請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25222
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉啟群 | |
dc.contributor.author | Li-Ru Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃莉茹 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:05:42Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-21 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 李協昌,2006,上市公司私募股權之資訊內涵及折價因素之探討,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
林育安,2006,私募股權之資訊內涵:上市(櫃)公司之實證研究,國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。 翁淑育,2000,台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。 高蘭芬,2002,董監事股權質押之代理問題對會計資訊與公司績效之影響,國立成功大學會計學系博士論文。 張文魁,2006,股權結構對私募發行公司價值影響之分析,國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 張明峰,1991,股權結構對公司績效影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 張雅琳,2004,我國企業獨立董事機制與經營績效之關聯性研究,大葉大學會計資訊學系碩士論文。 許永聲與陳俊合,2006,普通股私募與盈餘管理,2006會計理論與實務研討會,東吳大學/中華會計教育學會,台北。 許雪芳,2003,上市上櫃公司私募之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 許智超,2004,公司治理與經營績效、企業價值之關聯性研究,國立台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 陸潤生,2006,私募宣告之資訊內涵,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 熊大中,2000,我國企業財務危機與董監股權質押關連性之研究,國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。 羅國華、陳俊合與王馨晨,2006,內部人認購、公司治理結構與股權私募折價,2006會計與產業整合學術研討會,東海大學/中華會計教育學會,台中。 Agrawal, A. and G. N. Mandelker. 1990. Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Antitakeover Charter Amendments. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(2): 143-161. Bajaj, M., D. J. Denis, S. P. Ferris, and A. Sarin. 2001. Firm Value and Marketability Discounts. Working paper. Purdue University. Barth, M. E. and R. Kasznik. 1999. Share repurchases and intangible assets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(2): 211-241. Brickley, J. A., R. C. Lease, and C. W. Smith, Jr. 1988. Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1/2): 267-291. Brickley, J. A., J. L. Coles, and R. L. Terry. 1994. Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics, 35(3): 371-390. Byrd, J. W. and K. A. Hickman. 1992. Do outside directors monitor managers? : Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2): 195-221. Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2): 81-112. Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6): 2741-2771. Demsetz, H. 1983. The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2): 375-390. Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis. 1991. Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16: 49-64. Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2): 301-325 Folta, T. B. and J. J. Janney. 2004. Strategic Benefits to Firms Issuing Private Equity Placements. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 223-242. Friedlan, J. M. 1994. Accounting Choices of Issuers of Initial Public Offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(1): 1-31. Guay, W. R., S. P. Kothari, and R. L. Watts. 1996. A Market-Based Evaluation of Discretionary Accrual Models. Journal of Accounting Research, 34: 83-105. Hertzel, M. and R. L. Smith. 1993. Market Discounts and Shareholder Gains for Placing Equity Privately. The Journal of Finance, 48(2): 459-485. Hertzel, M., M. Lemmon, J. S. Linck, and L. Rees. 2002. Long-Run Performance Following Private Placements of Equity. The Journal of Finance, 57(6): 2595-2617. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360. Krishnamurthy, S., P. Spindt, V. Subramaniam, and T. Woidtke. 2005. Does investor identity matter in equity issues? Evidence from private placements. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 14(2): 210-238. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate Ownership around the World. The Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471-517. Leland, H. E. and D. H. Pyle. 1977. Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation. The Journal of Finance, 32(2): 371-387. Lemmon, M. L. and K. V. Lins. 2003. Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value: Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 58(4): 1445-1468. Patton, A. and J. C. Baker. 1987. Why won't directors rock the boat? Harvard Business Review, 65(6): 10-18. Pound, J. 1988. Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1/2): 237-265. Rangan, S. 1998. Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50(1): 101-122. Rosenstein, S. and J. G. Wyatt. 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2): 175-191. Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny. 1986. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(3): 461-488. Subramanyam, K. R. 1996. The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1-3): 249-281. Teoh, S. H., I. Welch, and T. J. Wong. 1998. Earnings Management and the Long-Run Market Performance of Initial Public Offerings. The Journal of Finance, 53(6): 1935-1974. Wruck, K. H. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value : Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(1): 3-28. Yeh, Y.-h., T.-s. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2(1/2): 21-49. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25222 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 市場通常將私募宣告視為利多消息,然而,私募提供少數人低價買進公司股票之機會,若無健全之治理機制監督把關,易生圖利特定人士而損害公司股東權益之疑慮;為壓低認購價格或吸引投資人認購,管理當局亦有操縱損益以窗飾財報數字之動機。因此,本研究欲檢視私募股票宣告之資訊內涵是否因私募公司之治理機制與盈餘管理行為而有所差異。此外,本研究亦探討私募公司無形資產與私募宣告效果之關聯性,預期無形資產衍生之資訊不對稱難以透過私募籌資有效解決,進而減弱市場正向反應。
本研究以民國91年至95年底辦理私募普通股之上市櫃公司為研究樣本,以私募過程中四個時點為事件日,估算累積異常報酬,並以迴歸分析測試宣告效果之解釋因素。四個事件日之實證結果不盡一致,但整體而言,盈餘管理變數及無形資產變數對累積異常報酬無顯著影響;而部分公司治理變數與異常報酬呈顯著相關,且與預期方向相符,顯示公司治理機制之良窳會影響投資人對於私募案件未來成效之解讀。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The announcement of private equity placement is usually considered as a good signal. However, a private placement makes few investors to buy shares with high discounts, so it might benefit specific persons and sacrifice shareholders’ equity without sound corporate governance. It might also motivate managements to manipulate financial statement numbers by lowering the placement price and for attracting investors. Thus, the study examines the impact of corporate governance and earnings management on the information content of private placement announcements. In addition, we also explore the relationship between private placement announcements and information asymmetry caused by intangible assets. We expect that the positive announcement effects will be weaker since accounting information asymmetry is more difficult to be mitigated.
The sample includes TSE-listed and OTC-listed companies that place shares privately from 2002 to 2006. We define four different event dates to estimate cumulative abnormal returns and test the factors influencing the effect of private placement announcements with multiple regression analysis. Empirical results are not consistent on four event dates. In general, earnings management variables and intangible assets variables can not explain announcement effects. Some of corporate governance variables are significantly related to abnormal returns as predicted. The evidence reveals that the market reaction to the private equity placement will reflect the quality of the governance structure. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:05:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94722015-1.pdf: 415964 bytes, checksum: a67b8952a9701e4c77ca3b63227ecf81 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
謝辭 i 中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 iv 表目錄 v 圖目錄 v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 3 第三節 研究架構 4 第二章 文獻探討與假說建立 6 第一節 私募股權制度 6 第二節 私募股權資訊內涵之文獻 9 一、 國外文獻 9 二、 國內文獻 11 第三節 假說建立 13 一、 公司治理對私募股權之影響 13 二、 盈餘管理對私募股權之影響 19 三、 無形資產對私募股權之影響 21 第三章 研究方法 23 第一節 研究模型與變數定義 23 一、 市場模式 23 二、 迴歸分析 24 第二節 樣本選取與資料來源 29 一、 樣本選取 29 二、 資料來源 30 第四章 實證結果與分析 32 第一節 敘述性統計量 32 第二節 相關係數 34 第三節 迴歸分析 35 一、 事件日為董事會決議宣告日 35 二、 事件日為股東會決議日 37 三、 事件日為私募定價日 38 四、 事件日為股款繳納完成日 39 第五章 結論與建議 40 第一節 研究結論 40 第二節 研究限制 41 第三節 建議未來研究方向 42 表目錄 表1-1 敘述性統計量—事件日為董事會決議宣告日 47 表1-2 敘述性統計量—事件日為股東會決議日 48 表1-3 敘述性統計量—事件日為私募定價日 49 表1-4 敘述性統計量—事件日為股款繳納完成日 50 表2-1 相關係數表—事件日為董事會決議宣告日 51 表2-2 相關係數表—事件日為股東會決議日 52 表2-3 相關係數表—事件日為私募定價日 53 表2-4 相關係數表—事件日為股款繳納完成日 54 表3-1 迴歸分析—事件日為董事會決議宣告日,CAR(-2,2) 55 表3-2 迴歸分析—事件日為股東會決議日,CAR(-2,2) 56 表3-3 迴歸分析—事件日為私募定價日,CAR(-2,2) 57 表3-4 迴歸分析—事件日為股款繳納完成日,CAR(-2,2) 58 表A 樣本公司資料 59 表B-1 迴歸分析—事件日為董事會決議宣告日,CAR(-1,1) 60 表B-2 迴歸分析—事件日為股東會決議日,CAR(-1,1) 61 表B-3 迴歸分析—事件日為私募定價日,CAR(-1,1) 62 表B-4 迴歸分析—事件日為股款繳納完成日,CAR(-1,1) 63 圖目錄 圖1 研究架構圖 5 圖2 公開發行公司私募具股權性質有價證券之一般程序 9 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 私募股權之宣告效果-公司治理機制、盈餘管理行為與無形資產之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Announcement Effects of Private Equity Placements-The Impact of Corporate Governance, Earnings Management, and Intangible Assets | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柯承恩,陳維慈 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 私募股權,公司治理,盈餘管理,無形資產, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | private placement of equity,corporate governance,earnings management,intangible assets, | en |
dc.relation.page | 46 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-24 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 406.21 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。