請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23542
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳文團 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chin-Wu Kuo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 郭晉吾 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:03:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考書目
英文部分 1. Isaiah Berlin’s Works Berlin, Isaiah, Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 2001. Berlin, Isaiah, Concepts and Categories: Philosophical Essays. New York:Penguin Books, 1981. Berlin, Isaiah, Four Essays on Liberty, New York: Oxford University Press, 1969. Berlin, Isaiah, Freedom and Its Betrayal: Six Enemies of Human Liberty, NewJersey: Princeton University Press, 2002. Berlin, Isaiah, Karl Marx, His Life and Environment. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 1978. Berlin, Isaiah, Liberalism without Illusions: Essays on Liberal Theory and thePolitical Vision of Judith N. Shklar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. Berlin, Isaiah, Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2002. Berlin, Isaiah, Personal Impressions. New York: Viking Press, 1981. Berlin,Isaiah, Russian Thinkers, London: Penguin Books, 1994 Berlin, Isaiah, The Age of Enlightenment: The 18th Century Philosophers. NewYork: New American Liberty, 1956. Berlin, Isaiah, The Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder. NewJersey: Princeton University Press, 2000. Berlin, Isaiah,TheFirst and the Last. New York: The New York Review of Books,1999. Berlin, Isaiah, The Magus of the North: J. H. Hamann and the Origins ofModern Irrationalism.Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1994. Berlin, Isaiah, The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays. London: Chatto & Windus, 1997. Berlin, Isaiah, The Roots of Romanticism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press,1999. Berlin, Isaiah, The Sense of Reality: Studies in Ideas and Their History. NewYork: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1997. Berlin, Isaiah, Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas. New York:Viking Press, 1976. 2. Works on Isaiah Berlin Dworkin, R., and Silvers, R. B. and Lilla, M., ed. The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin. NewYork: New York Review of Books, 2001. Edna and Margalit, Avishai, ed. Isaiah Berlin: A Celebration. Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1991. Galipeau, Claude J..Isaiah Berlin’s Liberalism, New York: Oxford University Press,1994. Gray, John.Isaiah Berlin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. Ignatieff, Michael. Isaiah Berlin: A Life. New York: Metropolitan Books, 1998. Jahanbegloo, Ramin. Conversations with Isaiah Berlin. New York: Scribner’s, 1992. Kocis, Robert. A Critical Appraisal of Isaiah Berlin’s Political Philosophy.Lewiston: E. Mellen Press, 1989. Margalist, Avishai and others.On the Thought of Isaiah Berlin: Papers Presented inHonor of Professor Isaiah Berlin on the Occasion of His EightiethBirthday. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1990. Pezzimenti, R. The Open Society and Its Friends: With Letters from Isaiah Berlinand the Late Karl R. Popper. Rome: Gracewing, 1997. Ryan, Alan., ed. The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honor of Isaiah Berlin. New York:Oxford University Press, 1979. Wood, Antony. The Guest from the Future: Anna Akhmatova and Isaiah Berlin.tr. ByGyorgyDalos. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1999. 3. General Books Arblaster, Anthony. The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism. Oxford: BasilBlackwell, 1984. Archard, Darid., ed. Philosophy and Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1996. Audi, Robert.ed. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1999 Bellamy, Richard. Liberalism and Modern Society: A Historical Argument.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992. Brinkley, Alan.Liberalism and Its Discontents. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1998. Chang, Ruth., ed. Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical reason.London: Harvard University Press, 1997. Collins, Irene. Liberalism in the Nineteenth-Century Europe. London, HistoricalAssociation, 1971. Crowder, George. Liberalism and Value Pluralism.New York: Continuum, 2002. De Ruggiero, tr. By Guito. R. G. Collingwood.The History of European Liberalism,Boston: Beacon Press, 1959. Delaney, C. F., ed..The Liberalism-Communitarianism Debate: Liberty andCommunity Values. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994. Ehrlich, Stanislaw and Wootton, Graham, ed. Three Faces of Pluralism. England:Gower Publishing Co.. Gillmore, Robert. Liberalism & the Politics of Plunder: The Conscience of aNeo-liberal. Dublin, N. H.: W. L. Bauhan, 1987. Gray, John. Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986. Hampshire, Stuart. Freedom and Mind and Other Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press,1972. Hobhouse, L. T..Liberalism and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1994. Kekes, John. The Morality of Pluralism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. Koerner, Kirk F..Liberalism and Its Critics. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985. Kukathes, Chandran. Hayek and Modern Liberalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. Kymlicka, Will. Liberalism, Community, and Culture. New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 1989. Locke, John. Two Treaties of Government. New York: The New American Library,1960 Luebbert, Gregory M. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classesand the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 1991. MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Notre Dame Press, 1988. McLennan, Gregor. Pluralism.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995. Mill, J. S., John Gray tr. On Liberiy and Other Essays, Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 1998. Nathan, H. L. and Williams, H. Heatchcote, ed. Liberalism and Some Problems ofToday. London, V. Gollancz Ltd., 1929. Parekh, Bhikhu. Contemporary Political Thinkers. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982. Popper, Karl Raimund. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge,1997. Rasmussen, Douglas B. Liberalism Defended: The Challenge of Post-modernity.Northampton: E. Elgar, 1997. Rawls, John.Political Liberalism.New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. Raz, Joseph.The Morality of Freedom.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986. Riker, W. H. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory ofDemocracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman,1982. Rousseau, Jean Jacques, G. D. H. Cole tr. The Social Contract and Discourses, NewYork: Everyman’s Library, 1950. Samuel, Herbert. Liberalism: An Attempt to State the Principles and Proposals ofContemporary Liberalism in England. London: G. Richards, 1902. Sandel, Michael J.., ed. Liberalism and Its Critics.New York: New York UniversityPress, 1984. Schapiro, J. Salwyn. Liberalism: Its Meaning and History. Princenton, N. J., VanNostrand, 1958. Seidman, Steven. Liberalism and the Origins of European Social Theory. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1983. Simkins, C. E. W. Liberalism and the Problem of Power.Braamfontein,Chicaco Press, 1998. Stocker, Michael.Plural and Conflicting Values. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990. Szacki, Jerzy, Chester A. K. trans. Liberalism After Communism. New York: CentralEuropean University Press, 1995. Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York:Basic Books, 1983. 4. Essays Cracraft, James. Berlin for Historians.History and Theory, Vol.41, Blackwell Publishing for Weslyan University, 2002. Franco, Paul. Oakshot, Berlin, and Liberalism.Political Theory, Vol31, Sage Publications Inc. 2003. Hawthorne, John. Freedom in Context. Philosophical Studies, Vol104, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. Montague, Philip. Is There a Right to Freedom? Philosophical Studies, Vol.49, D. Reidel Publishing, 1986. Parekh, Bhikhu. The Political Thought of Sir Isaiah Berlin.British Journal of Political Science, Vol12, Cambridge University Press, 1982. 中文部分: 1. 專書 以撒.柏林著,陳曉林譯,《自由四論》,台北:聯經,1986。 以撒.柏林著,趙干城、鮑世奮譯,《俄國思想家》,台北:聯經,1987。 以撒.柏林著,彭懷棟譯,《馬克思傳》,台北:時報,1990。 石元康著,《當代自由主義理論》,台北:聯經,1995。 包默著,李日章譯,《西方近代思想史》,台北:聯經,1988。 卡爾.曼海姆著,黎鳴、李書崇譯,《意識型態與烏托邦》,北京:商務,2002。 江金太著,《歷史與政治》,台北:桂冠,1981。 江宜樺著,《自由民主的理路》,台北:聯經,2001。 修昔的底斯著,黃文龍譯,《伯羅奔尼撒戰爭史》,台北:權力書局,1984。 胡傳勝著,《自由的幻象:柏林思想研究》,南京:南京大學,2001。 胡傳勝著,《觀念的力量:與柏林對話》,成都:四川人民出版社,2002。 約翰.阿克頓著,胡傳勝等譯,《自由史論》,南京:譯林,2001。 約翰.葛雷著,蔡英文譯,《自由主義的兩種面貌》,台北:巨流,2002。 柯林烏著,陳明福譯,《歷史的理念》,台北:桂冠,1998。 威廉.詹姆士著,吳棠譯,《多元的宇宙》,北京:商務,1999。 海耶克著,鄧正來譯,《自由秩序原理》,北京:三聯,1997。 海耶克著,張尚德譯《到奴役之路》,台北:桂冠,1982。 馬基維利著,閻克文譯,《君主論》,台北:商務,1998。 貢斯當著,閻克文、劉滿貴譯,《古代人的自由與現代人的自由》,北京:商務,1999。 麥克里蘭著,彭懷棟譯,《西洋政治思想史》,台北:商周,2000。 麥克.伊格納蒂夫著,高毅、高煜譯,《他鄉:以撒.柏林傳》,台北:立緒,2001。 華勒斯坦著,彭懷棟譯,《自由主義之後》,台北:聯經,2001。 華許著,王任光譯,《歷史哲學》,台北:幼獅,1984。 菲特列.華特金斯著,李豐彬譯,《西方政治傳統:近代自由主義之發展》,台北:聯經,1999。 雷敏.雅罕拜格魯著,楊孝明譯,《以撒.柏林對話錄》,台北:正中,1994。 啟良著,《西方自由主義傳統-西方反自由至新自由主義學說追索》,廣州:廣東人民出版社,2003。 赫次勒著,張兆麟等譯,《烏托邦思想史》,台北:商務,1990。 歐內斯特.巴克著,陳中人譯,《英國政治思想》,台北:結構群,1989。 蕭高彥、蘇文流主編,《多元主義》,台北:中央研究院,1998。 應奇著,《後自由主義》,台北:揚智,2001。 2. 期刊論文 李振坤,〈柏林自由理論研究〉。臺北:國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文,1993。 余桂霖,〈伊賽.柏林的政治哲學與理論〉,《復興崗學報》,50 期,1993, 頁 153-179。 林慈淑,〈以撒.柏林的史論—從觀念史的思考到決定論的批判—〉《臺大歷史學報》第36期,2005年12月。 顏伯儒,〈以撒•柏林─反潮流的自由主義者〉臺北:輔仁大學歷史研究所碩士論文,2004。 蘇文流,〈消極自由與積極自由:柏林的論點評述〉,《政治學報》,13 期,1985,頁 287-323。 蘇文流,〈消極自由與積極自由:柏林的論點評述〉,《政治學報》,第13 期,1985。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23542 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文本論文旨在對以撒•柏林(Isaiah Berlin)的自由主義哲學進行探討,並論證以撒•柏林自由主義哲學的核心觀念為「多元價值論」與「消極自由」。自由主義在二十世紀遭遇重大挫折,自啟蒙以來的自由主義論述不但無法發揮功用,甚至還反成為極權主義者斫害人民自由的武器,其中變化是論述的重點。
以撒•柏林首先破除一元論式的哲學傳統以及其後影響的決定論式歷史觀對政治哲學中的自由所造成的傷害,說明此二者皆會造成對人民的壓迫,以及剝奪其自由選擇的可能。接下來則重新建立以多元價值論作為自由主義的基礎,說明唯有彼此不可共量、不可比較的多元價值才能實現真正的自由主義社會 接著則以消極自由與積極自由兩種概念的區分,說明積極自由也可能經過不同的剪裁而反過來傷害自由主義,從而建立起以消極自由為唯一核心的自由主義理念,並且說明這樣的自由主義實踐能為個人與社會帶來真實的幸福。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract
This thesis mainly discusses Isaiah Berlin’s philosophy of freedom, proofing that “pluralism” and “negative freedom” are core concepts of it. Freedom philosophy confronts great discouragement at the middle of 20thcentury;the discourses of freedom philosophy are not only failed but also even backfired. Fascists and Nazis take liberty and freedom to support their totalitarian regime instead. Isaiah Berlin first breaks the monism thought and historical inevitability to prevent the harm they will make to freedom. And then set the pluralism as the foundation of freedom philosophy, clarifying that only pluralism with incommensurability and incompatibility can bring out the true free society. At the last part he distinguishes the two different concepts of freedom, which are negative freedom and positive freedom. Saying that positive freedom may backfire to destroy freedom philosophy, and negative freedom is the true and only core to establish the idea of freedom philosophy. And this freedom philosophy could bring out real happiness to people and make a desirable society. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:03:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R93124007-1.pdf: 768521 bytes, checksum: ddd734f7874b760fc86d851eadf84326 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 序論 第一節 研究動機.........................1 第二節 研究方法........................10 第二章 柏林對一元論與決定論之批.........12 第一節 對一元論之批判..................12 第二節 對決定論之批判..................21 第三章 柏林自由主義的基礎:多元論 第一節 穆勒對柏林之影響................28 第二節 柏林的多元價值論................31 第三節 多元論所受到的質疑與答辯........35 第四章 兩種自由概念 第一節 消極自由與積極自由..............43 第二節 對消極自由的闡揚................52 第五章 評論、回應與現實事件的反思 第一節 對柏林自由主義的評論與回應......58 第二節 現實事件的反思..................63 第三節 結論............................68 參考書目 英文部分................................71 中文部分................................76 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以撒柏林的自由哲學 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Isaiah Berlin's Philosophy of Freedom | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾慶豹,溫明麗 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 一元論,決定論,多元論,消極自由,積極自由, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | monism,determinism,pluralism,negative freedom,positive freedom, | en |
dc.relation.page | 78 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 哲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 750.51 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。