請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23659
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡坤憲(Kun-Hsien Tsai) | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Yen Tsai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡承晏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:06:51Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-10-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-06-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahmad, R., W. L. Chu, Z. Ismail, H. L. Lee, and S. M. Phang. 2004. Effect of ten chlorophytes on larval survival, development and adult body size of the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 35: 79-87.
Avery, S. W., and A. H. Undeen. 1990. Horizontal transmission of Parathelohania anophelis to the copepod, Microcyclops varicans, and the mosquito, Anopheles quadrimaculatus. J Invert Pathol 56: 98-105. Becnel, J. J., S. E. White, and A. M. Shapiro. 2003. Culex nigripalpus nucleopolyhedrovirus (CuniNPV) infections in adult mosquitoes and possible mechanisms for dispersal. J Invert Pathol 83: 181-3. Brown, M. D., B. H. Kay, and J. K. Hendrikz. 1991. Evaluation of Australian Mesocyclops (Cyclopoida, Cyclopidae) for mosquito-control. J Med Entomo 28: 618-623. Brown, M. D., J. K. Hendrikz, J. G. Greenwood, and B. H. Kay. 1996. Evaluation of Mesocyclops aspericornis (Cyclopoida: Cyclopidae) and Toxorhynchites speciosus as integrated predators of mosquitoes in tire habitats in Queensland. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 12: 414-420. Bruno, M. C., J. W. Reid, and S. A. Perry. 2005. A list and identification key for the freshwater, free-living copepods of Florida (USA). J Crusta Bio 25: 384-400. Calliari, D., K. Sanz, M. Martinez, G. Cervetto, M. Gomez, and C. Basso. 2003. Comparison of the predation rate of freshwater cyclopoid copepod species on larvae of the mosquito Culex pipiens. Med Vet Entomol 17: 339-42. Chen, W. J., C. F. Dong, L. Y. Chiou, and W. L. Chuang. 2000. Potential role of Armigeres subalbatus (Diptera : Culicidae) in the transmission of Japanese encephalitis virus in the absence of rice culture on Liu-Chiu Islet, Taiwan. J Med Entomo 37: 108-113. Cheng, S. S., J. Y. Liu, C. G. Huang, Y. R. Hsui, W. J. Chen, and S. T. Chang. 2009. Insecticidal activities of leaf essential oils from Cinnamomum osmophloeum against three mosquito species. Bioresour Technol 100: 457-64. Couch, T. L. 1981. Mosquito pathogenicity of Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis. Dev Ind Microbiol 22: 61-67. Cui, F., M. Raymond, and C. L. Qiao. 2006. Insecticide resistance in vector mosquitoes in China. Pest Manag Sci 62: 1013-1022. Dieng, H., M. Boots, N. Tuno, Y. Tsuda, and M. Takagi. 2002. A laboratory and field evaluation of Macrocyclops distinctus, Megacyclops viridis and Mesocyclops pehpeiensis as control agents of the dengue vector Aedes albopictus in a peridomestic area in Nagasaki, Japan. Med Vet Entomol 16: 285-291. Dieng, H., M. Boots, N. Tuno, Y. Tsuda, and M. Takagi. 2003. Life history effects of prey choice by copepods: Implications for biocontrol of vector mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc 19: 67-73. Focks, D. A., S. R. Sackett, and D. L. Bailey. 1982. Field experiments on the control of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus by Toxorhynchites rutilus rutilus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 19: 336-9. Gionar, Y. R., S. Atmosoedjono, and M. J. Bangs. 2006. Mesocyclops brevisetosus (Cyclopoida : Cyclopoidae) as a potential biological control agent against mosquito larvae in Indonesia. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc 22: 437-443. Gophen, M. 1979. Sex-ratio in Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) populations in Lake Kinneret (Israel). Hydrobiologia 66: 41-43. Guo, X. M. 2000. Two new species of Mesocyclops from southern China and notes on the genus Mesocyclops in China. Hydrobiologia 429: 115-131. Halpern, M., Y. Senderovich, and I. Izhaki. 2008. Waterfowl-The missing link in epidemic and pandemic Cholera dissemination? Plos Pathogens 4: -. Holick, J., A. Kyle, W. Ferraro, R. R. Delaney, and M. Iwaseczko. 2002. Discovery of Aedes albopictus infected with West Nile virus in southeastern Pennsylvania. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc 18: 131-131. Holynska, M. 2000. Revision of the Australasian species of the genus Mesocyclops Sars, 1914 (Copepoda : Cyclopidae). Annals Zool 50: 363-447. Hopkins, D. R., E. Ruiz-Tiben, P. Downs, P. C. Withers, and J. H. Maguire. 2005. Dracunculiasis eradication: the final inch. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73: 669-675. Jennings, C. D., J. G. Greenwood, and B. H. Kay. 1994. Response of Mesocyclops (Cyclopoida, Copepoda) to biological and physicochemical attributes of rainwater tanks. Environ Entomol 23: 479-486. Jennings, C. D., B. Phommasack, B. Sourignadeth, and B. H. Kay. 1995. Aedes aegypti control in the Lao People's Democratic Republic, with reference to copepods. Am J Trop Med Hyg 53: 324-30. Kay, B. H., and V. S. Nam. 2005. New strategy against Aedes aegypti in Vietnam. Lancet 365: 613-617. Kay, B. H., C. P. Cabral, A. C. Sleigh, M. D. Brown, Z. M. Ribeiro, and A. W. Vasconcelos. 1992. Laboratory evaluation of Brazilian Mesocyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopidae) for mosquito control. J Med Entomol 29: 599-602. Kay, B. H., V. S. Nam, T. V. Tien, N. T. Yen, T. V. Phong, V. T. Diep, T. U. Ninh, A. Bektas, and J. G. Aaskov. 2002. Control of Aedes vectors of dengue in three provinces of Vietnam by use of Mesocyclops (Copepoda) and community-based methods validated by entomologic, clinical, and serological surveillance. Am J Trop Med Hyg 66: 40-48. Kay, B. H., T. T. Tuyet Hanh, N. H. Le, T. M. Quy, V. S. Nam, P. V. Hang, N. T. Yen, P. S. Hill, T. Vos, and P. A. Ryan. 2010. Sustainability and cost of a community-based strategy against Aedes aegypti in northern and central Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82: 822-30. Kosiyachinda, P., A. Bhumiratana, and P. Kittayapong. 2003. Enhancement of the efficacy of a combination of Mesocyclops aspericornis and Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis by community-based products in controlling Aedes aegypti larvae in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69: 206-212. Kumar, R., and T. R. Rao. 2003. Predation on mosquito larvae by Mesocyclops thermocyclopoides (Copepoda : Cyclopoida) in the presence of alternate prey. International Review of Hydrobiology 88: 570-581. Kumar, R., and J. S. Hwang. 2006. Larvicidal efficiency of aquatic predators: a perspective for mosquito biocontrol. Zool Studies 45: 447-466. Lacey, L. A., and A. H. Undeen. 1986. Microbial control of black flies and mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol 31: 265-96. Lardeux, F. 1992. Biological-control of Culicidae with the copepod Mesocyclops aspericornis and larvivorous fish (Poeciliidae) in a village of French-Polynesia. Med Vet Entomol 6: 9-15. Lardeux, F., F. Riviere, Y. Sechan, and B. H. Kay. 1992. Release of Mesocyclops aspericornis (Copepoda) for control of larval Aedes polynesiensis (Diptera, Culicidae) in land crab burrows on an atoll of French-Polynesia. J Med Entomol 29: 571-576. Lien, J. C., T. N. Wu, C. H. Lin, C. C. Lin, and M. H. Weng. 1996. Occurrence of Culex pipiens issp. molestus Forskal, 1775 in northern Taiwan. . Chinses J. Parasitol 9: 19-26. Ligon, B. L. 2005. Dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever: a review of the history, transmission, treatment, and prevention. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 16: 60-5. Lord, C. C. 2007. Modeling and biological control of mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 23: 252-64. Lundkvist, E., J. Landin, M. Jackson, and C. Svensson. 2003. Diving beetles (Dytiscidae) as predators of mosquito larvae (Culicidae) in field experiments and in laboratory tests of prey preference. Bull Entomol Res 93: 219-226. Marten, G. G. 1990. Evaluation of cyclopoid copepods for Aedes albopictus control in tires. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 6: 681-8. Marten, G. G., and J. W. Reid. 2007. Cyclopoid copepods. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc 23: 65-92. Marten, G. G., W. Che, and E. S. Bordes. 1993. Compatibility of cyclopoid copepods with mosquito insecticides. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 9: 150-4. Marten, G. G., G. Borjas, M. Cush, E. Fernandez, and J. W. Reid. 1994. Control of larval Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) by cyclopoid copepods in peridomestic breeding containers. J Med Entomol 31: 36-44. Micieli, M. V., G. Marti, and J. J. Garcia. 2002. Laboratory evaluation of Mesocyclops annulatus (Wierzejski, 1892) (Copepoda : Cyclopidea) as a predator of container-breeding mosquitoes in Argentina. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 97: 835-838. Miyagi, I., T. Toma, and M. Mogi. 1992. Biological control of container-breeding mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus, in a Japanese island by release of Toxorhynchites splendens adults. Med Vet Entomol 6: 290-300. Mogi, M. 1993. Effect of intermittent irrigation on mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and larvivorous predators in rice fields. J Med Entomol 30: 309-19. Nam, V. S., N. T. Yen, B. H. Kay, G. G. Marten, and J. W. Reid. 1998. Eradication of Aedes aegypti from a village in Vietnam, using copepods and community participation. Am J Trop Med Hyg 59: 657-660. Nam, V. S., N. T. Yen, M. Holynska, J. W. Reid, and B. H. Kay. 2000. National progress in dengue vector control in Vietnam: survey for Mesocyclops (Copepoda), Micronecta (Corixidae), and fish as biological control agents. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62: 5-10. Nam, V. S., N. T. Yen, T. V. Phong, T. U. Ninh, L. Q. Mai, L. V. Lo, L. T. Nghia, A. Bektas, A. Briscombe, J. G. Aaskov, P. A. Ryan, and B. H. Kay. 2005. Elimination of dengue by community programs using Mesocyclops (copepoda) against Aedes aegypti in central Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg 72: 67-73. Phong, T. V., N. Tuno, H. Kawada, and M. Takagi. 2008. Comparative evaluation of fecundity and survivorship of six copepod (Copepoda : cyclopidae) species, in relation to selection of candidate biological control agents against Aedes aegypti. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc 24: 61-69. Pons, M., K. Sans, M. Gomez, and D. Calliari. 2008. Evaluation of Culex pipiens larvae control by cyclopoid copepods in an urban cemetery of Montevideo, Uruguay. J Vector Ecol 33: 212-215. Rey, J. R., and S. O'Connell. 2004. Rearing copepods for mosquito control. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, EDIS, [Gainesville, Fla.]. Rey, J. R., S. O'Connell, S. Suarez, Z. Menendez, L. P. Lounibos, and G. Byer. 2004. Laboratory and field studies of Macrocyclops albidus (Crustacea: Copepoda) for biological control of mosquitoes in artificial containers in a subtropical environment. J Vector Ecol 29: 124-34. Riviere, F., B. H. Kay, J. M. Klein, and Y. Sechan. 1987. Mesocyclops aspericornis (Copepoda) and Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis for the biological-control of Aedes and Culex vectors (Diptera, Culicidae) breeding in crab holes, tree holes, and artificial containers. J Med Entomol 24: 425-430. Rupp, H. R. 1996. Adverse assessments of Gambusia affinis: an alternate view for mosquito control practitioners. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc 12: 155-159. Scholte, E. J., B. G. J. Knols, R. A. Samson, and W. Takken. 2004. Entomopathogenic fungi for mosquito control: a review. J Insect Sci 4: 1-24. Shen, C. J., and A. Y. Tai. 1979. Fauna sinica: Crustagea freshwater copepoda (in Chinese). Science Press, Beijing. Simoes, N., and J. S. Rosa. 1996. Pathogenicity and host specificity of entomopathogenic nematodes. Biocontrol Sci Technol 6: 403-411. Song, Z. W., L. Wu, G. Yang, M. Xu, and S. P. Wen. 2008. Indicator microorganisms and pathogens removal function performed by copepods in constructed wetlands. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 81: 459-463. Stottrup, J. G., and J. Jensen. 1990. Influence of algal diet on feeding and egg-production of the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa,Dana. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 141: 87-105. Torres-Estrada, J. L., M. H. Rodriguez, L. Cruz-Lopez, and J. I. Arredondo-Jimenez. 2001. Selective oviposition by Aedes aegypti (Diptera: culicidae) in response to Mesocyclops longisetus (Copepoda: Cyclopoidea) under laboratory and field conditions. J Med Entomol 38: 188-92. Tranchida, M. C., M. V. Micieli, A. Macia, and J. J. Garcia. 2009. Native Argentinean cyclopoids (Crustacea: Copepoda) as predators of Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes. Rev Biol Trop 57: 1059-1068. Ueda, H., J. W. Reid, and M. Holynska. 2003. Copepoda : Cyclopoida : genera Mesocyclops and Thermocyclops. Backhuys, Leiden. Vandevelde, I. 1984. Revision of the African Species of the Genus Mesocyclops Sars, 1914 (Copepoda, Cyclopidae). Hydrobiologia 109: 3-66. Wyngaard, G. A., M. Holynska, and J. A. Schulte. 2010. Phylogeny of the freshwater copepod Mesocyclops (Crustacea: Cyclopidae) based on combined molecular and morphological data, with notes on biogeography. Mol Phylo Evol 55: 753-764. Yasuoka, J., and R. Levins. 2007. Ecology of vector mosquitoes in Sri Lanka - suggestions for future mosquito control in rice ecosystems. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 38: 646-57. Yeh, J. Y., H. J. Kim, J. J. Nah, H. Lee, Y. J. Kim, J. S. Moon, I. S. Cho, I. S. Choi, C. S. Song, and J. B. Lee. 2011. Surveillance for West Nile virus in dead wild birds, South Korea, 2005-2008. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 299-301. 水野, 寿彥., and 永治. 高橋. 2000. 日本淡水動物プランクトン検索図説. 東海大学出版会, Tokyo. 行政院衛生署疾病管制局. 2010a. 日本腦炎已進入流行高峰,請民眾做好自我保護措施, 臺北市. 行政院衛生署疾病管制局. 2010b. 行政院衛生署 疾病管制局 ─ 疾病介紹(日本腦炎), 臺北市. 行政院衛生署疾病管制局. 2010c. 傳染病統計資料查詢, 臺北市. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23659 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 淡水橈足類生物具有防除病媒蚊的能力,將其應用在病媒蚊的生物性防治,可以減少化學藥劑性防治之使用,避免對生態環境造成二次的破壞,將此生態友善的概念應用於控制病媒蚊才是生態永續的經營方式。本研究透過分析臺灣兩種原生橈足類:糙角中劍水蚤(Mesocyclops aspericornis Daday)和鄔氏中劍水蚤(M. woutersi Van de Velde)對台灣常見病媒蚊:埃及斑蚊(Aedes aegypti Linnaeus)、白線斑蚊(Aedes albopictus Skuse)與三斑家蚊(Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles)和常見騷擾性蚊種:地下家蚊(Culex pipiens form molestus Forskal)、白腹叢蚊(Armigeres subalbatus Coquillett)等防治效果,建立實驗室數據,評估實際進行戶外實驗或應用的可能性。本研究針對橈足類生物捕食孑孓的捕食率進行分析,評估實際應用的防治效果。根據野外採集結果,目前發現臺灣有10種原生橈足類生物,包含:龜背溫劍水蚤(Thermocyclops decipiens Fischer)、北碚中劍水蚤(Mesocyclops pehpeiensis Hu)、奧貢中劍水蚤(M. ogunnus Onabamiro)、厚溫劍水蚤(T. crassus Fischer)、鄔氏中劍水蚤(M. woutersi Van de Velde)、糙角中劍水蚤(M. aspericornis Daday)、白體刺劍水蚤(Acanthocyclops cf. trajani Mirabdullayev & Defaye)、溫中劍水蚤(M. thermocyclopoides Harada)、羅威溫劍水蚤(T. rylovi Smirnov)以及真劍水蚤屬(Eucyclops spp.)。針對埃及斑蚊的防治,鄔氏中劍水蚤貢寮品系的捕食率(72.60±0.09%)高於糙角中劍水蚤宜蘭品系(47.80±0.15%)和鄔氏中劍水蚤宜蘭品系(43.80±0.10%),各種品系中劍水蚤間防治效果出現顯著差異(df=2, F=18.10, p<0.0001)。防治白線斑蚊孑孓時,鄔氏中劍水蚤貢寮品系捕食率(52.60±0.16%)與糙角中劍水蚤宜蘭品系(38.60±0.13%)、鄔氏中劍水蚤宜蘭品系(46.40±0.13%)則不具顯著差異(df=2, F=2.53, p=0.0982)。防治經72小時後,各品系中劍水蚤防治埃及斑蚊或白線斑蚊捕食率差異減少或無顯著差異。針對三斑家蚊孑孓的防治,糙角中劍水蚤與鄔氏中劍水蚤的捕食率各為17.78±0.09%和16.22±0.03%,與捕食埃及斑蚊和白線斑蚊孑孓的捕食率有顯著差異(df=2, F=14.77, p<0.0001和df=2, F=27.16, p<0.0001)。鄔氏中劍水蚤貢寮品系和糙角中劍水蚤宜蘭品系於白線斑蚊孑孓(11.70±3.71%和8.40±4.50%)與埃及斑蚊孑孓(16.30±4.67%和18.40±3.03%)共存時偏好捕食埃及斑蚊孑孓,具有顯著的捕食選擇性(df=1, t=2.44, p=0. 03和df=1, t=5.83, p<0.01),因此針對不同種類和密度的孑孓,應選擇適當的防治材料。野外實驗結果則顯示長期防治下,水體若含有糙角中劍水蚤或鄔氏中劍水蚤則孑孓存活率可長期維持為0%,有顯著防治成效。
本研究特色在於:1)記載多種臺灣尚無記錄之淡水橈足類物種。2)臺灣首次利用本土採集之橈足類進行蚊蟲防治之能力探討。3)比較防治臺灣兩種登革熱病媒斑蚊之能力。4)分析區域化下同物種橈足類捕食能力之差異。5)利用誘蚊產卵器放置法替代橈足類直接野放法。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Biological control of disease vectors is an ecologically sound approach for the better sustainability. This study focused on the use of copepods to control larvae of the mosquito vectors, and the evaluation of the release of copepods as an eco-friendly alternative strategy for the biological control of disease vectors. By testing the indigenous Mesocyclops species to control mosquitoes, such as Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Cx. pipiens form molestus and Armigeres subalbatus to establish lab data and assess the potential application in the field. The predation rates between different copepods and different mosquitoe larvae can be valueable for the evaluation of the potential for further application in the field. Ten indiginous species of copepods in Taiwan including Thermocyclops decipiens Fischer, Mesocyclops pehpeiensis Hu, M. ogunnus Onabamiro, T. crassus Fischer, M. woutersi Van de Velde, M. aspericornis Daday, Acanthocyclops cf. trajani Mirabdullayev & Defaye, M. thermocyclopoides Harada and T. rylovi Smirnov and Eucyclops spp.were collected in this studied.
Mesocyclops woutersi, Gong-liao (GL) had a significantly (df=2, F=18.10, p<0.0001) higher predation rate (72.60±0.09%) on Ae. aegypti than M. aspericornis, I-lan (IL) (47.80±0.15%) and M. woutersi collected in I-lan (IL). (43.80±0.10%) did. However, no significant (df=2, F=2.53, p=0.0982) was observed among M. woutersi (GL) (52.60±0.16%), M. sapericornis (IL) (38.60±0.13%) and M. woutersi (IL) (46.40±0.13%) in their efficiency of predation on Ae. albopictus. The efficieny in controling Ae. aegypti or Ae. albopictus was not significantly differenct after 72 hours among three strains of copepods. For Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, the predation rates were 17.78±0.09% and 16.22±0.03% by M. aspericornis, and M. woutersi with significant differences (df=2, F=14.77, p<0.0001 and df=2, F=27.16,p<0.0001). By mixing Ae. aegypti or Ae. albopictus larvae, it shows that M. woutersi (GL) (predation rate are18.40±3.03% and 8.40±4.50%) and M. aspericornis (IL) (predation rate are 16.30±4.67% and 11.70±3.71%) had the preference in predating Ae. aegypti (df=1, t=2.44, p=0. 03 and df=1, t=5.83, p<0.01), implying the potential application of such preference for the control of vector species with specific distribution and importance in disease transmission. In the field test, it showed significantly mosquito control effect characterized by the absence of the mosquito larva in the water with M. aspericornis or M. woutersi. The significance and innovation of this study are: 1) the identification of copepod species which are collected in Taiwan for the first time, 2) the first time to demonstrate the potential application of freshwater copepods for the biological control of mosquito larvae in Taiwan, 3) the comparison of predation rates of two vectors responsible for the transmission of dengue virus among different copepod species, 4) analysis on the effects of copepod predation in various geographically distinct locations, and 5) the utilization of ovitraps to replace the releasing method for spreading the copepods. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:06:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97844003-1.pdf: 879194 bytes, checksum: 31a485fd54f5ca00dbe01d9eae17440c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………………i
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………………...ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………..iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………..v 前言 …..……..……………………………………………………………………..1 一、臺灣蚊媒傳染病現況及常見病媒蚊…………………….. ………………...1 二、病媒蚊防治之可行策略與應用橈足類防治之比較………………………5 三、橈足類之生態習性…………………………………………………..………8 四、國外防治案例與臺灣應用之限制…………………………………………15 材料與方法…………………………………………………………………….18 一、橈足類採集與飼養及蚊子飼養……………………………………………18 (1)橈足類採集與飼養…………………………………………...…….18 (2)蚊子飼養…………………………………………………..………..20 二、 捕食能力測試……………………………………………………………..22 三、大族群孑孓防治效果…………………………………...…………………24 四、野外防治觀察……………………………………………….…………….25 結果…………………………………………………………………………….…….26 一、 橈足類採集與飼養………………………..………………………………26 二、捕食能力測試……………….……….…………………………………….28 (1)中劍水蚤防治斑蚊與家蚊孑孓的捕食率差異………….…………….28 (2)中劍水蚤防治臺灣常見登革熱病媒蚊能力差異分析….…………….29 (3)中劍水蚤對埃及斑蚊與白線斑蚊捕食選擇性測試…….…………….32 (4)中劍水蚤對地下家蚊與白腹叢蚊捕食能力測試 暨中劍水蚤數量與孑孓數量對捕食效率的影響………………...…...32 三、大族群孑孓防治效果…………………………….………………………..34 四、野外防治觀察…………………………………………………………..…38 討論………………………………………………………………………………..…41 一、橈足類飼養…………………………………………………………………41 二、捕食率差異成因…………………………………………..….……………41 三、橈足類防治三斑家蚊之限制………………………….….………………..44 四、橈足類防治斑蚊屬孑孓……………………………………………………44 五、橈足類防治大量孑孓能力…………………………………………………46 六、戶外實驗成效……………………………………..………………………48 參考文獻………………………………………………….………………………….51 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 臺灣的淡水橈足類生物防治病媒蚊之評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Evaluation of Freshwater Copepods on Mosquito Control in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 王根樹 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃榮南,鄧華真 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 生物防治,橈足類,糙角中劍水蚤,鄔氏中劍水蚤,埃及斑蚊,白線斑蚊,三斑家蚊, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Biocontrol,copepod,Mesocyclops aspericornis,M. woutersi,Aedes aegypti,Ae. albopictus,Culex tritaeniorhynchus, | en |
dc.relation.page | 99 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-06-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境衛生研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境衛生研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 858.59 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。