請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27084
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 古佳艷(Chia-Yen Ku) | |
dc.contributor.author | Tai-Chun Ho | en |
dc.contributor.author | 何泰鈞 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T17:55:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-02-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-02-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-02-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Works Cited
Primary Sources Browning, Elizabeth Barrett. Aurora Leigh: Authoritative Text, Backgrounds and Contexts, Criticism. Ed. Margaret Reynolds. New York: Norton, 1996. Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. Berkeley: U of California P, 1993. Froude, James. “The Representative Men.” Short Studies on Great Subjects. London: Longman, 1888. I: 580. Lang, Cecil Y. Ed. The Swinburne Letters. 6 vols. New Haven, 1959-62. Malory, Thomas. Morte Darthur. Ed. Strachey, Edward. London: Macmillan, 1901. Rev. of The Holy Grail and Other Poems. Victorian Magazine XIV Feb. 1870: 376-83. Swinburne, Algernon. Swinburne Replies: Notes on Poems and Reviews, Under the Microscope and Dedicatory Epistle. Ed. Clyde Kenneth Hyder. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse UP, 1966. ---. “Tennyson and Musset.” Fortnightly Review. XXIX (1881): 129-53. Tennyson, Alfred. The Poems of Tennyson. Ed. Christopher Ricks. 2nd ed. 3 vols. Berkeley: U of California P, 1987. ---. Idylls of the King. Ed. James M. Gray. NY: Penguin, 1983. Tennyson: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Lohn D. Jump. London: Routledge, 1967. Tennyson, Hallman. Alfred Lord Tennyson: A Memoir by His Son. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1897. Secondary Sources Adams, James Eli. Dandies and Desert Saints: Styles of Victorian Manhood. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1995. Ahern, Stephen. “Listening to Guinevere: Female Agency and the Politics of Chivalry in Tennyson’s Idylls.” Studies in Philology 101 (2004): 88-112. Andrew, Aletha. An Annotated Bibliography and Study of the Contemporary Criticism of Tennyson’s Idylls of the King: 1859- 1886. New York: American U Studies, 1993. Barczewski, Stephanie L. Myth and National Identity in Nineteenth-Century Britain: The Legends of King Arthur and Robin Hood. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000. Brantlinger, Patrick. Rule of Darkness: British Literature and Imperialism, 1830-1914. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1988. Buckley, Jerome Hamilton. Tennyson: The Growth of a Poet. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1960. Clarke, Norma. “Thomas Carlyle and the Man of Letter as Hero.” Manful Assertions: Masculinities in Britain since 1800. Ed. Michael Roper and John Tosh. London: Routledge, 1991. 25-43. Chandler, Alice. A Dream of Order: The Medieval Ideal in Nineteenth-Century English Literature. Lincoln: Nebraska UP, 1970. Connell, R. W. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity P, 1995. ---. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.” Gender and Society 19 (2005): 829-53. Christ, Carol. “Victorian Masculinity and the Angel in the House.” In a Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Women. Ed. Martha Vicinus. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1977. 146-62. Cochran, Rebecca. The Neomedieval Works of Five Victorian Poets: Tennyson, Arnold, Swinburne, Rossetti, and Morris. Diss: U of Iowa, 1985. Culler, A. Dwight. The Poetry of Tennyson. New Haven: Yale UP, 1977. Eggers, J. Philip. King Arthur’s Laureate: A Study of Tennyson’s Idylls of the King. New York: New York UP, 1971. Gaines, Barry. “The Editions of Malory in the Early Nineteenth-Century” The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 68 (1974): 1-18. Gilbert, Elliot L. “The Female King: Tennyson’s Arthurian Apocalypse.” King Arthur: A Casebook. New York: Garland, 1996. 229-55. Girouard, Mark. The Return to Camelot: Chivalry and the English Gentleman. New Haven: Yale UP, 1981. Gramsci, Antonio. “Hegemony, Relations of Force, Historical Bloc.” An Antonio Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings, 1916-1935. Ed. David Forgacs. New York: Schocken Books, 1988. 189-221. Hair, Donald S. Domestic and Heroic in Tennyson’s Poetry. Toronto: Toronto UP, 1981. Harrison, Antony H. “Medievalism and the Ideologies of Victorian poetry.” Studies in Medievalism 4 (1992): 219-34. Houghton, Walter. The Victorian Frame of Mind. New Haven: Yale UP, 1957. Hughes, Linda K. “‘All that Makes a Man’: Tennyson’s Idylls of the King (1859) as a Primer for Modern Gentlemen.” Arthurian Interpretations 1 (1986): 54-63. ---. Tennyson’s Urban Arthurians: Victorian Audiences and the ‘City Built to Music.’” In King Arthur Through the Ages. Ed. Valerie M. Lagorio and Mildred Leake Day. 2 vols. NY: Garland, 1990. 2: 39-61. Knight, Stephen. Arthurian Literature and Society. London: Macmillan, 1983. Knoepflmacher, U.C. “Idling in Gardens of the Queen: Tennyson’s Boys, Princes, and Kings.” Victorian Poetry 30 (1992): 343-64. Kosofsky Sedgwick, Eve. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia P, 1985. Lewin, Lois S. “The Blameless King? “The Conceptual Flaw in Tennyson’s Arthur.” Ball State University Forum 10 (1969): 32-41. Linley, Margaret. “Sexuality and Nation in Tennyson’s Idylls of the King.” Victorian Poetry 30 (1992): 365-86. Machann, Clinton. “Tennyson's King Arthur and the Violence of Manliness.” Victorian Poetry 38 (2000): 199-226. Mancoff, Debra. The Arthurian Revival in Victorian Art. New York: Garland, 1990. ---. “To Take Excalibur: King Arthur and the Construction of Victorian Manhood.” King Arthur: A Casebook. New York: Garland, 1996. 257-80. McClain, Lee Tobin. “Gender Anxiety in Arthurian Romance.” Extrapolation: A Journal of Science Fiction and Fantasy 38.3 (1997): 193-9. Mcsweeney, Kerry. Tennyson and Swinburne as Romantic Naturalists. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1981. Merriman, James. The Flower of the Kings: A Study of the Arthurian Legend in England between 1485 and 1835. Lawrence: UP of Kansas, 1973. Morgan, Thaïs E. “The Poetry of Victorian Masculinities.” Victorian Poetry. Ed. Joseph Bristow. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. 203-27. Phillips, Catherine. “‘Charades from the Middle Ages’? Tennyson’s Idylls of the King and the Chivalric Code.” Victorian poetry 40 (2002): 241-53. Priestley, F. E. L. “Tennyson’s Idylls.” University of Toronto Quarterly 19 (1949): 35-49. Richards, Bernard. English Poetry of the Victorian Period 1830-1890. London: Longman, 1988. Rosenberg, John. The Fall of Camelot: A Study of Tennyson’s Idylls of the King. Cambridge: Belknap, 1973. Ryals, Clyde de L. From the Great Deep: Essays on Idylls of the King. Athens: Ohio UP, 1967. Schierbeck, Dale. Discourse of Discontent: The Use of Arthurian Legend by Morris, Swinburne and Burne-Jones. M.A. Thesis: Canada: U of Calgary, 1993. Shaw, Marion. Alfred Lord Tennyson. Feminist Reading Series, ed. Sue Roe. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities P International, 1988. Shires, Linda M. “Patriarchy, Dead Men, and Tennyson’s Idylls of the King.” Victorian Poetry 30 (1992): 401-19. Sussman, Herbert. Victorian Masculinities: Manhood and Masculine Poetics in early Victorian Literature and Art. Cambridge: Cambridge UP: 1995. Staines, David. Tennyson’s Camelot: The Idylls of the King and its Medieval Sources. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier UP, 1982. Stevenson, Catherine Barnes. “Druids, Bards, and Tennyson’s Merlin,” The Victorian Newsletter 52 (1980): 14-23. Sylvia, Richard A. “Sexual Politics and Narrative Method in Tennyson’s Guinevere” Victorian Newsletter 76 (1989): 23-8. Taylor, Beverly and Brewer, Elizabeth. The Return of King Arthur: British and American Literature Since 1900. Totowa: U of Canada P, 1983. Tillotson, Kathleen. “Tennyson’s Serial Poem.” Mid-Victorian Studies. Geoffrey and Kathleen Tilloston. London: Athlone P, 1965. 80-109. Tosh, John. A Man’s Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England. New Haven: Yale UP, 1999. ---.“Hegemonic Masculinity and the History of Gender.” Masculinities in Politics and War: Gendering Modern History. Ed. Stefan Dudink, Karen Hagemann, and John Tosh. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2004. 41-58. ---. “What Should Historians Do with Masculinities? Reflections on Nineteenth-Century Britain.” History Workshop Journal 38 (1994): 179-202. Tucker, Herbert F. “Trials of Fiction: Novel and Epic in the Geraint and Enid Episodes from Idylls of the King.” Victorian Poetry 30 (1992): 441-61. Zietlow, Paul. “Psychological Exploration in Idylls of the King: The Case of Geraint and Enid.” SEL 24 (1984): 731-47. William, Raymond. “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory.” Problems in Materialism and Culture. London: Verso, 1980. 31-49. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27084 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 摘要
本論文探究亞佛列.丁尼生《亞瑟王的畫像》中的維多利亞陽剛特質。目的在於,反對傳統詮釋將丁尼生的亞瑟王傳奇,視為維護維多利亞父權社會的說教式作品。儘管已有一些引人注目,探討陽剛特質的相關研究,但這些討論都限定於亞瑟王上。本文檢視亞瑟王與騎士們之間的陽剛競爭,主張丁尼生的亞瑟王為維多利亞讀者樹立了一種霸權陽剛典範,但同時也質疑了亞瑟王制定為兄弟會理念的主控意識形態。為此,採用康諾(R. W. Connell)霸權陽剛特質(hegemonic masculinity)的理論架構,從確切的社會歷史脈絡來討論丁尼生亞瑟王世界裡的陽剛特質、男人與女人之間的的性別關係和騎士的男性敘述。本文著重丁尼生如何利用亞瑟王傳奇建造了當代的霸權陽剛典範並強調其內部衝突和問題。亞瑟王的理想反映出中產階級男性對男性本質的自律與對女性的理想化而達到男子氣概,但當騎士們努力信守圓桌武士誓言,擁護亞瑟王霸權典範的過程中卻經歷了各自的男性危機。亞瑟王國度毀壞的原因,除了藍斯洛和維尼格的姦情外,更重要的原因是霸權典範的內部問題,例如英雄、居家陽剛特質的矛盾衝突和對女性過度的理想化。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract
This thesis is a study of Victorian masculinities in Tennyson’s Idylls of the King. The purpose of this thesis is to argue against the traditional interpretation that Tennyson’s Arthurian poem is a didactic work that upholds the status quo of Victorian patriarchal society. While some compelling studies dealing with the issue of masculinities have appeared, they have been limited to the discussion of Tennyson’s King Arthur. This thesis examines competing masculinities among Arthur and his knights. It argues that Tennyson constructs a Victorian hegemonic model of masculinity for his Victorian readers through his reconfiguration of Arthur by which the dominant ideology Arthur enacts as the ideals of the brotherhood is called into question. In doing so, it adopts R.W. Connell’s theoretical framework “hegemonic model” to discuss masculinities, gender relations between men and women in Tennyson’s Arthurian world and the knights’ masculine narratives in specific historical and social contexts. It pays particular attention to how Tennyson deploys the Arthurian legend to construct a hegemonic model as well as underscores its internal problems and contradictions. Arthur’s ideals reflect the middle-class view that a man should control his maleness and idealize his female counterpart as a means to achieve manhood. While striving to live up to the Round Table oaths and affirm Arthur’s hegemonic model, the knights suffer crisis of masculinities respectively. Arthur’s kingdom falls not only because of Guinevere’s sin but more importantly because of the internal problems of Arthur’s hegemonic model such as the contradiction between domestic and heroic masculinities as well as Arthur’s idealization of women. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T17:55:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93122013-1.pdf: 390166 bytes, checksum: f03b1c906e3c7ffd5c79aa7e6080f285 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
Certificate of Approval………………i Acknowledgements ...……………………ii Chinese Abstract ………………………iv English Abstract…………………………v Introduction ……………………………1 Chapter 1: Tennyson’s Hegemony in The Arthurian Revival I. The Context for the Arthurian Revival……20 II. Contemporary Reception of Tennyson’s Idylls of the King…27 Chapter 2: The Construction of Arthur’s Hegemonic Masculinity I. King Arthur as Tennyson’s Masculine Ideal……………….41 II. The Internal Problems of Arthur’s Hegemonic Model…58 Chapter 3: Arthur’s Round Table Knights I. Gareth and Geraint ………………………………………68 II. Balin and Pelleas, Lancelot and Trsitram…………83 Conclusion ……………………………………………………95 Works Cited……………………………………………………99 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 維多利亞陽剛特質與男子氣概:
丁尼生《亞瑟王的畫像》中的男性典範 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Victorian Masculinities and Manhood:
Tennyson’s Masculine Models in Idylls of the King | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊明蒼(Ming-Tsang Yang),李紀舍(Chi-She Li) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 亞佛列.丁尼生,《亞瑟王的畫像》,亞瑟王復興,霸權陽剛特質,居家陽剛特質,英雄陽剛特質,女人崇拜,男人本質,男子氣概, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Alfred Tennyson,Idylls of the King,the Arthurian Revival,hegemonic masculinity,domestic masculinity,heroic masculinity,women-worship,maleness,manhood, | en |
dc.relation.page | 105 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-02-02 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 外國語文學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 381.02 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。