請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26941完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡彥卿 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsung-Che Chiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 江宗哲 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:33:32Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-06-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一. 中文部份
林佩佳,2005,股權結構、盈餘管理與公司價值之關聯性-以我國上市公司為例,國立成功大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文 柯承恩,2000,我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議,會計研究月刊,第173期與第174期,P75-81與P79-83 唐春金,2004,台灣公司治理與盈餘管理關聯性之實證研究,美國西太平洋大學企業管理研究所博士論文 馬于雯,2004,我國公司治理、盈餘管理與盈餘資訊性之關聯,私立淡江大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文 陳錦村與葉雅薰,2002,公司改組、監督機制與盈餘管理之研究,會計評論,第34期:P1-P29 陳宏姿,2001,董監事結構與企業經營績效關聯性之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所,碩士論文 黃信忠,1999,員工認股權公平價值會計之可行性研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文 彭政錦,2003,董事會特性、股權結構及機構投資人持股與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文 曾偉倫,2007,企業實施員工認股權制度與公司治理機制之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文 葉銀華、李存修與柯承恩等箸,2002,公司治理與評等系統,商智文化出版 葉銀華、李冠德與柯承恩等箸,2002,公司監理機制對於關係人交易之影響,2002年台灣財務學術研討會,台灣財務金融學會 鄭丁旺,2005,中級會計學下冊,第8版 賴淑婷,2007,公司治理與認列減損關聯性之研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文 謝宇蓁,2004,獨立董監事特性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文 蘇惠卿,2004,股權集中度、管理當局機制及董事會特性與盈餘管理之相關性研究,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文 蘇玟夙,2003,上市公司董事會特性與盈餘管理程度關聯性之研究,高雄國立第一科技大學財務管理所碩士論文 二. 英文部分 Claessens,S.,S.Djankov,& L.H.P.Lang,2000,“The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations”,Journal of Financial Economics 58,81-112 Dean C.,Diana R.Franz,& G.R. Smith,Jr.(1997).Computing Employee Stock Option Values with a Spreadsheet,Management Accounting,79(1),44-48. Dechow P.M.,1994,“Accounting Earnings and Cash Flows as Measures of Firm Performance The Role of Accounting Accruals”,Journal of Accounting and Economics 18.3-42 Dechow,P.M.,& R.G.Sloan,1991,“Executive Incentives and Horizon Problem:An Empirical Investigation”,Journal of Accounting and Economics,14,51-89 Demestz,H.,& K.Lehn,1985,“The Structure of Corporate Ownership:Causes and Consequences”,The Journal of Political Economy,93,6,1155-1177 Ding,D.K.,& Q.Sun,2001,“Causes and effects of employee stock option plans:Evidence from Singapore”,Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,9,5,P563-599 Healy P.M.,1985,“The Effects of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions”,Journal of Accounting and Economics,7:85-107 Klein A.,1998,“Firm performance and board committee structure”,Journal of Law and Economics 41,275-303 La Porta,R.,F.Lopez-de-Silaned,& A.Shleifer,1999,“Corporate ownership around the world”,Journal of Finance 54:47-517 La Porta,R.,F.Lopez-de-Silaned, A.Shleifer & R.W.Vishny,2000,“Investor protection and corporate governance”,Journal of Financial Economics 58:3-27 La Porta,R.,F.Lopez-de-Silaned, A.Shleifer & R.W.Vishny,2002,“Investor protection and corporate valuation”,Journal of Finance 57:P1147-1170 Lemmon,M.L.,& K.V.Lins,2003,“Ownership structure,corporate governance and firm value:Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis”,Journal of Finance 58,p1445-1468 Liu,Q.,& J.Z.Lu,2002,“Earning Management to Tunnel:Evidence from China’s Listed Companies”,Working Paper. Morck,R.A.Shleifer & R. W.Vishny,1998,“Management ownership and market valuation:An empirical analysis”,Journal of Financial Economics 20,P293-315 Maribeth Coller & Julia L.Higgs(1997).Firm Valuation and Employee Stock Options,Financial Analyst Journal,53(1),26-34 Mak,Y.T.,& Y.Li,2001,“Determinants of Corporate Ownership and Board Structure:Evidence From Singapore”, Journal of Corporate Finance,7,3,235-256 Palliam R.,& Z.Shalhoub,2003,“The phenomenology of Earnings Management within the Confines of Agency Theory”, International Journal of Value-Based Management,16,1,p75-88 Rajna Gibson(1991).Option Valuation:Amalyzing and Pricing Standardized Option Contracts.New York:MaGraw-Hill,Inc Raheja,G.R.,2005,“Determinants of board size and composition:a theory of corporate boards”, Journal of Financial Quantitatinve Analysis 40,P283-306 Shleifer,A.,& R.W.Vishny,1997,“A Survey of Corporate Governance”,Journal of Finance,52,737-783 World Bank,1999,“Corporate governance:A framework for implementation-Overview.” Weisbach,M.S.,1988,“Outside directors and CEO turnover”,Journal of Financial Economics 20,431-460 Xie,B.,W.N.Davidson,& P.J DaDalt.2003.“Earnings management and corporate governance:the role of the board and the audit committee. ”, Journal of Corporate Finance Yeh,Y.H.,T.S.Lee & T.Woidtke,2001,“Family control and corporate governance:Evidence for Taiwan”,International Review of Finance 2:p21-48 Yeo,G.H.H.,P.M.S.Tan,K.W.Ho,& S. Chen,2002,“Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Earnings”,Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,29,7&8,1023-1046 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26941 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討員工認股權假設參數合理性與公司治理之關聯性,樣本期間為2004年至2007年第3季,分析方法採用OLS Model。其實證結果如下:
首先,本研究探討「員工認股權假設參數合理性之無風險利率與公司治理之關聯性」部份,實證結果發現,監事席次愈高、董監事持股質押比例愈高、控制權與現金流量請求權偏離程度愈高者、董事長兼任總經理,愈有可能透過操弄員工認股權參數假設來進行盈餘管理;另外,模型實證結果也發現,在法人持股部份,當法人持股比例愈高時,公司透過操縱員工認股權參數假設來進行盈餘管理的機會就愈低。上述結果意味著公司治理較差的公司,愈有機會透過操弄選擇權評價模型參數達到操縱損益之目的。 再者,探討「員工認股權假設參數合理性之預期股價波動性與公司治理之關聯性」部分,本研究實證結果發現,法人持股比例愈高、董事長兼任總經理、時,愈有可能透過操弄員工認股權參數假設來進行盈餘管理;此外,模型實證結果也發現,控制股東董事席次控制百分比愈高、控制股東現金流量請求權愈高,公司透過操弄員工認股權參數假設來進行盈餘管理的機率就愈低。上述結果意味著公司治理較差的公司,愈有機會透過操弄選擇權評價模型參數達到操縱損益之目的。 最後,根據本研究以上實證結果顯示,公司治理變數對於利用選擇權評價模型參數進行操縱損益之顯著情形及影響方向不盡相同;但本研究之實證結果,根據大部份假說之相符,可推論得知,公司治理愈好之公司,該公司透過操縱選擇權評價模型參數之手法達到操縱損益之機率較低。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research focuses on the association between the inputs of model of employee stock options and corporate governance. The sample period is from year 2004 to the third quarter of year 2007. The analysis models adopted in the research is OLS Model.Empirical results suggest what mentioned below.
First,this study focus on the association between the inputs of model of employee stock options-risk-free rate and corporate governance. The empirical results are as follows: 1.The number of inspectors is positively associated with earnings management through controlling the risk free rate with statistical significance. 2.The percentage of shares pledged of directors is positively associated with earnings management through controlling the risk free rate with statistical significance. 3.The degree of divagating between voting rights and cash flow claims is positively associated with earnings management through controlling the risk free rate with statistical significance. 4.The chairman who is also the manager in the company is positively associated with earnings management through controlling the risk free rate with statistical significance. 5.The ratio of the stock held by the institutional shareholders is negatively associated with earnings management through controlling the risk free rate with statistical significance. Second, this study focus on the association between model inputs of employee stock options-volatility and corporate governance. The empirical results are as follows: 1.The ratio of the stock held by the institutional shareholders is positively associated with earnings management through controlling the volatility with statistical significance. 2.The chairman who is also the manager in the company is positively associated with earnings management through controlling the volatility with statistical significance. 3.The percentage of the board of directors controlled by controlling shareholders is negatively associated with earnings management through controlling the volatility with statistical significance. 4.The cash flow claims is negatively associated with earnings management through controlling the volatility with statistical significance. Finally, the empirical results mean that when a company with good corporate governance ,it is seldom to do earnings management through controlling the inputs of the model of employee stock options. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:33:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95722044-1.pdf: 649442 bytes, checksum: 446572851c19a2155fe910c4c654f24e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試審定書..............................................i
誌 謝 ..............................................ii 中文摘要 .............................................iii Abstract ..............................................iv 第一章 緒論.............................................1 第一節 研究背景 ......................................1 第二節 研究動機與目的...................................3 第三節 研究架構.........................................5 第二章 文獻探討.........................................7 第一節 員工認股權的介紹.................................7 第二節公司治理意義及架構...............................12 第三節公司治理相關文獻.................................15 第四節公司治理與盈餘管理...............................19 第三章研究方法.........................................22 第一節研究架構與假說之建立.............................22 第三節變數之衡量.......................................28 第四節實證模型.........................................35 第五節 研究期間及樣本選取..............................39 第四章 實證結果與分析..................................41 第一節 資料分布及敘述性統計分析........................41 第二節 相關性與共線性分析..............................48 第三節多元回歸分析 .....................................53 第五章 結論與建議......................................61 第一節 研究結論......................................61 第二節 研究限制........................................63 第三節 後續研究建議....................................64 參考文獻...............................................65 圖次 圖1 - 1 研究流程圖 6 圖2 - 1世界銀行之公司治理架構 15 表次 表1 - 1認股權計畫比較表 9 表2 - 1半導體產業及光電產業於民國93年至96年第3季發放員工認股權之家數 12 【表3 - 1】直接影響選擇權價值之因素及影響其價值之方向 30 【表3 - 2】變數衡量彙總表 34 【表3 - 3】模型a樣本選取彙總表 40 【表3 - 4】模型b樣本選取彙總表 41 【表4 - 1】無風險利率差與預期股價波動性差樣本分配表 41 【表4 - 2】無風險利率差之全部樣本之敘述性統計 43 【表4 - 3】預期股價波動性之全部樣本之敘述性統計 44 【表4 - 4】RfDif<0之樣本之敘述性統計 45 【表4 - 5】RfDif>0之樣本之敘述性統計 46 【表4 - 6】VolaDif<0之樣本之敘述性統計 47 【表4 - 7】VolaDif>0之樣本之敘述性統計 47 【表4 - 8】RfDif各解釋變數間之Pearson相關係數分析 49 【表4 - 9】VolaDif各解釋變數間之Pearson相關係數分析 50 【表4 - 10】無風險利率差解釋變數之VIF值 51 【表4 - 11】預期股價波動性差解釋變數之VIF值 52 【表4 - 12】選擇權評價模型參數無風險利率合理性與公司治理特質之OLS分析 59 【表4 - 13】選擇權評價模型參數預期股價波動性合理性與公司治理特質之OLS分析 60 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 公司治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 員工認股權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 盈餘管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 無風險利率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 預期股價波動性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | employee stock option | en |
| dc.subject | volatility | en |
| dc.subject | risk-free rate | en |
| dc.subject | earnings management | en |
| dc.subject | corporate governance | en |
| dc.title | 員工認股權評價參數假設合理性與公司治理關聯性之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Model Inputs of Employee Stock Options and Corporate Governance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李文智,簡雪芳 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 公司治理,員工認股權,盈餘管理,無風險利率,預期股價波動性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | corporate governance,employee stock option,earnings management,risk-free rate,volatility, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 69 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-06-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 634.22 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
