請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25516完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊朝成(Chau-Chen Yang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jui-Chueh Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳瑞珏 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:16:46Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-02-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-01-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 麥克波特著,李明軒、邱如美譯,競爭優勢,台北:天下遠見出版,民國88年。
范加麟,細說從頭見證期貨十年發展史,期貨人雜誌,第11期,第3季:10-15,民國93年。 馮震宇,創新研發與專利策略,能力雜誌,第569 期,7月號:70-81,民國92年。 林志維,競爭策略,技術環境,技術創新與創新績效之關係研究-以電子高科技業與化工業為研究對象,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國90年。 羅珮軒,電子下單與券商經營模式的調適-組織核心能力與決策者策略意圖之影響,東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文,民國90年。 何祖銘,藍海策略檢視台灣電子雜誌業發展之研究,世新大學圖文傳播暨數位出版學系碩士論文,民國95年。 金偉燦、莫伯尼著,黃秀媛譯,藍海策略,台北:天下遠見出版,民國94年。 陳文章,企業技術創新績效影響因素之研究,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所,民國90年。 施百俊,事業模式創新之研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文,民國92年。 蘇奕中,創新策略之效益分析與評估─以資訊電子業為例,國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文,民國93年。 吳思華,策略九說,台北:麥田出版公司,民國85年。 余文郎,紅海、藍海—從鴻海與廣達的競合關係探討IT產業的藍海世界,國立台北科技大學管理研究所碩士論文,民國95年。 台灣期交所,http://www.taifex.com.tw/ Ansoff, H. I. and J. M. Stewart. 1967. Strategies for a technology-based business. Harvard Business Review 45(6):71-83. Abernathy, W. J. and K. B. Clark. 1985. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy 14(1):3-22. Afuah, A. 1998. Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation, and Profits. New York:Oxford University Press. Betz, F. 1987. Managing Technology-competing Through New Ventures, Innovation, and Corporate Research. New York:Prentice Hall. Betz, F. 1993. Strategic Technology Management. NewYork:McGraw-Hill. Barringer, B.R. & Bluedorn, A.C. 1999.The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management Strategic Management Journal 20:421-444 Burgelman, R. A. and L. R. Sayles. 1986. Inside Corporate Innovation. New York:Free Press. Chacke, G. K. 1988. Technology Management- Application to Corporate Markets and Military Missions, NY: Praeger, Cooper, R. G. 2000. Product innovation and technology strategy. Research Technology Management 43(1):38-41. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive Capability: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1):128-152. Dziura, M. J. 2001. Innovation: Sources and strategies. International Journal of Technology Management 21(5-6):612. Drucker, P. F. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York:Harper and Row. Freeman, C. 1974. The Economics and Industrial Innovation. Manchester:Penguin. Gilbert, J. T. 1994. Choosing an innovation strategy: Theory and practice. Business Horizons 37(6):16-22. Gobeli, D. H. & W. B. Brown. 1994. Technological innovation strategies. Engineering Management Journal 6(1):17-24. Golder, P. N. & G. J. Tellis. 1993. Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend? Journal of Marketing Research 30(2):158-170. Grossi, G. 1990. Promoting innovation in a big business. Long Range Planning 23(1):41-52. Hambrick, D. C. 1983. Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow’s strategic types. Academy of Management Journal 26(1):5-26. Henderson, R. M. & K. B. Clark. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies, and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 9-30. Holt, K. 1988. The Role of the User in Product Innovation, Technovation , 12(5):53-56. Maidique, M. A. & P. Patch. 1988. Corporate strategy and technology policy. In M.L. Tushman and W. L. Moore (eds.). Readings in the Management of Innovation, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA:Ballinger Publishing Company. Manu F. A. and V. Sriram. 1996. Innovation, marketing strategy, environment, and performance. Journal of Business Research 35(1):79-91. Marquish, D. G. 1982. The Anatomy of Successful Innovation, Winthrop Publishers:Cambridge, Oates, Keith. 1997. Innovation is Everybody’s Business, Management Service, 41(5):8-13 Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press. Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Boston:Harvard Business School Press. Tidd, J., J. Bessant, and K. Pavitt. 2001. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. New York:John Wiley & Sons. Tushman, N. L. & D. A. Nadler. 1986. Organizing for innovation. California Management Review 28(3):74-92. Vrakking. W. J. 1990. The Innovative Organization. Long Range Planning 23(2):94-102. Zahra, S. A. & S. Das. 1993. Innovation strategy and financial performance in manufacturing companies: An empirical analysis. Production and Operations Management 2(1):15-37. Zahra, S. A. & W. C. Bogner. 1999. Technology strategy and software new ventures’ performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing 15(2):135-173. Hedge Index, http://www.hedgeindex.com/hedgeindex/en/default.aspx?cy=USD | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25516 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 自民國83年國外期貨開放後,期貨交易的風潮興起,歷經86年台灣期貨交易所成立及其後數次的新品契約上市後,至95年11月止,期貨市場整體的交易量已來到2億1503萬口的新高,短短十三個年頭,期貨市場的發展倍速成長。與83年創立時僅有的34.4萬口比較,市場交易量成長了625倍,這樣的發展讓人驚嘆。
然而近年來期貨市場高度成長,專營期貨商的經營獲利卻未同步成長,相較於90與93年的整體市場交易狀況,市場交易量大幅成長了9.3倍,但專營期貨商稅前損益僅僅成長了20%,其間的差距相當可觀。本研究認為近年來市場交易結構改變,可承作經紀業務比重不斷降低,且本土專營期貨商家數眾多,彼此間業務同質性太高,各專營期貨商為爭取有限客戶,彼此間不斷削價競爭,進而造成期貨市場競爭過度,也讓期貨商自身的經營獲利能力面臨嚴峻考驗。 若要擺脫價格競爭的產業宿命,建立起有別於同業的差異化策略是必要的。本研究的目的就是希望藉由期貨業創新收益模式的可能性分享,激發同業擬定創新策略的無限可能,最後航向屬於自身開創的藍海。 本研究提出了四個專營期貨商創新收益模式的觀點,包含法人機構之風險管理顧問專案、顧問加值服務模式之創新、期貨市場客戶之開創、以及跨業種合作,並針對跨業種合作的部份做更詳盡的討論。創新的來源無限寬廣,期望本研究的成果能提供專營期貨商經營發展上之不同思維及方向,專營期貨商可依據自身的資源與競爭優勢,尋找出最合適的創新定位與策略。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | From the international futures and options deregulated in 1994, Taiwan futures market began to grow up swiftly. In 1997, Taiwan Futures Exchange was set up to develop the Taiwan futures market and created several products. Until Nov 2006, the futures market volume is going to a new high to the 215 million contracts. Compared with the volume (344,000 lots) in 1994, the market volume increased 625 times. It was a fabulous achievement for this growing only 13 years.
However, even the futures market continues growing fast, the revenue of futures commission merchants (FCMs) is not increase the same way. To contrast with the market of 2001 and 2004, the whole volume increased 9.3 times but the gross profit before tax for all FCMs only rose 20%, which was a big gap between the volume and profit. One of the most significant reasons is owing to the change of trading construction. The rate of proprietary traders continues going up. Meanwhile, the quantity of local FCMs and similar business model also cause this terrible consequence. Therefore, the challenge becomes intensive so that to damage the profit of all FCMs. To change this over-competitive situation, it is essential to develop a differentiation strategy. The purpose of this study expects to share the possibility of innovative business models so that can motivate more FCMs to contribute new innovative strategies. The research mentions about four innovative business models that include corporate risk manage consultant project, the innovation of value-added consultant model, the creation of new customers, and strategic alliance with other Industries. Among these four models, the cooperation in cross industries, which FCMs may further establish new operating area by the combination of each professional, will be specially emphasized. Hopefully the models mentioned in the study can be efficiently utilized in FCMs industry, and FCMs can rely on their resource and competitive advantage to find out the most suitable market positions and creative strategies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:16:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-P93745007-1.pdf: 1211266 bytes, checksum: faf03a8fa06ea9a003f658a54d93170a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌 謝 I
中文摘要 II THESIS ABSTRACT III 目 錄 IV 圖 目 錄 VI 表 目 錄 VIII 第壹章 緒 論 9 第一節、研究背景與研究動機 9 第二節、研究目的 11 第三節、論文架構 12 第四節、研究流程 13 第五節、研究方法 14 第貳章 創新收益模式之相關文獻探討 15 第一節、創新的定義 15 第二節、創新的類型 16 第三節、創新策略之文獻探討 20 第四節、藍海策略之研討 24 第参章 期貨產業分析及專營期貨商創新收益模式之可能性推論 32 第一節、期貨產業分析 32 一、台灣期貨市場簡介 32 二、產業結構與期貨商競爭分析 43 第二節、專營期貨商創新收益模式之可能性推論 51 一、法人機構之風險管理顧問專案 51 二、顧問加值服務模式之創新 63 三、期貨藍海市場客戶之開創 69 四、跨業種合作-結合他業收益模式共創新利基 75 第肆章 專營期貨商創新收益模式之個案研討-與投信合作發行基金 78 第一節、發行「市場中立策略基金」的背景說明 78 第二節、「市場中立策略基金」的發展 80 第三節、「市場中立策略基金」的價值創新 86 第四節、模擬基金的價值創造 88 第五節、模擬基金之運作架構與收益分析 98 第六節、專營期貨商扮演的角色 101 第七節、專營期貨商組織架構之調整與配合 102 第八節、本個案模擬基金之後續應用 104 第伍章 結論與建議 105 第一節、結論與建議 105 第二節、對後續研究之建議 113 參考文獻 114 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 期貨 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 創新收益模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 專營期貨商 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 選擇權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | options | en |
| dc.subject | futures | en |
| dc.subject | innovative business models | en |
| dc.subject | FCMs | en |
| dc.title | 台灣專營期貨商之創新收益模式研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on the Innovative Business Models of Futures Commission Merchants in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳勝源,劉任昌 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 期貨,創新收益模式,專營期貨商,選擇權, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | futures,innovative business models,FCMs,options, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 116 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-01-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.18 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
