Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25082Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳文賢(Wen-Hsien, Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chien-Hung Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳建宏 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:01:51Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.孫強、郝亞斌、郝曉玲、孟秀轉 (2004)，「IT治理：中國資訊化發展的畢遊之路」
2.Peter Weill & Jeanne Ross (2004), “IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results”, Harvard Business School Press 3.IT Governance Institute: Board briefing on IT governance. Available online at www.itgi.org (2000) 4.ISACA: Knowledge and value of the IT governance and control field. (1967), www.isaca.org 5.Van Grembegen (2002) Van Grembergen, W.: Introduction to the minitrack IT governance and its mechanisms. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE (2002) 6.The Ministry of International Trade and Industry (1999) 7.德勤企業管理顧問公司 8.KPMG 9.Roberts.Roussey（美國南加州大學教授） 10.Luftman, J.: Competing in the Information age – Strategic Alignment in Practice. Oxford University Press (1996) 11.Webb, P., Pollard, C., Ridley, G.: Attempting to define IT Governance: Wisdom or Folly, Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on system Sciences (2006) 12.“Effective IT Governance. By Design” [January 2003 exp premier] 71 pages, Gartner 13.“Tailor IT Governance to Your Enterprise” [October 2003 exp club] 42 pages, Gartner 14.Peter Weill & Marianne Broadbent (1998), “Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on IT”, Harvard Business School Press 15.Peter Weill & Richard Woodham (2002), “Don’t Just Lead, Govern: Implementing Effective IT Governance”, CISR WP NO.326, MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper No 4237-02 16.Peter Weill & Sinan Aral (2002), “Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility”, MIT Sloan Management Review 44, no. 1 17.Mårten Simonsson and Pontus Johnson, Ph.D. “DEFINING IT GOVERNANCE - A CONSOLIDATION OF LITERATURE – “ 18.Weill, P., Woodham, R.: State Street Corporation: Evolving IT Governance. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper No 4236-02, April (2002) 19.Ross, J.W.: Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper No 4314-03, April (2003) 20.Guldentops, E.:Governing Information Technology through COBIT. In Van Grembergen, W. (Ed.): Strategies for Information Technology Governance. Idea Group Publishing (2004) 21.Warland, C., Ridley, G.: Awareness of IT control frameworks in an Australian state government: A qualitative case study. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2005) 22.Ridley, G., Young, J., Carroll, P.: COBIT and its utilization: A framework from the literature. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (2004) 23.Luftman, J.: Competing in the Information age – Strategic Alignment in Practice. Oxford University Press (1996) 24.Luftman, J.: Assessing IT-Business Alignment Maturity. In Grembergen (Ed.) Strategies for Information Technology Governance. Idea Group Publishing (2004) 25.Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, R.W.: Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era - A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for research. Information Systems Research, Vol 11, No. 2, June (2000) 105-114 26.Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, R.W.: Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23. No. 2, June (1999) 27.R.Kaplan and D.Norton, 'The balanced scorecard: translating vision into action', Harvard Business School Press, 1996. 28.C.Gold, 'Total quality management in information services -- IS measures: a balancing act', in Research Note, Ernest & Young Center for Information Technology and Strategy, 1992. 29.L.Willcocks, 'The evaluation of information systems investments', Chapman & Hall, 1995. 30.W.Van Grembergen and D.Timmerman , 'Monitoring the IT process through the balanced scorecard', in proceedings of 9th Information Resources Management International Conference,1998. 31.W.Van Grembergen and I.Amelinckx, 'Measuring and Managing E-Business Initiatives through the Balanced Scorecard', in Strategies for Information Technology Governance, Ed. Wim Van Grembergen, Idea Group Publishing, 2004. 32.J.Van der Zee , 'Alignment is not enough: integrating business and IT management with the balanced scorecard', in proceedings of 1st Conference on the IT Balanced Scorecard,1999. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25082 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | IT 治理在公司中扮演起非常重要的關鍵角色。從Weill and Ross研究[2]顯示，有效的IT 治理是一個組織確保從IT所產生的價值的非常重要的指標。頂尖企業透過實現有效的IT 治理來支持他們的策略執行，比IT 治理成效不彰的企業還要成功。有平均超過20%的更高的利潤之差異。
本文先描述IT 治理的理論研究現狀，從定義的整理與比較，分析各家定義上的差異與共同點，期望藉由定義的角度，整理出IT 治理的涵義與可執行的方向。並且分辨IT 治理與IT管理之差異性，避免因觀念的混淆，而在實踐的規劃與過程中，著力點的不同，致使IT 治理真正的義涵失焦，使得企業的策略無法調準、使IT 價值的貢獻降低、風險無法控制。 本文分析指出，企業要從真正IT 治理獲取效益，IT 相關決策是否夠好的是主要的因素，而所謂夠好，是能夠符合企業公司的業務策略與方向來衡量 IT所投資的回饋是否有績效。而誰來決策的權責，對策略的調準、下對的決策、及監督有絕對的關係。 IT 治理與其他治理主體一樣，是管理執行人員和利益相關者的責任（以董事會為代表），如何讓他們高度的參與並把IT 治理當成他們的責任，是一項未來可以加強研究的課題。也是IT 治理的主要意義。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:01:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-P93747014-1.pdf: 1145659 bytes, checksum: f6fd92618b7c0f0aebb501de99c43d26 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝ii
中文摘要iii 英文摘要iv 目錄vi 圖目錄viii 表目錄ix 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節、研究背景 1 第二節、研究動機 1 第三節、研究目的 4 第四節、論文架構 5 第五節、研究設計與研究步驟 5 第六節、研究限制 7 第二章文獻探討 8 第一節、IT治理的定義 10 第二節、IT治理的定義分析與比較 10 第三節、從公司治理到IT治理 12 第四節、從IT治理到IT管理(IT Management) 14 第五節、IT治理的目標 17 第六節、IT治理的範圍 18 第三章IT治理架構與決策模式 21 第一節、IT治理架構(Framework) 21 一、IT 治理架構的範圍 21 二、Control Objectives for Information and related Technology (CobiT) 23 三、IT Balanced Scorecard 28 四、CobiT與BSC架構之比較與結合 30 第二節IT治理架構與決策模式之關係 31 一、IT治理架構與決策模式之定義 31 二、IT Decision Domains 31 三、IT 治理 Archetypes 32 四、Decision Governance Matrix 33 第三節、IT治理實踐的實務 34 第四章IT治理實踐現況與分析 42 第一節、IT治理實踐之現況分析 42 一、ITGI 42 二、MIT CISR(Center for Information Systems Research) IT治理實踐之現況分析 49 三、三種IT治理的典型 51 第二節、IT治理實踐之整體歸納分析 53 第五章結論與建議 55 第一節、研究結論 55 第二節、實施IT治理之建議 56 第三節、後續研究建議 56 參考文獻 58 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 價值交付 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊科技治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | IT平衡計分卡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 策略調準 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Strategic Alignment | en |
| dc.subject | Value Delivery | en |
| dc.subject | IT Governance | en |
| dc.subject | IT Balanced scorecard | en |
| dc.title | 資訊科技治理理論與實踐之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on IT Governance Theoretics and Implementation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林永松(F.Y.S. Lin),陳靜枝(C.C. Chern) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資訊科技治理,IT平衡計分卡,策略調準,價值交付, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | IT Governance,IT Balanced scorecard,Strategic Alignment,Value Delivery, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 60 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理組 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 資訊管理組 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.12 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.