請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27381
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 唐代彪(De- Piao Tang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Esther Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉君雅 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T18:03:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-01-30 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-01-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-01-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 方新惟 (2006) 「家庭生育決策之因素分析」,國立東華大學國際經濟研究所碩士學位論文 (未出版)。
王順民 (2007)「臺灣老化速度,世界第一」,國政評論,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,http://www.npf.org.tw/particle-3021-1.html。 王德睦 (1992) 「臺灣地區未來人口成長之若干可能」,人口學刊 15: 1-15。 艾兆蕾 (2005) 「影響住宅區地價因素之空間分析-以鄉鎮與縣市為例」,世新大學經濟學系碩士學位論文 (未出版)。 余清祥、許添容 (2004)「臺灣地區鄉鎮市區生育率的空間與群集研究」,臺灣人口學會2004年年會暨「人口、家庭與國民健康政策回顧與展望」研討會。 李茂政 (1974) 大眾傳播新論,臺北:三民書局。 佟新 (2000) 人口社會學,北京:北京大學出版社。 邱榮輝 (1981)「婦女勞動參與和生育率」,臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士學位論文 (未出版)。 孫得雄 (2001)「臺灣家庭計畫之推行對避孕及生育行為之影響」,人口學刊 23: 49-92。 孫得雄、張明正 (1988) 人口學與家庭計畫,臺北:國立空中大學。 翁秀琪 (1992) 大眾傳播理論與實證,臺北:三民書局。 張本飛 (2004)「生育行為的經濟解釋」,中國華中科技大學西方經濟學研究所碩士學位論文 (未出版)。 張明正、李美慧 (2001) 「臺灣地區人口轉型後之生育趨勢與展望」,人口學刊 23: 93-112。 張清溪、曹慧玲 (1981)「臺灣地區生育率的決定因素-與婦女勞動參與率的聯立模型」,人口學刊 5: 71-117。 陳信木 (2004) 「臺灣地區客家婦女之生育史時間模式變遷比較分析」,行政院客家委員會獎助客家學術研究計畫研究成果報告 1:51。 陳彥仁 (2006)「臺灣生育率下降因素之實證探討」,成功大學政治經濟研究所碩士學位論文 (未出版)。 陳寬政、王德睦、陳文玲 (1986)「臺灣地區人口變遷的原因與結果」,人口學刊 9: 1-23。 彭作奎 (2004)「生育問題已成經濟選擇」,中國時報,2004/8/20。 程亞文 (2007)「世界因人口而變」,東方早報, http://intl.ce.cn/sjjj/qy/200707/18/t20070718_12205244.shtml。 黃修梅 (2006)「臺灣婦女教育程度與龍虎年效應對生育率之影響」,政治大學經濟學研究所碩士學位論文 (未出版)。 黃偉明 (2007),「中國大陸區域所得變動之空間分析 (1995-2005)」,2007年研究生兩岸關係與大陸研究研討會,臺北:國立政治大學,97-117。 黃紹東 (2004)「臺南市東區住宅價格之空間自我迴歸分析」,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文 (未出版)。 楊麗秀 (1980)「臺灣地區有偶育齡婦女勞動參與情況對生育率之影響」,臺灣大學農業推廣學研究所碩士學位論文 (未出版)。 葉高華 (2006)「近朱者赤?近墨者黑?臺灣總統選舉藍綠變遷的鄰近效應,1996~2004」,臺灣政治學會2006年年會暨「再訪民主:理論、制度與經驗」研討會。 趙怡惠 (2003)「臺灣地區山地鄉與非山地鄉嬰幼兒死亡率的差異研究」,臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士學位論文 (未出版)。 劉一龍、王德睦 (2004)「臺灣地區總生育率的分析:完成生育率與生育步調之變化」,臺灣人口學會2004年年會暨「人口、家庭與國民健康政策回顧與展望」研討會。 蔡宏政 (2006)「人口老化問題與人口政策的歷史形構」,臺灣人口學會2006年年會暨「二十一世紀的臺灣人口與社會發展」研討會。 蔡宏進、廖正宏 (1987) 人口學,臺北:巨流圖書公司。 鄧志松 (2005) 「臺灣地區各縣市基本指標的空間分析」,中大社文化學報 20: 37-76。 駱明慶 (2007),「台灣總生育率下降的表象與實際」,研究台灣 forthcoming。 謝純瑩、周國屏 (2002)「應用空間自相關分析於人口老化時空變遷之研究」,人口學刊 25: 91-119。 謝高橋 (1971)「人口現代化:社會經濟發展及人口成長」,人口學刊 6: 69-75。 Anderson, J. E (1974) “Areal variation in fertility trends in Taiwan, 1952-1970: Diffusion or development process.” Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Michigan. Anselin, L. (1998) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Anselin, L. (1999) Spatial Econometrics. Bruton Center School of Social Sciences University of Texas at Dallas Richardson. Anselin, L. (2003) GeoDa™ 0.9 User’s Guide. USA: Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science. Balabdaoui, F., Bocquet-Appel, Lajaunie, C. and S. Irudaya Rajan (2001) “Space-time Evolution of the Fertility Transition in India.” International Journal of Population Geography 7: 129-148. Barro, Robert J. (1988) “A Reformulation of the Economic Theory of Fertility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103: 1-25. Becker, Gary S. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior.上海:三聯書店、上海人民出版社。(中文版,人類行為的經濟分析,王業宇、陳琪 譯) Becker, Gary S. (1981) A Treatise on the Family.北京:華夏出版社。(中文版,家庭經濟分析,彭松建 譯) Berelson, B. and Freedman, R (1964) “A Study in Fertility Control.” Scientific American 210(May): 29-37. Bocquet-Appel, J. -P. and Jakobi, L. (1996) “Barriers to the Spatial Diffusion for the Demographic Transition in Western Europe.” In Spatial analysis of biodemographic data, edited by Bocquet-Appel, Courgeau and Pumain John Libbey Eurotext and Institut National d’Etudes Démographiques, Paris.117-129. Bocquet-Appel, J. -P. and Jakobi, L. (1998) “Evidence for a Spatial Diffusion of Contraception at the Onset of the Fertility Transition in Victorian Britain.” Population: An English Selection 10(1): 181-204. Bongaarts, J. (1998) “Fertility and Reproductive Preferences in Post-transitional Societies.” Population Council (New York) PRD Working Paper (1): 14. Bongaarts, J. (1999) “Fertility Decline in the Developed World: Where Will It End?” The American Economic Review 89(2): 256-260. Boulier, Bryan L. and Mark R. Rosenzweig (1984) “Schooling, Search, and Spouse Selection: Testing Economic Theories of Marriage and Household Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 92: 712-732. Brown, L. A (1977) “Diffusion Research in Geography, A Thematic Account.” Studies in the Diffusion of Innovation Discussion 53, Columbus: Department of Geography, The Ohio State University. Caldwell, J. C. (1982) Theory of Fertility Decline. New York: Academic Press. Carlsson, G. (1966) “The Decline of Fertility: Innovation or Adjustment Process.” Population Studies 20(2): 149-174. Cavalli-Sforza L. and Feldman M. -W., (1983) “Cultural versus genetic adaptation.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 4993-4996 Cheng, Benjamin S. (1999) “Cointergration and Causality between Fertility and Female Labor Participation in Taiwan: A Multivariate Approach.” Atlantic Economic Journal 27(4): 422-434. Cleland, J. and C. Wilson (1987) “Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view.” Population Studies 41: 5-30. Coale, A. J. (1973) “The demographic transition reconsidered.” In International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP) (ed): Proceedings of the international population conference 1973, Editions Ordina, Liège, (1): 53-73. D. J. van de Kaa (1996) “Anchored Narratives: The Story and Findings of Half a Century of Research into the Determinants of Fertility.'Population Studies 50: 389-432. Davis, K. (1963) “The theory of change and response in modern demographic history.” Population Index 29: 345-366. Davis, K. (1967) “Population policy: will current programs succeed?” Science (Nov.): 730-39 Easterlin, R. A. (1978) “The Economics and Sociology of Fertility: a synthesis.” In Tilly, C. (ed.), Historical Studies of Changing Fertility. Princeton: University Press. Easterlin, R. A. (1980) Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare. New York: Basic Books. Farrell, P. and Victor R. Fuchs (1982) “Schooling and Health: the Cigarette Connection.” Journal of Health Economics 1: 217-230. Friedlander, D., J. Schellekens and E. Ben-Moshe (1991) “The Transition from High to Low Marital Fertility: Cultural or Socioeconomic Determinants?” Economic Development and Cultural Change 39: 331-351. Granovetter, M. (1973) “The strength of weak ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1380-1386. Hägerstrand, T. (1987) Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Jain, Anrudh K. (1981) “The Effect of Female Education on Fertility: A Sample Explanation.” Demography 18(4): 577-595. Joseph A. McFails Jr. (2003) “Population: A Lively Introduction, 4th ed.” Population Bulletin 58(4): 1-39. Katz, E (1957) “The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 21(1): 61-78. Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2006) Personal Influence. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. Kirk, Dudley (1996) “Demographic Transition Theory.'Population Studies 50: 361-387. Klapper, J. T (1960) The Effects of Mass Communication. New York: Free Press. Knodel, J (1977) “Family Limitation and the Fertility Transition: Evidence from the Age Patterns of Fertility in Europe and Asia.” Population Studies 31(2): 219-249. Knodel, J. and E. van de Walle (1979) “Lessons from the past: Policy implications of historical fertility studies.” Population and Development Review 5 (2): 217-246. Land, K. C. and G. Deane (1992) “On the Large-Sample Estimation of Regression Models with Spatial- or Network-Effects Terms: A Two-Stage Least Squares Approach.” Pp. 221-248 in Sociological Methodology, edited by P. V. Marsden. Washington D. C.: American Sociological Association. Lapham, Robert J. Mauldin, W. Parker (1985) “Contraceptive prevalence: The Influence of Organized Family Planning Programs.” Studies in Family Planning 6 (3): 123-124. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B. and Gaudet, H. (1968) The People’s Choice, 3th ed. New York and London: Columbia University Press. Leasure, J. W. (1962) Factors Involved in the Decline of Fertility in Spain, 1900-1950. Ph. D. dissertation, Princeton University. Leibowitz, Arleen (1974) “Education and the Allocation of Women’s Time.” Education, Income and Human Behavior New York: McGraw-Hill, 171-197. Lesthaeghe, R. (1977) The Decline of Belgian Fertility, 1800-1970. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lesthaeghe, R. and K. Neels (2001) “From the First to the Second Demographic Transition: An Interpretation of the Spatial Continuity of Demographic Innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland, Belgium.” Paper presented to the EURESCO conference ‘The second demographic transition in Europe’ Germany: Bad Herrenalb. Lesthaeghe, R. J. and Neidert, L. (2006) The “Second Demographic Transition.” In the U.S.: Spatial Patterns and Correlates. U.S.: Population Studies Center Research Report 06-592. Li, W. L. (1973) “Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Fertility Decline in Taiwan.” Population Studies 27(1): 97-104. Liu and R. Duff (1972) “The strength in weak ties.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (3): 361-366. Livi-Bacci, M. (1971) A Century of Portuguese Fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Livi-Bacci, M. (1977) A History of Italian Fertility During the Last Two Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Loftin, C and Ward, S. K (1983) “A Spatial Autocorrelation Model of the Effects of Population Density on Fertility.” American Sociological Review 48(1): 121-128. Lutz, W., V. Skirbekk, M. R. Testa (2006) “The Low Fertility Trap Hypothesis.” Vienna yearbook of population research Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. Mahajan, V., E. Muller, and F. M. Bass (1990) “New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research.” Journal of Marketing 54: 1-26. Marshall, J. (1971) “Topics and networks in intra-village communication.” In Culture and Population, edited by S. Polgar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman. McDonald, P. (2001) “Theory Pertaining to Low Fertility.” International Perspectives on Low Fertility: Trends, Theories and Policies Tokyo, 21-23 March. Mei Hsu (2005) “Low- Fertility and Low Participation in Taiwan--A Study on Taiwan Women Data,”selected paper presented in International Conference on “Lowest Low Fertility and Responses: The French Experience and East-Asian Realities,”Oct. 27, 2005, Taipei, Taiwan. Michael, R. J. (1973) “Education and The Derived Demand for Children.” Journal of Political Economy 81(2): S128-S164. Montgomery, M. R. and Casterline, J. B. (1993) “The Diffusion of Fertility Control in Taiwan: Evidence from Pooled Cross-Section Time Series Models.” Population Studies 47(3): 459-479. Montgomery, M. R., Casterline, J. B., and F. Heiland (1998) Social networks and the diffusion of fertility control. Population Council, Policy Research Division, Working Papers, No.119. Oliveau, S. and Guilmoto, C. Z. (2000) Spatial correlation and demography. Exploring India’s demographic patterns Paris: Unesco and UNFPA. Palmore, J. and R. Freedman (1969) “Perceptions of contraceptive practice by others: Effects on acceptance.” In Family Planning in Taiwan: An Experiment in Social Change, edited by R. Freedman and J. Takeshita. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pampel F. C. and Tanaka K. (1986) “Economic Development and Female Labor Force Participation: A Reconsideration.” Social Forces 63: 599-618. Pandit, K. and Bagchi-Sen, S. (1993) “The Spatial Dynamics of U.S. Fertility, 1970-1990” Growth and Change 24(Spring): 229-246. Poston, Jr (1988) “Childlessness Patterns in Taiwan.” Journal of Population Studies (人口學刊) 11: 55-77. Retherford, R. (1985) “A theory of marital fertility transition.” Population Studies 39: 249-268. Retherford, R. and J. Palmore (1983) “Diffusion processes affecting fertility regulation,” in Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, edited by R. Bulatao and R. Lee. New York: Academic Press. Rindfuss, R., M. K. Choe, L. L. Bumpass, and N. O. Tsuya (2004) “Social networks and family change in Japan.” American Sociological Review 69(6): 838-861. Rogers, E. E. and D. L. Kincaid (1981) Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York: The Free Press. Rogers, E. E. and Shoemaker, F. F. (1971) Communication of Innovations: A Cross Cultural Approach. New York: The Free Press. Rogers, E. M (2006) Diffusion of Innovations 5th ed. 臺北:遠流。(中文版,創新的擴散,唐錦超 譯) Rosenzweig, Mark R. and T. Paul Schultz (1985) “The Demand for and Supply of Births.” American Economic Review 75: 992-1015. Sander, William (1992) “The Effect of Women’s Schooling on Fertility.” Economics Letters 40: 229-233. Schultz, T. Paul (1994) “Human Capital, Family Planning, and Their Effects on Population Growth.” The American Economic Review 84(2): 255-260. Schumann, Paul L., Dennis A. Ahlburg, and Christine B. Mahoney (1994) “The Effects of Human Capital and Job Characteristics on Pay.” Journal of Human Resources 29(2): 481-503. Sun, T. H. (2001) “The Impacts of a Family Planning Program on Contraceptive/ Fertility Behavior in Taiwan.” Journal of Population Studies (人口學刊) 23: 49-92. Sun, T. H. and T. Y. Ting (孫得雄、丁庭宇) (1988) “Innovation-Diffusion or Adjustment: The Case of Taiwanese Fertility Transition.” Journal of Population Studies (人口學刊) 12: 67-89. Sun, T. H. and Y. L. Soong (孫得雄、宋永澧) (1979) “On Its Way to Zero Growth: Fertility Transition in Taiwan, Republic of China.” In Cho, Lee-Jay and Kajumasa Kobayashi (eds.) Fertility Trans : Time of the East Asian Populations. Honolulu: the University of Hawaii. Tarde, G. (2005) On communication and social influence. Clark, T. (ed.) 北京:中國人民大學出版社。(中文版,傳播與社會影響,何道寬 譯) Ting, T. Y. (丁庭宇) (1984) “Innovation-Diffusion: A Geographical Study of the Transition of Family Limitation Practice in Taiwan.” Journal of Population Studies (人口學刊) 7: 157-172. Tolnay, S. E. (1995) “The spatial Diffusion of Fertility: A Cross-Section Analysis of Counties in the American South, 1940.” American Sociological Review 60(2): 299-308. Tu, Edward J. C and Zhang, X (2004) “Patterns of Low Fertility in Hong Kong and Taiwan.” Journal of National Development Studies (國家發展研究) 4(1): 31-82. Watkins, S. C. (1987) “The Fertility Transition: Europe and the Third World Compared.” Sociological Forum 2: 645-73. Watkins, S. C. (1991) From Provirzces to Nations. Demographic Integration in Western Europe 1870-1960. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. Weeks, J. R. (1990) Population- An introduction to concepts and issues. 臺北:桂冠社會學叢書。(中文版,人口學 觀念與硏究課題導論,涂肇慶譯) Weeks, J. R. (2001) “The Role of Spatial Analysis in Demographic Research.” In Michael F. Goodchild and Donald G. Janelle (eds.) Spatially Integrated Social Science: Examples in Best Practice. New York: Oxford University Press. Willis, Robert J. (1973) “A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 81(2): 545-556. Yamaguchi K. (2005) True Relationship between Female Labor Force Participation and Total Fertility Rate: An Analysis of OECD Countries. (RIETI Discussion Paper) Yen, Eva C. and Gili Yen (1992) “Female Education and Fertility Differentials: One Effect or Two? Anthology.” Atlantic Economic Journal 20(2): 102. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27381 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在過去研究中,對於人口轉型導致生育率下降的原因分別有社經結構調適過程與 (創新) 傳播擴散過程的兩種解釋途徑,前者認為生育率的下降是社會邁向現代化過程中對於結構轉變的調適結果,強調社經結構對於行為者的生育態度及決策的影響,而後者則認為社會網絡與人際互動等人際傳播方式對大眾所形塑的減少生育或是延後生育觀念以及對避孕知識與方法的認識並採納,是促使生育率普遍下降的主要原因,重視空間鄰近關係所形成的影響效果。換句話說,傳播擴散觀點認為住得越近的人,其生育行為會越相似,也就是所謂的鄰近效應,因此本文的目的即在檢驗臺灣普遍低生育率現象是否是受到鄰近效應所影響。
本文應用地理資訊系統 (GIS) 分析1980年代後臺灣生育率的空間變異,探索結果顯示,臺灣生育率下降很大的原因來自於「城市/鄉村差距」與「平地/山地差距」的逐漸縮小,生育率有趨於同質化的傾向;此外空間指標Moran’s I 值隨著歷年的時間變化不斷上升,證實臺灣生育率有強烈的空間自相關;而LISA空間群聚圖反應出大都會地區 (臺北、臺南、高雄) 有穩固的低-低生育率聚集現象,而高-高生育率則普遍聚集於原住民比例較高的山地鄉,顯示族群也是影響臺灣生育率重要的變數之一。 從空間探索分析證實臺灣生育率存在空間聚集,本文進一步透過類空間迴歸模型,同時考慮時間及空間變數,分別檢驗社經結構、族群分布及鄰近關係對生育率空間變異的影響。結果顯示,1981年及2001年在加入空間鄰近關係變數後,迴歸模型解釋力大幅提升,證實鄰近效應對於生育率有極顯著的正相關影響,支持傳播擴散理論的觀點;表現在生育率歷年變化上,生育率持續的下降,說明了鄰近鄉鎮的低生育率形成負向回饋影響目標鄉鎮生育率的下降。1991年的迴歸模型顯示,鄰近效應影響效果較低且空間迴歸解釋力並不突出,說明影響生育率變化的因素主要源自於社經結構及族群分布的影響,尤其以族群影響更為顯著,偏向社經結構調適的觀點;表現在生育率歷年變化上,生育率維持低度穩定狀態。因此本文認為,社經結構的調適雖然會造成低生育率,但使生育率持續下降的原因則是受到鄰近效應的影響,進一步觀察2001年後臺灣極低生育率現象,其生育率的變化是持續下降而非平穩狀態,推測鄰近效應的影響仍是非常關鍵的因素。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the past researches, socioeconomic adjustment and innovation diffusion were two perspectives for explaining why fertility declined caused by the population transition. According to socioeconomic adjustment perspective, fertility transition is related to motivational forces stemming from changes in socioeconomic conditions prior to and during fertility decline. According to innovation diffusion perspective, an idea of less birth has been molded by social networks and interpersonal connection which makes people accept contraception. In other words, people live nearby have similar fertility behaviors, which is called the neighborhood effect. The purpose of this study is to verify whether Taiwan’s low fertility rate is influenced by the neighborhood effect or not.
We use the Geographic Information System (GIS) to analyze spatial differences of Taiwan’s fertility rate after 1980s. It shows that the fertility rate divergences between “urban vs. rural areas” and “aborigine vs. non-aborigine areas” are both becoming homogeneous. Moran’s I increases when time passes, which proves that Taiwan’s fertility rate has high spatial autocorrelation. The LISA cluster map also shows that big cities like Taipei, Tainan and Kaohsiung have a stable low-low fertility rate cluster; a high-high fertility rate cluster generally exist in mountain areas where there is a higher aborigine population, which means ethnicity is an important factor that affects Taiwan’s fertility rate. Next, we build a matrix-spatial regression model of fertility to test the socioeconomic structure, ethnic distribution and the neighborhood relation factors, which considers both time and spatial dimensions. The results show that in 1981 and 2001, after adding spatial factors, R2 has a big increase which shows how the neighborhood effect plays an important role on fertility decline, supporting the view of diffusion theory. Near county’s low fertility creates a negative feedback mechanism, influencing the focus county’s fertility and leading the whole fertility rate downward. In 1991, regression model shows that the neighborhood effect does not dominant; fertility rate is effected by socioeconomic structure and especially ethnic distribution factors. Partial to the view of adjustment theory, the fertility rate maintains low but stable. Therefore, we point out that although the socioeconomic adjustment process might cause a low fertility rate, it was the neighborhood effect that bought fertility downward. We observe that Taiwan’s lowest-low fertility from 2001 till now wasn’t stable but continuing downward, so we conjecture that the neighborhood effect is still a very important factor to influence the fertility rate. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T18:03:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R94341010-1.pdf: 3656071 bytes, checksum: 25561034127c165c3c8e95dc4ded64b9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究架構 7 第四節 研究流程 9 第二章 文獻回顧與檢討 10 第一節 臺灣的人口轉型與生育率 10 (一) 傳統農業社會 11 (二) 現代工業社會 12 第二節 低生育理論與相關實證 13 (一) 低生育理論 13 (二) 相關實證文獻回顧 17 第三節 傳播理論與空間擴散 20 (一) 傳播理論 20 (二) 家庭計畫擴散研究 28 第四節 文獻檢討 31 (一) 社經結構vs. 傳播擴散 31 (二) 空間擴散vs. 空間變異 34 第三章 資料說明與分析 37 第一節 資料說明 37 第二節 研究限制 39 第三節 生育率變異分析 40 第四章 空間探索分析 50 第一節 空間計量方法 50 第二節 探索式空間分析 54 (一) Moran’s I 59 (二) Local Moran’s I 60 第五章 空間迴歸分析 62 第一節 迴歸模型與假設建立 62 (一) 空間迴歸模型 62 (二) 變數假設建立 63 第二節 模型測試 66 (一) 1981年 66 (二) 1991年 68 (三) 2001年 70 第三節 結果分析 73 (一) 社經結構分析 73 (二) 族群分布分析 76 (三) 鄰近關係分析 77 第六章 結論與建議 80 參考書目 83 附錄 94 臺灣人口政策與相關措施之發展過程 94 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 臺灣低生育率之空間分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Spatial Analysis of Low Fertility Rate in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 鄧志松(Chih- Sung Teng) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 孫得雄(Te- Hsiung Sun),郭迺鋒(Nai-Fong Kuo) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 總生育率,鄰近效應,空間自相關,族群, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | TFR,The neighborhood effect,Spatial autocorrelation,Ethnicity, | en |
dc.relation.page | 93 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-01-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國家發展研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.57 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。