請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25727完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陶儀芬(Yi-Feng Tao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hui-Meng Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃輝猛 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:26:53Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-28 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
于宗先、王金利、方星海、施東暉著，2004，《兩岸股市面面觀》，台北：喜瑪拉雅研究發展基金會。 中華人民共和國國家統計局編，《中國統計年鑑》相關各期。 中國證券業年鑑編輯委員會，《中國證券業年鑑》相關各期。 中國證券監督管理委員會編，《中國證券期貨統計年鑑》相關各期。 2005，「只有重建國家信用 股市才能欣欣向榮」，《東亞經濟評論》，6月26日（http://www.e-economic.com/info/2640-1.htm） 2004，「市場化發展途徑：增加有效供給 打破股市僵局」，《新華網》，12月17日（http://news.xinhuanet.com/stock/2004-12/17/content_2346047_1.htm）。 2002，「民企加盟能否提升上市公司質量」，《上海證券報》，9月20日，版6。 2002，「民企借殼症」，《證券市場週刊》，73: 16-21。 朱宏偉，1998，「證券市場監管主體和監管方式的國際比較」，《上海大學學報》（社會科學版），4: 30-3。 行政院陸委會，1994，《大陸證券市場現況》，台北：行政院陸委會。 阮銘，1992，《鄧小平帝國》，台北：時報文化。 2006，「李榮融著眼後股改時代國資監管」，《第一財經日報》，3月28日（http://china.sina.com.tw/finance/stock/y/20060328/01492451562.shtml）。 2001，「周小川：重中之重之投資者利益」，《東方網》，12月3日（http://enjoy.eastday.com/epublish/gb/paper181/1/class018100001/hwz160735.htm）。 邵以智，2000，「逐步走向規範化的大陸證券市場」，《臺研兩岸前瞻探索》，21: 297-312。 2004，「我們的股市救市政策還有多少牌可以出？」，《Tom財經》，12月21日（http://finance.news.tom.com/1552/1653/20041221-127999.html）。 郎咸平、Leslie Young，2001，「為何要監管—由歐洲歷史看股份置的掠奪本質」，〈新財富〉，8（http://www.p5w.net/docs/fortune/200108/8.htm）。 2005，「股權分置改革迷茫時刻」，《財經雜誌》，136: 42-4。 2005，「重建信用才能拯救市場」，證券日報，6月15日（http://www.zqrb.com.cn/ReadNews.asp?NewsID=12569&BigClassName=&BigClassID=3&SmallClassID=18&SmallClassName=保留&SpecialID=0）。 2004，「專訪前中國證監會主席周正慶：答股民九問」，《新華網》，4月15日（http://news.xinhuanet.com/stock/2004-04/15/content_1420095.htm）。 高建寧，2005「我國證券發行監管制度的現狀及完善」，《市場週刊》（研究版），6: 4-7。 胡榮才、王芳，2004，「滬市A股上市公司盈利性變遷研究」，《財經理論與實踐》，2: 59-63。 2003，「保薦制：股市全程監管新模式？專家擔心流於形式」，《南方網》，8月22日（http://www.southcn.com/finance/cjzt/gsbjz/gsbjzbjzsk/200308220615.htm）。 2003，「許小年：國有股和法人股全流通不能再拖」•《中國新聞週刊》，11月28日。 2004，「許小年：中國股市制度結構本末倒置 缺乏體系支持」，《財經時報》，3月14日（http://news.sina.com.hk/cgi-bin/news/show_print.cgi?type=cnfinance&date=2004-03-14&id=211963）。 陳永忠，2004，《上市公司殼資源利用理論與實務》，北京：人民出版社。 陸國慶，2004，「我國股票上市制度變遷的績效分析」，《財經科學》，1: 27-31。 2006，「國資委定制金手銬」，《財經雜誌》，12。 寧南，張婭，2003，「逼空中國，中國股市財富洗劫」，《商務週刊》，24。 2003，「劉紀鵬：國有股不應超越市場監管」，《中國經濟時報》，7月23日（http://www.cet.com.cn/20030723/YAOWEN/200307232.htm）。 劉紀鵬、伍裝，「對價方案由誰主導？」，《產權市場》，2005年第1期，（http://www.cbex.com.cn/cqsc/cqsc8.shtml）。 2005，「劉紀鵬論股權分置改革中的國有資產保值增值」，《中國經濟時報》，7月21日（http://www.cet.com.cn/20050721/FOCUS/200507212.htm）。 劉雅靈、王信賢，2002，「缺乏發展的增長：中國大陸股票市場的制度內捲化」，《中國大陸研究》，45(4): 43-74。 2005，「誰在控制券商」，《經濟》，7: 37-40。 2005，「誰需要券商」，《經濟》，7: 32-6。 戰穎，2005，「保薦代表人的執業水平、執業道德與證券市場風險」，《道德與文明》，3: 46-8。 魏峰，1999，「過剩、退出和公司控制權」，《改革》，6: 5-11、56。 外文文獻 Akerlof, George A. 1970. The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3):488-500. Appel, Hilary. 1997. Voucher Privatization in Russia: Structural Consequences and Mass Response in the Second Period of Reform. Europe-Asia Studies 49 (8):1433-49. Atta, Don Van. 1989. The USSR as a 'Weak State': Agrarian Origins of Resistance to Perestroika. World Politics 42 (1):129-49. Bachman, David. 1992. The Limits on Leadership in China. Asian Survey 32 (11):1046-62. Baum, Richard. 1992. Political Stability in Post-Deng China: Problems and Prospects. Asian Survey 32 (6):491-505. Black, Bernard, Reinier Kraakman, and Anna Tarassova. 2000. Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong? Standford Law Review 52 (6):1731-808. Brada, Josef C. 1996. Privatization is Transition--Or is it? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (2):67-86. Broadman, Harry G. 1995. Meeting the Challenge of Chinese Enterprise Reform. In World Bank Discussion Papers No. 283. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank Cao, Yuanzheng, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast. 1999. From Federalism, Chinese Style to Privatization, Chinese Style. Economics of Transition 7 (1):103-31. Chen, Feng. 1997. Order and Stability in Social Transition: Neoconservative Political Thought in Post-1989 China The China Quarterly (151):593-613. Claessens, Stijn, and Simeon Djankov. 1999. Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance in the Czech Republic. Journal of Comparative Economics 27 (3):498-513. Claessens, Stijn, Simeon Djankov, and Larry H. P. Lang. 2000. The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1-2):81-112. Coffee, John C. 1999. Privatization and Corporate Governance: The Lessons from Securities Market Failure. Journal of Corporation Law 25 (1):1-39. Cui, Zhiyuan. 1994. Can Privatization Solve the Problems of Soft Budget Constraints? In Changing Political Economies: Privatization in Post-Communist and Reforming Communist States, edited by V. Milor. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Ding, X. L. 1999. Who Gets What, How? When Chinese State-Owned Enterprises Become Shareholding Companies. Problems of Post-Communism 46 (3):32-41. Dittmer, Lowell. 2001. The Changing Shape of Elite Power Politics. The China Journal (45):53-67. Djankov, Simeon, and Peter Murrell. 2000. The Determinants of Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: An Assessment of the Evidence. In A World Free of Poverty Series No. 20942. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. Duckett, Jane. 2001. Bureaucrats in Business, Chinese-Style: The Lessons of Market Reform and State Entrepreneurialism in the People's Republic of China. World Development 29 (1):23-37. Fan, Chengze Simon, and Herschel I. Grossman. 2001. Incentives and Corruption in Chinese Economic Reform. Journal of Policy Reform 4 (3):195-206. Fewsmith, Joseph. 2001. China Since Tiananmen: The Politics of Transition. New York: Cambridge University Press. Fischer, Stanley, and Alan Gelb. 1991. Issues in the Reform of Socialist Economies. In Reforming Central and Eastern European Economies: Initial Results and Challenges, edited by V. Corbo, F. Coricelli and J. Bossak. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. Fischer, Stanley, Ratna Sahay, and Carlos A. Vegh. 1996. Stabilization and Growth in Transition Economies: The Early Experience. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (2):45-66. Frye, Timothy. 2002. The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World. World Politics 54 (3):308-37. Frye, Timothy. 2004. Credible Commitment and Property Rights: Evidence from Russia. American Political Science Review 98 (3):453-66. Gelb, Alan, Gary Jefferson, and Inderjit Singh. 1993. Can Communist Economies Transform Incrementally? In World Bank Policy Research Working Papers No. 1189. Washington DC: World Bank. Goldstein, Steven M. 1995. China in Transition: The Political Foundations of Incremental Reform. The China Quarterly (144):1105-31. Gomulka, Stanislaw. 1994. Economic and Political Constraints during Transition. Europe-Asia Studies 46 (1):89-106. Goodman, David S. G. 1994. The Politics of Regionalism: Economic Development, Conflict and Negotiation. In China Deconstructs: Politics, Trade and Regionalism, edited by D. S. G. Goodman and G. Segal. London New York: Routledge. Gourevitch, Peter A. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Gourevitch, Peter A. 1996. The Macropolitics of Microinstitutional Difference in the Analysis of Comparative Capitalism. In National Diversity and Global Capitalism, edited by S. Berger and R. Dore. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Gray, Cheryl W. 1996. In Search of Owners: Privatization and Corporate Governance in Transition Economies. The World Bank Research Observer 11 (2):179-97. Gray, Cheryl W., and Rebecca J. Hanson. 1993. Corporate Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: Lessons from Advanced Market Economies. In World Bank Policy Research Working Papers No. 1182. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. Hao, Yufan. 1999. From Rule of Man to Rule of Law: An Unintended Consequence of Corruption in China in the 1990s. Journal of Contemporary China 8 (22):405-23. Hedlund, Stefan. 2000. Path Dependence in Russian Policy Making: Constraints on Putin's Economic Choice. Post-Communist Economies 12 (4):389-407. Hellman, Joel S. 1998. Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions. World Politics 50 (2):203-34. Hellmann, Thomas F., Kevin C. Murdock, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 1997. Financial Restraint: Toward a New Paradigm. In The Role of Government in East Asian Economic Development: Comparative Institutional Analysis, edited by M. Aoki, M. Okuno-Fujiwara and H. Kim. Oxford: Clarendon. Huang, Yasheng, and Tarun Khanna. 2003. Can India Overtake China? Foreign Policy (137):74-81. Huchet, Jean-François, and Xavier Richet. 2002. Between Bureaucracy and Market: Chinese Industrial Groups in Search of New Forms of Corporate Governance. Post-Communist Economies 14 (2):169-201. International Finance Corporation. 2000. China's Emerging Private Enterprises: Prospects for the New Century. Washington, D. C.: World Bank and International Finance Corporation. Iwasaki, Ichiro. 2003. The Governance Mechanism of Russian Firms: Its Self-enforcing Nature and Limitations. Post-Communist Economies 15 (4):503-31. Johnson, Simon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2000. Tunneling. The American Economic Review 90 (2):22-7. Karmel, Solomon M. 1994. Emerging Securities Markets in China: Capitalism with Chinese. The China Quarterly (140):1105-1120. Knack, Stphen, and Philip Keefer. 1997. Does Inequality Harm Growth Only in Democracies? A Replication and Extension. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1):323-32. Kornai, János. 1986. The Hungarian Reform Process: Visions, Hopes, and Reality. Journal of Economic Literature 24 (4):1687-737. Kornai, János. 1990. The Affinity between Ownership Forms and Coordination Mechanisms: The Common Experience of Reform in Socialist Countries. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (3):131-47. Kornai, János. 1992. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of communism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Kornai, János. 2001. Hardening the Budget Constraint: The Experience of the Post-Socialist Countries. European Economic Review 45 (9):1573-1599. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishney. 1997. Legal Determinants of External Finance. Journal of Finance 52 (3):1131-50. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 1999. Corporate Ownership around the World. Journal of Finance 54 (2):471-518. Lau, W. K. 1999. The 15th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party: Milestone in China's Privatization. Capital & Class (8):51-87. Lieberthal, Kenneth G. 1992. Introduction: The 'Fragmented Authoritarianism' Modle and Its Limitations. In Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China, edited by K. G. Lieberthal and D. M. Lampton. Berkeley: University of California Press. Lin, Yi-min, and Tian Zhu. 2001. Ownership Restructuring in Chinese State Industry: An Analysis of Evidence on Initial Organizational Changes. The China Quarterly (166):305-41. Lipton, David, Jeffrey Sachs, and Lawrence H. Summers. 1990. Privatization in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1990 (2):293-341. Litwack, John M. 1991. Discretionary Behavior and Soviet Economic Reform. Soviet Studies 43 (2):255-79. Lu, Xiaobo. 2000. Booty Socialism, Bureau-Preneurs, and the State in Transition: Organization Corruption in China. Comparative Politics 32 (3):273-94. Mako, William P., and Chunlin Zhang. 2003. Management of China's State-Owned Enterprises Portfolio: Lessons from International Experience. In Working Paper No. 30250. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. Manzetti, Luigi. 2003. Political Manipulations and Market Reforms Failures. World Politics 55 (3):315-60. McFaul, Michael. 1995. State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia. World Politics 47 (2):210-43. Mertha, Andrew C. 2005. China's 'Soft' Centralization: Shifting Tiao/Kuai Authority Relations. The China Quarterly (184):791-810. Mishkin, Frederic S. 2001. Prudential Supervision: Why s It Important and What Are the Issues? In Prudential Supervision: What Works and What Doesn't, edited by F. S. Mishkin. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Montinola, Gabriella, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast. 1995. Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China. World Politics 48 (1):50-81. Murrell, Peter. 1991. Can Neoclassical Economics Underpin the Reform of Centrally Planned Economies? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (4):59-76. Murrell, Peter. 1992. Conservative Political Philosophy and the Strategy of Economic Transition. East European Politics and Societies 6 (1):3-16. Murrell, Peter, and Mancur Olson, Jr. 1991. The Devolution of Centrally Planned Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics 15 (2):239-65. Naughton, Barry. 1995. China's Macroeconomy in Transition. The China Quarterly (144):1083-104. Nee, Victor. 1992. Organizational Dynamics of Market Transition: Hybrid Forms, Property Rights, and Mixed Economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly 37 (1):1-27. Nellis, John. 2002. The World Bank, Privatization and Enterprise Reform in Transition Economies: A Retrospective Analysis. Nordlinger, Eric. 1981. On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton. North, Douglass C. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1):97-112. North, Douglass C., and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History 49 (4):803-32. OECD. 1995. Special Features: Financial Markets and Corporate Governance. Financial Market Trends (62):13-35. Oi, Jean. 1992. Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China. World Politics 45 (1):99-126. Oi, Jean. 1995. The Role of the Local State in China's Transitional Economy. The China Quarterly (144):1132-49. Olson, Mancur Jr. 1963. Rapid Growth as a Destabilizing Force. The Journal of Economic History 23 (4):529-52. Olson, Mancur Jr. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press. Olson, Mancur Jr. 2000. Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships. New York: Basic Books. Özkaya, Mehmet, and Hossein Askari. 1999. Management of Newly Privatized Companies: Its Importance and How Little We Know. World Development 27 (6):1097-1114. Pearson, Margaret M. 2005. The Business of Governing Business in China: Institutions and Norms of the Emerging Regulatory State. World Politics 57 (2):296-322. Pei, Minxin. 1996. Microfoundations of State-socialism and Patterns of Economic Transformation. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 29 (2):131-45. Pei, Minxin. 2002. China’s Governance Crisis: More than Musical Chairs. Foreign Affairs 81 (5):96-109. Przeworski, Adam, and Fernando Limongi. 1993. Political Regimes and Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (3):51-69. Qian, Yingyi. 1996. Enterprise Reform in China: Agency Problems and Political Control. Economics of Transition 4 (2):427-47. Qian, Yingyi. 2000. Government Control in Corporate Governance as Transitional Institutions: Lessons from China. In Rethinking East Asian Miracle, edited by J. E. Stiglitz and S. Yusuf. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Roeder, Philip G. 1985. Do New Soviet Leaders Really Make a Difference? Rethinking the 'Succession Connection'. American Political Science Review 79 (4):958-76. Sachs, Jeffrey D. 1995. Reforms in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union in Light of the East Asian Experience. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 9 (4):454-85. Sachs, Jeffrey D. 1996. Notes on the Life Cycle of State-led Industrialization. Japan and the World Economy 8 (2):153-74. Sachs, Jeffrey D., and Wing Thye Woo. 2000. Understanding China's Economic Performance. Journal of Policy Reform 4 (1):1-50. Sachs, Jeffrey D., Wing Thye, and Xiaokai Yang, 2000. Economic Reforms and Constitutional Transition. Annals of Economics and Finance 1(2):423-79. Sappington, David E. M. 1991. Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (2):45-66. Shambaugh, David. 2001. The Dynamics of Elite Politics during the Jiang Era. The China Journal (45):101-11. Shih, Victor. 2004. Factions Matter: Personal Networks and the Distribution of the Bank Loans in China. Journal of Contemporary China 13 (38):3-19. Shirk, Susan L. 1993. The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. Shirley, Mary M. 1999. Bureaucrats in Business: The Roles of Privatization versus Corporatization in State-Owned Enterprise. World Development 27 (1):115-36. Shleifer, Andrei. 1995. Establishing Property Rights. Paper read at Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1994, March, at Washington, DC. Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert W. Vishny. 1994. The Politics of Market Socialism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (2):165-76. Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert W. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance 52 (2):737-83. Shue, Vivienne. 1988. The Reach of the State: Sketches of the Chinese Body Politics. Stanford, California: Cornell University Press. Simon, Herbert A. 1991. Organizations and Markets. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (2):25-44. Solnick, Steven L. 1996. The Breakdown of Hierarchies in the Soviet Union and China. World Politics 48 (2):209-38. Solnick, Steven L. 1998. Stealing the State: Control and Collapse in Soviet Institutions. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press. Stark, David. 1996. Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism. The American Journal of Sociology 101 (4):993-1027. Steinfeld, Edward S. 2002. Moving beyond Transition in China: Financial Reform and the Political Economy of Declining Growth. Comparative Politics 34 (4):379-98. Stigler, George J. 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1):3-21. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1994. The Role of the State in Financial Markets. Paper read at Proceedings of the World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1993, March, at Washington DC. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2000. Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition. Paper read at Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics 1999, December, at Washington, DC. Sun, Yan. 1999. Reform, State, and Corruption: Is Corruption Less Destructive in China than in Russia? Comparative Politics 32 (1):1-20. Tan, Qiangshan. 2004. State, Institution Building, and Emerging Stock Markets in China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 37 (3):373-94. Tao, Yi-feng. 2001. The Evolution of Central-Provincial Relations in Post-Mao China, 1978-98: An Event History Analysis of Provincial Leader Turnover. Issues & Studies 37 (4):90-120. Teiwes, Frederick C. 1995. The Paradoxical Post-Mao Transition: From Obeying the Leader to 'Normal Politics'. The China Journal (34):55-94. Tenev, Stoyan, Chunlin Zhang, and Loup Brefort. 2002. Corporate Governance and Enterprise Reform in China: Building the Institutions of Modern Markets. Washington, D. C.: World Bank and International Finance Corporation. Thompson, John K. 1998. Shareholder Value and the Market in Corporate Control in OECD Countries. Financial Market Trends (69):15-37. Vogel, Steven Kent. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Walder, Andrew G. 1994a. Corporate Organization and Local Government: Property Rights in China. In Changing Political Economies: Privatization in Post-Communist and Reforming Communist States, edited by V. Milor. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Walder, Andrew G. 1994b. The Decline of Communist Power: Elements of a Theory of Institutional Change. Theory and Society 23 (2):297-323. Walder, Andrew G. 1995. Local Governments as Industrial Firms: An Organizational Analysis of China's Transitional Economy. The American Journal of Sociology 101 (2):263-301. Weingast, Berry R. 1995. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 11 (1):1-31. Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracts. New York: Free Press. Williamson, Oliver E. 1971. The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations. The American Economic Review 61 (2):112-23. Wong, Christine P. W. 1991. Central-Loal Relations in an Era of Fiscal Decline: The Paradox of Fiscal Decentralization in Post-Mao China. The China Quarterly (128):691-715. Wong, Christine P. W. 1992. Fiscal Reform and Local Industrialization: The Problematic Sequencing of Reform in Post-Mao China. Modern China 18 (2):197-227. Woo, Wing Thye. 1994. The Art of Reforming Centrally Planned Economies: Comparing China, Poland, and Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics 18 (3):276-308. World Bank. 1995. Bureaucrats in Business: The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. World Bank. 1997. China's Management of Enterprise Assets: The State as Shareholder. In Report No. 16265-CHA. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. World Bank. 2002. World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Market. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. Yang, Dali L. 2003. China in 2002: Leadership Transition and the Political Economy of Governance. Asian Survey 43 (1):January/February. Yang, Dali L. 2004. Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market Transition and the Politics of Governance in China. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25727 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 主要是從政治邏輯來解釋中國金融當局對於股市制度設計的影響，討論中國在亮麗經濟增長表現下潛藏的結構危機。在此採取的研究架構是主張政治權力結構決定市場的制度設計，進而影響公司治理結構以及各市場參與者之間的關係，也左右著市場化改革的結果。而所謂的中國政治邏輯是指在不變更既存政治遊戲規則的前提下進行經濟改革，嘗試以最少的政治成本來帶動最多的經濟效益，舊的制度在尚未完全被淘汰的情況下引進新的市場制度，市場經濟與計畫經濟成分的並存就成為中國轉型過程中的一個重要特徵。
政治邏輯表現在股市市場制度就是，尋求市場化轉型的不完全以持續關照和籠絡對中共政權生存相關的行為者，這些市場制度安排就包括：國家持續行政控制市場准入、國家成為上市公司的股東、國家並未制訂公平的市場遊戲規則，以及國家作為監管者卻與被監管對象之間的角色矛盾等。於是此種扭曲的市場制度也就導致近年來中國股市的與宏觀經濟和政治穩定矛盾的表現。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:26:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R92322005-1.pdf: 735190 bytes, checksum: 4e0f298f839c6ecb9729800dde206776 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 問題緣起與研究目的 1 第二節 中國股市發展歷程 1 第三節 文獻回顧與檢討 7 （一）國家、市場關係與社會主義轉型 7 （二）股市發展的本質 11 （三）政治目的與政策設計 12 第三節 分析架構與研究方法 14 （一）研究架構 14 （二）研究途徑與研究方法 17 第二章 中國特殊的政治處境及其經濟政策影響 19 第一節 政治正當性來源和政治權力基礎 19 （一）改革啟動的背景—繼承和變革毛澤東時代的格局 19 （二）鄧小平經改的影響與侷限 23 第二節 中共政權延續和經濟轉型的前提 26 （一）市場失靈提供的政府介入市場之需求 26 （二）國家在金融體制發展過程中的功能和角色 28 第三節 市場發展的制度性層面 30 （一）當前中國金融體系資金配置的效率問題緣由 30 （二）金融市場化的制度基礎 33 第三章 中國股市監管的制度安排與變遷 35 第一節 由分權化監管走向集中化監管 35 第二節 發行制度的行政審批問題 40 （一）審批制：計畫管理的發行制度 42 （二）核准制：計畫管理的延續 45 （三）保薦制：走向市場？ 48 第三節 角色錯置的證監會 51 （一）國家球員兼裁判的影響 51 （二）走向規範的矛盾 55 第四節 證券監管體制的部門本位主義挑戰 57 （一）股權分置改革需要與國資管理體制相配合 58 （二）證監會在股權分置改革中的角色衝突問題 62 （三）證監會未來監管的挑戰 64 第四章 非流通股的成因與影響 66 第一節 委託代理關係的理論與應用 66 （一）委託代理關係的成因 66 （二）委託代理關係的應用 68 （三）國際上先進市場國家的金融體系之經驗與啟示 69 第二節 中國股市中非流通股的成因與其發展 72 （一）非流通股的發展與額度制息息相關 74 （二）民營企業在額度制下上市管道—買殼上市 75 第三節 非流通股的影響 78 （一）國家無法克服內部的代理問題致使不能扮演積極的股東角色 80 （二）買殼上市的民企的經營績效低於上市公司的平均水平 83 （三）國有股減持的無疾而終 85 第四節 股權分置改革對非流通股的影響 87 第五章 結論與展望 91 第一節 研究發現 91 （一）中國股市問題的成因與發展 91 （二）中國股市的前景展望 96 第二節 中國股市對漸進改革的啟示 99 第三節 衍生的問題討論 100 參考書目 102 中文文獻 102 外文文獻 105 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 漸進改革的陷阱：以中國股市中國家與市場關係為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Pitfalls of Gradual Reform—The Case of State-Market Relations in China's Stock Market | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 徐斯勤(Szu-Qin Hsu),童振源(Chen-Yuan Tung) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 中國研究,政治,股市,漸進改革, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | China Study,Financial Politics,Stock Market,Gradual Reform, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 116 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 717.96 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。