 顯示這種不注意的視聽整合在處理歷程中的不同層次都能夠發生。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Past studies have demonstrated visual-auditory interactions such as the McGurk effect (McGurk & MacDonald, 1976) and the sound-induced-flash illusion (Shams, Kamitani, & Shimojo, 2002). However, visual stimuli in these studies were well attended by the observers, and it remains unknown whether visual-auditory interactions also occur when the observers are unaware of the existence of the visual stimuli. We used the modified inattentional blindness paradigm of Moore and Egeth (1997) by adding a synchronous sound to examine whether sound can affect processing of unattended visual background. Experiment 1 used a texture segregation task in which the unattended background pattern was formed by texture segregation of different oriented Gabors to render the railroad track as in the Ponzo illusion. The participants were asked to judge the length of the two horizontal lines. Half of the trials were accompanied with a beep sound, and the other half were not. Results showed that in trials with beep sounds, the Ponzo illusion occurred; however, no Ponzo illusion was observed without beep sounds. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, we tested 3 hypotheses about the mechanism and our results suggested that it was due to visual-auditory integration. Further, in Experiments 5 and 6, a response-end processing, accessory-stimulus Simon effect was examined, and we found that response-end processing also occurred in synchronous sound condition when observers were unattended to the accessory stimulus. These results suggest that adding a synchronous sound can speed up the low-level unattended visual processing (texture segregation) and make the high-level response-end processing (the Simon effect) possible. Thus, unattended visual-auditory integration can occur at different loci through the processing stream. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:03:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94227112-1.pdf: 1801777 bytes, checksum: 35dc2b151e6b98fc923c8109ffb036b7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 緒論...............................................1
視聽交互作用 1 不注意處理 3 不注意視盲典範 4 注意力與主觀意識 6 質地區隔與賽門效果 6 不注意處理與處理時間 7 本研究目的 8 實驗一............................................10 實驗二............................................19 實驗三............................................22 實驗四............................................25 實驗五............................................28 實驗六............................................34 綜合討論..........................................37 同步聲音加速不注意處理的可能原因 37 視聽交互作用對於反應端處理的影響 41 從不注意視盲相關生理機制來看注意力與主觀意識的關係 42 此研究現制與未來可能的研究方向 44 結論 45 參考文獻...........................................46 附圖...............................................53 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 不注意視盲下的視聽交互作用 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Visual-auditory interaction in inattentional blindness | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 汪曼穎,黃淑麗,陳建中 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 視聽整合,注意力,不注意視盲典範,質地區隔,賽門效果, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | visual-auditory integration,attention,inattentional blindness paradigm,texture segregation,Simon effect, | en |
dc.relation.page | 74 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.76 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。