請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26124完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林世銘 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shih-Han Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃詩菡 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:00:49Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-05-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中華公司治理協會，2003，公司治理研究報告。
李秀玲、李佩陵，2008，淺談「公開發行公司董事會議事辦法」強化董事會功能及相關配套機制推動情形，證券暨期貨月刊，第26卷，第3期。 高蘭芬，邱正仁，2002。董監事股權質押對會計盈餘與股票報酬相關性之影響，臺大管理論叢，第13卷，第1期，頁127-162。 翁淑育，2000，台灣上市股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究，私立輔仁大學金融所碩士論文。 陳振遠、張智堯、王蘭芬、李文智，2005，應用Ohlson會計評價模型探究公司治理之價值攸關性：以台灣上市公司電子業為例，臺大管理論叢，第15卷，第2期，頁123-142。 陳春山，2003，審計委員會之運作與法制改革，證券暨期貨月刊，第21卷，第12期。 陳瑞斌、許崇源，2007，公司治理結構與資訊揭露之關聯性研究，交大管理學報，第27期， 第2卷，頁55-109。 葉雅薰、陳錦村，2002，公司改組、監督機制與盈餘管理之研究，會計評論，第34期，頁1-29。 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩，2002，公司治理評等系統，商智文化。 廖秀梅、李建然、吳祥華，2006，董事會結構特性與公司關係之研究：兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響，東吳經濟商學學報，第54期，頁117-160。 蔡信夫、鍾惠民、林詩韻，2003，控制股東代理問題與盈餘資訊內涵之關聯性研究：以台灣上市公司為例，當代會計，第4卷，第2期，頁143-168。 鍾俊文、陳漢沖，2004，對上市櫃公司授信比較有保障嗎?－兼論董監事持股與質押對違約風險之影響，貨幣觀測與信用評等，第48期，頁3-20。 Agrawal, A. and G. N. Mandelker. 1990. Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Anti-takeover Charter Amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25:143-161. Alchian, A. 1950 . Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 58:211-21. Ball, R. and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6:159-78. Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver., and W. R. Landsman. 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of accounting and Economics 31:77-104. Beasely, M. S. 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71 No.4:443-465. Becker, C.L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiamvalbo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 No. 1:4-24. Berle, A. A., and G. C. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York, MacMillan. Bushee, B. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review. 73 No.3:305-333. Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58:81-112. Collins, D. W., E. L. Maydew, and I. S. Weiss. 1997. Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24:39-67. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor Independence, Low Balling and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3:113-127. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earning management. The Accounting Review 70 No.2:193-225. Dechow, P., R. G. Sloan. and A. Sweeny. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 No. 1:1-36. DeFond, M. L. and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors. The Accounting Review 66 No. 3:643-55. Defond, M.L. and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant effects and the manipulation of accruals. Journal of accounting & Economics 17:145-76. Demsetz, H. 1983. The structure of ownership and theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics. 26 No.2:375-390. El-Gazzar, S. M. 1998. Predisclosure Information and Institutional Ownership: A Cross-sectional Examination of Market Revaluations during Earnings Announcement Periods. Accounting Review 73:119-129. Fama, E. F.1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 No.2:288-307. Fang, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33:401-425. Forker, J. J. 1992. Corporate governance and disclosure. Accounting and Business Research 22 No.86:111-124. Goodstein, J., K. Gautam, and W. Boeker. 1994. The effects of board size and diversity and strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 15:241-250. Habib, A., and I. Azim. 2008. Corporate governance and value-relevance of accounting information：Evidence from Australia. Accounting Research Journal 21 No.2:167-194 Ho, S. S. M., and K. S. Wang. 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation 10:139–156. Hayn, C. 1995. The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting & Economics 20:125-53. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm：Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics:305-360. Jensen, M.C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48: 831-80. Kang, J. K. and A. Shivdasani. 1995. Firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in Japan. Journal of Finance and Economics 38:29-58. Klein, A. 2002. Audit Committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 No.3:375-400. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer., and R. W. Vishny. 1998. Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy 106:1113-1155. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance (April):471-517. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer., and R. W. Vishny. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58:3-27. Lev, B. 1989. On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: lessons and directions from two decades of empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research 27:153-201. Liao, C. H. 2009. Does corporate governance reduce information asymmetry of intangibles? National Taiwan University working paper. Manne, H. 1965. Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 73 No. 2:110-20. Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book values and dividends in security valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11:661-88. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1999. OECD principles of corporate governance. Pfeffer, J. 1973. Size, composition and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly 18:349-364. Pound, J. 1988. Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20:237-265. Rajgopal, S., M. Venkatachalam and J. Jiambalvo. 1999. Is Institutional Ownership Associated with Earnings Management and the Extent to which Stock Prices Reflect Future Earnings? Social Science Research Network. working paper. Rosestein, S., and J. G. Wyatt. 1990 Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26:175-191. Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance (June):737-783 . Singhvi, S. and H. B. Desai. 1971. An Empirical Analysis of the Quality of Corporate Financial Disclosure. The Accounting Review 46:621-632. Teoh, S.H. and T.J. Wong, 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review 68:346-66. Theil, M. Principles of Econometrics. N.Y.: Wiley, 1971. Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20:431-60. World Bank. 1999. Corporate governance：A framework for implementation overview. Yermack, D.1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40:185-212. Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrated model. Journal of Management 15 No.2:291-334. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26124 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討公司治理機制與會計資訊價值攸關性(value-relevance)之關聯。以91年至96年之台灣證券交易所上市公司、3744個會計年度為研究對象，就內部股權結構、內部監理機制及外部治理機制此三個面向切入，探究公司治理機制是否能有效發揮其功能，增加會計資訊價值攸關性。以Ohlson (1995)評價模型為攸關性衡量基礎，並同時考量公司特徵值之影響，評估公司治理變數與公司特徵值對資訊價值攸關性之增額解釋能力。研究結果發現如下：
一、 會計資訊攸關性同時受公司治理機制與公司特徵值之影響，其中尤以公司特徵值之影響較大。 二、 內部股權結構對帳面價值之資訊攸關性產生影響，顯示出控制股東之股權偏離以及董監持股質押比會將增加自利性誘因並響財務報導程序，降低帳面價值之攸關性。 三、 內部監理機制則對盈餘資訊攸關性產生影響。顯示出董事會之專業性與獨立性可有效提升監理功能，對盈餘資訊攸關性產生正面效果。 四、 外部治理機制對帳面價值資訊攸關性及盈餘資訊攸關性皆有正面影響。代表機構投資人與外部最大股東對公司扮演積極監督的角色，有助於提升會計資訊品質；而外部查核亦能有效為財務報表把關，提供適切之資訊予投資人。 綜上所述，若能將控制股東或管理當局之利益與公司整體利益做連結，並藉由董事成員之專業性與獨立性加強董事會功能，以及外部監督機制之運作，可有效提升會計資訊價值攸關性。 關鍵詞：公司治理、董事會、股權結構、會計資訊價值攸關性 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study seeks to examine the relationship between corporate governance and the value-relevance of accounting information. This study uses internal ownership structure, board of directors and external mechanism related variables to proxy for corporate governance. Value-relevance is measured by the adjusted R2 derived from a regression of stock price on earning and book values which is based on Ohlson’s accounting-based valuation model.
Regression results are as follows：(1) Stronger corporate governance structure exhibits higher value-relevance of accounting information. Firm-specific factors are also related to the value-relevance of accounting information. (2) There is a negative association between the deviation of control right from cash flow right of the controlling shareholders and value-relevance of equity book values. (3) There is a positive relation between board composition, proxied by board size and board independence, and value-relevance of earning. (4) External mechanism has positive effects on both the value-relevance of equity book values and earning. Keyword: corporate governance, value-relevance of accounting information, board of directors, ownership structure | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:00:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96722031-1.pdf: 665555 bytes, checksum: ea28b54d05aab9955b307d40eeed60eb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
謝 辭 I 中文摘要 II ABSTRACT III 第一章 緒論 1 第ㄧ節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 3 第三節 研究架構 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 公司治理 6 第二節 公司治理與會計資訊價值攸關性 16 第三節 會計資訊價值攸關性之衡量 20 第三章 研究設計 25 第一節 研究假說之建立 25 第二節 變數定義 31 第三節 研究模型 37 第四節 樣本選取與資料來源 40 第四章 實證結果分析 42 第一節 敘述性統計分析 42 第二節 複迴歸結果分析 45 第五章 結論 54 第一節 研究發現 54 第二節 研究限制與研究建議 55 參考文獻 57 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 公司治理與會計資訊價值攸關性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Corporate Governance and Value-relevance of Accounting Information | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳國泰,黃美祝 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 公司治理,董事會,股權結構,會計資訊價值攸關性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | corporate governance,board of directors,value-relevance of accounting information,ownership structure, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 61 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-06-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 649.96 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。