請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25359
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 練乃華 | |
dc.contributor.author | An-Ting Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭安婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:10:22Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1. 田祖武,「衡量消費者產品涉入程度數學模式之 構件及其應用」,台灣科技大學管理技術研究所未出版博士論文,民國八十七年。 2. 佘昭龍,「廣告圖片勸服過程-情緒、涉入之調節角色」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,民國九十年六月。 3. 許益彰,「產品利益無關屬性、訊息涉入程度、產品類別與廣告效果及產品評價之關係」,台灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文,民國八十五年。 英文部分 1. Aaker, D.A., Stayman, D.M. and Hagerty, M.R. (1986).”Warmth in Advertising: Measurement, Impact, and Sequence Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12(March), 365-381. 2. Aderman, D. (1972). “Elation, depression, and Helping Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 91-101. 3. Batra, R. and Ray, M.L. (1986). “Affective Responses Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13(September), 234-249. 4. Batra, R. and Stayman, D.M. (1990). “The Role of Mood in Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 203-214. 5. Belk, R.W. (1988). “Possessions and the Extended Self,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 139-168. 6. Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N. and Strack, F. (1990). “Mood and Persuasion: A Cognitive Response Analysis,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331-345. 7. Bower, G.H. (1981). “Mood and Memory,” American Psychologist, 36, 129-148. 8. Bower, G.H., Gilligan, S.G. and Monteiro, K.P. (1981). 'Selectivity of Learning Caused by Affective States,' Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110 (December), 451-473. 9. Burke, M.C. and Edell, J.A. (1989). “The Impact of Feeling on Ad-based Affect and Cognition,” Journal 0f Marketing Research, 26(February), 234-249. 10. Childers, T.L. and Houston, M.J. (1984). “Conditions for a Picture-Superiority Effect on Consumer Memory,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 643-654. 11. Dickson, P.R., Burnkrant, R.E., Miniard, P.W. and Unnava, H.R. (1986). “If It Isn’t Duck Then Why Did It Quack? Competing Explanations for an Observed Effect of Illustrations in an Advertisement,” Advances in Consumer research, 13, 153-157. 12. Drever, J. (1952). A Dictionary of Psychology, Penguin, Harmonds worth. 13. Edell, J.A. and Staelin, R. (1983). ” The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements,” The Journal of Consumer Research, 10(1), 45-61 14. Goldberg, M.E. and Gorn, G.J. (1987). “Happy and Sad TV Programs: How They Affect Reactions to Commercials,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 387-403. 15. Houston, M.J. and Rothschild, M.L. (1978). “Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives on Involvement,” Research Frontiers in Marketing, 184-187. 16. Isen, A.M. and Means, B. (1983). “The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy.” Social Cognition, 2, 18-31. 17. Isen, A.M., Shalker, T., Clark, M. and Karp, P. (1978). “Affect, Accessibility of Material in Memory, and behavior: A Cognitive loop?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1-12. 18. Isen, A.M. and Stayman, D.M. (1993). “The Influence of Positive Affect on response to Novel Material,” Working paper, Johnson graduate school of management and department of psychology, Cormell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. 19. Kringm A.M. and Gordon, A.H. (1998). “Sex Differences in Emotion: Expression, Experience, and Physiology,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(March), 686-703. 20. Laurent, G. and Kapferer, J. (1985). “Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22(February), 41-53. 21. Lutz, K.A. and Lutz, R.J. (1977). “Effects of Interactive Imagery on Learning Application to Advertising,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 62 (4), 473-491. 22. MacInnis, D.J. and Price, L.L. (1987). ”The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions,” Journal of consumer Research, 13(March), 473-491. 23. Mackie, D.M. and Worth, L.T. (1989). “Processing Deficits and the Mediation of Positive Affect in Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 27-40. 24. Miniard, P.W., Bhatla, S., Lord, K.R., Dickson, P.R. and Unnava, H.R. (1991). “Picture-based Persuasion Processes and the Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18(June), 92-107. 25. Mitchell, A.A. (1986). “The Effect of Verbal and Visual Components of Advertisements on Brand Attitudes and Attitude toward the Advertisement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13(June), 12-24. 26. Mitchell, A.A. and Olson, J.C. (1981). “Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitudes?” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(August), 318-332. 27. Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1981). “Issue Involvement as a Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context,” Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 20-24. 28. Percy, L. and Rossiter, J.R. (1983). “Mediating Effects of Visual and Werbal Elements in Print Advertising upon Belief, Attitude, and Intention Responses,” in Advertising and Consumer Psychology, L. Percy and A. Woodside, eds. Lexington, MA: Lesington Books, 197-217 29. Robert, J.F. (2005). “Gender Differences in Responses to Emotional Advertising: A Social desirability Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31(March), 850-858. 30. Sherif, M., and H. Cantril(1947), The Psychology of Ego-involvement, New York: John Wilet and Sons, Inc. 31. Stayman, D.M. and Asker, D.A. (1988). “Are All the Effects of Ad-induced Feelings Mediated by Aad?” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(December), 368-373. 32. Stayman, D.M. (1994). “Processing less versus Processing Differently: An-investigation of the Influence of Affect on the Processing of Persuasive Messages,” Working paper, Cormell University, Ithaca, NY. 33. Worth, L.T. and Mackie, D.M. (1987). “Cognitive Mediation of Positive Affect in Persuasion,” Social Cognition, 5,76-94. 34. Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1986). ”Conceptualizing Involvement,” Journal of Advertising, Prove, 15(2), 4-34. 35. Zhang. Y. (1986). “Responses to Humorous Advertising: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition,” Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 15-31. 36. Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985). “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12(December), 341-352. 37. Zimbardo, P. G. (1960). “Involvement and Communication Discrepancy as Determinants of Opinion Conformity,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 86-94. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25359 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 廣告圖片的使用是一種很常見的行銷溝通工具,如何在有限的預算下有效的運用廣告圖片達到廣告主的目的:提高消費者的購買意願,成為許多研究者感興趣的議題,也因而衍生出許多探討不同情境或變數下廣告圖片效果的研究。根據佘昭龍(2001)的研究,以涉入和情緒作為廣告說服效果的調節變數,以果汁汽水為目標產品,發現受試者在正面情緒且低涉入的情形下,觀看相關廣告圖片比無關廣告圖片的受試者的產生更多的想法數,本研究希望找出其背後可能的運作機制。
本實驗採用2×2×2的三因子實驗設計,以高/低涉入,相關/無關廣告圖片和正面/中性情緒為自變數,以中性產品-牙膏作為研究產品,共有8種不同的實驗情境,以台灣大學大學部女生為研究對象,探討受試者的廣告態度、購買意願和產品態度等,所得的結果如下: 一、 相關圖片使消費者容易聯想到和產品有關的想法。無關圖片不帶有產品相關訊息,反而分化了消費者的認知資源,因此使得相關圖片的廣告說服效果高於無關圖片的廣告說服效果。 二、 在正面情緒下,高渉入組較注意產品相關訊息,低渉入組較注意非產品相關訊息。因此,高渉入組在想法的回報上,和產品相關的想法數顯著多於低渉入組,而低渉入組和廣告相關的想法數也顯著多於高渉入。 三、 在正面情緒且高渉入的情況下,好心情活化了消費者的認知能力,願意花力氣去”解讀”無關圖片,觀看相關圖片廣告和無關圖片廣告時,產生相同的廣告說服效果;正面情緒低渉入的情況下,觀看無關廣告圖片消費者的廣告說服效果都顯著低於觀看相關圖片的消費者。 四、 正面情緒且低涉入的受試者在觀看中性產品的相關圖片和無關圖片時產生的總想法數量無差異,是因為受到產品本身引發消費者情緒的不同,其態度形成的認知運作機制受到產品所引發的情緒影響所致。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | According to study of佘昭龍(2001), the study took involvement and emotion as adjustable variables, subjects looking at AD containing relevant picture generate larger number of thoughts than subjects looking at AD containing irrelevant picture. This research is undertaken with the intention to explain the possible utilization system behind. The conclusions derived are shown as follows:
1. Relevant AD containing picture makes consumer easily think of thoughts related to product. On the other hand, irrelevant AD containing picture, without product-related information, tends to distract consumer’s perception resources. Hence, the persuasion effect of relevant AD containing picture is higher than that of irrelevant AD containing picture. 2. Under positive emotion, high involvement group pays more attention to product-related information while low involvement group pays more attention to non-product-related information. Therefore, high involvement group has clearly more feedbacks and number of thoughts. On the other hand, low involvement group has obviously more number of thoughts regarding AD. 3. Under positive emotion and high involvement scenario, positive emotion vitalizes consumer’s perception ability, making consumer willing to make efforts to “decipher” irrelevant pictures. Under this scenario, similar AD persuasion effect is produced no matter whether consumer looks at relevant AD containing picture or irrelevant one. 4. With positive emotion and low involvement, subjects have no difference in number of total thoughts when looking at relevant or irrelevant AD containing picture of neutral products. The reason is that product itself evokes the difference of consumer emotion, thus the utilization system of consumer perception is affected by the product. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:10:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94741055-1.pdf: 880443 bytes, checksum: 7378898512fba323719d9ba21ee000b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 iii
中文摘要 iv Abstract v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 廣告圖片的說服效果 3 第二節 涉入 5 一、 涉入的定義 5 二、 涉入的分類 7 第三節 情緒 8 第三章 研究方法 12 第一節 研究假設 12 第二節 研究設計 15 一、 目標產品的選取 15 二、 自變數的操弄 16 三、 應變數的衡量 19 四、 實驗進行步驟 21 第三節 資料分析方法與工具 23 第四章 資料分析與研究結果 24 第一節 基本資料分析 24 第二節 自變數操弄檢定 26 一、 情緒的操弄檢定 26 二、 渉入的操弄檢定 27 三、 圖片的操弄檢定 28 第三節 廣告態度、產品態度和購買意願的假設檢定 29 一、 正面情緒*高渉入組 33 二、 正面情緒*低涉入組 33 第四節 想法列舉的假設檢定 34 一、 想法編碼 34 二、 假設檢定 37 第五節 假設檢定結果與結論 40 第五章 結論與建議 43 第一節 結論與討論 43 第二節 行銷實務上的意涵 45 第三節 研究限制 46 第四節 後續研究建議 47 參考文獻 48 附錄一 前測問卷-目標產品的選取 52 附錄二 前測問卷的節錄-針對牙膏產品,相關和無關圖片的選取 54 附錄三 正式問卷高涉入*相關圖片組 56 附錄四 正式問卷低涉入*無關圖片組 63 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 廣告圖片說服效果在涉入及情緒調節作用下的運作機制 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Mechanism of Picture-based Persuasion Effect:The Moderating Role of Involvement and Emotion | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭中強,陳建維 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 廣告圖片,涉入,情緒,廣告說服效果,中性產品, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | AD picture,involvement,emotion,persuasion effect,neutral product, | en |
dc.relation.page | 51 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-11 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 859.81 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。