請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25095
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周雍強 | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Chih Hsieh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 謝承志 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:02:10Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Abel, A. B. (1996). 'Options, the Value of Capital, and Investment.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(3): 753.
2. Alchian, A. (1963). 'Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production.' Econometrica 31(4): 679-693. 3. Ana, A. (2006). 'Why did semiconductor price indexes fall so fast in the 1990s? a decomposition.' Economic Inquiry 44(3): 485. 4. Arrow, K. J. (1962). 'The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.' The Review of Economic Studies 29(3): 155-173. 5. Balasubramaniam, S., A. K. Sarwar, et al. (1997). 'Yield learning in integrated circuit package assembly.' Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part C, IEEE Transactions on [see also Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, IEEE Transactions on] 20(2): 133-141. 6. Baldwin, C. Y. (1982). 'Optimal Sequential Investment When Capital is Not Readily Reversible.' The Journal of Finance 37(3): 763-782. 7. Bohn, R. E. and C. Terwiesch (1999). 'The economics of yield-driven processes.' Journal of Operations Management 18(1): 41-59. 8. Bollen, N. P. B. (1999). 'Real Options and Product Life Cycles.' Management Science 45(5): 670-684. 9. Boyan, J. and L. R. Peter (2002). Moore's Law and Learning-By-Doing, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 10. Cakanyildirim, M. and R. O. Roundy (2002). 'Evaluation of capacity planning practices for the semiconductor industry.' Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on 15(3): 331-340. 11. Chen, A., R.-S. Guo, et al. (2000). An effective SPC approach to monitoring semiconductor quality data with multiple variation sources. 12. Chien, C.-F., W.-C. Wang, et al. (2007). Data mining for yield enhancement in semiconductor manufacturing and an empirical study, Pergamon Press, Inc. 33: 192-198. 13. Chou, Y.-C., C. T. Cheng, et al. (2007). 'Evaluating alternative capacity strategies in semiconductor manufacturing under uncertain demand and price scenarios.' International Journal of Production Economics 105(2): 591-606. 14. Dance, D. and R. Jarvis (1992). 'Using yield models to accelerate learning curve progress [semiconductor industry].' Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on 5(1): 41-46. 15. Delbono, F. (1991). 'Incentives to Innovate in a Cournot Oligopoly.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(3): 951. 16. Demeester, L. L. and M. Qi (2005). 'Managing learning resources for consecutive product generations.' International Journal of Production Economics 95(2): 265-283. 17. Dixit, A. K. and R. S. Pindyck (1995). 'The options approach to capital investment.' Harvard Business Review 73(3): 105. 18. Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole (1983). 'Learning-by-Doing and Market Performance.' The Bell Journal of Economics 14(2): 522-530. 19. Hatch, N. W. and D. C. Mowery (1998). 'Process Innovation and Learning by Doing in Semiconductor Manufacturing.' Management Science 44(11): 1461-1477. 20. Irwin, D. A. and P. J. Klenow (1994). 'Learning-by-Doing Spillovers in the Semiconductor Industry.' The Journal of Political Economy 102(6): 1200-1227. 21. Jeffrey, T. M. and C. M. David (2003). ''Managing' learning by doing: An empirical study in semiconductor manufacturing.' The Journal of Product Innovation Management 20(5): 391. 22. Kumar, N., K. Kennedy, et al. (2006). 'A review of yield modelling techniques for semiconductor manufacturing.' International Journal of Production Research 44(23): 5019-5036. 23. Lambrecht, B. and W. Perraudin (1995). Option Games, Faculty of Economics (formerly DAE), University of Cambridge. 24. Lee, T. and L. L. Wilde (1980). 'Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation.' The Quarterly Journal of Economics 94(2): 429-36. 25. Lieberman, M. B. (1984). 'The Learning Curve and Pricing in the Chemical Processing Industries.' The RAND Journal of Economics 15(2): 213-228. 26. Lieberman, M. B. (1987). 'The Learning Curve, Diffusion, and Competitive Strategy.' Strategic Management Journal 8(5): 441-452. 27. Loury, G. C. (1979). 'Market Structure and Innovation.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 93(3): 395. 28. Luke, T. M. and S. P. Chan (2005). 'A Learning Real Options Framework with Application to Process Design and Capacity Planning.' Production and Operations Management 14(1): 5. 29. Malos, S. B. (1995). 'An Options-Based Model of Career Mobility in Professional Service Firms.' Academy of Management Review 20(3): 611. 30. Mirza, A. I., G. O'Donoghue, et al. (1995). Spatial yield modeling for semiconductor wafers. 31. Murto, P., E. Nasakkala, et al. (2004). 'Timing of investments in oligopoly under uncertainty: A framework for numerical analysis.' European Journal of Operational Research 157(2): 486-500. 32. Nakatsuka, H. (2002). 'Derivation and implication of a novel DRAM bit cost model.' Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on 15(2): 279-284. 33. Nile W. Hatch, J. H. D. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. 25: 1155-1178. 34. Reinganum, J. F. (1981). 'Dynamic games of innovation.' Journal of Economic Theory 25(1): 21-41. 35. Reinganum, J. F. (1982). 'A Dynamic Game of R and D: Patent Protection and Competitive Behavior.' Econometrica 50(3): 671-688. 36. Reinganum, J. F. (1989). The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion, Elsevier. 1: 849-908. 37. Smit, H. T. J. (1993). 'A Real Options and Game-Theoretic Approach to Corporate Investment Strategy under Competition.' Financial Management 22(3): 241. 38. Smit, H. T. J. and L. Trigeorgis (2006). 'Real options and games: Competition, alliances and other applications of valuation and strategy.' Review of Financial Economics 15(2): 95-112. 39. Spence, A. M. (1981). 'The Learning Curve and Competition.' Bell Journal of Economics 12(1): 49-70. 40. Steffen, H. H. (2003). 'Existence of equilibrium and comparative statics in differentiated goods Cournot oligopolies.' International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(7): 989. 41. Terwiesch, C. and R. E. Bohn (2001). 'Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up.' International Journal of Production Economics 70(1): 1-19. 42. Trigeorgis, L. (1993). 'The Nature of Option Interactions and the Valuation of Investments with Multiple Real Options.' The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28(1): 1-20. 43. Weber, C. (2004). 'Yield learning and the sources of profitability in semiconductor manufacturing and process development.' Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on 17(4): 590-596. 44. Wright, T. (1936). 'Factors affecting the costs of airplanes.' Journal of Aeronautical Sciences 3: 122-128. 45. Yeric, G., E. Cohen, et al. (2005). 'Infrastructure for successful BEOL yield ramp, transfer to manufacturing, and DFM characterization at 65 nm and below.' Design & Test of Computers, IEEE 22(3): 232-239. 46. Young-Jun, K. and D. M. H. Walker (1995). Yield learning via functional test data. 47. Zulehner, C. (2003). 'Testing dynamic oligopolistic interaction: evidence from the semiconductor industry.' International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(10): 1527-1556. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25095 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在快速應用高新科技的產業環境下,企業會面臨產品更迭快速,高品質的新產品不斷推陳出新的競爭情境,在此樣情境下,隱含著企業必須進行快速的研發,並且面臨具高度變化的經營環境,有高變異的需求,這樣的產業環境具有兩大特性,「產品更迭快速」考驗企業工程能力,「需求變異」考驗企業因應環境變異的製造能力,然而企業並非只需要獨立地加強工程能力與製造能力,而是需要發展兩種能力之間的整合能力,工程能力與製造能力必須整合,才能夠相得益彰獲得綜合效益,企業工程能力考慮製造能力,可以明瞭工程能力發展的方向,而工程能力主動積極改善市場環境後,還需進而搭配適當的製造能力。
本研究主要研究製造能力中的產能策略,提供了企業增進工程能力主動改善市場環境後,要如何搭配適當產能策略的思考架構。基本結果如下:當需求具有不確定下,工程能力影響產品價格狀況大於產能成本下,工程能力越強產能策略要隨之越積極,而工程能力影響影響產品價格狀況小於產能成本下,則反之。半導體先進製程價格易鬆動,LCD製造,台灣採用成熟機台,韓國公司較早介入新機台,Wii發生缺貨,皆是例證。另外,在工程能力只影響需求變異下,工程能力影響會使需求變異變小時,產能策略要隨之越謹慎,工程能力影響會使需求變異變大時,則反之,背後隱含的道理,是在決策者風險中立的假設下,需求變異較大,所面臨到大需求量的機率也上升,因此值得一搏可能較高的利潤。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In an industrial environment where new and high technology is being rapidly applied, firms are faced with competition on rapid product change and never ending development of high quality products. Such situation deems enterprises to have fast response R&D and face a business environment with high degrees of change and volatile demand. This type of industry has two major characteristics – “Rapid Product Change,” testing the firm’s engineering capability and “Demand Variability,” testing the firm’s manufacturing capability according to changes within the environment. Firms do not need to independently improve its engineering capability nor manufacturing capability alone, moreover but to develop the integration between these two capabilities. Engineering capabilities and manufacturing capabilities must be integrated so as to complementarily benefit on its integrative effect. A firm’s engineering capability being able to consider manufacturing capability will enable to understand clearly the development path of engineering capability. When the engineering capability has already taken the initiative to improve the market conditions, an appropriate combination of manufacturing capability is further required.
The study mainly researches on the production capacity strategy of manufacturing capabilities. It provides a framework for strategically combining appropriate mix of production capacity after the firm has promoted engineering capabilities which initiate the improvement on market conditions. Basic results are as follows: when demand is uncertain, the engineering capabilities influence the product prices greater than production costs. When engineering capability is stronger, the production capacity strategy must be more active and the impact of engineering capabilities influence on the product prices is less than production cost, and vice versa. Some examples are the advancement in semiconductor manufacturing processes where prices easily loosened, LCD manufacturing, Taiwan adopting a more mature plant, Korean company’s earlier intervention with new machine and under stock of Wii. In addition, when situations where the engineering capability only influences the demand changes and the engineering capability impact makes demand changes smaller, the capacity strategy must accordingly be more cautious, but when the engineering capability impact makes demand changes bigger, the contrary is applied. The logic behind is that under the analysts risk assumption, demand changes are bigger, the probability of facing larger demand tends to be higher, therefore deserving to strike on a higher profit. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:02:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94546005-1.pdf: 608532 bytes, checksum: 63ac2630a9e7d01f8cdd43d9b46c2fbc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
摘要 II Abstract III 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題背景 1 第二節 研究問題 2 第三節 論文架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 相關研究文獻 6 第一項 確定性產量決策(靜態與比較靜態) 6 第二項 隨機性投資決策(靜態) 7 第二節 半導體專業製造工程能力與產能文獻 9 第一項 半導體專業製造企業的工程能力與產能決策 10 第二項 良率改善有關文獻 11 第三項 產能決策有關文獻 13 第三節 半導體專業製造相關概念文獻 15 第一項 半導體製程的生命週期概述 15 第二項 工程能力 17 第三項 需求樣態 21 第四項 產能成本 23 第五項 產品價格 24 第六項 小結 26 第三章 數量模型 27 第一節 求算最佳製造能力 27 第二節 的比較靜態分析 30 第一項 工程能力只影響價格和成本 31 第二項 工程能力只影響需求變異 33 第四章 應用及其數例 35 第一節 命題數值範例 35 第一項 成本影響為負,價格影響為正 37 第二項 成本影響為正,價格影響大於成本影響 38 第三項 成本影響為正,價格影響小於成本影響 39 第二節 半導體製造業應用 40 第一項 工程能力影響價格大於成本 41 第二項 工程能力影響價格小於成本 43 第三節 產品生命週期應用 44 第一項 衰退率固定 46 第二項 衰退率隨著時間改變(非固定) 50 第五章 研究貢獻與限制 57 第一節 貢獻 57 第二節 限制 57 第三節 未來工作 58 參考文獻 59 資料附錄 63 數學附錄 70 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 工程-製造系統能力整合 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Capability Integration in Engineering-Manufacturing System | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姜常俊,賴鴻輝 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 工程能力,製造能力,產能策略,需求變異,整合能力, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | engineering capabilities,manufacturing capabilities,capacity strategy,demand variability,integration capability, | en |
dc.relation.page | 70 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 工業工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 594.27 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。