請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27696
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 唐牧群 | |
dc.contributor.author | Jian-Hao He | en |
dc.contributor.author | 何健豪 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T18:15:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-23 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王梅玲(民84)。書評。在圖書資訊學與資訊科學大辭典(頁1228)。台北市:漢美。
甘宗靄(民99)。社交性書籤社群成員之資訊分享、社交關係與價值觀之研究。未出版之碩士論文,元智大學資訊傳播學系,桃園縣。 李莉伶(民97)。網路書評與借閱意願之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士班,台北市。 杜瑞(Drewry, J.E.)(民62)。書評要門(Writing book reviews)(徐進夫譯)。台北市:幼獅。(原作1946年出版) 吳宛青(民99)。評估社會性導覽工具對探索性檢索經驗之愉悅性的影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。 吳燕惠(民89)。網路讀者書評之研究。未出版之碩士論文,私立南華大學出版學研究所,嘉義縣。 林彥宏(民94)。網路口碑對消費者購買決策影響之探討。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學企業管理學研究所,桃園縣。 孟昭晉(民93)。書評概論。南京市:南京大學。 唐牧群、吳宛青(民98)。由透鏡理論看大學圖書館讀者選書決策過程。圖書資訊學刊,7(1/2),37-52。 黃運圭(民94)。網路書評與購買意願之研究:臺灣網路書店的實證調查。未出版之博士論文,國立臺灣科技大學企業管理所,台北市。 潘莉娟(民95)。網路書評與購買意願之關聯性研究。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。 Aiello, L.M., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Ruffo, G., Schifanella, R.(2010). Link creation and profile alignment in the aNobii social network. In SocialCom ’10: Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Social Computing (August 2010), pp. 249-256. Bettman, J.R., Luce, M.F., & Payne, J.W. (2008). Preference construction and preference stability: putting the pillow to rest. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 170-174. Bettman, J.R., & Zins, M. A. (1977). Constructive processes in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 75-85. Brunswik, E., Hammond, K. R. & Stewart, T. R. (2000). The essential Brunswik: Beginnings explications, applications. New York: Oxford University Press. Carroll, J.S. & Johnson, E.J. (1990). Decision research: a field guide. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Chen, Yi-Fen (2007). Herd behavior in purchasing books online. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1977-1992. Cheong, H.J. & Morrison, M.A. (2008). Consumer’s reliance on product information and recommendations found in UGC. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 38-49. Dellarocas, C.(2003). The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407-1424. Dieberger, A., Dourish, P., Hook, K., Resnick, P., & Wexeblat, A.(2000). Social navigation: techniques for building more usable systems. Interactions, 7(6), 36-45. Dieberger, A. (1997). Supporting social navigation on the world wide web. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 46, 805-825. Dourish, P. & Chalmers, M. (1994). Running out space: models of information navigation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Computer-Human Interaction (HCI’94). Einhorn, H.J. & Hogarth, R.M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53-88. Farzan, R. & Brusilovsky, P. (2009). Social navigation support information seeking: if you build it, will they come?. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5535, 66-77. Feick, L. & Higie R.A.(1992). The effects of preference heterogeneity and source characteristics on ad processing and judgments about endorsers. Journal of Advertising, 21(2), 9-24. Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421−435. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Knowing what you want: measuring labile values. In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior (p. 117−141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Fong, J. and Burton, S. (2006). Electronic world-of-mouth: a comparison of stated and revealed behavior on electronic discussion boards. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 61-70. Giustini, D., Hooker, D., & Cho, A.(2009). Social cataloging: An overview for health librarians. JCHLA/JABSC, 30(4), 133-138. Goldsmith, R., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 1-16. Herr, P. M., Kardes, F.R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454-462. Hill, W.C., Hollan, J.D., Wroblewski, D., & Mccandless, T. (1992). Edit wear and read wear. In Bauersfeld, P., Bennett, J., & Lynch, G. (eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, 3-9. Hoge, J.M.(1987). Literary Reviewing. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. Hopper, R.(2005). What are teenagers reading? Adolescent fiction reading habits and reading choices. Literacy, 39(3), 113-120. Hu, N., Liu, L., & Zhang, J.J. (2008). Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and Management, 9(3), 201-214. Huang, Y.K. & Yang, W.I. (2010). A study of internet book reviews and borrowing intention. Library Review,59(7), 512-521. Huang, Y.K. & Yang, W.I. (2008). Motives for and consequences of reading internet book reviews. The Electronic Library, 26(1), 97-110. Jeong, M., & Lambert, C.U. (2001). Adaptation of an information quality framework to measure customers’ behavioral intentions to use lodging web sites. Hospitality Management, 20, 129-146. Johnson, S. (2010, June 19). Yes, people still read, but now it’s social <online newspaper comment>. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/business/20unbox.html Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. Katz, W.A.(1980). Book-selection aids. In Collection development: the selection of materials for libraries (chap.6, 123-154). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Kumar, N. & Benbasat, I. (2006). The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 425-439. Leino, J. and Raiha, K.J.(2007). Case amazon: ratings and reviews as part of recommendations. Proceeding of RecSys’ 07: Proceeding of the 2007 ACM Conference on Recommender systems, 137-140. Lin, T.M.Y., Luarn, P., & Huang, Y.K.(2005). Effect of internet reviews on purchase intention: a focus group study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(5), 461-468. Maynard, S., Mackay, S., & Smyth, F. (2008). A survey of young people’s reading in England: browsing and choosing books. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40(4), 239-253. Millen, D., Yang , M., Whittaker, S., & Feinberg, J.(2007). Social bookmarking and exploratory search. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW). Neelameghan, R. & Jain, D. (1999). Consumer choice process for experience goods: an economic model and analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(3), 373-386. Newell, B. R., Lagnado, D. A., & Shanks, D. R. (2007). Straight choices : the psychology of decision making. New York : Psychology Press. O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 65(1), 17-37. Park, D.H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: the moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125-148 Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., & Luce, M.F. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187-217. Payne, J.B., Bettman, J.R., & Johnson, E.J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: a constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131. Phillips, S.D. (1997). Toward an expanded definition of adaptive decision making. Career Development Quarterly, 45(3), 275-287. Ree, M.J.(2003). Why review books? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28(1), 71-72. Reuter, K. (2007). Assessing aesthetic relevance: children’s book selection in a digital library. Journal of American Society Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1745-1763. Ross, C.S. (1999). Finding without seeking: the information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Information Processing and Management, 35, 783-799. Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25(5), 638−656. Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. (2001). The construction of attitudes. In A. Tesser, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intraindividual Processes (p. 436−457). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Sharp, A. (2010, Dec 23). How to use e-book annotation features: highlights and bookmarks <web blog message>. Retrieved from http://www.suite101.com/content/how-to-use-ebook-annotation-features-highlights-and-bookmarks-a323458 Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I., & Gross, B.L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-170. Shocker, A.D., Ben-Akiva, M., Boccara, B., & Nedungadi, P. (1991). Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing Letters, 2(3), 181-197. Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364-371. Smith, F. (1982). Understanding reading (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Stieve, T. & Schoen, D.(2006). Undergraduate student’s book selection: a study of factors in the decision-making process. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(6), 599-608. Tang, M.C.(2009). A study of academic library users’ decision-making process: A Lens model approach. Journal of Documentation, 65(6), 938-957. Benbasat, I. (2000). Inducing compensatory information processing through decision aids that facilitate effort reduction: an experimental assessment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 91-106. Wang, P. & Soergel, D. (1998). A cognitive model of document use during a research project: Study I. Document Selection. Journal of American Society Information Science and Technology, 49(2), 115-133. Wexelblat, A., & Maes, P. (1999). Footprints: history-rich tools for information foraging. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit (pp. 270–277). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27696 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究目的在分析讀者利用aNobil網路書櫃之尋書歷程,瞭解不同尋書途徑的瀏覽經驗,並歸納讀者所用的尋書線索及依賴之原因。另外,網路書櫃提供之社會性導覽工具,如網路書評及推薦星等,其參考價值及對尋書行為之影響,亦是探討重點。
研究發現讀者依據個人對書櫃及作者的了解選擇瀏覽對象,而在瀏覽過程中,書櫃使用者的閱讀品味及書籍偏好的相似度會影響瀏覽意願。分析尋書途徑對擴展閱讀涉獵範圍之影響,選擇相似書櫃之人數偏多,讀者較可接觸到閱讀偏好外之書籍。 尋書線索按特性分成書籍資訊及詮釋資訊二類,其中主題、作者及網路書評是讀者較常參考的尋書線索。主題及作者和個人主觀偏好有關,而網路書評可協助讀者獲得更多內容資訊及用作過濾書籍。相較下,推薦星等因評分主觀且標準不一,參考價值受到質疑。另外,讀者參考朋友的閱讀品味,對朋友推薦之圖書表示信任,其結果反應在線索─熟人推薦一項。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The study set out to investigate users’ interaction with aNobii, an online social network site for book lovers. Specifically, it looked into users’ judgment and browsing behaviors when using three book discovery tools afforded by aNobii: “friends”, “similar bookshelves”, and “authors.”
A total of 34 participants took part in the study in which they were asked to use alternately with the three tools to look for books they found interesting. The participant’s screen activities was recorded and was reviewed jointly afterwards by the researcher and the participant during the post-search interview. They were asked about their choice criteria when choosing which bookshelves to browse and books to read. It was found that participants relied on different cues when choosing bookshelves with different book discovery tools. Among the three tools, “similar bookshelves” was found to be most effective in broadening one’s reading horizon. Friends’ bookshelves were also found to be an interesting book discovery tool. The participants judged the usefulness of friends’ bookshelves by their understanding of their tastes. The influences of various cues such as topic, plot, author, online reader reviews and star ratings on their judgment were investigated. Topic and author were found to be most useful for judging the desirability of the works. While online book review was found to play an important role for users to infer the book content and filter out non-relevant titles, star rating was found to be less useful. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T18:15:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97126001-1.pdf: 2234212 bytes, checksum: e08ed3cf1733645924d5b4be15261071 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目次 iv 圖目次 vi 表目次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 5 第四節 名詞解釋 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 尋書偏好及決策行為 9 第二節 社會性導覽工具 23 第三節 網路書評 30 第三章 研究設計與實施 37 第一節 研究方法 37 第二節 研究對象 39 第三節 研究工具 39 第四節 研究實施 45 第五節 資料處理與分析 46 第六節 研究步驟 48 第四章 訪談結果與分析 50 第一節 受訪者基本資料分析 50 第二節 書櫃瀏覽行為 54 第三節 尋書線索 89 第五章 結論與建議 126 第一節 結論 126 第二節 建議 131 第三節 進一步研究之建議 133 參考資料 135 附錄一、前測問卷 143 附錄二、訪談問卷(正式版) 146 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | aNobii網路書櫃使用者利用社會性導覽工具尋書及決策之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Investigation of aNobii users’searching and decision making with social navigational tools | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 藍文欽,邱銘心 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 偏好,決策,經驗性商品,社會性導覽工具,網路書評,推薦星等, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | preference,decision making,experienced goods,social navigational tools,internet book review,star rating, | en |
dc.relation.page | 148 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.18 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。