請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27340完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張祖亮(Tsu-Liang Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsi-Chin Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳錫欽 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T18:01:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-02-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-02-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-01-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 尤次雄. 2002. 香草生活家. 台視文化事業股份有限公司. 臺北.
2. 尤次雄. 2003. 探索台灣香草產業的過去、現在與未來.休閒作物資源之開發與應用研討會專刊. 花蓮區農業改良場編印. P.21. 3. 尤次雄. 2004. 香草夢想家. 台視文化事業股份有限公司印行. P.8-38. 臺北. 4. 中華民國統計資訊網. 2007. 國民所得及經濟成長-統計表-歷年各季國內生產毛額依行業分(93SNA). 22 Nov 2007. <http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem= 14616&CtNode=3564>. 5. 吳昭祥. 2003. 台灣的香草產業發展. 刊於:張定霖等編著. 香藥草植物圖鑑. 行政院農業委員會種苗改良繁殖場. p.9. 臺中. 6. 邱湧忠. 2005. 休閒農業經營學.第三版. 茂昌圖書有限公司. 臺北. 7. 林錫鴻. 2005. 六標準差原理探討與應用之研究-以台鹽實業公司為例. 國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文. 8. 翁崇雄. 1993. 評量服務品質與服務價值之研究-以銀行業為實證對象. 國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文. 9. 宮野弘司、宮野ちひろ. 2003. 香草栽培事典-78種最能舒緩身心的芳香花草. 晨星出版有限公司. 臺中. 10. 陳乃源. 2003. DFSS的導入與應用. 中國生產力中心訓練教材. 11. 張元聰、王仕賢. 2000a. 香草栽培與利用. 臺南區農業改良場技術專刊89:11. 12. 張元聰、王仕賢. 2000b. 香草產業的現況及未來產業方向(上). 台灣花卉園藝173:39-40. 13. 張元聰、王仕賢、王裕權. 2003. 台灣香草植物品種圖鑑. 臺南區農業改良場技術專刊92-4(124):1-72. 14. 張育森. 2007. 國立臺灣大學「園藝學原理」上課講義. 15. 張定霖、吳昭祥、洪進雄. 2003. 香藥草植物圖鑑. 行政院農業委員會種苗改良繁殖場印行. P.45-187. 16. 張定霖、吳倩芳、邱燕欣、楊佐琦、蕭吉雄. 2005. 香藥草之永續利用. 休閒農業與農業之永續發展研討會特刊:57-65. 17. 張祖亮、張育森. 2003. 香草植物之栽培管理. 臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院農業推廣委員會. 臺北. 18. 張隆仁. 2006. 香藥草植物的認識與利用. 行政院農業發展委員會臺中農業改良場:1-17(上課講義). 19. 張耀乾. 2007. 國立臺灣大學「花卉學」上課講義. 20. 黃俊英. 2000. 多變量分析. 華泰文化事業公司. 臺北. 21. 黃振育. 2004. 六標準差之探討. 品質月刊3:42-45. 22. 黃敏展. 2002. 亞熱帶花卉學總論. 國立中興大學園藝系. 臺中. 23. 黃淑薰. 2002. 大家來認識香草(Herb)植物. 親子科學活動輯要17:19-26. 24. 彭瑞芬. 2006. 香草園消費行為與市場區隔之研究. 屏東科技大學熱帶農業暨國際合作研究所碩士論文. 25. 傅炳山. 1997. 香草的栽培及應用. 農業世界163:17. 26. 傅炳山. 2002. 揭開香草魔力傳奇. 全台香草完全享樂手冊1:6-8. 27. 傅炳山. 2005. 休閒農場香草體驗活動. 休閒農場經營專題. 段兆麟編撰. 28. 詹立群. 2003. 台灣香草農場發展探源. 國立臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文. 29. 劉惠敏. 2006. 應用六標準差之DMAIC模式降低證劵商之錯帳率. 國立勤益技術學院生產系統工程與管理研究所碩士論文. 30. 顏嘉成. 2007. 香草、流行、地景變遷-以花蓮縣君達香草健康世界為例. 國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文. 31. 薛聰賢. 1991. 圖解栽培繁殖技術. 薛氏園藝有限公司出版部. 臺北. 32. Rosenfeld, R. 2000. 芳香藥草栽培實用指南(黃小萍譯). 貓頭鷹出版社. 臺北. 33. Albrecht, K. 1985. Achieving excellence in service. Training & Development Joural 39(12):64-67. 34. Babakus, E. and W. G. Mangold. 1992. Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services:An empirical investigation. Health Services Research 26(6):767-786. 35. Behara, R. S. and R. B. Chase. 1993. Service quality deployment:Quality Service by Design, in Perspectives in Operations Management:Essays in Honor of Buffa, E. S. Norwell. Ed. R.V. Sarin. MA:Kluwer Academic Publisher. 36. Brown, T. J., G. A. J. Churchill, and J. P. Peter. 1993. Research Note:Improving the measurement of service quality. Journal of Retailing 69(1):127-139. 37. Carman, J. M. 1990. Consumer perceptions of service quality:An assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing 66(1):33-55. 38. Chase, R. B. 1978. Where does the customer fit in a service operations? Harvard Business Review 56(6):137-142. 39. Coronado, R. B. and J. Antony. 2002. Critical success factors for the successful implementation of six sigma projects in organizations. The TQM Magazine 14(2):92-99. 40. Cronin, J. J. Jr. and S. A. Taylor. 1992. Measuring service quality:A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing 56(3):55-68. 41. Devlin, S. J. and H. K. Dong. 1994. Service quality from the customers' perspective. Marketing Research 6(1):pp4-14. 42. Ennew, C. T., G. Y. Reed, and M. R. Binks. 1993. Importance-perform- ance analysis and the measurement of service quality. European Journal of Marketing 27(2):59-70. 43. Geogel, M. L. 2001. Lean six sigma. McGraw-Hill. New York, N. Y. U.S.A. 44. Graessel, B. and P. Zeidler. 1993. Using quality function deployment to improve customer service. Quality Progress 26(11):59-63. 45. Gronroos, C. 1982. An applied service marketing theory. European Journal of Marketing 16(7):30-41. 46. Gronroos, C. 1984. A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of marketing 18(4):36-44. 47. Hauser, J. R. 1993. How puritan-bennett used the house of quality. Sloan Management Review 34(3):61-70. 48. Hauser, J. R. and D. Clausing. 1988. The house of quality. Harvard Business Review 66(3):63-73. 49. Hung, Y. H., M. L. Huang, and K. S. Chen. 2003. Service quality evaluation by service quality performance matrix. Total Quality Management 14(1):79-89. 50. Lambert, D. M. and A. Sharma. 1990. A customer-based competitive analysis for logistics decisions. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 20(1):21-23. 51. Laurette, D., M. D. Johnson, and L. M. Renaghan. 1999. Asapting the QFD approach to extended service transactions. Production and Operations Management Society 8(3):301-317. 52. Lehtinen, J. R. 1983. Customer oriented service system. working paper. Service management Institute. Helsinki Finland. 53. Leonard, F. S. and W. E. Sasser. 1982. The incline of quality. Harvard Business Review 60(5):163-171. 54. Lewis, B. R. and V. W. Mitchell. 1990. Defining and measurement the quality of customer service. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 8(6):11-17. 55. Oliver, R. L. 1981. Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retailing setting. Journal of Retailing 57(3):25-48. 56. Pande, P. S., R. P. Neuman, and R. R. Cavanach. 2000. The six sigma way. McGraw-Hill. New York, N.Y. U.S.A. 57. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1985. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 49(4):41-50. 58. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1988. SERVQUAL:A multi-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64(1):12-40. 59. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1991. Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing 67(4):420-450. 60. Pyzdek, T. 1999. Six sigma is primarily a management program. Quality Digest 3(6):26. 61. Reichfield, F. and W. Sasser. 1990. Zero defections:quality comes to customer service. Harvard Business Review 68(5):105-1. 62. Rosander, A. C. 1980. Service industry QC-Is the challenge being met. Quality Progress(September):34-35. 63. Sasser, W. E., R. P. Olsen, and D. D. Wyckoff. 1978. Management of service operations:text, cases, and readings. Boston:Allyn and Bacon. 64. Scott, L. M. 2001. Operationally deploying six sigma. Quality Congress 2(6):751-755. 65. Snee, R. D. and W. H. Roger. 2003. Leading six sigma:A step-by-step guide based on experience with GE and other six sigma companies, Upper Saddle River, N. J. Pearson Education. 66. Wyper, B. and A. Harrison. 2000. Deployment of six sigma methodology in human resource function:A Case study. Total Quality Management 11(4):720-727. 67. Zeithaml, V. A. 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value:A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 52(3):2-22. 68. Zeithaml, V. A. and M. J. Bitner. 1996. Services marketing. McGraw-Hill. New York, N. Y. U.S.A. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27340 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 服務業近幾年來蓬勃發展,其GDP 產值比重已高達73%以上,從業人口約占就業人數的5成8。其中,休閒服務業更呈現倍數成長,足見其重要性,說明臺灣已經進入服務業經濟時代。最近6年來,隨著我國農業因應加入WTO後而轉型,加上週休二日制的實施,臺灣香草園迅速崛起,在休閒農業中佔有重要的地位。惟由於香草園之間具有高度的同質性、替代性的特質,在面對激烈的競爭環境,如何提昇服務品質是所有問題的核心。因此,本研究應用六標準差(6σ)的方法,提出改善香草園的服務品質並提昇競爭力之對策。首先用Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry的服務品質模式(簡稱PZB服務品質模式),設計服務品質問卷項目,並以量表為基礎,調查顧客對各項休閒服務項目的重視度與滿意度。再將量表平均值轉成指標值,以重視度指標為縱座標,滿意度指標為橫座標,定義出一個以量表為基礎的服務績效評估矩陣。接著根據各服務項目的指標值落點,找出顧客高重視但低滿意的服務項目,定義改善的重點。在衡量的部分,則提出一個以顧客的重視度與滿意度差距大小為衡量標準的衡量模式,並定義出一個衡量指標,且針對這個指標提出一套客觀評估方法與程序。接著分析顧客不滿意的要因,找出改善方法,最後由管制績效模式監控香草園的服務品質。
本研究以「香草故鄉」臺中縣新社鄉的A家香草園為研究個案,並選擇當地B、C家香草園作為相對性的比較基礎,幫助A家香草園能夠更明確且客觀的透過顧客的心聲定義出關鍵問題點。本次問卷調查共發出330份問卷,有效樣本數分別為A家香草園為96份、B家香草園為93份、C家香草園為100份,共計289份,調查日期為96年7月1日至96年7月22日。問卷調查後透過績效評估矩陣及點線距離的比較,明確定義出其中的服務要項16「詳細解說香草的特性、栽培、功能與作用」係A家香草園的關鍵問題點,亟需優先改善,接著進行特性要因圖的問題分析,以及相關係數矩陣的改善作業。 本研究經過分析改善策略之後,即要求A家香草園針對此關鍵策略確實執行「詳細解說香草的特性、栽培、功能與作用」之改善,經實施上述改善策略後,本研究於96年11 月24日再進行一次問卷調查,有效樣本數49份,經計算出改善後的K值已由原先的2.092降為1.051,落於接受區內。亦即,實施相關的改善策略後,K值已降低,即表示顧客重視度與顧客滿意度越趨接近。如此,在確定異常產品服務項目皆修正在理想範圍後,則A家香草園即可依所訂定之標準作業程序與知識管理標準化,落實執行並確保控制成效。 透過此次的分析和研究,已建立一套適用於香草園服務產業的績效評估標準作業流程,可用以維持、控制服務品質,相信面對未來激烈的競爭環境,俾可提昇競爭力,同時也可藉著問題改善以調整香草園栽培的方向,並配合標準化作業流程以落實園藝技術,達到創造經營的佳績。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The flourishing development of the service industry makes GDP over 73% in recent years. About 58% of the employment population serve this industry. The leisure service industry, in particular grows by multiple revealing its significant importance. As there is a feature of high homogeneity and substitution in the same trade, the core issue lies on enhancement of service quality in an environment of keen competition. As a result, six sigma (6σ) is applied in this research to improve service quality and increase competitiveness of the leisure industry. First, the service quality model proposed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry (PZB model for short) is utilized to design the items in the service quality questionnaire. Importance and satisfaction of each service item perceived by customers are based for the scale, whose means are further converted to indexes. Thus, a scale-based service performance evaluation matrix with indices of importance as the Y-axis and those of satisfaction as the X-axis is defined. Then, service factors of high importance and low satisfaction are located and defined for improvement in accordance with the index location of each service factor. A measurement model based on the difference between customers’ importance and satisfaction is proposed and a measurement index is defined for an objective evaluation method and procedures. Next, factors of customer dissatisfaction are analyzed and improvement methods are devised. Finally, herb garden service quality is monitored by the performance control model.
This paper is a case study on a herb garden A, located at so called Herb Township(Shinshou Township) in Taichung County. Comparisons were made with the other two herb gardens B and C, their locations are close to A, to identify crucial problems clearly and positively expressed by customer. For the survey, a total of 330 copies of questionnaire were issued where 289 were effective copies; 96 were from A, 93 from B and 100 from C, respectively. Survey was made from 2007/7/1 to 2007/7/22. The questionnaires were compared using the performance evaluation matrix and the distance far away from the expected results. The 16th service item: the detailed explanations of the herb characteristic, culture, function and application , was identified to be the crucial problems of herb garden A . It is necessary to be improved first . The cause and effect diagram presented is used to analyze major factors of customer dissatisfaction and improvement strategies are devised by the correlation coefficient matrix. After the improvement strategy, the herb garden A is requested to carry out the crucial strategy to give the detail explanations on improvements on herb characteristic, culture, function and application. For this research, questionnaires were issued once on 2007/11/24 with 49 effective returns. The calculated K value after improvement is shown to drop from 2.092 to 1.051. This value is found to be in the acceptance area. After implementing the related improvement strategies and with a low K value, customer importance and customer satisfactions are increasingly closer. So after finding an abnormal product service and changes made in an ideal range, the herb garden A can then follow the standardized procedure and knowledge management to implement which can ensure effective control. After these analysis and research, the standard performance evaluation was developed suitable for the herb garden service industry which can be used to maintain and control service quality. This will increase competitiveness in face of fierce competitions in the near future. At the same time, the improvements also made the herb gardener to achieve and to match standardized procedures used in horticultures for successful management. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T18:01:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R94628150-1.pdf: 2354609 bytes, checksum: ff74ca46c95b2c4e64485993fdfba2c3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………………ⅰ
誌謝……………………………………………………………………………………ⅱ 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………ⅲ 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………ⅴ 第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的 ………………………………………………………………2 第三節 研究流程 ………………………………………………………………3 第二章 文獻回顧 ……………………………………………………………………4 第一節 香草產業的發展 ………………………………………………………4 第二節 服務品質的衡量………………………………………………………10 第三節 六標準差的應用………………………………………………………17 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………………22 第一節 定義……………………………………………………………………22 第二節 衡量……………………………………………………………………24 第三節 分析……………………………………………………………………27 第四節 改善與控制……………………………………………………………28 第四章 結果與討論…………………………………………………………………29 第一節 問卷調查與問題定義…………………………………………………29 第二節 分析服務品質不佳的原因……………………………………………33 第三節 改善服務品質不佳的方法……………………………………………38 第四節 監控服務品質…………………………………………………………40 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………………41 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………………82 附錄……………………………………………………………………………………88 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 應用六標準差概念提昇臺灣香草園之服務品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Improvement of Service Quality of Taiwan Herb Garden by Six Sigma Concept | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳坤盛,陳右人 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 香草,香草園,服務品質,六標準差,評估, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | herb,herb garden,service quality,six sigma,evaluation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 121 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-01-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
