請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27274完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姜皇池 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Chieh Wei | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 魏正杰 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T17:59:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-08-23 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文專書
姜皇池（2004）。《國際海洋法上、下冊》。臺北：學林文化。 姜皇池（2008）。《國際公法導論》。臺北：新學林。 姜皇池（2006）。《國際海洋法文獻選編上、下冊》。臺北：行政院農業委員會漁業署。 張海文（2006）。《聯合國海洋法公約釋義集》。北京：海洋出版社。 殷敏（2010）。《外交保護法律制度和中國》。上海：上海人民出版社。 二、 中文期刊論文 林則奘（2005）。《國際海洋法法庭設置機制與法制之研究》，國立臺灣海洋大學海洋法律研究所碩士論文。 孫光民（2000）。〈國際海洋法法庭與第一、二號賽加輪案〉，《問題與研究》，39卷10期，頁1-43。 蒲國慶（2005）。〈阿瑪斯號貨輪事件的再檢討－論船隻和船員的迅速釋放〉，《中華國際法與超國界法評論》，1卷1期，頁185-236。 蒲國慶（2004）。〈臺灣向國際海洋法法庭申訴之研究〉，《臺灣國際法季刊》，1卷4期，頁139-218。 三、 外文專書 Aust, Anthony, MODERN TREATY LAW AND PRACTICE (2d ed. 2007; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). CHANDRASEKHARA, P. & PH. GAUTIER, THE RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA: A COMMENTARY (2006; Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). EIRIKSSON, GUDMUNDUR, THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA (2000; The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). INT’L TRIB. L. SEA, 2 INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA YEARBOOK 1998 (1998; The Hague/Boston/London: Kluwer Law International). KLEIN, NATALIE, DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE UN CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA (2005; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). NORDQUIST, MYRON H. ET AL., 5 UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA 1982: COMMENTARY (1989; Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). SANDS, PHILIPPE ET AL., MANUAL ON INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS (1999; West Sussex: Tottel Publishing). SOHN, LOUIS B. & JOHN E. NOYES, CASES AND MATERIALS ON THE LAW OF THE SEA (2004; New York: Transnational Publishers). VUKAS, BUDISLAV, THE LAW OF THE SEA: SELECTED WRITINGS (2004; Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). 四、 外文期刊論文 Akl, Joseph., Question of Time-limits in Urgent Proceedings before the Tribunal, in CURRENT MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA 75–80 (Myron H. Nordquist & John Norton Moore eds., 2001; The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Anderson, David H., The Effective Administration of International Justice - Early Practice of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, in NEGOTIATING FOR PEACE: LIBER AMICORUM TONO EITEL 529-542 (Jochen Abr. Frowein et al. eds., 2003; Berlin: Springer). Anderson, David H., Investigation, Detention and Release of Foreign Vessels under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982 and other International Agreements, 11 INT’L J. MARINE & COASTAL L. 165-177 (1996). Anderson, David H., The Role of ITLOS as a Means of Dispute Settlement under UNCLOS, in INTERNATIONAL MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 19-29 (Andree Kirchner ed., 2003; The Hague/New York/London: Kluwer Law International). Bantz, Vincent P., Views from Hamburg: the Juno Trader Case or How to Make Sense of the Coastal State’s Rights in the Light of Its Duty of Prompt Release, 24 U QUEENSLAND L.J. 415-444 (2005). Bender, Philip, Current Legal Developments: International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, 23 INT'L J. MARINE & COASTAL L. 349-358 (2008). Boyle, Alan E., Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention, 46 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 37-54 (1997). Brown, E.D., Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea: The UN Convention Regime, 21 MARINE POC’Y 17-43 (1997). Brown, E. D., The M/V ‘Saiga’ Case on Prompt Release of Detained Vessels: the First Judgment of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, 22 MARINE POL’Y 307-326 (1998). Caminos, Hugos, The Creation of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea as a Specialized Court under the United Nations Convention for the Law of the Sea, in PROMOTING JUSTICE, HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION THROUGH INTERNATIONAL LAW: LIBER AMICORUM LUCIUS CAFLISCH 823-835 (Marcelo G. Kohen ed., 2007; Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Caminos, Hugo, The Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, in OCEAN POLICY: NEW INSTITUTIONS, CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 93-108 (Myron H. Nordquist & John N. Moore eds., 1999; The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Chandrasekhara Rao, P., ITLOS: the First Six Years, 6 MAX PLANCK Y.B. UN L. 183-300 (2002). Churchill, Robin, Dispute settlement under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2004, 21 INT’L J MARINE & COASTAL L 1-14 (2006). Churchill, Robin, Dispute Settle Under the UN Convention on the law of the Sea: Survey for 2007, 23 INT'L J. MARINE & COASTAL L. 601-642 (2008). Churchill, Robin & Vaughan Lowe, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2002, 18 INT'L J. MARINE & COASTAL L. 447-456 (2003). Escher, Anne-Katrin, Release of Vessels and Crews before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, 3 L. & PRAC. INT’L CTS. & TRIBUNALS 205-347 (2004). Franckx, Erik, “Reasonable Bond” in the Practice of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, 32 CAL. W. INT’L L.J. 303-342 (2002). Gao, Jianjun, Reasonableness of the Bond under Article 292 of the LOS Convention: Practice of the ITLOS, 7 CHINESE J. INT’L L. 115-142 (2008). Gautier, Philippe, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Activities in 2002, 2 CHINESE J INT’L L 341-364 (2003). Gautier, Philippe, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Activities in 2004, 4 CHINESE J INT’L L 183-201 (2005). Gullett, Warwick Prompt Release Procedures and the Challenge for Fisheries Law Enforcement: The Judgment of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in the ‘Volga’ Case (Russian Federation v Australia), 31 FED. L. REV. 395-407 (2003). Jaenicke, Günther, Prompt Release of Vessels – The M/V “Saiga”, 2 MAX PLANCK Y.B. UN L. 387-407 (1998). Lagoni, Rainer, The Prompt Release of Vessels and Crews before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: a Preparatory Report, 11 INT’L J. MARINE & COASTAL L. 147-164 (1996). Little, Laura & Marcos A. Orellana, Can CITES play a Role in Solving the Problem of IUU Fishing?: The Trouble with Patagonian Toothfish, 16 COLO. J. INT’L ENVTL. L. & POL’Y 21-122 (2005). Lowe, Vaughan, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2000, 16 INT'L J. MARINE & COASTAL L. 549-570 (2001). Lugten, Gail, Big Fish to Fry- International Law and Deterrence of the Toothfish Pirates, 16 CURRENT ISSUES CRIM. JUST. 307-321 (2004-5). Mensah, Thomas A., The Dispute Settlement Regime of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 2 MAX PLANCK Y.B. UN L. 307-323 (1998). Mensah, Thomas A., The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Promotion of a Legal Order in the Oceans, 1998 AUSTL. INT’L L.J. 1-10 (1998). Mensah, Thomas A., The Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, 63 RABEL ZEITSCHRIFT FÜER AUSLÄNDISCHES UND INTERNATIONALES PRIVATRECHT 330-341 (1999). Mensah, Thomas A., The Tribunal and the Prompt Release of Vessels, 22 INT'L J. MARINE & Coastal L. 425-449 (2007). Nelson, L.D.M., The Jurisprudence of the International tribunal for the law of the Sea: Some Observations, in LAW OF THE SEA, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES: LIBER AMICORUM JUDGE THOMAS A. MENSAH 967-988 (Tafsir Malick Ndiaye and Rüdiger Wolfrum eds., 2007; Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Noyes, John E., Compulsory Third-Party Adjudication and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 4 CONN. J. INT'L L. 675-696 (1989). Noyes, John E., The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, 32 CORNELL INT’L L. J. 109-182 (1999). Noyes, John E., The Third-Party Dispute Settlement Provisions of the 1982 United Nations Conventions on the Law of the Sea: Implications for States Parties and for Nonparties, in ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE LAW OF THE SEA CONVENTION 213-237 (Myron H. Nordquist & John N. Moore eds., 1995; The Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Oda, Shigeru, Dispute Settlement Prospects in the Law of the Sea, 44 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 863-872 (1995). Oda, Shigeru, Fisheries under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 77 AM. J. INT’L L. 739-755 (1983). Olbourne, Ben et al., 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea – Prompt Release – Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU Fishing), 23 Aust. Y.B. Int’l L. 255-264 (2004). Oppenheim, Adrienne J., The Plight of the Patagonian Toothfish: Lessons from the Volga Case, 30 BROOK. J. INT’L L. 293-328 (2004-5). Oxman, Bernard H., Does the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea have Jurisdiction over Disputes with Taiwan?, 2 TAIWAN INT’L L. Q. 205–226 (2005). Oxman, Bernard H., The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, in BRINGING NEW LAW TO OCEAN WATERS 285-296 (David D. Caron & Harry N. Scheiber eds., 2004; Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Oxman, Bernard H., The M/V “Saiga” (Saint Vincent and Grenadines v. Guinea) ITLOS Case No. 1, 92 AM. J. INT’L L. 278-282 (1998). Oxman, Bernard H., Observations on Vessel Release under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 11 INT’L J. MARINE & COASTAL L. 201-215 (1996). Oxman, Bernard H. & Vincent Bantz, The “Camouco” (Panama v. France) ITLOS Case No. 5, 94 AM. J. INT’L L. 713-721 (2000). Rothwell, Donald R, Building on the Strengths and Addressing the Challenges: The Role of the Sea Institution, 35 OCEAN DEV. & INT’L L.131-156 (2004). Rothwell, Donald R. & Tim Stephens, Dispute Resolution and the Law of the Sea: Reconciling the Interaction between the LOS Convention and other Environmental Instruments, in OCEANS MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS AND RESPONSES 209-229 (Alex G. Oude Elferink & Donald R. Rothwell eds, 2004; Leiden/ Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Rothwell, Donald R. & Tim Stephens, Illegal Southern Ocean Fishing and Prompt Release: Balancing Coastal and Flag State Rights and Interests, 53 INT’L & COMP. L. Q. 171-187 (2004). Schwarte, Christoph, Environmental Concerns in the Adjudication of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, 16 GEO. INT’L ENVTL. L. REV. 421-439 (2003-4). Sohn, Louis B., The Importance of the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, in ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE LAW OF THE SEA CONVENTION 265-277 (Myron H. Nordquist & John N. Moore eds., 1995; The Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Sohn, Louis B., Peaceful Settlement of Disputes in Ocean Conflicts: Does UNCLOS III Point the Way?, 46 L. & COMTEMP. PROBS 195-210 (1983). Tanaka, Yoshifumi, Prompt Release in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Some Reflections on the ITLOS Jurisprudence, 51 NETH. INT’L L. REV. 237-271 (2004). Treves, Tullio, The Exclusive Economic Zone and the Settlement of Disputes, in THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE AND THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA, 1982-2000: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF STATE PRACTICE 79-96 (Erik Franckx & Philippe Gautier eds., 2003; Brussels: Bruylant). Treves, Tullio, Flags of Convenience before the Law of the Sea Tribunal, 6 SAN DIEGO INT’L L.J. 179-189 (2004). Treves, Tullio, Human Rights and the Law of the Sea, 28 BERKELEY J. INT’L L. 1-14 (2010). Treves, Tullio, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Applicable Law and Interpretation, in THE WTO AT TEN: THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM 490-500 (Giorgio Sacerdoti et al. eds., 2006; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Treves, Tullio, The Law of the Sea Tribunal: Its Status and Scope of Jurisdiction after November 16, 1994, 55 ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR AUSLÄNDISCHES ÖFFENTLICHES RECHT UND VÖLKERRECHT 421-451 (1995). Treves, Tullio, The Proceedings Concerning Prompt Release of Vessels and Crews before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, 11 INT’L J. MARINE & COASTAL L. 179-200 (1996). Treves, Tullio, ‘Straddling and Highly Migratory Flags’ before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, in LAW IN THE SERVICE OF HUMAN DIGNITY: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF FLORENTINO FELICIANO 323-335 (Steve Charnovitz et al. eds., 2005; Cambridge, Cambridge University Press). Treves, Tullio, The Role of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in the Protection of the Marine Environment in Cases Concerning Economic Activities in the Sea and Seabed, in INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS AND PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 97-121 (The International Bureau of PCA ed., 2001; The Hague: Kluwer Law International). Tuerk, Helmut, The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to International Law, in THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL REGIME OF AREAS BEYOND NATIONAL JURISDICTION: CURRENT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS 217-230 (Alex G. Oude Elferink & Erik J. Molenaar eds., 2010; Leiden:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Vukas, Budislav, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Some Features of the New International Judicial Institution, in The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Law and Practice 59-72 (P. Chandrasekhara Rao & Rahmatullah Khan eds., 2001; The Hague: Kluwer Law International). Wegelein, Florian H. Th., The Rules of the Tribunal in the Light of Prompt Release of Vessels, 30 OCEAN DEV. & INT’L L. 255-296 (1999). White, Michael, Prompt Release Cases in ITLOS, in LAW OF THE SEA, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES: LIBER AMICORUM JUDGE THOMAS A. MENSAH 1025-1052 (Tafsir Malick Ndiaye & Rüdiger Wolfrum eds., 2007; Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). White, Michael & Stephen Knight, ITLOS and the ‘Volga’ Case: The Russian Federation v Australia, 17 AUSTL. & N.Z. MAR. L.J. 39-53 (2003). 五、 國際間法院判決 The “M/V Saiga” (No. 1) (St. Vincent v. Guinea), 110 I.L.R.736 (Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea 1997). The “Camouco” (No. 5) (Pan. v. Fr.), 126 I.L.R. 164 (Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea 2000). The “Monte Confurco” (No. 6) (Sey. v. Fr.) , 126 I.L.R. 220 (Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea 2000). The “Grand Prince” (No. 8) (Belize v. Fr.), 125 I.L.R.272 (Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea 2001). The “Chaisiri Reefer 2” (No. 9) (Pan. v. Yemen.), Order of 13 July 2001 (Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea 2001). The “Volga” (No. 11) (Austl. v. Russ.), 126 I.L.R 433 (Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea 2002). The “Juno Trader” (No. 13) (St. Vincent v. Guinea-Bissau) , 128 I.L.R. 267 (Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea 2004). The “Hoshinmaru” (No. 14) (Japan v. Russ.) (Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea 2007). The “Tomimaru” (No. 15) (Japan v. Russ.) (Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea 2007). 六、 網路資源 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: http://www.itlos.org. Ocean and the Law of the Sea: http://www.un.org/Depts/los/index.htm. The World Factbook: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook. 聯合國文件中心。http://www.un.org/zh/documents/index.shtml。 文匯報（2011/04/11）。《指違法捕魚 日拘浙籍船長》，載於http://paper.wenweipo.com/2011/04/11/YO1104110008.htm。 聯合報（2011/06/08）。《闖日海域被捕 台漁船長獲釋》，載於http://udn.com/NEWS/SOCIETY/SOC1/6385143.shtml。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27274 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 為保護船旗國對抗沿海國或港口國對其船舶與船員過長之扣留，以及為對沿海國或港口國特定管轄權行使行為提供救濟，1982年《聯合國海洋法公約》第292條賦予國際間法院審理迅速釋放船舶與船員爭端之管轄權。條文內容包含對經濟、人道、安全與環境等等面向之關注。
「國際海洋法法庭」迄今已受理19宗案件中，9宗係第292條之迅速釋放程序。法庭於判決中對換取船舶與船員釋放的合理保證書或其他財政擔保其概念，與用以評估合理性之因素作出重大貢獻，相當值得深入探究。本文先就當代國際海洋法之爭端解決機制與「國際海洋法法庭」進行介紹。第三章則論述《公約》第292條迅速釋放制度，包括其立法歷史、實體要件，訴訟程序之特性。第四章就「國際海洋法法庭」成立迄今所審理之重要迅速釋放案件作各案介紹。第五章則針對合理保證書或其他財政擔保之概念進行通案、系統性之分析，並檢討法庭於迅速釋放案例判決中之法律理由及立論闡述。最後綜合前述各章意見，提出以當代海洋法為出發點之觀察與意見。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In order to protect the flag state against excessive detentions of its vessels and crews, and to render a remedy for actions taken in exercise of certain jurisdiction by costal state or port state, Article 292 of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea confers jurisdictions on international tribunals over any dispute with respect to prompt release of detained vessels and crews. This provision on prompt release accommodates economic and humanitarian as well as safety and environmental concerns.
In the list of cases of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea which began its work in 1996, 9 out of the total 19 cases relate to the prompt release proceeding under Article 292. The Tribunal in its judgments made significant contribution on elaboration of the reasonable bond or other financial guarantee to be posted in exchange for the release of the vessels and crews in detention, especially regarding its conception and the relevant factors of reasonableness assessment. It is worthwhile to carry out a thorough study. This thesis firstly introduces the dispute settlement mechanism of contemporary law of the sea and the institution of International Tribunal for the Law, secondly the prompt release procedure under Article 292, including its legislative history, substantive requirements and procedural characteristics. Chapter four examines the relevant prompt release cases submitted before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, and chapter five provides an overall and systematic analysis on the reasonable bond or other financial guarantee based on the review of the jurisprudence of the Tribunal. In final chapter, this thesis concludes with some observations and comments from the perspective of contemporary law of the sea. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T17:59:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R96a21104-1.pdf: 8234913 bytes, checksum: cc0de7d602d439fd5c5d353fb8759348 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii 目錄 iii 第一章 序論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究範圍 4 第三節 研究架構 6 第二章 國際海洋法法庭概述 7 第一節 《聯合國海洋法公約》爭端解決制度概述 7 第一項 一般規定 8 第二項 導致有拘束力裁判的強制程序 9 第三項 強制爭端解決程序之限制與例外 10 第二節 國際海洋法法庭 10 第一項 國際海洋法法庭之成立 10 第二項 國際海洋法法庭之組織 12 第三項 國際海洋法法庭之官方語言 14 第四項 國際海洋法法庭之屬人管轄 15 第五項 國際海洋法法庭之訴訟管轄權 16 第六項 國際海洋法法庭之諮詢管轄權 18 第七項 審理案件適用之法律 19 第八項 判決之效力 20 第九項 分庭 20 第三節 小結 24 第三章 迅速釋放制度簡介 25 第一節 立法歷史 25 第一項 《公約》第292條之緣起 25 第二項 條文內容之演進 27 第三項 《公約》之談判結果 35 第二節 《公約》第292條之實體要件 36 第一項 締約國扣留懸掛另一締約國旗幟之船舶 37 第二項 扣留國未遵從《公約》規定迅速釋放遭扣留船舶或其船員 38 第三項 不適用《公約》第292條之情形 49 第三節 《公約》第292條之程序特性 53 第一項 當事方間之通知與談判 53 第二項 擁有管轄權之法院 54 第三項 由船旗國或以其名義提起程序 57 第四項 訴訟程序之不遲延處理 62 第五項 僅處理釋放問題 67 第六項 不影響內國任何案件之是非曲直 67 第四節 小結 69 第四章 迅速釋放相關案例 70 第一節 前言 70 第二節 M/V Saiga 案（聖文森及格瑞那丁訴幾內亞） 72 第一項 事實 72 第二項 兩造主張 72 第三項 法院判決 73 第三節 Camouco 案（巴拿馬訴法國） 75 第一項 事實 75 第二項 兩造主張 76 第三項 法院判決 76 第四節 Monte Confurco 案（賽昔爾訴法國） 80 第一項 事實 80 第二項 兩造主張 81 第三項 法院判決 82 第五節 Volga 案（澳大利亞訴俄羅斯） 88 第一項 事實 88 第二項 兩造主張 89 第三項 法院判決 90 第六節 Juno Trader 案（聖文森及格瑞那丁訴幾內亞比索） 96 第一項 事實 96 第二項 兩造主張 97 第三項 法院判決 98 第七節 Hoshinmaru 案（日本訴俄羅斯） 103 第一項 事實 103 第二項 兩造主張 104 第三項 法院判決 104 第五章 合理保證書或其他財政擔保之分析 109 第一節 前言 109 第二節 合理保證書或其他財政擔保之意義 109 第一項 《公約》與《法庭議事規則》之規定 109 第二項 解釋合理保證書或其他財政擔保之方法 113 第三項 合理保證書或其他財政擔保之必要性 119 第三節 合理保證書或其他財政擔保之相關因素 121 第一項 合理保證書或其他財政擔保相關因素之功能 121 第二項 依扣留國法律所施加或可施加之懲罰 123 第三項 所控犯行之嚴重性 128 第四項 遭扣留船舶與貨物之價值 134 第五項 扣留國所訂定之保證書數量及形式 138 第六項 兩造間有關保證書或其他財政擔保之協議 139 第七項 系爭船舶逮捕之情形 140 第八項 與前判決之比例性 140 第九項 小結 143 第四節 合理保證書或其他財政擔保之決定 145 第一項 數量之決定 145 第二項 性質之決定 147 第三項 形式之決定 149 第四項 釋放標的之決定 150 第五項 提交對象之決定 152 第五節 小結 153 第六章 結論 155 參考文獻 159 一、 中文專書 159 二、 中文期刊論文 159 三、 外文專書 159 四、 外文期刊論文 160 五、 國際間法院判決 168 六、 網路資源 168 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 爭端解決 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 船舶與船員之迅速釋放 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際海洋法法庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 聯合國國際海洋法公約 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 合理保證書或其他財政擔保 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | settlement of disputes | en |
| dc.subject | the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | en |
| dc.subject | prompt release of vessels and crews | en |
| dc.subject | the reasonable bond or other financial guarantee | en |
| dc.subject | 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea | en |
| dc.title | 國際海洋法法庭迅速釋放案例之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on Cases Concerning Prompt Release before ITLOS | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何勝初,陳國勝 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 國際海洋法法庭,船舶與船員之迅速釋放,爭端解決,聯合國國際海洋法公約,合理保證書或其他財政擔保, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,prompt release of vessels and crews,settlement of disputes,1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,the reasonable bond or other financial guarantee, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 169 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 8.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。