請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2449
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 趙福杉 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Ming Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張智銘 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T06:40:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-27 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T06:40:21Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Ecke U, Luebben B, Maurer J, Boor S, Mann WJ. Comparison of Different Computer-Aided Surgery Systems in Skull Base Surgery. Skull Base. 2003; 13: 43-50.
2. Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ, Rosenbaum AE, Johns ME. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Theory and diagnostic evaluation. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985; 111: 576-582. 3. Schloendorff G, Moesges R, Meyer-Ebrecht D, Krybus W, Adams L. CAS (computer assisted surgery). A new procedure in head and neck surgery. HNO. 1989; 37: 187-190. 4. Anon JB. Computer-aided endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1998; 108: 949-961. 5. Mafee MF, Chow JM, Meyers R. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: anatomy, CT screening, indications, and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 160: 735-744. 6. Hepworth EJ, Bucknor M, Patel A, Vaughan WC. Nationwide survey on the use of image-guided functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 135: 68-73. 7. Al-Swiahb JN, Al Dousary SH. Computer-aided endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective comparative study. Ann Saudi Med 2010; 30: 149-152. 8. Fried MP, Topulos G, Hsu L, et al. Endoscopic sinus surgery with magnetic resonance imaging guidance: initial patient experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 119: 374-380. 9. Mosges R1, Schlondorff G. A new imaging method for intraoperative therapy control in skull-base surgery. Neurosurg Rev. 1988; 11: 245-247. 10. Reinhardt HF, Horstmann GA, Gratzl O. Microsurgical removal of deep vascular malformations using sonar-stereometry. Ultraschall Med. 1991; 12: 80-83. 11. Claes J, Koekelkoren E, Wuyts FL, Claes GM, Van den Hauwe L, Van de Heyning PH. Accuracy of computer navigation in ear, nose, throat surgery: the influence of matching strategy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 126: 1462-1466. 12. Eliashar R, Sichel JY, Gross M, et al. Image guided navigation system-a new technology for complex endoscopic endonasal surgery. Postgrad Med J. 2003; 79: 686-690. 13. Metson RB. Image-guided sinus surgery: Lessons learnt from the first 1000 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 128: 8-13. 14. Metson RB, Cosenza MJ, Cunningham MJ, Randolph GW. Physician experience with an optical image guidance system for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2000; 110: 972-976. 15. Snyderman C1, Zimmer LA, Kassam A. Sources of registration error with image guidance systems during endoscopic anterior cranial base surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 131: 145-149. 16. Klimek L, Ecke U, Lubben B, Witte J, Mann W. A passive-marker-based optical system for computer-aided surgery in otorhinolaryngology: development and first clinical experiences. Laryngoscope. 1999; 109: 1509-1515. 17. Hummel J, Figl M, Birkfellner W, et al. Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol. Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51: N205-210. 18. Yaniv Z, Wilson E, Lindisch D, Cleary K. Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. Med Phys. 2009; 36: 876-892. 19. Fried MP, Kleefield J, Gopal H, Reardon E, Ho BT, Kuhn FA. Image-guided endoscopic surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multicenter clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system. Laryngoscope. 1997; 107: 594-601. 20. Maurer CR Jr, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, Galloway RL Jr, Maciunas RJ, Allen GS. Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997; 16: 447-462. 21. Maurer CR Jr, Maciunas RJ, Fitzpatrick JM. Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998; 17: 753-761. 22. Raabe A, Krishnan R, Wolff R, Hermann E, Zimmermann M, Seifert V. Laser surface scanning for patient registration in intracranial image-guided surgery. Neurosurgery. 2002; 50: 797-803. 23. Schlaier J, Warnat J, Brawanski A. Registration accuracy and practicability of laser-directed surface matching. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7: 284-290. 24. Stelter K, Andratschke M, Leunig A, Hagedorn H. Computer-assisted surgery of the paranasal sinuses: technical and clinical experience with 368 patients, using the Vector Vision Compact system. J Laryngol Otol. 2006; 120: 1026-32. 25. Ledderose GJ, Stelter K, Leunig A, Hagedorn H. Surface laser registration in ENT-surgery: accuracy in the paranasal sinuses--a cadaveric study. Rhinology. 2007; 45: 281-285. 26. Kral F, Puschban EJ, Riechelmann H, Pedross F, Freysinger W. Optical and electromagnetic tracking for navigated surgery of the sinuses and frontal skull base. Rhinology 2011; 49: 364-368. 27. Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL, Hadley JA, et al. Rhinosinusitis: Developing guidance for clinical trials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 135: S31-80. 28. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR Jr. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997; 17: 694-702. 29. Labadie RF, Davis BM, Fitzpatrick JM. Image-guided surgery: what is the accuracy? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 13: 27-31. 30. May M, Levine HL, Mester SJ, Schaitkin B. Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery: analysis of 2108 patients--incidence and prevention. Laryngoscope. 1994; 104: 1080-1083. 31. Tschopp KP, Thomaser EG. Outcome of functional endonasal sinus surgery with and without CT-navigation. Rhinology. 2008; 46: 116-120. 32. Metson R, Gliklich RE, Cosenza M. A comparison of image guidance systems for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1998; 108: 1164-1170. 33. Grevers G, Menauer F, Leunig A, Caversaccio M, Kastenbauer E. Navigation surgery in diseases of the paranasal sinuses. Laryngorhinootologie. 1999; 78: 41-46. 34. Schmerber S, Chassat F. Accuracy evaluation of a CAS system: laboratory protocol and results with 6D localizers, and clinical experiences in otorhinolaryngology. Comput Aided Surg. 2001; 6: 1-13. 35. Knott PD, Batra PS, Butler RS, Citardi MJ. Contour and paired-point registration in a model for image-guided surgery. Laryngoscope. 2006; 116: 1877-1881. 36. Roth M, Lanza DC, Zinreich J, Yousem D, Scanlan KA, Kennedy DW. Advantages and disadvantages of three-dimensional computed tomography intraoperative localization for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1995; 105: 1279-1286. 37. Stelter K, Ertl-Wagner B, Luz M, et al. Evaluation of an image-guided navigation system in the training of functional endoscopic sinus surgeons. A prospective, randomised clinical study. Rhinology. 2011; 49: 429-437. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2449 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 自1980年代起,功能性內視鏡鼻竇手術已廣泛應用於鼻竇疾患之治療。90年代開始,電腦輔助手術日益進展;在內視鏡手術合併即時影像導引之下,幫助醫師更清楚定位術中解剖構造,預防術中併發症發生。進行電腦輔助手術時,導航系統須對已儲存之術前影像及術中特定解剖位置進行連結,完成註冊步驟後,方能進行定位。而使用表面註冊法的導航效能,以及光學導航和電磁導航之比較,無論在活體手術或大體手術的研究則付之闕如。因此,本研究利用表面註冊法進行真人內視鏡鼻竇導航手術,探討導航系統的設置及手術時間,分析光學及電磁導航系統的導航準確度,分享我們臨床進行電腦輔助手術的經驗。
40名雙側慢性全鼻竇炎之患者納入本研究,接受內視鏡鼻竇手術,使用表面註冊法後,以電磁導航系統輔助進行手術。術中測量包含設備設置時間、表面註冊時間、手術時間,以及三個軸向的導航誤差。結果顯示:設備設置時間、表面註冊時間、手術時間分別為179 ± 23 秒、39 ± 4.8秒及114 ± 36分鐘。三個軸向的導航誤差顯示左右軸向的誤差顯著小於前後軸向誤差及頭尾軸向誤差。第二部分的研究納入30名雙側慢性全鼻竇炎之患者,手術醫師隨機於一側鼻腔進行光學導航內視鏡鼻竇手術,另一側鼻腔則進行電磁導航內視鏡鼻竇手術。術中測量包含表面註冊時間、手術時間,以及各軸向的導航誤差。結果顯示:光學導航系統之表面註冊時間顯著大於電磁導航系統,手術時間兩者則無明顯差異。無論在光學導航下或電磁導航下,各軸向的導航誤差皆顯示左右軸向的誤差顯著小於前後軸向誤差及頭尾軸向誤差。除此之外,比較光學導航與電磁導航,同一個解剖定位點測得之兩組導航誤差,相較之下皆無顯著差異。 總結來說,電磁導航系統的設備設置,和使用表面註冊法來進行光學及電磁導航,經研究顯示均為高效、便利且易於操作的。在臨床應用上,兩種導航系統的準確度差距不多,且誤差皆在可容許範圍內。除此之外,相較於前後軸向及頭尾軸向,左右軸向可測得最佳的準確度,光學導航如此,電磁導航亦同。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Functional endoscopic sinus surgery has gained wide application in the management of sinus disease since the 1980s. The use of computer-aided surgery (CAS) technology was developed to assist surgeons in identifying anatomic landmarks during sinus surgery since the 1990s. In CAS, a correlation between a stored preoperative image data set and specific landmarks in the surgical area is required. However, studies on the performance of surface registration and comparisons between optic and electromagnetic navigation systems were lacking. Hence, the purpose of our study is to investigate time efficiency of system preparation and operation as well as the precision of optic and electromagnetic navigation systems using the surface registration in live endoscopic sinus surgery.
Forty patients with bilateral chronic paranasal pansinusitis underwent endoscopic sinus surgery. The surgeries were performed under electromagnetic navigation guidance after the surface registration had been carried out on all of the patients. The intraoperative measurements indicate the time taken for equipment set-up, surface registration and surgical procedure, as well as the degree of navigation error along the 3 axes. The result revealed that the deviation in the medial-lateral direction was significantly less than that in the anterior-posterior and cranial-caudal directions. In the second part of our study, thirty patients with bilateral chronic paranasal pansinusitis underwent surgery on one side using optic navigation guidance and on the other side using electromagnetic navigation guidance. The intraoperative measurements performed included the time taken for the surface registration and surgical procedure on each side, as well as the navigation errors at the different locations. The result showed that the time for surface registration was significantly longer in the optic navigation group than the electromagnetic group. However, the time for surgical procedure has no significant difference between these 2 groups. A comparison of the navigation errors along the 3 axes showed that the deviation in the medial-lateral direction was significantly less than that in the anterior-posterior and cranial-caudal directions in the optic navigation group as well as the electromagnetic group. Furthermore, in comparison to the navigation error in each specific location, there was no significant difference between the optical and electromagnetic navigation groups. In conclusion, the procedures of equipment set-up in electromagnetic navigation system, surface registration in both optic and electromagnetic navigation tracking are efficient, convenient and easy to manipulate. The accuracy of both navigation systems is comparable and within acceptable ranges for clinical use. In addition, the best accuracy was measured in the medial-lateral direction compared with the other two axes, either in optic or electromagnetic navigation system. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T06:40:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-D02548007-1.pdf: 719679 bytes, checksum: 3d4f229e4193ac0d9b56787edb7051e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………………I 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………II 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………IV 縮寫對照表………………………………………………………………VII Chapter 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 2 Materials and Methods………………………………………………………6 2.1 The performance of electromagnetic navigation system using surface registration……………………………………………………………………6 2.1.1 Patients……………………………………………………………………………………………………6 2.1.2 Equipment set-up………………………………………………………………………………6 2.1.3 Surface registration……………………………………………………………………8 2.1.4 Navigation error………………………………………………………………………………8 2.2 The comparisons of optic and electromagnetic navigation system using surface registration…………………12 2.2.1 Patients………………………………………………………………………………………12 2.2.2 Equipment set-up…………………………………………………………………12 2.2.3 Surface registration………………………………………………………13 2.2.4 Navigation error…………………………………………………………………13 2.3 Statistical methods…………………………………………………………………………17 2.4 Ethical consideration…………………………………………………………………18 Chapter 3 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………19 3.1 The performance of electromagnetic navigation system using surface registration…………………………………………………………………19 3.2 The comparisons of optic and electromagnetic navigation system using surface registration…………………21 Chapter 4 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………25 Chapter 5 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………………32 References……………………………………………………………………………………………………………33 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………38 圖 目 錄 Figure 1 The set-up of the electromagnetic navigation system in endoscopic sinus surgery………………………………………………7 Figure 2 The measurements of the navigation errors at the nasopharynx (NP), the opening of the sphenoid sinus (OS), the central points of the anterior and posterior ethmoidal roofs (AER, PER, respectively), the insertion point of the superior turbinate (ST) and the most medial point of the lamina papyracea (LP). Dotted lines indicate imaginary lines passing the predetermined CT landmarks and perpendicular to the measuring axes…………………………………………10 Figure 3 The set-up of (a) the optic navigation system (b) the electromagnetic navigation system in endoscopic sinus surgery……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 Figure 4 The measurements of the navigation errors at the central points of the anterior and posterior ethmoid roofs (AE, PE, respectively), the most medial point of the lamina papyracea (LP), the insertion point of the superior turbinate (ST), the opening of the sphenoid sinus (OS) and the upper border of choana (UC). Dotted lines indicate imaginary lines passing the predetermined CT landmarks and perpendicular to the measuring axes.………………………………………16 Figure 5 The navigation error (NE) in the 6 location groups. The NE in ST and LP groups (medial-lateral axis) was significantly less than that in the other 4 location groups (cranial-caudal and anterior-posterior axes). Open circles and bars represent the maximum values and upper limits of 95% confidence intervals calculated by mean and standard deviation, respectively. Top edges of the boxes indicate mean values…………………………………………………………………………………20 Figure 6 The navigation error (NE) of the optic navigation system in the 6 location groups. The NE in LP and ST groups (medial-lateral axis) was significantly less than that in the other 4 location groups (cranial-caudal and anterior-posterior axes). The bottom and top of the box are the first and third quartiles, and the band inside the box is the median. The ends of the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum of all of the data………………………………………………………………………………………………23 Figure 7 The navigation error (NE) of the electromagnetic navigation system in the 6 location groups. The NE in LP and ST groups (medial-lateral axis) was significantly less than that in the other 4 location groups (cranial-caudal and anterior-posterior axes). The bottom and top of the box are the first and third quartiles, and the band inside the box is the median. The ends of the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum of all of the data………………………24 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 定量評估表面註冊法於導航系統之準確度–應用於真人內視鏡鼻竇手術 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Quantitative Evaluation of the Surface Registration Accuracy of Navigation Systems – in Live Endoscopic Sinus Surgery | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃基礎,楊怡和,柯政郁,鄭博文 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 表面註冊,光學導航系統,電磁導航系統,內視鏡鼻竇手術,電腦輔助手術,導航誤差,導航準確度, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | surface registration,optic navigation system,electromagnetic navigation system,endoscopic sinus surgery,computer-aided surgery,navigation error,navigation accuracy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 39 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701967 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫學工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 醫學工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf | 702.81 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。