請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24637完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 巫和懋 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hao Chuang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 莊育豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:34:25Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-02-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-01-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
1. 平山道雄, “Cost Saving”，台北: 小知堂，民國八十九年。 2. 陳海鳴，企業組織與管理，華泰書局，台北，。民國七十三年。 3. 陳樹勛，企業管理方法論，中華企管發展中心，台北，民國七十八年。 4. 袁義才、陳軍, “項目管理手冊”, 北京:中信出版社, (2002). 5. 羅應浮，”專案管理的失效模式與效應分析”，中華大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，2000 6. Adams, J. R. & Barndt, S. E., Behavioral Implications of the Project Life Cycle,” in Cleland, D. I. & King, W. R., (Eds.) Project Management Handbook, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 183-204. (1983). 7. Afuah, A., Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation, and Profits, Oxford University Press. (1998). 8. Aldag, J. R., Strearns, M. T.，Management, South-Western PublishingCo., U.S.A。（1991） 9. Allen, T. J., Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization, MA: M.I.T. Press. (1984). 10. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F.,“Bridging the Boundary: External Process and Performance in Organizational Teams,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665. (1992b). 11. Benson P.G., Saraph J. V.,& Schroeder R.G.,” The Effects of Organizational Context on Quality Management “An Empirical Investigation ”, Management Science, Vol.37, No. 9, September ,p1107-1124, 1991 12. Balachandra, R., & Friar, A. H.,“Factors for Success in R&D Projects and New Product Innovation: A Contextual Framework,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276-287. (1997). 13. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, New Products Management for the 1980’s, New York: Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. (1982). 14. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Management of New Products, New York: Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. (1968). 15. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M., Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions,” Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343-378. (1995). 16. Clark, K. B. & Fujimoto, T., Product Development Performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. (1991). 17. Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschmidt, E. J.,“ Winning Business in Product Development: the Critical Success Factors,” Research-Technology Management, 39, 18-29. (1996). 18. Crawford, C. M. & Di Benedetto, C. A., New Products Management, 7th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill. (2003). 19. Dimarco N., Goodson J.R.,& Houser H.F., ”Situational Leadership in a Project/ Matrix Environment”, Project Management Journal, Vol.28, No.1,p11-18, March ,1989 20. Eliyahu M. Goldratt, “ Critical Chain”, Taipei: Commonwealth Publish Co., Ltd., (2002) 21. Eliyahu M. Goldratt, “ The Goal – A Process of Ongoing Improvement”, Taipei: Commonwealth Publish Co., Ltd., (1996 ) 22. Griffin, A. & Page, A. L.,“PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure, ”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(6), 478-496. (1996). 23. Hauser, J. R.,“Research, Development, and Engineering Metrics, Management Science, 44(12), 1670-1689. (1998). 24. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P.,“ The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, 71-79. (1992). 25. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P., The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press. (1996). 26. Kathy Schwalbe, “Information Technology Project Management”, 北京: 機械工業出版社, (2001). 27. Katz R.,& Allen T.J., ”Project Performance and the Locus of Influence in the R&D Matrix”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol,28,No.1,March, p67-87, 1985 28. Keller, R. Kedia, B. & Julian, S.,“R&D Team Productivity in Eastern and Western European Countries,” European Management Journal, 13(3), 316-321. (1995). 29. Kerssens-van Drongelon, I. C. & Bilderbeek, J., “R&D Performance Measurement: More than Choosing a set of Metrics,” R&D Management, 29(1), 35-46. (1999). 30. Kim B. Clark & Steven C. Wheelwright, “Organizing and Leading Heavyweight Development Teams”, NY: Free Press, 1992. 31. Loch, C. Stein, L. & Terwiesch, C., “Measuring Development Performance in the Electronics Industry,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(1), 3-20. (1996). 32. Larson E.W.,& Gobeli D. H., ”Significance of Project ManagementStructure on Development Success”, IEEE Transactions on EngineeringManagement, Vol.36,No.2,May , p119-125, 1989 33. Larson E.W.,& Gobeli D. H., ”Significance of Project Management Structure on Development Success”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.36,No.2,May , p119-125, 1989 34. Larson E.W.,& Gobeli D. H., ”Organization For Product DevelopmentProject”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, May , p180-190, 1988 35. Larson E.W., Gobeli D. H., ”Relative Effectiveness of Different ProjectStructure”, Project Management Journal, Vol.18,No.2,June , p81-85, 1987 36. Larson E.W., Gobeli D. H., ” Project Management Research Program: AStatus Report”, Project Management Journal, March , p24-25, 1986 37. Larson E.W., Gobeli D. H., ” Project Management Structure : Is There ACommon Language? ”, Project Management Journal, June , p40-44, 1985 38. Lorsch J. W.,& Lawrence P.R., Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Harvard University,1967 39. McCollum J.K.,& Sherman J.D., “The Matrix Structure : Bane or Benefit To High Tech Organization? ”, Project Management Journal, Vol.24,No.2,June, p23-26, 1993 40. Michael Dell., “ Direct from Dell” , Taipei, Taiwan : Locus Publishing Company 41. Might, R.J.,& Fischer, W.A., “The Role of Structural Factors in Determining Project Management Success”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, May,p71-77, 1985 42. Mishar, S., Kim, D., & Lee, D. H.,“Factors Affecting New Product Success: Cross-Country Comparisons,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 530-550. (1996). 43. Motoya-Weiss, M. M. & Calantone, R.,“ Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 397-417. (1994). 44. Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C. & Ruekert, R. W.,“ Organizing for Effective New Product Development: the Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness, ”Journal of Marketing, 59(Jan.), 48-62. (1995). 45. Padgham,H.F.,”Choosing The Right Program Management Organization ” , Project Management Journal, Vol.20,No.2,Jan, p35-40, 1989 46. Page, A. L., “Accessing New Product Development Practices and Performances: Establishing Crucial Norms,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 273-290. (1993). 47. Pappas, R. A. & Remer, D. S., “Measuring R&D Productivity,” Research Management, 16(3), 15-22. (1985). 48. Perry L. Ludy, “Profit Building-Cutting Costs Without Cutting People”, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2003. 49. Pinto J.K.,& Covin J.G.,” Critical Factors in Project Implementation: A Comparison of Construction and R&D Projects”, Technovation, Vol.9, p49-62, 1989 50. Pinto, J. K. & Prescott, J. E., “Planning and Tactical Factors in the Project Implementation Process,” Journal of Management Studies, 27(3), 305-327. (1990). 51. Posner B.Z. ”What’s the Fighting About? Conflicts in Project Management”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.EM-33, No.4,November, p51-54, 1987 52. Reitz, H. J.（1982）Behavior in Organizations，鄭伯壎與林詩詮譯，組織行為，中華企管發展中心，台北。民國七十一年。 53. Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton, “The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action”，台北：臉譜出版有限公司，民國八十八年。 54. Roberts, E. B., “What We’ve Learned: Managing Invention and Innovation,” Research-Technology Management, 31(1), 11-29. (1988). 55. Schumann, P. A. Jr., Ransley, D. L. & Prestwood. C. L., “Measuring R&D Performance,” Research Technology Management, May-June, 45-54. (1995). 56. Song, X. M. & Parry, M. E., “The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), Feb., 64-76. (1997). 57. Song, X. M., Thieme, R. J. & Xie, J., “The Impact of Cross-Functional Joint Involvement Across Product Development Stages: an Exploratory Study,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(4), 289-303. (1998). 58. William J. Stevenson, “Production Operations Management”, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1999. 59. Tushman, M.L. ”Technical Communication in R&D Laboratories: the Impact of Project Work Characteristics”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 21, p624-645, 1978 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24637 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究採用探索性研究，以限制理論的概念為基礎運用思維過程尋找解決專案產品開發過程中可能發生包括技術、專案管理和組織之間的問題。整個研究中先針對有關專案管理的文獻重點進行探討，整理專案管理關鍵成功因素，接著對矩陣式組織管理常發生之問題及建議之方法要點也進行歸納整理。最後利用個案研究方法深入探討兩家公司之案例，了解其實施功能式矩陣組織專案和專案式矩陣組織的作法及原因，並與前面所提之專案管理關鍵成功因素與矩陣管理要點進行比較分析。最後提出對於功能式矩陣組織和專案式矩陣組織的研發管理中，成功的關鍵因素及作法建議如下：
一個企業實施功能式矩陣組織或專案式矩陣組織研發時，最好具備下列條件： 1. 建立良好的溝通協調管道 2. 愼選合適的專案計畫主持人 3. 尋求高階管理者的支持 4. 明確界定專案任務與可執行的目標 5. 決策的授權 6. 明確的權責劃分 7. 充分的專案人力與相關資源 8. 有效的專案資訊系統 9. 培養危機處理的能力 10. 精準的專案時程規劃 11. 有效衝突管理 本研究從個案案例和文獻資料中證明，以上的專案管理成功因素及確實對資訊產品的研發有相當重要的影響。同時發現到一些有趣的現象，特別提出下面幾點： 1. 高階管理者的涉入程度 2. 先期備援方案研擬 3. 專案計畫主持人具績效評議、分配權 4. 採用目標管理 5. 塑造專案團隊 本研究對於功能式矩陣組織管理和專案式矩陣組織管理利用文獻整理及個案研究比較，兩方面著手分析才提出矩陣式組織之運用應考量的背景因素與關鍵成功因素之項目，雖然自認對相關議題及相關公司管理方式已有深層的了解，但深入程度之定義見仁見智。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract
The study adopted the exploratory research of case analysis. Based on the concept of Theory of Constrain (TOC), the research was trying to figure out the critical issues of technology, project management and organization structure by the thinking logic process. The research started from study of relevant literature review on TOC, project mangement and matrix oganization. Based on most critical successful factors concluded from the previous literature review, the study performed case interview, analysis and comparison. Finally the study has concluded the Key Successful Factors of Research & Development Management in the Functional and Project Matrix Organization. The following conclusions are obtained by this research: the key successful factors of running project management in a matrix organization enterprise should inlcude the following conditions: 1. Establish a good communication channel 2. Find an appropriate project leader 3. Seek support from top management 4. Clearly identify the scope and mission of the project 5. Full authorization 6. Clear role and responsibility 7. Sufficient resouce in terms of human resouce and related resources 8. Effective project information system 9. Prepare capability of risk management 10. Precisely planning and scheduling in project management 11. Mangement of confrontation In addition to above mentioned, this research found other related factors, which also play significant roles on project management. 1. The involement level of top management 2. Preparation of contingency plan in advance 3. The project leader should have the rights of evaluation and allocation 4. Adopt Target Management 5. Culture formation for a project team The research based on the literartues of theory of constrain, project management and matrix organization developed and concluded the key successful factors for project management. Due to the time constrain, the broadness of case review might not be sufficient. However, the study should still be good for reference since the chosen cases are from index coporations. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:34:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R90724037-1.pdf: 1433755 bytes, checksum: 855cc70882dbfaec4fb6692bfb5539f8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要
Abstract 誌謝 目錄 圖目錄 表目錄 第 1 章 緒論 1 1. 1 背景與動機 1 1. 2 研究目的 2 1. 3 研究範圍 2 第 2 章 研究方法 4 2. 1 研究方法 4 2. 2 研究流程 5 第 3 章 文獻探討 6 3. 1 限制理論 6 3. 2 專案管理 9 3. 2. 1 專案的定義 9 3. 2. 2 專案管理的歷史、定義及特性 11 3. 2. 3 專案管理的過程及內容 13 3. 2. 4 專案管理的優缺點 15 3. 2. 5 專案管理的關鍵成功因素 16 3. 2. 6 專案生命周期及開發階段 20 3. 3 組織概論 23 3. 3. 1 組織的定義 23 3. 3. 2 專案組織的類型分析 24 3. 3. 3 研究發展專案組織結構設計考量的因素 29 3. 3. 4 矩陣式組織的適用時機 30 3. 3. 5 矩陣式組織管理要點 32 3. 3. 6 矩陣組織研發管理要因分析(功能式矩陣 vs 專案式矩陣) 38 3. 3. 7 功能式矩陣組織和專案式矩陣組織的適用時機 40 3. 3. 8 矩陣組織研發管理之關鍵成功因素探討 40 第 4 章 個案研討 華碩電腦公司 45 4. 1 華碩電腦公司簡介 45 4. 2 華碩電腦專案研發管理 — 以筆記型電腦為例 46 4. 2. 1 華碩電腦個案A背景說明 46 4. 2. 2 華碩電腦個案A之開發階段過程 46 第 5 章 個案研討 戴爾電腦 54 5. 1 戴爾電腦公司簡介 54 5. 2 戴爾電腦專案研發管理 — 以筆記型電腦為例 55 5. 2. 1 戴爾電腦個案D背景說明 55 5. 2. 2 戴爾電腦個案D之開發階段過程 55 第 6 章 組織設計與成功關鍵因素分析研討 61 6. 1 組織設計因素分析 61 6. 1. 1 華碩電腦公司功能式矩陣管理方式 62 6. 1. 2 戴爾電腦公司專案式矩陣管理方式 65 6. 2 關鍵成功因素分析 67 6. 2. 1 華碩電腦公司 67 6. 2. 2 戴爾電腦公司 69 6. 3 個案比較 71 第 7 章 結論 75 7. 1 矩陣式組織時應考量下列幾點背景因素 ( 因地制宜) 75 7. 2 成功的關鍵因素及專案執行方式建議如下 76 7. 3 對後續研究之建議 79 參考文獻 80 附錄: 84 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 專案管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Project Management | en |
| dc.title | 專案管理應用於資訊產品開發之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Research of project management applied to the develoment of information product | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳文華,江炯聰 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 專案管理, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Project Management, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 106 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-01-31 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.4 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。