請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23423
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林惠玲(Hui-Lin Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yueh-Ying Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃月盈 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:01:26Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-12-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-12-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分:
1.行政院國家科學委員會(2009),科學技術統計要覽,行政院國家科學委員會。 2.趙鈞浩(2009),政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。 3.張朝欽(2008),政府支援企業研發之政策工具國際比較,科技發展政策報導2008年第一期。 4.吳慧瑛、張家禎、陳健職,2008,「政府與廠商研發支出之關係替代或互補—台灣業界科專的實證研究」,臺灣銀行季刊,59(1),74-86。 5.葉高廷(2008),台灣SBIR計畫之關鍵成功因素研討,國立交通大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 6.經濟部中小企業處(2007),經濟部「2007中小企業白皮書」,經濟部中小企業處。 7.林建憲(2008),政府研發補助對於研發績效之影響-以工業局輔導案為例,國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 8.薛招治, (2007),政府研發補助政策績效評估之實證研究,國立中央大學 9.鄭秀玲,黃國綱,2005,'政府資助的產業創新活動:以工研院科專計畫為例'《人文及社會科學集刊》, 17:3, 459-489。 10.行政院國家科學委員會(2005),行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告-科技專案績效評估,行政院國家科學委員會。 11.許尚哲 (2005),政府補助中小企業從事技術創新研發之政策探討—以經濟部鼓勵中小企業開發新技術計畫為例,國立中山大學 12.林惠玲、陳正倉(2004),廠商合併行為與其生產力之研究-台灣製造業廠商之驗證,經濟論文32:4(2004),535-571。 13.國科會(2004),中華民國科學技術白皮書-科技發展遠景與策略(92~95年),行政院國家科學委員會。 14.行政院國家科學委員會(2003),行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告-政府補助民間研發管理模式之研究:以主導性新產品開發計畫為例,行政院國家科學委員會。 15.黃仟文(2003),評估政府資助中小企業創新之效果--以「鼓勵中小企業開發新技術推動計畫」為例,中山大學公共事務管理研究所。 16.方彥永(2003),“知識經濟體系下政府協助產業創新之研究-以業界開發產業技術計畫為例,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。 17.孫克難 (2002),”台灣產業科技發展中的財政支持,” 財團法人中華經濟研究院。 18.陳嘉萍 (2002), “政府研發獎助與中小企業研發創新關係之研究--以新竹科學園區廠商為例,” 國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。 19.王健全、陳厚銘(1994),促進產業升級條例有關研究發展投資抵減之獎勵效果評析,中華經濟研究院。 20.劉代洋、謝戎峰 (2001), “政府研發補助措施對公司研發投入影響之研究-以主導性新產品開發計畫及電子業之研發補助措施為例,財稅研究 35(5),92。 21.王金凱,(1986),我國製造業廠商研究發展決定因素之研究,國立台灣大學。 英文部分: 1.Becker, B. and Palin, N. (2008), “What Determines Industrial R&D Expenditure in the UK?” The Manchester School, Vol. 76, No. 1, 66–87. 2.Coe, D. T. and Helpman, E. (1995), “International R&D Spillovers,” European Economic Review, Vol. 39, 859-887. 3.Falk, M. (2007), “R&D Spending in the High-Tech Sector and Economic Growth,” Research in Economics, Vol. 61, 140–147. 4.Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991), “Innovation and Growth: Technological Competition in the Global Economy,” MIT PRESS, Boston, MA 5.Hussinger, K. (2008), “R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semiparametric Two-Step Selection Model,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 23, 729–747. 6.Kauko, K. (1996), “Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies: A Sceptical Note on the Empirical Evidence,” Research Policy, Vol. 25, No 3, 321-323. 7.Lluís Santamaríaa, Andrés Barge-Gilb, Aurelia Modregoc,(2010), “Public selection and financing of R&D cooperative projects: Credit versus subsidy funding” Research Policy 39 (2010) 549–563 8.Xulia Gonz´alez , Consuelo Paz´o, (2007),“ Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? ” Research Policy 37 (2008) 371–389 9.Saul Lach, (2000) , “Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D?Evidence from Israel,” The Hebrew University and NBER 10.Ricardo, N. B. (2002), “R&D Expenditures and the Role of Government Around the World,” Studies of Economic, Vol. 29, No. 1, 109-121. 11.Romer, P. (1990), 'Endogenous Technological Change,' Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, 71-102. 12.Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1982), “The General Problem of Government Intervention and the Main Forms of Government Influence on Technical Innovation,” Industrial Innovation and Public Policy, 46-54. 13.Stiglitz, J. (1988), “Economics of the Public Sector,” 2nd edition, W.W. Norton and Company. 14.Varsakelis, N. C. (2001), “the Impact of Patent Protection, Economy Openness and National Culture on R&D Investment a Cross Country Empirical Investigation,” Research Policy, Vol. 30, 1059–1068. 15.Wang, J. C. and Tsai, K. H. (2004), “Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in Taiwan’s Manufacturing Firms,” Growth and Productivity in East Asia, NBER-East Asia Seminar on Economics, Vol. 13, 277-296. 16.Wallsten, S. J. (2000), “The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research program,” The Rand Journal of Economics, Vol 31, No. 1, 82-100. 17.Winthrop, M., Deckro, R. F. and Kloeber, Jr. (1999), “The Impact of Government R&D Expenditures on U.S. Technology Advancement,” In: Kocaoglu, D.F., Anderson,T.R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the PICMET’ 99 Book of Summaries, Vol. 1, 281. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23423 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在激烈的全球化競爭時代,研發創新是維持產業保有競爭力的重要因素,也是引導經濟發展的主要驅動力,但由於投資研發具有高度風險,故政府的政策措施在企業研發過程中扮演了重要角色。
本研究利用行政院國家科學委員會「台灣地區第二次產業創新活動調查」與行政院主計處「95年工商及服務業普查」的合併資料,以Treatment Effect Model,首先分析受政府資助廠商特質,再進一步分析政府研發資助對國內廠商研發績效的影響,最後比較政府研發資助對製造業與服務業廠商創新績效影響之差異。就實證分析結果可歸納出主要結論如下: 一、大廠及本地廠商受政府資助較多:就製造業而言,廠商規模越大及國內本地商越會向政府申請研發資助,但就服務業廠商而言,規模的影響不顯著,但本地商亦較容易向政府申請研發資助。 二、政府研發資助對廠商研發支出的邊際效果為正,顯示兩者具互補關係:不論製造業或服務業,單就Treatment Effect Model估計政府資助對廠商研發的影響時,顯示兩者具有替代關係,但進一步衡量邊際效果時,政府研發資助對廠商研發具有互補效果。 三、政府資助變數對廠商創新產品營收有正向的影響:不論在製造業及服務業,受政府資助變數對創新產品營收有正向的影響。進一步衡量邊際效果時,製造業有受政府資助的廠商之創新產品營收反而較未受政府資助的廠商低;服務業有受政府資助的廠商較未受政府資助的廠商高,主要係來自間接補助(與政府或非營利機構研發合作)之影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In this highly-globalized environment, research, development, and innovation have become fundamental not only to maintenance of core competencies for industry but also to the economic development. Given the high risks involved in the R&D investment, measures taken by the government have vital impacts on R&D activities carried out by enterprises.
Based on the data generated from the “Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey II” and the “2006 Industry, Commerce and Service Census”, this thesis first analyzes the characteristics of enterprises subsidized by the government under the Treatment Effect Model; further, impacts on performance of R&D activities carried out by the Taiwan enterprises are also elaborated. Lastly, comparison between the impacts arising from the public subsidies on manufacturing and service industries is conducted in the thesis. Conclusions are summarized as follows: 1.Most of the enterprises granted by the public subsidies are large and local companies: For the manufacturing industry, large and local enterprises intend to apply for the government’s subsidies. In contrast, the effect of enterprise scale under the service industry is unobvious to apply for the public subsidies; nonetheless, local service enterprises are still more inclined to apply for the public subsidies. 2.The marginal effect of public subsidies on private R&D expenditures is positive, which represents a complementary correlation:Irrespective of manufacturing and service industries, the substitute correlation between the public subsidies and the private R&D expenditures is shown under the Treatment Effect Model; however, such correlation is converted complementary in terms of the marginal effect. 3.The impact of public subsidies on private revenues derived from innovative products is positive:Public grants have positive impacts on both manufacturing and service industries. Our further evaluation by way of the marginal effect shows that revenues from innovative products earned by manufacturing enterprises with the public subsidies are less than those without the public subsidies; on the other hand, service enterprises with the public subsidies earn more revenues than those without the public subsidies, which is resulted from the indirect subsidies, i.e. R&D cooperation with government or non-profit organization. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:01:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-P97323024-1.pdf: 908815 bytes, checksum: d683b1a488d4d58e2fb6f1d6350eef3d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書.......................i
謝辭..................................ii 中文摘要.............................iii Abstract..............................iv 圖目錄...............................vii 表目錄..............................viii 第一章 緒論............................1 1.1 研究背景與研究動機.................1 1.2 研究方法及研究目的.................2 1.3 研究架構...........................3 第二章 文獻回顧........................5 2.1 政府介入企業研發創新活動理由.......5 2.2 研發創新績效之衡量.................7 2.3 政府研發獎勵與廠商特性之關聯.......9 2.4 政府研發獎勵措施實證文獻 ..........10 第三章 我國研發創新獎勵政策及措施......14 3.1 政府研發創新之政策工具.............14 3.2 我國與主要國家研發支出概況.........16 3.3 我國科技政策的演進.................19 3.4 目前政府協助國內研發創新之主要措施.23 第四章 實證模型設定與說明..............25 4.1 資料來源...........................25 4.2 模型設定與變數說明.................28 第五章 實證結果與分析..................40 5.1 受政府資助廠商特性實證結果.........44 5.2 廠商研發支出的實證結果.............49 5.3 創新所帶來營收之實證結果...........52 5.4 政府資助對廠商研發創新的影響.......55 第六章 結論與建議......................56 6.1 研究結論...........................56 6.2 檢討與建議.........................58 參考文獻...............................60 附錄...................................64 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 政府研發資助對廠商研發績效之影響
-台灣製造業與服務業比較 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Public Subsidies on Private Innovation
Performance-Comparison of Taiwan Manufacturing and Service Industry | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭秀玲(Show-Ling Jang),楊志海(Chih-hai Yang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 政府研發資助,研發創新績效,製造業,服務業,Treatment Effect Model, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | R&D subsidy,R&D and Innovative Performance,manufacturing industry,service industry,Treatment Effect Model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 66 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-12-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 887.51 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。