FIDIC國際契約模式與我國施工綱要規範之比較研究

Abstract

台灣於2008年加入政府採購協定(Government Procurement Agreement，GPA)以後，我國政府開放公共工程採購市場勢必受到GPA的影響，許多大型公共工程，我國廠商經常需與國外廠商互相合作或削價競爭，台灣營建產業必需與國際營建產業接軌，國內的營造廠必須瞭解國際工程契約之權利義務、風險分配、行政程序等相關規定，對於我國營建產業未來進軍國際市場將有很大的助益。 國際通用的FIDIC契約對於一般條款所規定的項目與我國公共工程契約略有差異，因此本研究認為在不踰越政府採購法也不違背民法強行禁止規定之下，基於私法自治的精神應把工程爭議回歸於工程契約條款的相關規定來解決工程中複雜且技術層面的問題；本研究先將FIDIC紅皮書一般條款與我國施工綱要規範00700一般條款經由初步比較及歸納後，藉由條款中的規定項目及索賠請求權之差異，使用了模糊德爾菲法分析問卷內容並透過爭議處理的機制，以便探討我國常見履約爭議問題與工程契約規定不完善之關係，進而對我國施工綱要規範00700一般條款提出修改之建議。

Since Taiwan acceded to the GPA in 2008, the agreement must affect Taiwan public construction. Taiwan's contractors need to cooperate with foreign companies or competition in many large-scale public constructions. Taiwan’s construction industry inevitably aligns with the international construction industry. The domestic contractors must figure out relevant regulations such as rights and obligations, risk allocation, administrative procedure of the international construction contract. It will have lots of merits for Taiwan’s construction industry to take the challenge of the international markets in the future. The study believes construction contract transgresses neither the legislation the Government Procurement Law nor the prohibition and force under the provisions of the Civil Law. It should return to the relevant provisions of the lease conditions to solve the dispute of complex engineering and technical level problems based on the degree of autonomy of private law. First, the sudy sruggles to classfy and compare the general condition between FIDIC with construction specifications and then discovered differences by the terms of the claims and regulations. The analysis of survey conducted uses Fuzzy Delphi Method with dispute mechanisms to discuss the relationship between domestic common dispute and imperfect clauses. In conclusion, there’re some suggestions of amendment for Taiwan construction specifications.