Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 土木工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2443
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor康仕仲(Shi-Chung Kang)
dc.contributor.authorShu-Han Yangen
dc.contributor.author楊舒涵zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T06:40:17Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-04
dc.date.available2021-05-13T06:40:17Z-
dc.date.copyright2017-08-04
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017-07-26
dc.identifier.citationBerenguer, J. (2007). The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39(2), 269-283.
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150-155.
Parker, J., & Sams, D. (2015). Eco-feedback Technology’s Influence on Water Conservation Attitudes and Intentions of University Students in the USA: An Experimental Design. In Sustainable Water Use and Management (pp. 169-184). Springer International Publishing.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260.
Pooley, J. A., & O’Connor, M. (2000). Environmental education and attitudes: Emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environment and behavior, 32(5), 711-723.
Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual review of psychology, 65.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Skoumios, M. (2013). The Development of Environmental Awareness through School Science: Problems and Possibilities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(3), 405-426.
Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PloS one, 12(5), e0177186.
Dahlstrom, M. F., & Ho, S. S. (2012). Ethical considerations of using narrative to communicate science. Science Communication, 34(5), 592-617.
Gough, N. (1993). Environmental education, narrative complexity and postmodern science/fiction. International Journal of Science Education, 15(5), 607-625.
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13614-13620.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694-712.
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS one, 8(1), e55341.
Kau, P. H.(2011), Adult Picture Book Creation- Application of Diagram and Authoring Narrative Structure (Master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University)
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(5), 701.
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150-155.
Pulkki, J., Dahlin, B., & VÄRRI, V. (2017). Environmental Education as a Lived‐Body Practice? A Contemplative Pedagogy Perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 214-229.
Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94-101.
van Rompay, T. J., Veltkamp, M., & Pruyn, A. T. (2014). A View from the Inside: Perspective Taking in Object Perception. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind, Brain & Culture, 10(1).
Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514-521.
McDonald, J. K. (2009). Imaginative instruction: what master storytellers can teach instructional designers. Educational Media International, 46(2), 111-122.
Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Brinol, P., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (2006). Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: an exploration of the PAST model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(1), 21.
Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual review of psychology, 62, 391-417.
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological bulletin, 132(5), 692.
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1421-1432.
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in experimental social psychology, 10, 221-279.
Freytag, G. (1896). Freytag's technique of the drama: an exposition of dramatic composition and art. Scholarly Press.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome Way, San Francisco, CA 94104.
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The journal of environmental education, 9(4), 10-19.
Desmet, P.M.A. (2003). Measuring emotion; development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In: M.A. Blythe, A.F. Monk, K. Overbeeke, & P.C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: from Usability to Enjoyment (pp. 111-123). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hofer, M., & Wirth, W. (2012). It’s right to be sad. Journal of Media Psychology.
Shepperd, J. A., Waters, E. A., Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (2015). A primer on unrealistic optimism. Current directions in psychological science, 24(3), 232-237.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2443-
dc.description.abstract水資源保護是一項環境教育的重要工作。環境態度,包涵環境意識、環境責任感以及環境價值觀三個面向,是造成民眾水資源保護行動意願的因素,也環境教育的重點,其中,與自然環境的情感連結是影響環境態度的重要來源。研究顯示「故事」是一種能夠有效引發情感連結的工具,透過故事造成的觀點取替(perspective-taking),讀者對故事角色的情感能夠被引發。本研究發展與設計一個適合環境教育目標的故事,以提升「對自然的情感連結」為目標,主張以物體的視角來敘說環境議題故事,有別多數故事以人的視角,希望藉此方法帶領讀者站在自然環境物體的觀點上,反觀人類行為。「物體視角故事」的說故事方法,使用擬人化自然物體作為故事主角,以其視角來敘述環境相關議題。本研究建立了物體視角故事的建構三步驟:(1) 物體素材鎖定 (Object Targeting),(2) 物體角色生成 (Object Character Formation),以及 (3) 物體經驗建立 (Object’s Experience Building)。繪本有聲書《水寶》為本研究提出的物體視角故事方法的一項實作,內容以水環境議題為中心,並施測於188位高中生,其中95位是讀繪本的實驗組。結果顯示受試者看過《水寶》後的環境態度有顯著的變化,並且,情緒引發程度越高的受試者,其一個月後環境態度態度有較優異得表現。質性訪談結果也顯示出讀者會將自己投射在擬人化的自然物體角色,並對其產生情感連結,因而對故事中探討的環境議題產生更高的興趣以及更深入的反思。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWater conservation is an important issue in environmental education for all. Environmental attitudes, including environmental awareness, responsibility and values and beliefs, have long been a priority within environmental education due to its crucial role to people’s intentions toward water conservation behaviors. Particularly, emotional connection with natural environment and its impact on pro-environmental attitudes are believed can be aroused through storytelling. Due to the effect of perspective-taking, emotional connection could possibly be aroused by a story character. Thus, we aim to construct a story specifically for environmental education purposes to change environmental attitude by stimulating emotional arousal.
For the purpose to induce readers’ emotional connection toward the “nature”, this study proposes to narrate environmental issues from the view of natural objects, instead of the most-used human view. This reversed approach, indicated as Objective View Story (OVS), is developed to help readers examine human impacts on the environment in the position of nature.  In the story, a personified object is created as the lead character to describe environmental issues from the object’s view. The following three main steps were developed to construct OVS: (1) Object Targeting, (2) Object Character Formation and (3) Object Experience Building. An audio picture book, entitled WaterBob, was created as a practice of OVS specifically for water environmental issues and tested among 188 high school students, with 95 in experimental group reading WaterBob and 93 in the control group. The findings show that WaterBob significantly influenced participants attitude changes in the aspects of environmental awareness and environmental values and beliefs. Besides, higher level of emotion aroused toward WaterBob significantly predicts better performance in their overall environmental attitudes over one month. The corresponding focus group interviews also revealed that readers often projected themselves onto the personified object, produced emotions attachments, and gain more interests in and deeper reflection on the featuring environmental issues.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T06:40:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-106-R04521601-1.pdf: 14101170 bytes, checksum: 139ff927a13fac966cf306fe77e8a823 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES vii
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation 1
1.2 Background 2
1.3 Research Goal 4
1.4 Research Questions 4
Chapter 2. Literature Review 6
2.1 The Role of Emotional Connections in Environmental Education 6
2.2 Storytelling as an Instructional Tool in Environmental Education 7
2.3 Perspective-taking and Effects of Personification of Objects 9
2.4 Summary 10
Chapter 3. Methodology 11
3.1 Overview of OVS 11
3.2 Research Framework 12
3.3 OVS Construction 13
3.3.1 Step1. Object Targeting 14
3.3.2 Step2. Object Character Formation 18
3.3.3 Step3. Object’s Experience Building 19
3.4 A Practice of OVS: WaterBob 24
3.4.1 Brief Introduction of WaterBob 24
3.4.2 OVS Construction of WaterBob 26
3.5 Data Collection 34
3.5.1 Pilot Study 34
3.5.2 Quantitative Investigation 36
3.5.3 Qualitative Investigation 38
Chapter 4. Result and Discussion 43
4.1 Pilot Study Result and Discussion 43
4.2 Quantitative Investigation Result 44
4.2.1 Environmental attitudes 44
4.2.2 Emotional Connection (toward WaterBob) 45
4.3 Qualitative Investigation Result and Discussion 50
4.3.1 Projection on the object character 50
4.3.2 Perception of the symbolized issues 51
4.3.3 New Awareness in the featuring issues 53
Chapter 5. Conclusion 57
Reference 59
Appendix 62
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject故事zh_TW
dc.subject水環境教育zh_TW
dc.subject觀點取替zh_TW
dc.subject態度zh_TW
dc.subject情緒zh_TW
dc.subjectstory booken
dc.subjectWater Environmental Educationen
dc.subjectperspective-takingen
dc.subjectattitudeen
dc.subjectemotionsen
dc.subjectstorytellingen
dc.title物體視角故事的水環境教育應用: 以物體視角敘事產生情感連結以激發環境態度變化zh_TW
dc.titleObject View Story: Changing Environmental Attitude by Stimulating Emotional Arousal in Water Educationen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear105-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor曾敬梅(Ching-Mei Tseng)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee葉欣誠(Shin-Cheng Yeh),許素朱(Su-Chu Hsu)
dc.subject.keyword水環境教育,觀點取替,態度,情緒,故事,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordWater Environmental Education,perspective-taking,attitude,emotions,storytelling,story book,en
dc.relation.page89
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201701962
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2017-07-26
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept土木工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:土木工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-106-1.pdf13.77 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved