Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 工程科學及海洋工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23427
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王昭男
dc.contributor.authorChien-Ho Wuen
dc.contributor.author吳建和zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T05:01:29Z-
dc.date.copyright2010-12-10
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-11-29
dc.identifier.citation1. M. L. Munjal, Acoustics of ducts and mufflers, John Wiley and sons, New York,1987.
2. J. F. Allard, Propagation of sound in porous media, modelling sound absorbing materials, Elsevier applied science, London and New York, 1993.
3. D. D. Davis, J. M. Stokes, D. Moore, and L. Steven, Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Mufflers with Comments on Engine Exhaust Muffler Design, Report No. 1192, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1954.
4. J. Igarashi, and M. Toyama, Fundamental of acoustical silencers, part 1: theory and experiment of acoustic low-pass filters, Aeronaut research institute of university of Tokyo, 223-241, Report No. 339, 1958.
5. M. Toshisuke, and J. Igarashi, Fundamental of acoustical silencers, part 2: determination of four terminal constants of acoustical elements, Aeronaut research institute of university of Tokyo, 67-85, Report No. 344, 1959.
6. J. Igarashi, and M. Arai, Fundamental of acoustical silencers, part 3: attenuation characteristics studies by elementic simulator, Aeronaut research institute of university of Tokyo, 17-31, Report No. 351, 1960.
7. M. L. Munjal, Velocity ratio-cum-transfer matrix for the evaluation of a muffler with mean flow, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 105-119, 1975.
8. M. G. Prasad, and M. J. Crocker, Evaluation of four-pole parameters for a straight pipe with a mean flow and linear temperature gradient, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 916-921, 1981.
9. M. G. Prasad, and M. J. Crocker, Studies of acoustical performance of a muti-cylinder engine exhaust muffler system, Journal of sound and vibration, 90(4), 491-508, 1983.
10. M. L. Munjal, and M. G. Prasad, Transfer matrix for a uniform tube with moving medium and linear temperature gradient, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80(5), 1501-1506, 1986.
11. K. S. Peat, The transfer matrix of a uniform duct with a linear temperature gradient, Journal of sound and vibration, 123(1), 43-53, 1988.
12. J. W. Sullivan, and M. J. Crocker, Analysis of concentric tube resonators having unpartitioned cavities, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 207-215, 1978.
13. K. Jayaraman, and K. Yam, Decoupling approach to modeling perforated tube muffler components, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69(2), 390-396, 1981.
14. C. N. Wang, Numerical decoupling analysis of a resonator with absorbent material, Applied acoustics, 58, 109-122, 1999.
15. M. L. Munjal, Analysis and design of pod silencers, Journal of sound and vibration, 262, 497-507, 2003.
16. A. Selamet, M. B. Xu, and I. J. Lee, Analytical approach for sound attenuation in perforated dissipative silencers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(5), 2091-2099, 2004.
17. S. N. Panigrahi and M. L. Munjal, Plane wave propagation in generalized multiply connected acoustic filters, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 2860-2868, 2005.
18. C. N. Wang, C. H. Wu, and T. D. Wu, A network approach for analysis with/without absorbent material, Applied acoustics, 70, 208-214, 2009.
19. C. J. Wu, X. J. Wang, and H. B. Tang, Transmission loss prediction on a single-inlet/double-outlet cylindrical expansion-chamber muffler by using the modal meshing approach, Applied Acoustics, 69(2), 173-178, 2007.
20. F. D. Denia, and A. Selamet, Letter to Editor ‘Transmission loss prediction on a single-inlet/double-outlet cylindrical expansion-chamber muffler by using the modal meshing approach’ by C.J. Wu, X.J. Wang, H.B. Tang, Applied Acoustics, 69(3), 280-281, 2008.
21. H. B. Tang, Reply to comments on ‘Transmission loss prediction on a single-inlet/double-outlet cylindrical expansion-chamber muffler by using the modal meshing approach’, Applied Acoustics, 69(3), 282, 2008.
22. F. D. Denia, and A. Selamet, Remark on reply to comments on ‘Transmission loss prediction on a single-inlet/double-outlet cylindrical expansion-chamber muffler by using the modal meshing approach’, Applied Acoustics, 69(3), 283-284, 2008.
23. M. L. Munjal, A simple numerical method for three-dimensional analysis of simple expansion chamber mufflers of rectangular as well as circular cross-section with a stationary medium, Journal of Sound and Vibration,116(1) , 71-88, 1987.
24. J. Y. Chung, D. A. Blaser, Transfer function method of measuring in-duct acoustic properties. I. Theory, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 907-913, 1980.
25. J. Y. Chung, D. A. Blaser, Transfer function method of measuring in-duct acoustic properties. II. Experiment, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 914-921, 1980.
26. C. I. J. Young, M. J. Crocker, Prediction of transmission loss in muffler by the finite-element method, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57(1), 144-148, 1975.
27. K. S. Peat, Evaluation of four-pole parameters for ducts with flow by the finite element method, Journal of sound and vibration, 84(3), 389-395, 1982.
28. L. Ramdas Ram-Mohan, Finite element and boundary element applications in quantum mechanics, Oxford university press, 2002.
29. T. W. Wu, Boundary element acoustics, fundamentals and computer codes, WIT press,1999.
30. T. Tanaka, T. Fujikawa, T. Abe, and H. Utsuno, A method for the analytical prediction of insertion loss of a two-dimensional muffler model based on the transfer matrix derived from the boundary element method, Journal of vibration, acoustics, stress, and reliability in design, 107(1), 86-91, 1985.
31. C. Y. R. Cheng, A. F. Seybert, and T. W. Wu, A multidomain boundary element solution for silencer and muffler performance prediction, Journal of Sound and Vibration,151(1) , 119-129, 1991.
32. C. N. Wang, C. C. Tse, and Y. N. Chen, Analysis of three dimensional muffler with boundary element method, Applied Acoustics,40, 91-106,1993.
33. C. N. Wang, A boundary element analysis for simple expansion silencers with mean flow, Journal of the Chinese institute of engineers, 23(4), 529-536, 2000.
34. V. Rokhlin, Rapid Solution of Integral Equations of Classical Potential Theory, Journal of computational physics, 60, 187–207, 1985.
35. L. Greengard, V. Rokhlin, A Fast Algorithm for Particle Simulations, Journal of computational physics, 73, 325–348, 1987.
36. J. T. Chen, K. H. Chen, Applications of the Dual Integral Formulation in Conjunction with Fast Multipole Method in Large-scale Problems for 2D Exterior Acoustics, Engineering analysis with boundary elements, 28, 685-709, 2004.
37. K. H. Chen, J. T. Chen, J. H. Kao, Y. T. Lee, Applications of Dual Integral Formulation in Conjunction with Fast Mutipole Method to Oblique Incident Wave Problem, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 59, 711-751, 2009.
38. H. Fujiwara, The fast multipole method for solving integral equations of three-dimensional topography and basin problems, Geophysical journal international,140, 198-210, 2000.
39. H. Fujiwara, The Fast Multipole Method for Integral Equations of Seismic Scattering Problems, Geophysical journal international, 133, 773-782, 1998.
40. N. Nishimura, Fast Multipole Accelerated Boundary Integral Equation Methods, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 55, 299-324, 2002.
41. C. H. Wu, and C. N. Wang, An application of fast multipole method in analyzing acoustic filters, Journal of the Chinese institute of engineers, 32(6), 779-778, 2009.
42. J. G. Ih, and B. H. Lee, Analysis of higher-order mode effects in the circular expansion chamber with mean flow, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77(4), 1377-1388, 1985.
43. A. Selamet, and Z. L. Ji, Acoustic attenuation performance of circular expansion chambers with extended inlet/outlet, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 223(2), 197-212, 1999.
44. R. Barbieri, and N. Barbieri, Finite element acoustic simulation based shape optimization of a muffler, Applied Acoustics, 67, 346-357, 2006.
45. Z. Kang, Z. Ji, Rapid communication ‘Acoustic length correction of duct extension into a cylindrical chamber’, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 310, 782-791, 2008.
46. A. Selamet, F. D. Denia, and A. J. Besa, Acoustic behavior of circular dual-chamber mufflers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 265, 967-985, 2003.
47. Z. L. Ji, Short communication‘Acoustic attenuation performance analysis of multi-chamber reactive silencers’, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 283, 459-466, 2005.
48. S. N. Panigrahi, and M. L. Munjal, A generalized scheme for analysis of multifarious commercially used mufflers, Applied Acoustics, 68, 660-681, 2007.
49. C. N. Wang, A numerical scheme for the analysis of perforated intruding tube muffler components, Applied Acoustics, 44, 275-286, 1995.
50. C. N. Wang, A Numerical Analysis for Perforated Muffler Components with Mean Flow, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 121(2), 231-236, 1999.
51. C. N. Wang, and C. Y. Liao, Boundary integral equation method for evaluating the performance of straight-through resonator with mean flow, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 216(2), 281-294, 1998.
52. M. L. Munjal, B. K. Behera, and P. T. Thawani, Transfer matrix modal for the reverse-flow, three-duct, open end perforated element muffler, Applied Acoustics, 54(3), 229-238, 1998.
53. T. Kar, and M. L. Munjal, Generalized analysis of a muffler with any number of interacting ducts, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 285, 585-596, 2005.
54. M. C. Chiu, and Y. C. Chang, Shape optimization of multi-chamber cross-flow mufflers by SA optimization, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 312, 526-550, 2008.
55. S. H. Lee, and J. G. Ih, Effect of non-uniform perforation in the long concentric resonator on transmission loss and back pressure, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 311, 280-296, 2008.
56. T. Ikeda, T. Nishimura, and T. Ando, Resonance of elliptical perforated tube muffler, Electronics and communications in Japan, part 3, 83(8), 1483-1491, 2000.
57. T. Nishimura, T. Ando, and T. Ikeda, Resonance of elliptical muffler chamber having a nonuniformly perforated pipe, Electronics and communications in Japan, part 3, 85(7), 253-259, 2002.
58. S. N. Y. Gerges, R. Jordan, F. A. Thieme, J. L. Bento Coelho, and J. P. Arenas, Muffler modeling by transfer matrix method and experimental verification, The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 27(2), 132-140, 2005.
59. N. Sohei, N. Tsuyoshi, and Y. Takashi, Acoustic analysis of elliptical muffler chamber having a perforated pipe, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 297, 761-773, 2006.
60. R. Glav, The transfer matrix for a dissipative silencer of arbitrary cross-section, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 236(4), 575-594, 2000.
61. R. Kirby, Transmission loss predictions for dissipative silencers of arbitrary cross section in the presence of mean flow, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(1), 200-209, 2003.
62. A. Cummings, R. J. Astley, Finite element computation of attenuation in bar-silencers and comparison with measured data, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 196(3), 351-369, 1996.
63. B. Venkatesham, M. Tiwari, and M. L. Munjal, Transmission loss analysis of rectangular expansion chamber with arbitrary location of inlet/outlet by means of Green’s functions, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 323, 1032-1044, 2009.
64. M. B. Xu, A. Selamet, I. J. Lee, and N. T. Huff, Letter to the editor ‘Sound attenuation in dissipative expansion chambers’, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 272, 1125-1133, 2004.
65. I. L. Lee, Acoustic characteristics of perforated dissipative and hybrid silencers, Dissertation, The Ohio state university, 2005.
66. A. Cummings, and I. J. Chang, Internal mean flow effects on the characteristics of bulk-reacting liners in circular ducts, Acustica, 64, 169-178, 1987.
67. A. Cummings, and I. J. Chang, Sound attenuation of a finite length dissipative flow duct silencer with internal mean flow in the absorbent, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 127, 1-17, 1988.
68. K. S. Peat, and K. L. Rathi, A finite element analysis of the convected acoustic wave motion in dissipative silencers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 184(3), 529-545, 1995.
69. J. Albelda, F. D. Denia, M. I. Torres, and F. J. Fuenmayor, A transversal substructuring mode matching method applied to the acoustic analysis of dissipative mufflers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 303, 614-631, 2007.
70. R. Kirby, A comparison between analytic and numerical methods for modeling automotive dissipative silencers with mean flow, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 325(3), 565-582, 2009.
71. A. Selamet, M. B. Xu, I. J. Lee, N. T. Huff, Analytical approach for sound attenuation in perforated dissipative silencers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 2091-2099, 2004.
72. T. W. Wu, C. Y. R. Cheng, and Z. Tao, Boundary element analysis of packed silencers with protective cloth and embedded thin surface, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 261, 1-15, 2003.
73. O. Z. Mehdizadeh, M. Paraschivoiu, A three-dimensional finite element approach for predicting the transmission loss in mufflers and silencers with no mean flow, Applied Acoustics, 66, 902-918, 2005.
74. B. K. Venkanna, and S. B. Wadawadagi, Experimental investigations on noise attenuation of a twin cylinder stationary diesel engine with different types of mufflers, Journal of vibration and acoustics, 121, 351-354, 1999.
75. A. Selamet, I. J. Lee, and N. T. Huff, Acoustic attenuation of hybrid silencers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 262, 509-527, 2003.
76. S. N. Panigrahi, M. L. Munjal, Comparison of various methods for analyzing oined circular ducts, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 285, 905-923, 2005.
77. Z. L. Ji, Short communication ‘Boundary element analysis of a straight-through hybrid silencer’, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 292, 415-423, 2006.
78. F. D. Denia, A. Selamet, F. J. Fuenmayor, and R. Kirby, Acoustic attenuation performance of perforated dissipative mufflers with empty inlet/outlet extendions, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 302, 1000-1017, 2007.
79. S. Marburg, and B. Nolte, Computational acoustics of noise propagation in fluid – Finite and boundary methods, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
80. C. N. Wang, The Application of boundary element method in the noise reduction analysis for the automotive mufflers, Dissertation, National Taiwan University, 1993.
81. L. E. Kinsler, A. R. Frey, A. B. Coppens, and J. V. Sanders, Fundamentals of acoustics, fourth edition, John Wiley and Sons, INC, 2000.
82. L. J. Eriksson, Higher order mode effects in circular ducts and expansion chambers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68(2), 545-550, 1980.
83. C. A. Brebbia, The boundary element method for engineers, Pentech Press, London, 1978.
84. A. D. Pierce, Acoustics: An introduction to its physical and application, The Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1989.
85. J. T. Chen, K. H. Chen, Applications of the Dual Integral Formulation in Conjunction with Fast Multipole Method in Large-scale Problems for 2D Exterior Acoustics, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 28(6), 685-709, 2004.
86. M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables, Dover, NY, USA, 1965.
87. M. L. Munjal, Analysis and design of pod silencers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 262, 497-507, 2003.
88. M. E. Delany, and E. N. Bazley, Acoustical properties of fibrous materials, 3, 105-116, 1970.
89. F. P. Mechel, Chapter 8 sound-absorbing materials and sound absorber, Noise and Vibration Control Engineering, Edited by L. L. Beranek, and I. L. Ver, John Wiley and Sons, INC., 1992.
90. H. Utsuno, T. Tanaka, T. Fujikawa, and A. F. Seybert, Transfer function method for measuring characteristic impedance and propagation constant of porous materials, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86(2), 637-643, 1989.
91. S. Kanapathipillai and K. P. Byrne, A model for calculating the insertion losses of pipe lagging, Journal of sound and vibration, 200(5), 579-587, 1997.
92. T. A. Busch and R. E. Nugent, A reduced-scale railway noise barrier’s insertion loss and absorbent coefficients: comparison of field measurements and predictions, Journal of sound and vibration, 267, 749-759, 2003.
93. T. H. Melling, An impedance tube for precision measurement of acoustic impedance and insertion loss at high sound pressure levels, Journal of sound and vibration, 28(1), 23-54, 1973.
94. R. Ramakrishnan and R. Stevens, Improving the accuracy of duct silencer insertion loss predictions, Journal of sound and vibration, 169(3), 423-427, 1994.
95. W. Frommhold and F. P. Mechel, Simplified methods to calculate the attenuation of silencers, Journal of sound and vibration, 141(1), 103-125, 1990.
96. A. V. Sreenath and M. L. Munjal, Evaluation of noise attenuation due to exhaust mufflers, Journal of sound and vibration, 12(1), 1-19, 1970.
97. A. Cummings, Sound attenuation in ducts lined on two opposite walls with porous material, with some applications to splitters, Journal of sound and vibration, 49(1), 9-35, 1976.
98. S. N. Panigrahi, and M. L. Munjal, Plane Wave Propagation in Generalized Multiply Connected Acoustic Filters, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 2860-2868, 2005.
99. T. Kar, and M. L. Munjal, Plane wave analysis of acoustic wedges using the boundary-condition-transfer algorithm, Applied Acoustics, 67, 901-917, 2006.
100. M. L. Munjal, Plane wave analysis of side inlet/outlet chamber mufflers with mean flow, Applied Acoustics, 52(2), 165-175, 1997.
101. M. Ren, and F. Jacobsen, A method of measuring the dynamic flow resistance and reactance of porous materials, Applied Acoustics, 39, 265-276, 1993.
102. Y. S. Wang, H. He, and A. L. Geng, Comparison and application of the experimental methods for multi-layer prediction of acoustical properties of noise control materials in standing wave-duct systems, Applied Acoustics, 69, 847-857, 2008.
103. A. F. Seybert, R. A. Seman, and M. D. Lattuca, Boundary element prediction of sound propagation in ducts containing bulk absorbing materials, Journal of vibration and acoustics, 120, 976-981, 1998.
104. S. Bilawchuk, K. R. Fyfe, Comparison and Implementation of the Various Numerical Methods Used for Calculating Transmission Loss in Silencer Systems, Applied Acoustics, 64, 903-916, 2003.
105. D. A. Bies, C. H. Hansen, Flow resistance information for acoustical design, Applied Acoustics, 13, 357-391, 1980.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23427-
dc.description.abstract本研究主要目的為消音器傳輸損失之性能研究。邊界元素法相較於有限元素法更適合應用於消音器之性能分析,因為有限元素法必須分割其內部的領域。利用邊界元素法其係數矩陣為滿矩陣且常具有非對稱之性質。為了降低電腦運算時間之需求,本文將利用快速多極展開預測消音器之性能。此數值方法利用加法定理分離場點及源點為兩部分。因此,快速多極展開相較於邊界元素法可以降低電腦運算時間從 到 ,其中N為未知數之量且 為一常數。
四埠參數法廣泛應用於消音器性能之探討,僅能分析具有單一入出口型消音器為其限制。為了使研究更加完整,本文引入轉換函數法來分析具有單一出口及雙出口型消音器之傳輸損失。分析消音器性能之數值方法一般為有限元素法,邊界元素法或平面波法。平面波法是一方便且快速之數值方法,但其分析之有效頻率有限。此外,有限元素法特別耗用大量之運算時間及記憶體於三維問題或是高頻問題。因此,快速多極展開配合轉換函數法將被使用於本文預測二維及三維消音器之傳輸損失。
本文分析大量設計不相同之消音器:平行之單膨脹管型消音器,具有轉角入口之單膨脹管型消音器,槽孔型消音器及具有吸音材之消音器,豆莢型消音器等等。此外,也考量了不同之參數:入出口管半徑,膨脹管長度,槽孔管孔隙率及半徑。數值結果也與實驗及相關數值方法比較,提高了數值結果之正確性。
數值結果與實驗相較下進一步證實了轉換函數法可以成功應用於分析具有單一或是雙出口型消音器。於已公開發表之文獻中尚未發現轉換函數法被應用於分析具有雙出口型消音器之傳輸損失。值得一提的是轉換函數法亦可應用於預測具有多出口型之消音器。並聯型消音器及具有垂直轉角型之消音器其傳輸損失於特定的頻率表現優異。另外,可以根據波長及入口管半徑之調整,進而移動此優異性能出現之頻率範圍。豆莢型消音器利用內砍之吸音圓柱使聲音能量大量被消散,故常使用於排氣及散熱系統中,提升其傳輸損失之表現。此外,槽孔型消音器其孔隙率若大於20%,由數值結果可以發現槽孔管之特性將不明顯。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to investigate the transmission losses of mufflers. As a numerical scheme for analyzing a muffler, the boundary element method is more suitable than domain methods, such as the finite element method, which has to mesh the domain. However, the coefficient matrices established by the boundary element method are full and often non-symmetrical. In order to decrease the computational time required, the fast multipole method has been developed to predict attenuations of mufflers. This numerical scheme takes advantage of the addition theorem to separate the field points and source points into two terms. Therefore, the fast multipole method, when compared with the boundary element method, reduces CPU time from an order of to , where N is the number of unknowns and is a constant.
While the four-pole parameter representation has been widely established in previous literatures, this technique was applied only to single-inlet/single-outlet mufflers in those studies. For a more comprehensive investigation, the transfer function is utilized to predict the transmission losses of mufflers with either double or single outlets in this work. Performance figures can mainly be calculated by different numerical simulations, such as the finite element method, the boundary element method and plane wave theory. The plane wave theory is a convenient and fast approach but it is limited in that it can only predict muffler attenuation below the cut-off frequency. In addition, finite element method, in particular, requires high computational and memory resources for 3D acoustic problems or at high frequencies. For these reasons, fast multipole method combined with transfer function method is adopted to analyze 2D and 3D muffler performance in the present work.
The transmission losses of mufflers with different designs, such as parallel simple expansion chamber mufflers, simple expansion chamber mufflers with a right-angle inlet, perforated mufflers with or without absorbent material, pod mufflers, etc, are analyzed in this work. Parameters also taken into account in this work include: the radii of the inlet and outlet pipes, the length and radius of the simple expansion chamber, the flow resistivity of absorbent material, the porosity of perforated ducts, the perforated chamber radius, and so on. The numerical results are compared to experiments and previous published data, and the results clearly show that the agreements are good.
It stands to reason that the transfer function can successfully predict the attenuation of mufflers with single or with double outlets. It is worth mentioning that this scheme has not been adopted in previous research to determine the transmission losses of mufflers with two outlets. Above all, the present method can also be extended to the study of single-inlet/multi-outlet mufflers. The parallel mufflers and mufflers with a right angle inlet in which without any absorbent material attached show a better performance at particular frequencies. The better attenuation can also be shifted according to the relations of the wavelength and the radius of inlet pipe. Pod muffler is also a prevalent setup in exhaust system or in heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. Since absorbent pods or plates are embedded into a lined duct to make a split flow passage, thereby increasing transmission losses. From the numerical results one can also see the contribution of perforated pipe can be ignored when the porosity is chosen to be greater than 20%.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:01:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-F94525020-1.pdf: 4175330 bytes, checksum: c8c69ae2105de02e482366b383d8262f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsCONTENTS III
FIGURE CAPTIONS V
ABSTRACT XII
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Analytical and numerical models 4
1.3 Literature review 11
2 BASIC FORMULATION 17
2.1 Continuity equation 17
2.2 Balance of momentum 19
2.3 Constitutive equation for the speed of sound 21
2.4 Linearization for the governing equations 22
2.5 Derivation of the wave equation 24
2.6 Three-dimensional waves in circular duct 25
3 THE NUMERICAL METHOD 28
3.1 Boundary element method 28
3.2 The fast multipole method for 2D mufflers 34
3.3 The fast multipole method for 3D mufflers 40
3.3.1 Parallel simple expansion chamber muffler 46
3.3.2 Simple expansion chamber muffler with a right angle inlet 47
3.3.3 Perforated muffler 48
3.3.4 Double perforated muffler 51
3.3.5 Pod muffler 54
4 ACOUSTICAL PROPERTIES AND TRANSMISSION LOSS 57
4.1 Acoustical properties of absorbent material 57
4.2 Impedance of perforates 59
4.3 Transmission loss 61
5 VERIFICATION OF THE PRESENT METHOD 66
5.1 Theory of the transfer function method 66
5.2 Experiment data versus numerical results for 3D mufflers 72
5.3 The published data versus numerical results for 2D problems 75
5.4 Published data versus numerical results for 3D mufflers 76
6 THE NUMERICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 78
6.1 Two-dimensional muffler 78
6.2 Parallel simple expansion muffler 81
6.3 Simple expansion chamber muffler with a right angle inlet 86
6.4 Single perforated muffler 91
6.5 Double perforated muffler 96
6.6 Pod muffler 99
7 CONCLUSIONS 102
REFERENCES 105
FIGURES 120
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject消音器zh_TW
dc.subject邊界元素法zh_TW
dc.subject快速多極展開zh_TW
dc.subject轉換函數法zh_TW
dc.subject傳輸損失zh_TW
dc.subjectBEMen
dc.subjecttransmission lossen
dc.subjecttransfer functionen
dc.subjectmuffleren
dc.subjectFMMen
dc.title快速多極展開法於消音器性能分析之應用zh_TW
dc.titleFAST MULTIPOLE METHOD FOR THE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MUFFLERSen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear99-1
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee何信宗,洪振發,涂季平,劉德源,謝傳璋,鐘裕亮
dc.subject.keyword快速多極展開,邊界元素法,消音器,轉換函數法,傳輸損失,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordFMM,BEM,muffler,transfer function,transmission loss,en
dc.relation.page189
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2010-11-29
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept工程科學及海洋工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:工程科學及海洋工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
4.08 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved