請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24823完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳文華 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ming-De Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林明德 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:56:54Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-02-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-01-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻：
王思淳（2005）。台灣軟體產業營運模式與策略研究。國立台灣大學國際企業學所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 王盈勛（2002）。軟體產業的顧客知識運用、產權與組織型式。國立政治大學科技管理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 行政院經濟建設委員會(2000)。知識經濟發展方案。 吳思華(2001)：知識經濟、知識資本與知識管理。台灣產業研究，4期，11-50頁。 吳貴生，謝偉(1996)。用戶創新概念及其運行機制。科研管理， 5，14-19。 陳玫汝（2004）。台灣生技製藥廠商之經營模式分析。國立台灣大學國際企業學所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 陳佩婷（2006）。文化創意產業之陶瓷產業經營模式分析。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 陳銘毅（2005）。智慧卡產業結構分析及競爭策略。國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 張雅瑄（2003）。PDA 作業系統之競合分析－以Palm OS 與Pocket PC 為例。國立台灣大學國際企業學所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 森谷正規(1985)：日本的技術。上海：翻譯出版公司，頁4。 蔡啟通（1997），組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。 劉芳君（2006）。文化創意產業之玻璃工藝產業經營模式分析。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 聯合國經濟合作開發組織(1996)。知識經濟報告。 二、英文文獻： Afuah, A. (1998). Innovation Management：Strategies, Implementation ,and Profits. New York: Oxford University Press. Afuah, A. (2004). Business Models: A Strategic Management Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill. Andrews, K. R. (1951). Executive Training by the Case Method. Harvard Business Review, 29, 58-70. Barney, J. (1995). Looking Inside for Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive , 9, 49-61 Becker, S. W. and Whisler T. L. (1967). The Innovative Organization: A Selective View of Current Theory and Research. Journal of Business, 4, 462-469. Betz, F. (1987). Managing Technology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Benoit, B. and Abdalla, G. (2000). Licensing and Selling Property Rights and Technology Online. The Licensing Journal, April, 9-12. Bovet, D.and Martha, J. (2000). Value Nets: Breaking the Supply Chain to Unlock Hidden Profits. New Jersey: Wiley. BTG (2005). Annual Report and Accounts. London: British Technology Group. Castellion, G. (2006). Democratizing Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 193-195. Chacke, G.. K. (1988). Technology Management – Application to Corporate Markets and Military Missions. New York: Praeger. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting form Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Chesbrough, H. W. (2004). A Better Way to Innovate. Harvard Business Review, 81, 12-13. Chesbrough, H. W. (2004). Managing Open Innovation. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 32, 52-56. Collis, J. and Montgomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73, 118-128. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590. Dierking, D. (2004) Open the Door to Open Innovation. Chemical Processing, 67, 7. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Butterworth Henemann. Eisenmann, T. R. (2006). Platform Structure in Networked Markets. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing. Enos, J. L. (1962) Petroleum Progress and Profits: A History of Process Innovation. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press. Piller, F. & Schaller, C. Customers as codesigners: A framework for open innovation. Retrieved April 8, 2007, from http://www.handels.gu.se/ifsam/Streams/Poster/116%20POSTER%20final.pdf. Frankle, E. G. (1990). Management of Technology Change. Boston: Kluwer Academic publishers. Freeman, C. (1968). Chemical Process Plant: Innovation and the World Market. National Institute Economic Review, 45, 2957. Gales, L. & Mansour, C. D. (1995). User Involvement in Innovation Projects: Toward an Information Processing Model. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12, 77- 109. Gattiker, U. E. (1990). Technology Management in Organization. California: Sage Publications. Hansen, M. T. and Birkinshaw, J. (2007). The Innovation Value Chain. Harvard Business Review, 85, 121-131. Herstatt, C and von Hippel, E. (1992). From Experience: Developing New Product Concepts via the Leader User Method: a Case Study in a “Low-tech” Field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 213-221. Holt, K. (1988). Product Innovation Management. London: Butterworth. Knight, K. E. (1963). A Study of Technological Innovation: The Evolution of Digital Computers. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, PA. Kuhlmann, S. (2001). Future Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe - three scenarios. Research Pocily, 30, 953-976. Lee, K. R. (1996). The Role of User Firms in the Innovation of Machine Tools: the Japanese Case. Research Policy, 25, 491- 507. Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (1996). Customer Contributions to Quality: A Different View of the Customer-Oriented Firm. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 791-824. Lettl, C., & Herstatt, C. , & Gemuenden, H.G. (2006). Users' contributions to radical innovation: evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R&D Management, 36, 251-272. Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, 38, 45-60. Lionetta, W. G. Jr. (1977). Sources of Innovation Within the Pultrusion Industry. Unpublished S.M. thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. Luecke, R. (2003). Managing Creativity and Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Magretta, J. and Stone, N. (2002). What Management Is: It Works and Why It’s Everyone’s Business. New York: Free Press. Mansfield, E. (1975). International Technology Transfer: Forms, Resource Requirements and Policies. American Economic Association, 68, 372-376. Markides, C. C. & Geroski, P. A. (1988). Fast Second: How Smart Companies Bypass Radical Innovation to Enter and Dominate New Markets. New Jersey: Wiley. Horwitch, M., & Parikh, M., & Ziv, N. (2000, Januanry). Open Innovation: Transferring Lessons from Software for Modern Value Creation. Paper presented at the CISEP workshop on innovation and diffusion in the economy, Lisbon, Portugal. Morrison, P. D., & Roberts, J. H. , & Von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market. Management Science, 46, 1513-1527. Nambisan, S. and Sawhney, M. (2007). A Buyer’s Guide to the Innovation Bazaar. Harvard Business Review, 85, 109-118. Nelson, R. (1982). The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency. Quartely Journal of Economics, 97, 453- 470. Nonaka, I. and Hirotaka T. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press. Rayport, J. F.and Jaworski, B. J. (2002). Introduction to E-commerce. New York: McGraw Hill. Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Schneider, B. and Bowen, D. E. (1995). Winning the Service Game. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Schoder, D. (2000). Forecasting the Success of Telecommunication Services in the Presence of Network Effects. Information Economics and Policy, 12, 181-200. Schramm, W. L. (1971). The Science of Human Communication: New Directions and New Findings in Communication Research. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row. Shah, S. (2000). Sources and Patterns of Innovation in a Consumer Products Field: Innovations in Sporting Equipment. Sloan Working Paper #4105. Stuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., and Samson, D. (2002). Effective case research in operations management：a process perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 419-433. Subramaniam, M. (2006). Integrating Cross-Border Knowledge for Transnational New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 541-555. Teece, D. J. (1980). Economics of Scope and The Scope of The Enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 223-247. Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 193-224. Teresko, J. (2004). Open Innovation? Rewards and challenges. Industry Week. 253, 20. Thomke, S. and von Hippel, E. (2002). Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value. Harvard Business Review, 80, 74-81. Tushman, M. and Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for Innovation. California Management Review , 28, 74-92 Urban, G.. and von Hippel, E. (1988). Lead User Analysis for the Development of New Industrial Products. Management Science, 34, 569–582. VanderWerf, P. A. (1990). Product tying and innovation in U.S. wire preparation equipment. Research Policy, 19, 83-96. von Hippel, E. (1976). The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process. Research Policy, 5, 212-239. von Hippel, E. (1977). he Dominant Role of the Users in Semiconductor and Electronic Subassembly Process Innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 24, 60-71. von Hippel, E. (1982). Getting New Products from Customers. Harvard Business Review, 60, 117-122. von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, 32, 791-805. von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation. Management Science, 40, 429-439. von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of Product Development by User: The Impact of “Sticky” Local Information. Management Science, 44, 629-644. von Hippel, E. (2001). Innovation by User Communities: Learning from Open-Source Software. Sloan Management Review, 42, 82-86. von Hippel, E. (2002). Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits. Management Science, 48, 821-833. von Hippel, E. (2002). Horizontal innovation networks - by and for users. Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/papers/opensourceexecsummary.pdf. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MA: MIT Press. Weill, P. and Vitale, M. R. (2001). Place to Space: Migrating to eBusiness Models. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. West, J. (2003). How Open is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies. Research Policy, 32, 1259-1285. Yin, R. K., & Bateman, P. G. (1983), & Moore, G. B. Case Studies and Organisational Innovation. Washington D.C.: COMOS Corporation. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and methods. California: Sage. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24823 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來創新是各國政府積極倡導的目標，在這個知識經濟的社會中，創新更是決定企業競爭力的關鍵要素。隨著資訊科技的發展，不只讓資訊的流通更為迅速方便，相關設計工具如AutoCAD及程式語言的發展，每個人都能夠利用這些工具設計出切合需求的創新產品。如何讓這些分散不集中的創新能量，能夠分享予大多數的人受益並實現創意的市場價值，其中一個途徑便是經由創新交易平台的運作。
本研究以個案研究法，從產業中各種性質不一的創新交易平台裡，依其依其運作模式與服務項目分為四大類別，並從各類別挑選出具有代表性的公司，深入各個企業的經營活動，為整體產業描繪大致上的輪廓。 在研究分析方面，首先經由平台產業的分析工具，判斷出創新交易平台產業未來將成為非集中式，也就是多平台共存並偏向利基式發展的產業結構。接下來，分別對個案進行商業模式分析，檢視其企業經營元素，配合VRISA分析，為他們未來的發展、競爭態勢及獲利能力作客觀的分析，分為具有持久競爭優勢、暫時競爭優勢、及無競爭優勢。 最後，經由VRISA分析後之三種競爭態勢綜合商業模式的分析結果，分別為身處不同競爭態勢的創新交易平台給予相關的未來營運建議及可行策略，希冀未來國內外相關產業在面臨相關挑戰時，能夠提出有效的經營策略。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Innovation is a goal of every govenment around the world to advocate in recent years. And innovation is also a crucial factor that will determine how competitive an enterprise will be in this knowledge economy. With information technology rapid developments, not only could it make information flow much faster and more convenient, but also make everyone can easily design things that perfectly fit his(or her) demand by tools like AutoCAD and program language. And it is one of the effective methods through operations of innovation trade platform to make scattered innovation energy contribute its benefits to societies.
To deepen the research in this topic, the methodology adopted in this research is case research. In this study, you can find out innovation trade platform cases are categorized into four categories by their characteristics, and one or two cases from each as representatives. And in each case, we are going to look into its business activities and outline this industry. On the aspect of analysis, firstly, it is determined as a decentralized industry structure by Eisemann’s model. It means there are going to be several platforms in the market with their own niches respectively. And after the business models analysis, the results showed their competitiveness as sustained competive advantage, temporary competive advantage, and competive parity through VRISA analysis. Finally, there are given some suggestions and strategy recommends for the innovation trade platforms in each competitive position determined by VRISA analysis. And hopefully someday when it comes to challenges, the enterprises could find out their effective strategies with this thesis as reference. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:56:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94741026-1.pdf: 2205937 bytes, checksum: f64674bf04c314091dd8adc0aea5f79b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I
摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目次 V 表目錄 VII 圖目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 4 第三節 研究目的 5 第四節 研究架構 5 第二章 相關理論與文獻探討 7 第一節 創新 7 第二節 民主式創新 11 第三節 開放式創新 14 第四節 商業模式 20 第五節 網路外部性 22 第三章 研究設計 25 第一節 個案研究法 25 第二節 研究對象 27 第三節 研究模式 32 一、 Eisenmann平台產業結構分析模式 32 二、 VRISA分析模式 34 第四章 個案介紹與分析 35 第一節 YET2.COM 36 一、 個案介紹 36 二、 商業模式剖析 37 三、 商業模式探討 38 四、 商業模式之VRISA分析 40 第二節 PHARMA-TRANSFER 41 一、 個案介紹 41 二、 商業模式剖析 42 三、 商業模式探討 43 四、 商業模式之VRISA分析 44 第三節 BIG IDEA GROUP 46 一、 個案介紹 46 二、 商業模式剖析 47 三、 商業模式探討 49 四、 商業模式之VRISA分析 51 第四節 BRITISH TECHNOLOGY GROUP 52 一、 個案介紹 52 二、 商業模式剖析 53 三、 商業模式探討 56 四、 商業模式之VRISA分析 58 第五節 IPEX 59 一、 個案介紹 59 二、 商業模式剖析 60 三、 商業模式探討 63 四、 商業模式之VRISA分析 65 第五章 結論與建議 67 第一節 分析結果 67 一、 產業結構分析結果彙總 67 二、 個案分析結果彙總 68 第二節 對創新交易平台的建議 71 第三節 給未來欲採行開放性創新模式企業之建議 76 第四節 研究貢獻 77 第五節 研究限制 78 參考文獻 80 附錄 90 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 網路外部性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 開放式創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 商業模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 平台 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | open innovation | en |
| dc.subject | platform | en |
| dc.subject | network externality | en |
| dc.subject | business model | en |
| dc.title | 創新交易平台商業模式分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Business Model Analysis of Innovation Trade Platforms | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柯承恩,簡怡雯 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 開放式創新,商業模式,平台,網路外部性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | open innovation,business model,platform,network externality, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 89 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-01-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.15 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。