請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25184
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊銘欽(Ming-Chin Yang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Wen Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林玉雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:04:35Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-08-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | ARC遠擎管理顧問公司策略績效事業部譯(2001)•策略核心組織--以平衡計分卡有效執行企業策略•台北:臉譜。
朱文洋、葉淑娟(2001)•中小型醫院經營略與營運績效之探討-以平衡計分卡觀點分析•醫務管理期刊,2(2),109~135 。 朱凱道譯(1999)•平衡計分卡—資訊時代的策略管理工具•台北:臉譜。 沈雪娥(2004)•平衡計分卡在醫院護理部績效管理的應用設計—以雲林縣某區域醫院為例•碩士論文,雲林:雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所。 李明譯(2003)•執行力•台北:天下文化。 李政修(2004)•汎奇國計管理顧問公司李政修總經理之「變革學習三部曲」•於汎奇國際管理顧問有限公司主辦,2004健康產業領導變革論壇-帶動醫院變革的關鍵角色講義,台北:台灣大學。 李懋華(2004,7月)•行政院衛生署基隆醫院變革學習分享•於汎奇國際管理顧問有限公司主辦,2004健康產業領導變革論壇-帶動醫院變革的關鍵角色講義,台北:台灣大學。 林富美、盧美秀、楊銘欽等(2005)•運用平衡計分卡改善醫院附設護理之家營運績效之個案研究•醫務管理期刊,6(3),327-346。 林靜佳(2002)•醫院對平衡計分卡的認知與現況分析•碩士論文,台北:國立陽明大學。 周慧娟(2002)•某醫學中心護理部一般病房之策略性績效指標訂定—以平衡計分卡為架構之個案研究•碩士論文,台北:台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所。 高惠松(2001)•平衡計分卡的規劃與設計—以基隆港務局為例•科技與管理學術研討會論文集。 郭約瑟(2003)•醫療機構導入平衡計分卡之研究•碩士論文,台北:台灣大學會計學研究所。 陳正平等譯(2004)•策略地圖—串聯組織策略從形成到徹底實施的動態管理工具•台北:臉譜。 陳明哲(2003)•平衡計分卡應用於警務機關之績效評估•碩士論文,中壢:中原大學工業工程學系。 陳韻靜、郭乃文、黃國哲(2003)•醫院策略型態與績效評估指標之相關性探討-以平衡計分卡觀點分析•醫務管理期刊,4(4),91-110。 張達人(2002,11月)•產業最佳實務-嘉南療養院如何應用平衡計分卡進行組織變革•於汎奇國際管理顧問有限公司主辦,平衡計分卡之產業應用實務論壇講義,台北:台灣大學。 黃永吉(2002)•醫院建構平衡計分卡之研究-以雲林縣某地區教學醫院為例•碩士論文,雲林:國立雲林科技大學。 黃淑馨(2002)•運用平衡計分卡提昇急診績效之探討•碩士論文,台北:私立台北醫學大學。 黃铣扶(2003)•建構中大型醫院平衡計分卡之實證研究•碩士論文,台中:逢甲大學工業工程學所。 彭雅惠(2002)•醫療產業實施平衡計分卡的問題探討•醫務管理期刊,3(1),26-36。 Andra, G., Dorothy, E. B., & Bridget L.(2003). A three year journey to organizational and financial health using the balanced scorecard:A case study at a Yale new haven health system hospital. The Journal of Business and Economic Studies Oakdale: Fall , 9(2), 54. Bastidas, B., Eunice, L., & Ripoll, F. V.(2003). An approach to the implications of using balanced scorecard in public sector organization. Compendium, 11, Dec, 23-41. Curtright, J. W., Stolp-Smith, S. C., & Edell, E.S.(2000). Strategic performance management:development of a performance measurement system at the Mayo clinic, Journal of Healthcare Management, 45(1), January, 58-68. Harber, B. W.(1998). The balanced scorecard solution at Peel memorial hospital, Hospital Quarterly, Summary, 1(4), 59-61, 63. Heather, S., & Kim, I. W.(2005), Balanced scorecard at Summa health system. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance Hoboken, Jul/Aug, 16(5), 65-72. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2000). The strategy-focused organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new environment. Harvard Business Review, January, 69-73. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2001).The Strategy-Focused Organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Olve, N.G., Roy, J., & Wetter, M. (1999). Performance drivers: a practical guide to using the balanced scorecard. England, John Wiley & Sons. 149-83 & 317-24. Ontario Hospital Association. (1999), Hospital Report. Pink, G. H., Mckillop, I., Schraa, E. G., Preyra, C., Montgomery, C., & Baker, G.R. (2001). Creating a Balanced Scorecard for A Hospital System. Journal Health Care Finacial, 27(3), 1-20. Robert, S. M. (2005). Physician Buy-In is essential for pay for performance. Physician Executive Tampa, Nov/Dec, 31(6), 16-19. Huang, S. H., Chen, P. L., & Yang, M. C. (2004). Using a balanced scorecard to improve the performance of an emergency department. Nursing Economic$, May-June,22(3), 140-146. Susan, M.(2004). Data in safety out. trustee Chicago, Jul/Aug, 57(7), 12-14. William, N. Z., George, H. P., & Catherine, B. M. (2003). Use of the balanced scorecard in health care. Journal of Health Care Finance, summer, 1-16. Yang, M. C., & Tung, Y. C. (2006). Using path analysis to examine causal relationships among balanced scorecard performance indicators for general hospitals: the case of a public hospital system in Taiwan. Health Care Management Review. October/December 31(4), 280-288. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25184 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著全球人口逐年老化,健保制度的大幅變革,加上民眾就醫觀念的改變,醫療機構扮演的角色逐漸加重,使醫院在經營上面臨嚴重的衝擊與困難;在此種情況下醫院必須訂定適當的經營模式,以滿足病患的醫療需求,提供病患高品質的醫療服務,並確保醫院在面對內外部環境的改變時仍能永續經營。醫院為達永續經營目的,運用平衡計分卡為主體之經營模式,協助個案醫院建立以員工學習為基礎,顧客滿意為導向,品質改善為核心之事業經營共同體,並且能有目標、有系統、有組織地不斷進行變革與提升績效。
本研究之目的在於了解推動平衡計分卡過程中有哪些關鍵因素,讓醫院中某策略核心團隊(SBU)成功的提升營運績效及競爭力,達到預定的目標,以及探討推動醫院營運績效活動具體實施內容,找出實施過程中所面臨的挑戰及改善方式。 本研究主要以個案研究方式,採用直接觀察、歷史文件、檔案紀錄、及訪談等方式,進行研究並分析個案醫院在實施過程中的問題、成果及成功推動平衡計分卡過程中之關鍵因素與成員對於平衡計分卡推動看法。平衡計分卡導入時間2004年1月至2006年12月,共計3年,次級資料蒐集期間為2002-2006年,本研究比較實施前(2002-2003年)與實施後(2004-2006年)成果,訪談時間為2007年4月。 本研究結果顯示: 1.平衡計分卡推動下長期照護策略核心團隊在顧客、流程、學習構面均已提升績效,達到目標值,在2006年財務構面達到目標值,顯示出學習、品質、顧客關係構面無形資產提升績效,可以成功轉換成財務有形的成果。 2.參與平衡計分卡推動員工認為平衡計分卡具有功效,平衡計分卡制度在提供同仁之學習成長、醫療滿意度、醫療品質及機構之營運績效方面有提升,並且認為平衡計分卡是很好的管理工具,有共同溝通語言加以整合。推動平衡計分卡制度所面臨之挑戰,可透過績效獎勵制度、適當人力規劃、加強溝通機制,以使平衡計分卡推動順利。 3.除了推動過程、架構、績效指標訂定、制定有價值的策略等結構性因素外,成功推動平衡計分卡過程中之關鍵因素為1.領導者之執行力:包括領導人的重要行為,改變文化讓公司動起來,知人善任,如:充分溝通、增加團隊成員之間友好關係、持續追蹤、以身作則、要有激勵因子、人才培育、與事實貼近;2.運用追蹤概念持續追蹤3.發展成為學習型組織。 因此建議對引進或推行平衡計分卡者,推動平衡計分卡整合各項品管手法的策略管理工具,與績效獎勵制度連結,確實掌握執行之道取得競爭優勢,機構的經營文化與高階管理者的管理方式,可增加此工具之績效提升;針對未來研究者的部份,可深入了解推動此項工具過程中之關鍵因素對於國內醫療院所的適用性及提升績效之因果關係進行研究。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | As the gradually aging of world population, drastic reformation in health insurance system, concept changes in seeking doctors, the role of health care organization becomes more important, making hospitals facing a serious attack and predicament in management. In this situation, hospitals should set a proper management model and offer high quality medical treatment services to satisfy the medical treatment necessary for patients in order to make sure the sustainable operation of hospitals in the changing situations in both inner and outer environment. Using the (BSC) management model can make the case hospital to continuously reform and operate performance systematically and objectively by the establishment of a business operation entity, which is based on the employee learning. Also focus on costumer satisfaction and the persistent quality improvement.
The goal of this research was to understand the key factors to promote operational performance, competition, and how to reach the anticipated objectives by implementing BSC process, and determine the concrete contents of the activities in promoting the hospital performance, to find out the challenge and methods for improvement in the process. Case study was applied in this research. Data was collected by the method of direct observation, archive documentation and personal interview. The research was focused on the problems, achievements, the key factors by implementing BSC model in the case hospital, and the thoughts from staff members. The BSC was introduced from January 2004 to December 2006. Secondary data were collected from 2002-2006. The result before(2002-2003) and after(2004-2006) using the model was compared. Interview was made in April 2007. The result of this research revealed: 1. The performance in costumer, process, and learning perspectives of long-term care SBU were promoted to reach the anticipated target value by implementing BSC model. In 2006, the financial perspective reached the target value, which revealed the performance promotion of the invisible properties including learning, quality, and costumer perspectives. These can be transformed into the visible result like the promotion of tangible financial results. 2. Staff members who participated in the BSC model assured the function of BSC. They thought the BSC was useful in employees learning, medical treatment satisfaction, medical treatment quality and the operation performance of the health care organization. They also thought that the BSC is a good management tool that can conform the common communication language. The challenge by implementing BSC can be conquered by using the performance reward mechanism, proper manpower plan, strengthened communication mechanism in order to apply BSC smoothly. 3. In addition to the structural factors including the processes, framework, performance indicator determination and, valuable strategies making, the key factor to implement BSC successfully is a. the execution of the leader; b. continuous follow-up; c. developing the learning organization in order to reach the goal successfully. In order to get the superior competitive, we recommend conforming each quality control method and linking it to the performance reward mechanism. The operation culture and management method of high-ranked manager can promote the performance. In the future, one can research the applicability of these key factors in the hospitals and their casual relationship with performance promotion. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:04:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-P94843007-1.pdf: 930831 bytes, checksum: ccf97115ad4cc21db58e650c8eff22f7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文口試委員會審定書 I
中文摘要 II 英文摘要 IV 致 謝 VI 目 錄 VIII 圖 目 錄 IX 表 目 錄 X 第一章 前言 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 本研究的重要性 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 平衡計分卡導入流程與成功條件 4 第二節 平衡計分卡在醫療機構運用之相關研究 12 第三章 材料與方法 15 第一節 研究對象 15 第二節 研究方法 15 第三節 研究設計 16 第四章 結果 18 第一節 個案醫院簡介 18 第二節 個案醫院實施平衡計分卡的背景與原因分析 18 第三節 個案醫院導入平衡計分卡的實施步驟 21 第四節 個案醫院導入平衡計分卡的具體實施內容 24 第五節 深度訪談內容分析 34 第六節 結果彙整 42 第五章 討論 46 第一節 研究討論 46 第二節 研究限制 50 第六章 結論與建議 51 第一節 研究結論 51 第二節 研究建議 52 參考文獻 54 附錄 長期照護策略核心團隊同仁特性分布、外包照顧服務員特性分布表 57 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 成功推動平衡計分卡過程中之關鍵因素-以某公立區域教學醫院長期照護策略核心團隊為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Key Factors of Successful Balanced Scorecard Implementation-Using a Long-term Care Strategic Business Unit of a Government Regional Teaching Hospital as an Example | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鍾國彪(Kuo-Piao Chung),李懋華 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 平衡計分卡,長期照護,經營績效,組織變革,領導管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Balanced scorecard,Long-term care,Operation performance,Organization reformation,Leadership management, | en |
dc.relation.page | 59 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫療機構管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 909.01 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。