請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2676
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 呂學士 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chin-Wen Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃琴文 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T06:48:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-16 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T06:48:35Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-02-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-01-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文:
李浩、高澤華、高峰、趙榮華(2009)。IEEE 802.11 無線局域網標準研究。計算機應用研究,26(5)。 李淳(2008)。國家標準涉及智慧財產權之研究。中華經濟研究院(台灣WTO中心)。 張宇、陳金鷹 (2011)。WiFi 發展的思考。四川省通信學會 2011 年學術年會論文集。 楊帆 (2006)。國際技術標準與智慧財產權。人民法院出版社。 廖雅雯(2004)。論產業標準與專利權。國立中正大學財經法律研究所碩士論文。 網路通訊國際標準分析及參與制定計劃網 (2017)。Retrieved January1, 2017, from http://std-share.itri.org.tw/ IEEE (2017a)。 IEEE 介紹。 Retrieved January1, 2017, from http://cn.ieee.org/about_IEEE.html 經濟部標準檢驗局 (2017a)。國外標準發展組織簡介。Retrieved January1, 2017, from http://www.bsmi.gov.tw/wSite/public/Data/f1320395747595.pdf 經濟部標準檢驗局 (2017b)。國家標準化體系。Retrieved January1, 2017, from http://www.bsmi.gov.tw/wSite/ct?xItem=16583&ctNode=4005 經濟部標準檢驗局 (2017c)。國家標準編修程序。Retrieved January1, 2017, from http://www.bsmi.gov.tw/wSite/lp?ctNode=4014&CtUnit=1330&BaseDSD=7&mp=1 姚玉鳳(2016)。標準必要專利的產生流程及實踐中的若干問題。電信科學,32(6), 163。 馬廷燦、李桂菊、薑山、馮瑞華(2012)。專利品質評價指標及其在專利計量中的應用。 馬海生(2009)。技術標準中的 “必要專利” 問題研究。智慧財產權,(2), 35-39。 IEEE (2017e)。IEEE標準協會的標準發展。Retrieved January1, 2017, from https://standards.ieee.org/develop/overview.html 陳啟桐(2016)。美國臨時專利申請案之申請特性及其與專利品質之相關性研究。國立台灣大學機械工程學研究所博士論文。 梁峻齊、阮明淑(2009)。專利指標發展研究。圖書館學與資訊科學。 二、英文: Allison, J. R., Lemley, M. A., Moore, K. A., & Trunkey, R. D. (2003). Valuable patents. Geo. Lj, 92, 435. Allison, J. R., & Sager, T. W. (2006). Valuable Patents Redux: On the Enduring Merit of Using Patent Characteristics to Identify Valuable Patents. Tex. L. Rev., 85, 1769. Allison, J. R., Lemley, M. A., & Walker, J. H. (2009). Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? The Characteristics of the Most Litigated Patents. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 158(1). Armstrong, A. K., Mueller, J. J., & Syrett, T. (2014). The smartphone royalty stack: Surveying royalty demands for the components within modern smartphones. Baron, J., Pohlmann, T., & Blind, K. (2016). Essential patents and standard dynamics. Research Policy. Breitzman, A. F., & Narin, F. (2001). U.S. Patent No. 6,175,824. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Narin, F. (2000). Tech-line background paper. From knowledge management to strategic competence, 3, 155-195. ETSI (2017). What are standards? Retrieved January1, 2017, from http://www.etsi.org/standards/what-are-standards Grabowski, H. G., & Vernon, J. M. (2000). Effective patent life in pharmaceuticals. International Journal of Technology Management, 19(1-2), 98-120. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (No. w8498). National Bureau of Economic Research. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of economics, 16-38. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research policy, 32(8), 1343-1363. Harhoff, D., & Wagner, S. (2009). The duration of patent examination at the European Patent Office. Management Science, 55(12), 1969-1984. IEEE (2017b). About IEEE-SA. Retrieved January1, 2017, from http://standards.ieee.org/about/index.html IEEE (2017c), IEEE-SA records of ieee standards-related patent letters of assurance for ieee standard 802.11 and amendments. Retrieved January1, 2017, from http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/pat802_11.html IEEE (2017d), What are standards? Retrieved January1, 2017, from https://standards.ieee.org/develop/overview.html IEEE-SA (2017), Standards Board Bylaws. Retrieved January1, 2017, from https://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/index.html ISO (2017), ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004,Retrieved January1, 2017, from http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=39976 Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. the Quarterly journal of Economics, 577-598. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465. Lemley, M. A., & Shapiro, C. (2006). Patent holdup and royalty stacking. Tex. L. Rev., 85, 1991. Mueller, J. M. (2002). Patent misuse through the capture of industry standards. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 623-684. Rysman, M., & Simcoe, T. (2008). Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations. Management science, 54(11), 1920-1934. Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Wu, C. Y., & Lin, C. W. (2012). A patent quality analysis for innovative technology and product development. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(1), 26-34. Podolny, J. M., Stuart, T. E., & Hannan, M. T. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991. American journal of sociology, 659-689. USPTO (2017). Provisional Application for Patent. Retrieved January 1, 2017, from http://www.uspto.gov/patents-getting-started/patent-basics/types-patent-applications/provisional-application-patent Van Zeebroeck, N. (2011). The puzzle of patent value indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(1), 33-62. Zuniga, P., Guellec, D., Dernis, H., Khan, M., Okazaki, T., & Webb, C. (2009). OECD patent statistics manual. Francia: OECD Publications. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2676 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文之目的在於藉由美國專利申請案資料庫(U.S. Patent Application Database),以分析802.11標準必要專利之專利特性,而評估802.11標準必要專利是否比非802.11標準必要專利具有較佳之專利品質。多重的專利指標被用來進行分析,這些指標包括:向前引用次數、向後引用次數、非專利參考文獻引用次數、專利家族的數量、請求項的數量、發明人人數、審查時間、專利維護比率、主張臨時案優先權比率以及涉及訴訟比率。
本論文研究發現,802.11標準必要專利與非802.11標準必要專利在下述多重專利指標變量具有統計學上顯著性差異:(1)向前引用次數、(2)向後引用次數、(3)專利家族的數量、(4)審查時間、(5)維護專利之比率、(6)涉及訴訟之比率;本章研究結果並發現,802.11標準必要專利及非802.11標準必要專利在下述4個多重專利指標變量並不具有統計學上顯著性差異:(1)非專利參考文獻引用次數、(2)請求項的數量、(3)發明人之數量、(4)主張臨時案優先權之比率。 基於以上之發現,本論文結論為802.11標準必要專利相較於非802.11標準必要專利確實具有較好的專利品質。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The object of this study is to use the US Patent Application Database to identify the characteristics of IEEE 802.11 stadard essential patents to determine whether 802.11 stanard essential patents have better patent performance than non-802.11 standard essential patents. Multiple indicators are used to analyze the issue. These indicators include: the number of forward citations, the number of backward citations, the number of non-patent references, the number of patent families, the number of claims, the number of inventors, the examination time, the maintained rate, the rate of claiming priority from a provisinaol application and the rate of involving litigations.
It is found that there are statistically significant differences for the two types of patents in the following seven variables: (1) number of forward citations, (2) number of backward citations, (3) number of patent families, (4) examination time, (5) maintained rate, and (6) rate of involving litigations. It is also found that there are no statistically significant differences for 802.11 stanard essential patents and non-802.11 standard essential patents in the following three variables: (1) number of non-patent references, (2) number of claims, (3) number of inventors, and (4) the rate of claiming priority from a provisinaol application. Accordingly, it is concluded that 802.11 standard essential patents have better patent performance than non-802.11 standard essential patents. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T06:48:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-P96943009-1.pdf: 1961515 bytes, checksum: c3a62ad7f1f8f8ac9184f2185b565d07 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………….…...i
誌謝……………………………………………………………………………………...ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iii 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iv 表目錄…………………………………………………………………………………ix 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………...…...........xi 第一章 緒論…………………....……………………………………………………..1 1.1研究背景…….……………………………………………………………….1 1.2研究問題…….……………………………………………………………….4 1.3研究流程…………...…….………………...…………………………...........6 第二章 文獻探討…………………....………………………………………………..7 2.1標準之意義及其制定流程………………..….………………………...........7 2.1.1標準之意義…………….………………..……………………………...........7 2.1.2標準之制定流程…….…..……….................……………………….........10 2.1.2.1我國標準之制定流程…….…..………...…………….…………...........10 2.1.2.2 IEEE標準協會之標準制定流程…….…..………..….…….………….....16 2.2標準必要專利之意義及其形成過程……………………………..……......21 2.2.1標準必要專利之意義...………………………….……………………........21 2.2.2IEEE標準必要專利之形成過程…..…………..….……..…………….........22 2.3適合評估802.11標準必要專利之專利品質之指標…..………………......24 2.3.1 向前引用………………….….……...……………………………...............29 2.3.2 向後引用……………….………………………..………………………….30 2.3.3 非專利參考文獻之引用..……………………………….………………….31 2.3.4 專利家族………………………………..……………….………………….31 2.3.5 請求項的數量………..…………………………………….……………….32 2.3.6 審查時間………………….…………………..…………………………….32 2.3.7 專利維護比率……..………..…………..…………………….…………….33 2.3.8 發明人的數量…………………..……………………………….………….34 2.3.9 是否主張臨時申請案優先權….………………..……...…….…………….34 2.3.10 是否涉及訴訟…………..………..………...………………..…………….35 第三章 研究假設及研究方法….………………………………………………........36 3.1 802.11標準必要專利與專利品質相關性之假設.…………………………..36 3.2研究資料範圍……………..…………………………………………...…...38 3.2.1 802.11標準必要專利之資料範圍………..…………………….…...…...38 3.2.2非802.11標準必要專利之資料範圍......…….…………………….….....48 3.3研究方法…………………..…………………………………………...…...51 第四章 802.11標準必要專利之申請特性…………………...………….….………53 4.1 802.11標準必要專利之申請年度……………….…………….…………..53 4.2 802.11標準必要專利之所屬國家別…..……………………………...…...54 4.3 802.11標準必要專利之所屬專利權人類型.…………………….…...…...55 4.4 802.11標準必要專利之所屬專利權人….…….…………………….….....56 第五章802.11標準必要專利與專利品質之相關性………...……………….………58 5.1與專利引用相關的指標…………………………..…………….………….58 5.1.1向前引用次數…………..……………………………….………………….58 5.1.2向後引用次數…………………………..……………….………………….62 5.1.3非專利參考文獻引用次數………..……………………….……………….65 5.1.4分析結果…………………………..……………………….……………….68 5.2與專利家族相關的指標………………………..…………………………….70 5.2.1專利家族的數量………………………..…………………….…………….70 5.2.2分析結果…………………………..……………………….……………….74 5.3與專利申請過程相關的指標……………………..……...…….…………….75 5.3.1請求項之數量……………………..………...………………..…………….75 5.3.2發明人的數量……………..………...…………….……….…………….79 5.3.3審查時間……….……………..………...………….……….…………….83 5.3.4維護專利之比率..………...…………….………….……….…………….87 5.3.5主張臨時案優先權之比率……………..…………….…….…………….91 5.3.6分析結果………………………..………………………….……………….97 5.4與專利爭議相關的指標...……..………...…………….……….…………….97 5.4.1涉及訴訟之比率……………...……...…………….……….…………….97 5.4.2分析結果.....……..…..………...………………….………………………102 5.5小結…...….....……..…..………...………………….………………………103 第六章 研究結論及建議..…..…..………...………………………………………….104 6.1關於802.11標準必要專利之特性……....…………………………………104 6.2關於802.11標準必要專利與專利品質之相關性………………..………105 6.3建議……………………………………………….………………..………107 參考文獻………………….……………………………….………………..………...108 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 802.11標準必要專利之專利品質之分析與研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Analysis and Research on Patent Performance of 802.11 Standard Essential Patents | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳達仁 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳省三 | |
dc.subject.keyword | IEEE 802.11,標準必要專利,專利指標,專利品質,專利價值, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | IEEE 802.11,standard esential patent,patent indicator,patent performance,patent value, | en |
dc.relation.page | 112 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201700252 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-01-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 電子工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 電子工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf | 1.92 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。