請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24193完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張重昭 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chen Tung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 董宥辰 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:18:08Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-08-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | REFERENCES
Birnbaum, Michael H. (1974), “Using Contextual Effects to Derive Psychological Scales”, Perceptions and Performance 12, 445-454 Chernev, A. (2004a), “ Extremeness Aversion and Attribute-Balance Effects in Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (September), 249-63. Chervev, A. (2004b), “ Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (September), 557-65 Dana-Nicoleta Lascu, George Zinkhan (1999), “Consumer conformity: Review and applications for marketing theory and practice,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7, 1-12 Dhar, Ravi, Stephen M. Nowlis, and Steven J. Sherman (2000), “ Trying Hard or Hardly Trying: An Analysis of Context Effects in Choice,” Journal of Consume Psychology, 9, 189-200 Farley, John U., Katz, Jerrold, Lehmann, Donald R. (1978), “Impact of Different Comparison Sets on Evaluation of a New Subcompact Car Brand” Journal of Consumer Research, 5(September), 138-42 Green, Donald, Jacowitz, Karen E, Kahneman, Daniel, McFadden, Daniel (1998), “Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods,” 20 (Jun), 85 Hsee, C. K., and F. Leclerc (1998), “Will Product Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (September), 175-86 Huber, Joel, John W. Payne, and Christopher Puto (1982), “Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis”, Journal of consume research, 9(June), 90-98 Huber, Joel, Christopher Puto, (1983), “Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research; 10 (June); 31-44 Jacowitz, K. R., & D. Kahneman (1995), “Measures of anchoring in Estimation Tasks,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161-6 Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch, and R. H. Thaler (1991), “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (winter), 193-206. Luce, R. Ducan. (1959), Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis, New York: Wiley Lynch, John G., Jr., Chakravarti, Dipankar, Mitra, Anusree (1991), “Contrast Effects in Consumer Judgments: Changes in Mental Representations or in the Anchoring of Rating Scales?” Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 284-97 Payne, J. W., J. R. Bettman, and E. J. Johnson (1988), “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14 (3), 534-52. Ran Kivetz, Oded Netzer, V Srinivasan (2004), “Extending Compromise Effect Models to Complex Buying Situations and Other Context Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, 41(Aug), 262 Samuelson, William and Richard Zeckhauser (1988), “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(March), 7-59 Shibin Sheng, Andrew M. Parker, Kent Nakamoto (2005), “Understanding the mechanism and determinants of compromise effects” Psychology & Marketing, 22, 591-609 Shugan, S. M. (1980), “ The Cost of Thinking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7, September 99-111 Simonson, I. (1989), ‘”Choice based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research (September), 158-73. Simonson, I., and A. Tversky (1992), “Choice in Context: Trade off Contrast and Extremeness Aversion,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (August), 281-95. Tversky, A. & D. Kahneman (1991), “Loss Aversion and Riskless Choice: A Reference Dependent Model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics Tversky, A. (1977), “Features of Similarity,” Psychological Review, 84, 327-52 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D (1974), Judgments under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Bias,” Science, 185, 1124-31 Tversky, A. (1972), “Elimination by Aspect: A Theory of Choice”, Psychological Review, 89, 281-299 Wedell, Douglas H. and Jonathan C. Pettibone (1996), 'Using Judgements to Understand Decoy Effects in Choice,' Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(September), 326-344 Wernerfelt, Birger (1995), “A Rational Reconstruction of the Compromise Effect: Using Market Data to Infer Utilities,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(March), 627-33 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24193 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract
This research focuses on consumers’ choosing behavior in two-attribute choice set. In previous research, it is found that consumers’ evaluation is affected not only by characteristics of alternative but also by other alternatives. To explain the choosing behavior, scholars proposed the compromise effect which demonstrates middle option is viewed as the least extreme, compromise option. However, another viewpoint formed in last year. This is the concept of attribute-balance effect. Attribute-balance effect proposes that an option with equal attribute rating will be perceived as the compromise even if it is not the middle option. In this article, another effect that might influence consumers’ choice behavior is proposed. The effect is called market average effect. It demonstrates if market average information is presented, alternative adjacent to market average will be more compromise. There are two experiments in the research. One verifies compromise effect and similarity hypothesis in 100-point rating scale information and the other examines the market average effect. Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:18:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92741041-1.pdf: 269409 bytes, checksum: 48b5baad114d45ef41e328ed4e70866d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………I TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………II CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REIVIEW……………………………………4 2-1 Similarity Hypothesis and Attraction Effect………5 2-2 Compromise Effect and Extremeness Aversion……… 8 2-3 Attribute-Balance Effect………………………………11 2-4 Market Average Effect………………………………… 13 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH HYPOTHESES…………………………………15 CHAPTER 4 Research Design………………………………………25 4-1 Pre-test……………………………………………………25 4-2 Experiment 1………………………………………………26 4-3 Experiment 2………………………………………………32 CHAPTER 5 GENERAL DISCUSSION………………………………… 40 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………43 APPENDIX………………………………………………………………46 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | A Study on Compromise, Similarity, and Market-Average Effects | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃恆獎,簡怡雯 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 市場平均效果,折衷效果,吸引效果,相似性假設, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | market-average effect,attraction effect,similarity hypothesis,compromise effect, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 55 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-08-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 263.09 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。