請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26747
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周國端 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Ting Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林育亭 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:23:43Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1.Aliprantis C.D., Brown D.J., Werner J., “Minimum-cost portfolio insurance,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, No. 24, 2000, pp.1703-1719.
2.Andreas Lundvik, “Portfolio insurance methods for index-funds,” Project Report, Jun.2005. 3.Black, Fischer, Scholes, Myron S., “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, Iss.3, May/June.1973, pp.637-654. 4.Boyle, P. P.; J. Evnine; and S. Gibbs, “Numerical Evaluation of Multivariate Contingent Claims,” The Review of Financial Studies, No. 2, 1989, pp. 241-250. 5.Bernard Dumas, Elisa Luciano, “An Exact Solution to a Dynamic Portfolio Choice Problem under Transactions Costs,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, Jun.1991, pp. 577-595. 6.Bookstaber, Richard, Langsam, Joseph A., “Portfolio Insurance Trading Rules,” Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 8, Feb.1988, pp.15-32. 7.Boyle, P.P., and Y.K. Tse, “An Algorithm for Computing Values of Options on the Maximum or Minimum of Several Assets,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 25, No.2, Jun.1990, pp.215-227. 8.Blessing Mudavanhu, Jun Zhuo, “Valuing guaranteed minimum death benefits in variable annuities and the option to lapse,” Journal of North American Actuarial, Mar.2002. 9.Bird, R., Cunningham, R., Dennis, D., Tippett, M., “Portfolio insurance: a simulation under different market conditions,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economic, Vol. 9, No.1, 1990, pp.1-19. 10.Black, Fischer, Jones, Rober, “Simplifying Portfolio Insurance ,” Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, Fall1987, pp.48-52. 11.Charles J. Jacklin, Allan W. Kleidon, Paul Pfleiderer, “Underestimation of Portfolio Insurance and the Crash of October 1987,” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 5, 1992, pp.35-63. 12.Clarke, Roger G., Arnott, Robert D, “The Cost of Portfolio Insurance: Tradeoffs and Choices,” Vol. 43, Iss. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1987, pp. 35-48 13.Cesari, R. and Cremonini , D., “Benchmarking, portfolio insurance and technical analysis: a Monte Carlo comparison of dynamic strategies of asset allocation,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 27, Iss. 6, Apr.2003, pp. 987-1011. 14.Do, B.H., “Relative Performance of Dynamic Portfolio Insurance Strategies: Australian Evidence,” Accounting and Finance, Vol. 42, pp.279-296. 15.Do, B.H. and Faff, R.W., 2004. “Do Futures-Based Strategies Enhance Dynamic Portfolio Insurance?, ” Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 24, No.6, pp. 591-608. 16.Garcia, C. B., Gould, F.J., “An Empirical Study of Portfolio Insurance,” Vol. 43, Iss. 43, Jul/Aug. 1987, pp.44-55. 17.Geman, H., “Portfolio insurance and synthetic securities,” Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, Vol. 8, Iss. 3, Sep.1992, pp.179-188. 18.Hardy, M.R., “Hedging and reserving for single-premium segregated fund contracts,” North American Actuarial Journal, 2000. 19.Jose` M. Chamorro, Jose` M. Perez de Villarreal, “Mutual fund evaluation: a portfolio insurance approach A heuristic application in Spain,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economic 27, 2000, pp.83-104. 20.Jan Annaert, Sofieke Van Osselaer and Bert Verstraete, “Performance evaluation of portfolio insurance strategies using stochastic dominance criteria,” working paper, May.2006. 21.Johnson Herb, “Options on the Maximum or Minimum of Several Assets,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 22, No.3, Sep.1987, pp.277-283. 22.Loria, S., Pham, T. M., Sim, A.B., “The performance of a stock index futures-based portfolio insurance scheme: Australian evidence,” Review of Futures Markets, 10(3), 1991, pp. 438-457. 23.Leland, Hayne E., “Option Pricing and Replication with Transaction Costs,” Options markets, Vol. 3, 2001, pp. 276-294. 24.Margrabe, W., “The Value of an Option to Exchange One Asset for Another,” Journal of Finance, Vol.33, Mar. 1978, pp. 177-186. 25.Mark Rubinstein, “Alternative Paths to Portfolio Insurance,” Journal of Financial Analyst, Jul./Aug.1985, pp.42-52. 26.Moshe Arye Milevsky, Steven E. Posner, “The Titanic Option: Valuation of the Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit in Variable Annuities and Mutual Funds,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 68, No.1, Mar.2001, pp.93-128. 27.Michael Asay, Charles Edelsburg, “Can a Dynamic Strategy Replicate the Returns of an Option? ,” The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, spring 1986, pp. 63-71. 28.Mark Rubinstein, “Rainbow Options”, Jan.1995 29.Phelim P. Boyle, Mary R. Hardy, “Reserving for maturity guarantees: Two approaches,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economic 21, 1997, pp.113-127. 30.Perold, Andre F, Sharpe, William F., “Dynamic strategies for asset allocation,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 51, Iss. 1, Jan/Feb. 1995, pp.149-161. 31.Rubinstein, M., “Portfolio insurance and the market crash,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan/Feb.1988. 32.Rubinstein, M. and H. Leland, “Replicating options with positions in stock and cash,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jul/Aug.1981. 33.Rubinstein. Mark, “Alternative Paths to Portfolio Insurance,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 41, Iss. 4, Jul /Aug. 1985, pp. 42-53. 34.Richard Bookstaber; Roger Clarke, “Option Portfolio Strategies: Measurement and Evaluation,” Journal of Business, Vol. 57, Oct.1984, pp. 469-492. 35.Rendleman, R.J., Jr. and O`Brien, T.J., “The Effects of Volatility Misestimation on Option-Replication portfolio Insurance,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 46, No.3, May/Jun. 1990, pp.61-70. 36.Rachid Bouchaib, “Dynamic Asset Allocation to Hedge Cash Guarantees using Revised Option Based Portfolio Insurance,” Finance & Investment Conference, Jun.2004. 37.Rachid Bouchaib, “Risk-averse Capital Market Line using Revised Option-Based Portfolio Insurance,” ICA, 2006. 38.Son-Nan Chen, Financial Engineering, 2005, pp.151-159. 39.Snorre Lindset, “Options on the Maximum or the Minimum of Several Assets Revisited,” Mar.2003. 40.Simon LEGER, Joseph PEREZ, Yann RENOUX, “Model validation-Risk Management,” Mar.2006. 41.Stulz, R.M., “Options on the Minimum or the Maximum of Two Risky Assets: Analysis and Applications,” Journal of Financial Economics, 1982, pp.161-185. 42.Topper, J., “Worst Case Pricing of Rainbow Options,” Discussion Paper No. 217, Oct.2001. 43.Tilley, J.A. and Latainer. G.D., “A synthetic option framework for asset allocation,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 41, 1985, pp.32-43. 44.Trennepohl, G.L., Booth, J.R. and Tehranian, H., “An empirical analysis of insured portfolio strategies using listed options,” Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 11, No.1, Spring1988, pp.1-12. 45.Tilley, J. A,, and G. D. Latainer, “A Synthetic Option Framework for Asset Allocation,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 41, Jun.1985, pp. 32-43. 46.Ulf Herold, Raimond Maurer, Michael Stamos, and Huy Thanh Vo, “Total Return Strategies for Multi-Asset Portfolios,” Winter2007, pp.60-76. 47.Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, Financial Engineering and Computation, Cambridge University, UK, 2002. 48.Zhu, Yu, Kavee, Robert C., “Performance of Portfolio Insurance Strategy,” Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, Spring1988. 49.http://www.actuaries.org/AFIR/colloquia/Brussels/Boulier_Kanniganti.pdf,May, 2005. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26747 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, considerable interest has arisen over the method of dynamic asset allocation to limit downside risk while allowing some participation in upside market. Thus, the main purpose of our study is to explore how to replicate the maximum multi-asset option by adjusting the weight of the risky assets and risk-free asset dynamically to preserve the upward return with limited downside risk. We attempt to develop an option replication portfolio insurance strategy, called ORPI strategy. This strategy is based on the maximum options pricing model, and is modified with PS method which was popularized by Perold and Sharpe. We use the GARCH volatility model for the estimate and use the method of moving averages over an N-day window to calculate the correlation.
We applied this ORPI strategy to ETF data and five markets indices. Then, we perform a sensitivity analysis to compare the performance of the different implementation variables with different floors and investment horizon. The empirical evidences confirm that as the floor declines, less portfolio is protected, but more upside return is captured and vice versa; nevertheless, when the market situation perform badly, the portfolio return could be much worse. When implementing the floor value of 100% of the initial value, a risk-averse investor will try to avoid any loss of the initial portfolio value and then invest in more weights on the risk-free asset. On the other hand, the more risk tolerant investors will tolerate more risk to capture more upward potential and will implement the floor value less than 100% of the initial value so they will invest in fewer weights on the risk-free asset. The main contribution of this thesis is to help investors adjust the asset allocations dynamically with the protection of the chosen floor combined with the GARCH volatility model. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:23:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95723034-1.pdf: 1243097 bytes, checksum: 5a1ccd5bf0beb3bcfed792b5e1f71c97 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 Chapter 3 Model and Assumptions 7 3.1 Maximum Multi-asset Option 7 3.2 Parameter Estimation 10 Chapter 4 Data and Methodology 12 Chapter 5 Empirical Results 16 5.1 The effects of 100 per cent of the portfolio insured with one year horizon for six ETFs 17 5.2 The effects of 100 per cent of the portfolio insured with one year horizon for five markets indices 23 5.3 The effects of 97.5 per cent of the portfolio insured with one year horizon for six ETFs 30 5.4 The effects of 95 per cent of the portfolio insured with one year horizon for six ETFs 36 5.5 The comparison of 100, 90 and 80 per cent of the portfolio insured with one quarter horizon for six ETFs 44 5.6 The comparison of 100,90, 80 per cent of the portfolio insured with one year for five markets indices 48 Chapter 6 Conclusion 50 References 52 Appendix 56 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 多資產極大值選擇權應用於限制下方風險之動態資產配置 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Application of Dynamic Asset Allocation using Maximum Options for downside risk protection | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林筠 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 廖咸興,吳志遠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 動態資產配置,極大值選擇權, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Dynamic Asset Allocation,Maximum Options, | en |
dc.relation.page | 59 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.21 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。