請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27450
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 朱瑞玲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ping-Hui Ho | en |
dc.contributor.author | 何炳輝 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T18:05:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-01-22 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-01-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-01-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 朱瑞玲(1987)。中國人的社會互動:試論面子的運作。「中國社會學刊」,11,23-53。
朱瑞玲(1997)。青少年性格量表之編製。「測驗年刊」,44(2),21-46。 余安邦(1990)。「成就動機的建構效度研究」(未發表之博士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 余安邦(1993)。社會取向成就動機與個我取向成就動機不同嗎?從動機與行為的關係加以探討。「中央研究院民族學研究所集刊」,76,197-224。 余安邦、楊國樞(1987)。社會取向成就動機與個我取向成就動機:概念分析與實徵研究。「中央研究院民族學研究所集刊」,64,51-98。 李秉錡(2005)。「能力與努力稱讚對華人學童成就動機之影響」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 吳季珊(2006)。「努力本質觀對華人青少年憂鬱情緒之預測力」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 林易慧、程炳林(2006)。課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之交互效果。「教育心理學報」,37(3),231-255。 教育部電子報(2004年3月9日)。2007年6月1日,取自http://epaper.edu.tw/010/Important.htm#im02。 教育部電子報(2004年4月9日)。2007年6月1日,取自http://epaper.edu.tw/ 019/people.htm。 教育部電子報(2005年10月27日)。2007年6月1日,取自http://epaper.edu.t w/177/reform.html。 教育部十二年國教討論區。2007年6月1日,取自 http://www.edu.tw/12edu/ind ex.php。 陳舜文(2005)。「華人的社會目標與成就動機:以台灣大學生為例」(未發表之博士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 黃光國(2005)。華人社會中的臉面觀。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編):「華人本土心理學」,頁365-406。台北:遠流。 張郁雯、林文瑛(2003)。升學主義還是升學機會?—升學壓力的社會意涵。「教育心理學報」,35(2),167-182。 葉明華、楊國樞(2005)。家族主義與泛家族主義。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編):「華人本土心理學」,頁249-292。台北:遠流。 蔡宜妙(2003)。「成就動機的文化特徵:台灣地區青少年的努力信念」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. England: Holt, Reinhart & Winston. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6), 359-372. Chao, R. K. (1996). Chinese and European American mothers' beliefs about the role of parenting in children's school success. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(4), 403-423. Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43-54. Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 666-679. Deci, E. L. (1975)., Intrinsic motivation. NY, US: Plenum Press. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA : Psychology Press. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 549-563. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541-553. Haidt, J. (2006). The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom. xiii, NY, US: Basic Books. Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 599-615. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349-366. Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the 'overjustification' hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129-137. Lepper, M. R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning 'play' into 'work' and 'work' into 'play': 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. Sansone, Carol & Harackiewicz, Judith M (Eds). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance(pp.257-307). San Diego: Academic Press. Lepper, M. R., Henderlong, J., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196. Li, J. (2004). Learning as a task or a virtue: U.S. and Chinese preschoolers explain learning. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 595-605. Li, J. (2005). Mind or virtue: Western and chinese beliefs about learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 190-194. Li, J., & Wang, Q. (2004). Perceptions of achievement and achieving peers in U.S. and Chinese kindergartners. Social Development, 13(3), 413-436. Maehr, M. L., & Meyer, H. A. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we've been, where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 371-409. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710-718. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford, England: Oxford Univ. Press. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328-346. Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 450-461. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15(3), 185-205. Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 133-160. Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89-99. Urdan, T. C. (1997). Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 99-141). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297-333. Wong, M. M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Motivation and academic achievement: The effects of personality traits and the quality of experience. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 539-574. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27450 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究欲探討不同成就目標情境如何影響學習過程中的情緒與失敗回饋後的作業興趣及挑戰意願,個體的不同學習目標傾向與學習過程中的情緒、失敗回饋後的作業興趣及挑戰意願的關聯,以及個體的成就動機、文化價值傾向、心理需求及智力本質信念與成就目標的關聯。Grant與Dweck(2003)將個體的學習目標傾向區分為挑戰學習目標與增長學習目標,前者指的是個體想要征服作業帶來的挑戰,後者指的是個體想要充實自我的能力而學習。研究一的結果顯示,分配在學習目標情境的大學生之挑戰意願高於在表現目標情境的大學生。此外無論個體傾向挑戰學習目標或增長學習目標,面臨能力不足的回饋後依然有較正向的情緒、擁有持續學習的意願,但是唯有傾向挑戰學習目標的學生才會對學習感到興趣。研究二的結果發現,除了分配在趨近表現目標情境的大學生之作業興趣與挑戰意願高於在學習目標情境的大學生外,更進一步的指出愈持挑戰學習目標傾向的大學生愈會樂在學習的過程當中,但是增長學習目標傾向不影響學習過程中的情緒。研究三的結果說明,表現需求較高的學生愈傾向增長學習目標,而與挑戰學習目標無關。這個結果意涵著持增長學習目標的學生認為,學習成果的獲得還需要他人的回饋與評價才能達成。最後檢討研究一與研究二中的目標情境影響學習行為的結果不一致之原因,包括個體是否對作業感到勝任感、回饋訊息的性質與及作業材料的特殊性。由於本研究僅操弄失敗回饋,儘管研究結果支持挑戰學習目標可以樂在學習,並且在能力不足回饋後對學習感到興趣;是否增長學習目標在獲得成功的成果後,會有更大的喜悅與培養出更深的學習樂趣,值得進一步探討。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigates how achievement goal situations influence learning behaviors and what is the relation between learning goals that people adopt and learning behaviors. Grant and Dweck(2003)differentiated learning goals to “mastery-challenge goal” which means people engage activity for challenge and “learning goal” labeled “incremental-learning goal” in this study which means people engage activity for improve ones ability. Study 1 showed that when facing failure, students in learning goal situation still wanted to learn than those in performance goal situation and “mastery-challenge goal” adopted by students has an effect on intrinsic motivation. However, study 2 showed that in failure context approach-performance goal situation promote student’s intrinsic motivation than learning goal situation. Study 2 discovered that “mastery-challenge goal” adopted by students has an effect on task-involved emotion, but “incremental-learning goal” has no effect. Study 3 used relevant psychological constructs to differentiate “incremental-learning goal” and “mastery-challenge goal”. Results imply that “incremental-learning goal” is relation to exhibition need, however, there is no rekationship on “mastery-challenge goal”. Finally we discussed inconsistent results on learning behavior in achievement goal situation between study 1 and study 2. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T18:05:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93227115-1.pdf: 472547 bytes, checksum: 41ca53089e3e52b2fa41c995773c927d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 緒論 1
前言 1 文獻回顧 2 研究目的 12 研究一 13 方法 13 結果 16 討論 23 研究二 27 方法 27 結果 31 討論 41 研究三 43 方法 44 結果 46 討論 53 綜合討論 56 參考文獻 62 附錄 68 附錄一 68 附錄二 69 附錄三 73 附錄四 75 附錄五 76 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 不同成就目標的內涵及其影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The influence of achievement goals on learning behaviors | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 余安邦,孫蒨如,雷庚玲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 成就目標,挑戰學習目標,增長學習目標,內在動機, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | achievement goals,mastery-challenge goal,incremental-learning goal,intrinsic motivation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 67 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-01-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 461.47 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。