請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26652
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李鴻源(Hong-Yuan Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Chun Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉彥均 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:19:16Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Ayalew, L., Yamagishi,H. (2005) “The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan” Geomorphology (65),p15~31
2. BAEZA,C., COROMINAS,J., (2001) “ASSESSMENT OF SHALLOW LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY BY MEANS OF MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES“ Earth Surface Processes and Landforms ,26:1251~1263 3. Bai,S.B.,W,J.(2010)“GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China” Geomorphology(115),p23~31 4. Cervi,F. et al.,(2010)“Comparing predictive capability of statistical and deterministic methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in the northern Apennines (Reggio Emilia Province, Italy)” Original (7),p433~444 5. Chang,K.T (2007)“Modeling typhoon- and earthquake-induced landslides in a 6. Chang,K.T.,Chiang,S.H.(2009)“An integrated model for predicting rainfall-induced landslides” Geomorphology(105),p366~373 7. Chauhan,S. et al.,(2010) “Landslide susceptibility zonation of the Chamoli region,Garhwal Himalayas, using logistic regression model” Original (7),p411~423 8. Chung.C.J, Fabbri.A. (1993). “The representation of geoscience information for data integration “Geomorphology(89),p335~347 9. Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F. (2003)“ A spatiotemporal probabilistic modeling of storm-induced shallow landsliding using aerial photographs and logistic regression” Earth Surf. Process Landforms( 28),p527~545. 10. Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F.,Tham, L.G., Ng, K.C., Shum, W.L. (2004) “Logistic regression modelling of storm-induced shallow landsliding in time and space on natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. (63), p315~327. 11. Danang.S.H , Franck.L, Junun.S, Pramono.H, Winaryo . (2010) “Landslide hazard and risk assessment and their application in risk management and landuse planning in eastern flank of Menoreh Mountains, Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia”Original (54), p623~642 12. Eeckhaut,M.V.D et al.,(2006) “Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: A case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium)” Geomorphology (76), p392~410 13. F.C. Dai , C.F. Lee.(2002)“Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong” Geomorphology (42), p213~218 14. F.C.Dai, C.F.Lee, Y.Y.N. (2002) “Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview.” Engineering Geology 64, p65~87 15. Frans.K, Michael.V.B, Sabine.A.M, van.R. (2004)“Flood-risk Management Strategies for an Uncertain Future: Living with Rhine River Floods in The Netherlands?” Human Environment, 33(3), p141~147 16. Gorsevski.PV, Gessler.PE, Boll.J, Elliot.WJ, Foltz.RB. (2006) “Spatially and temporally distributed modeling of landslide susceptibility.” Geomorphology 80, p178~198 17. Guzzetti.F, Carrara.A, Cardinali.M, Reichenbach.P.(1999) “Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study,Central Italy” Geomorphology(31),p181~216 information for data integration.“ Nonrenewable Resources 2, p122~139. 18. Iverson,R.M. (2000). “Landslide triggering by rain infiltration” Water Resources Research,Vol.36, No.7, p1897~1910 19. Juan.R , Jaime.B, Antonio.C. (2008) “Quantitative landslide risk assessment and mapping on the basis of recent occurrences“ Geomorphology (94) , p496~507 20. Knapen.A, Kitutu.MG, Poesen.J, Breugelmans.W, Decker.J, Muwanga.A .(2006) “Landslides in a densely populated county at the footslopes of Mount Elgon (Uganda): characteristics and causal factors.” Geomorphology 73, p149~165 21. Lee,S., Pradhan ,B.(2006)“Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models”Original Article(4), p33~41 22. Lee,S.,Min,K.(2001)“Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin,Korea“Environmental Geology(40),p1095~1113 23. Montgomcry,D.R.,Dietrich,W.E.(1994)“A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding” Water Resources Research,Vol.30, No.4, p1153~1171 24. Miller.S, Brewer.T, Harris.N,(2009) “Rainfall thresholding and susceptibility assessmentof rainfall-induced landslides: application to landslide management in St Thomas, Jamaica“Environmental Geology(68), p539~550 25. Ojeda.M. J, Locat J, Couture R, Leroueil S .(2004) “ The magnitude of landslides: an overview.“ Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, p379~384 26. R.Anbalagan. (1992) “Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain” Engineering Geology,(32), p269~277 27. Saha.AK, Gupta.RP .(2002) “GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas.” Int J Remote Sens 23(2), p357~369 28. Salciarini,D. et al.,(2006)“Modeling regional initiation of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the eastern Umbria Region of central Italy” Original (3),p181~194 29. Saldivar-Sali.A, Einstein.HH. (2007) “A landslide risk rating system for Baguio, Philippines.” Eng Geol 91(2–4), p85~99 using frequency ratio and logistic regression models“ Original (4), p33~41 30. Varnes, D.J., (1978) “Slope movement and type and processes in:Landslide Analysis and Control.”Transportation Res. Board Nat. Ac.Sci.Washington Special Report,176 :11~13 31. Zezere.JL, Garcia.R, Oliveira.SC, Reis.E. (2008) “Probabilistic landslide risk analysis considering direct costs in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal).” Geomorphology (94), p467~495 32. Zhihong.Li, Farrokh.N, Hongwei.H, Marco.U, Suzanne.L. (2010) “Quantitative vulnerability estimation for scenario-based landslide hazards“ Original (7), p125~134 33. 彭玉玲(2006) 「地理資訊系統作為與民眾溝通工具之探討-以華隆部落土地爭議為例」,國立東華大學碩士論文。 34. 渡正亮(1971),「すべリやすい地すべリ防止技術」(8),1~2 35. 許銘熙、賴進松、林國峰(2002) 「脆弱度及風險地圖分析方法之研究」,國立臺灣大學氣候天氣災害研究中心。 36. 蕭煥章(2008) 「鄉鎮市區水災脆弱性評估模式之研究」,華岡地理學報第二十一期。 37. 行政院公共工程委員會(2010)「高雄縣甲仙鄉小林村、那瑪夏鄉及桃源鄉致災原因調查報告摘要」,〈http://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/BIZSfront/MenuContent.do?site=002&bid=BIZS_C09902898〉 38. 張石角(1987) 「山坡地潛在危險之預測及其在環境影響評估之應用」,中華水土保持學報,18(2):41-62。 39. 中央氣象局,〈http://www.cwb.gov.tw/〉 40. 鍾意晴(2009) 「區域性山崩潛感分析方法探討-以石門水庫集水區為例」,國立中央大學碩士論文。 41. 水土保持局,〈http://www.swcb.gov.tw/〉 42. 吳亭燁(2006) 「土石流防災社區承受度評估之研究」,國立中興水土保持學研究所碩士論文。 王姵兮(2007) 「應用TRIGRS模式評估降雨及入滲誘發池上山棕寮地滑之影響研究」,國立中正大學碩士論文。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26652 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 崩塌地發生常造成嚴重的土砂災害,危及產業與居民生命財產安全,政府日前已投入相當的經費及人力進行崩塌地治理,但每當颱風挾帶大量豪雨行經台灣時,仍無法避免各地災害發生。有鑑於此,建立崩塌地潛勢評估模型,在災害發生前,研判高崩塌風險區位,準確評估崩塌地發生位置及機率,實為一重要研究課題。
崩塌發生潛勢的計算大致可分為物理模型及統計模型兩種方法。由於衛星影像與電腦計算技術的發達,資料取得容易,以統計模型中多變量分析為最普遍使用的工具,本研究以其中的羅吉斯回歸法,於高屏溪流域建置崩塌地潛勢評估模型。使用的資料包含2001年至2010年11場降雨事件造成的崩塌地與水文、地文及人文因子。參考行政院公共工程委員會(2010)調查結果,將11場降雨事件以平均累積雨量800公釐為基準分為大、小颱風兩類別建立模型,並結合保全對象,模擬四種降雨情境下崩塌地發生潛勢與風險的改變。 兩模型率定準確率平均為79%及71.7%,驗證結果準確率分別為78%及71%;另外以崩壞比概念探討兩模式中的顯著因子與崩塌地發生之關聯,發現大颱風(以莫拉克率定參數)及小颱風(以碧利斯率定參數)造成的崩塌地多分布在東北至東南坡向,且莫拉克颱風崩塌地發生位置靠近山稜線,碧利斯颱風崩塌地則多靠近河道,可能原因與莫拉克雨量過大有關,大量雨水入滲至土壤中直接在離山稜線較近的區域造成崩塌,導致較少雨水透過入滲或地表逕流匯集至河道邊,使得靠近河道邊坡的崩壞比例較少;長延時降雨易造成大面積規模崩塌,短延時且高強度降雨則容易產生小面積規模崩塌。在情境四模擬(平均雨量1,535公釐)時,隘寮溪、荖濃溪、旗山溪子集水區分別產生24.5%、49.3%、47.4%的崩塌地坡單元,且在荖濃溪子集水區有較高的崩塌風險。本研究提供的崩塌潛勢評估模型,期能事先防範災害,減少人命及財產損失,達到減災之目標。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Landslides usually cause serious damages to industry, lifes, and properties. The government has invested considerable funds and manpowers for landslide managements, but people can`t avoid hazards during typhoon events. The construction of landslides-risk-assessment model, which can identify occurrence
probabilities and locations of landslides, is an important topic. The calculations of landslide occurrence probability can be divided into physical and statistical models. As the satellite images and computer technology developed, data can be obtained more easily. Logistic regression is one of well-know multivariate analyses methods and applied to construct landslide modeling in the Kaoping River Basin. We interpreted and delineated new landslides triggered by eleven rainfall events from 2001 to 2010 and considered hydrological, humanity and landscape factors as the variables we used. We divided eleven rainfall events into two clusters according to the investigation of Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan. Then, we simulated four precipation scenarios to represent landslide probability and risk analyses. The averages of two models accuracies are 76.5% and 71.1% in calibration, and 76% and 71% in validation, respectively. According to the results, the landslides triggered by Morakot and Bilis typhoons tend to northeast to southeast aspect. In addition the landslide triggered by typhoon Morakot located near ridgeline,but near river by typhoon Bilis. The reason is that typhoon Morakot has most precipation so that lots of water infiltrates near the ridgeline. Then, we found more landslides near the ridgeline then the river. In the scenario four, which average rainfall is 1,535mm , the percentages of landslides in Ailiao、Laonong and Cishan River subwatershed are 24.5%,49.3%,and 47.4%, respectively. The Laonong River subwatershed has most landslides. This study provides landslide-risk-assessment model to prevent disasters and loss of lives and properties. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:19:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98521314-1.pdf: 7742767 bytes, checksum: debab5a76dea23dcd6e50e3b80c4e64e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract II 目錄 III 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 X 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 前言 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究流程與章節架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 崩塌地介紹 4 2.2 估算崩塌地潛勢方法 8 2.2.1 Iverson模式 10 2.2.2 SHALSTAB模式 11 2.2.3 TRIGRE 13 2.2.4 判別分析法 15 2.2.5 羅吉斯迴歸分析 16 2.3 土砂災害脆弱度及風險評估 19 第三章 研究方法 27 3.1 研究區域背景介紹 27 3.1.1 地形地勢 29 3.1.2 地質構造 33 3.1.3 土地利用 36 3.1.4 氣候與水文 38 3.2 羅吉斯回歸方法 38 3.2.1 羅吉斯回歸模式 38 3.2.2 最大概似估計 (Maximum Likelihood Estimation, MLE) 44 3.2.3 羅吉斯回歸模式估計的假設條件 45 3.3 資料蒐集與處理 46 3.3.1 崩塌地目錄建立 46 3.3.2 坡單元劃分 47 3.3.3 崩塌地相關影響因子 49 3.4 崩塌地潛勢評估模式建置 55 3.4.1 模式率定與驗證 57 3.5 崩塌地脆弱度及風險評估方法 60 3.5.1 崩塌地脆弱度評估方法 60 3.5.2 崩塌地風險評估方法 61 第四章 流域崩塌風險分析結果與討論 63 4.1 降雨事件雨量分析結果 63 4.2 崩塌地判釋結果 68 4.3 崩塌潛勢模式建置 75 4.3.1 水文因子相關性分析 75 4.3.2 模式率定結果 77 4.3.3 模式驗證 86 4.3.4 敏感度分析 87 4.3.5 顯著因子與崩塌地特性探討 89 4.4 不同降雨情境崩塌潛勢估算結果 109 4.5 崩塌地風險地圖建置結果 115 4.5.1 脆弱度分析結果 115 4.5.2 不同降雨情境崩塌風險地圖 117 第五章 結論與建議 123 5.1 結論 123 5.2 建議 125 參考文獻 126 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 應用Logistic回歸法建立崩塌風險模式
-以高屏溪為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Application of Logistic Regression for Landslide Risk Model Construction in Koaping River Basin | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳樹群,張康聰(Kang-tsung Chang),謝正倫(Cheng-Lun Shieh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 崩塌地,羅吉斯回歸,崩塌潛勢,崩塌風險, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Landslides,Logistic regression,Landslide potential,Landslide risk, | en |
dc.relation.page | 130 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7.56 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。