請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23199完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝清佳(Ching-Chia Hsieh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jia-Li Hsu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 徐嘉利 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:47:03Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Observational Techniques. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (pp. 79-109). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Alkaraan, F., & Northcott, D. (2006). Strategic Capital Investment Decision-making: A Role for Emergent Analysis Tools? A Study of Practice in Large UK Manufacturing Companies. The British Accounting Review, 38(2), 149-173. Alkaraan, F., & Northcott, D. (2007). Strategic Investment Decision Making: The Influence of Pre-decision Control Mechanisms. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 4(2), 133-150. Antonucci, Y. L., & Tucker, J. J. (1998). IT Outsourcing: Current Trends, Benefits, and Risks. Information Strategy: Executive's Journal, 14(2), 16-26. Apostolopoulos, T. K., & Pramataris, K. C. (1997). Information Technology Investment Evaluation: Investment in Telecommunication Infrastructure. International Journal of Information Management, 17(4), 287-296. Avgerou, C. (2001). The Significance of Context in Information Systems and Organizational Change. Information Systems Journal, 11(1), 43-63. Bacon, C. J. (1992). The Use of Decision Criteria in Selecting Information Systems/Technology Investments. MIS Quarterly, 16(3), 335-353. Ballantine, J., & Stray, S. (1998). Financial Appraisal and the IS/IT Investment Decision Making Process. Journal of Information Technology, 13(1), 3-14. Ballantine, J. A., Galliers, R. D., & Stray, A. J. (1996). Information Systems/Technology Evaluation Practices: Evidence from UK Organizations. Journal of Information Technology, 11(2), 129-141. Ballantine, J. A., & Stray, S. (1999). Information Systems and Other Capital Investments: Evaluation Practices Compared. Logistics Information Management, 12(1/2), 78-93. Ballmer, S. (2008). CIGREF--Club Informatique des Grandes Entreprises Françaises. Microsoft Press. Retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/steve/2008/10-02cigref.mspx Bannister, F., & Remenyi, D. (1999). Instinct: Value and IT Investment Decisions (Working Paper OP001/99). Mnanagement Research Center, University of Wolverhampton. Bannister, F., & Remenyi, D. (2000). Acts of Faith: Instinct, Value and IT Investment Decisions. Journal of Information Technology, 15(3), 231-241. Bardhan, I., Bagchi, S., & Sougstad, R. (2004). Prioritizing a Portfolio of Information Technology Investment Projects. Journal of Global Information Management, 21(2), 33-60. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78-108. Beath, C., & Ives, B. (1988). The information technology champion: aiding and abetting, care and feeding. Beath, C. M. (1991). Supporting the Information Technology Champion. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 355-372. Bell, G. G., Bromiley, P., & Bryson, J. (1997). Spinning a Complex Web: Links Between Strategic Decision Making Context, Content, Process, and Outcome. In V. Papadakis & P. Barwise (Eds.), Strategic Decisions (pp. 163-178). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369. Bhattacherjee, A. (1998). Management of Emerging Technologies: Experiences and Lessons Learned at US West. Information & Management, 33(5), 263-272. Boland, R. J. (1991). Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process. In H.-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein & R. A. Hirschheim (Eds.), Information Systems research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (pp. 439-464). North-Holland, Amsterdam. Boonstra, A. (2003). Structure and Analysis of IS Decision-making Processes. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(3), 195-209. Borenstein, D., & Baptista Betencourt, P. R. (2005). A Multi-criteria Model for the Justification of IT Investments. Infor-Information Systems and Operational Research, 43(1), 1-22. Bulter, R. (1990). Decision-making Research: Its Uses and Misuses. A Comment on Mintzberg and Waters: 'Does Decision Geit in the Way'. Organization Science, 11(1), 11-16. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Portsmounth: Heinemann. Butler, R., Davies, L., Pike, R., & Sharp, J. (1991). Strategic Investment Decision-making: Complexities, Politics and Processes. Journal of Management Studies, 28(4), 395-415. Butler, R., Davies, L., Pike, R., & Sharp, J. (1993). Strategic Investment Decisions: Theory, Practice, and Process. New York: Routledge. Carr, N. G. (2003). IT Doesn't Matter. Harvard Business Review, May, 41-49. Cavusoglu, H. (2003). The Economics of Information Technology Investments. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Texas at Dallas. Chabrow, E. (2003). I.T. Staffs lack Financial Chops for Project Analysis. InformationWeek. Retrieved from www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticleSrc.jhtml?articleID=8700123 Clemons, E. K., & Gu, B. (2003). Justifying Contingent Information Technology Investments: Balancing the Need for Speed of Action with Certainty before Action. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(2), 11-48. Clemons, E. K., & Weber, B. W. (1990). Making the Information Technology Investment Decision: A Principled Approach. Paper presented at the The 23th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawii. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualityative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Currie, W. L. (1989). The Art of Justifying New Technology to Top Management. Omega, 17(5), 409-418. Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully Completing Case study Research: Combining Rigour, Relevance and Pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, 8(4), 273-289. Deitz, R., & Renkema, T. (1995). Planning and Justifying Investments in Information Technology: A Framework with Case Study Illustrations. Paper presented at the The 2nd European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Methods of Collecting an dAnalyzing Empirical Materials. London: SAGE Publications. Dos Santos, B. L. (1991). Justifying Investments in New Information Technologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(4), 71-90. Earl, M. (1989). Management Strategies for Information Technology. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ, USA. Eickelmann, N. (2001). A Comparative Analysis of the Balanced Scorecard as Applied in Government and Industry Organizations. In W. V. Grembergen (Ed.), Information Technology Evaluation Methods and Mangement (pp. 253-268). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Emery, C., Faison, S. M., Houk, J., & Kirk, J. S. (2007). The Integrated Enterprise: Enterprise Architecture, Investment Process and System Development. Paper presented at the The 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, USA. Farbey, B., Land, F., & Gargett, D. (1992). Evaluating Investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7(2), 109-122. Farbey, B., Land, F., & Targett, D. (1993). How to Assess Your IT Investment: A Study of Methods and Practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Farbey, B., Land, F., & Targett, D. (1999). The Moving Staircase--Problems of Appraisal and Evaluation in a Turbulent Environment. Information Technology & People, 12(3), 238-252. Galliers, R. D. (1991). Choosing Information Systems Research Approaches: A Revised Taxonomy. Paper presented at the European Journal of Information Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark. GAO (1997). Assessing Risks and Returns: A Guide for Evaluating Federal Agencies' IT Investment Decision-making (GAO/AIMD-10.1.13). GAO (2004). Information Technology Investment Management: A Framework for Assessing and Improving Process Maturity (GAO-04-394G). Gemmell, M., & Pag, R. (2003). A Post-Implementation Evaluation of a Student Information System in the UK Higher Education Sector. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 6(2), 95-106 Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1993). Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince. Organization Science, 4(4), 595-616. Goldstein, P. J. (2004). IT Funding in Higher Education. Boulder: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Gutierrez, L. H. S. (1995). Transformations of the HR Function in the Context of Restructuring. International Journal of Manpower, 16(10), 25-38. Hawkins, B. L., & Oblinger, D. G. (2005). The Myth About Saving Money:' IT Investments Will Save The Institution Money'. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(2), 12-13. Hinton, C. M., & Kaye, G. R. (1996). The Hidden Investments in Information Technology: The Role of Organisational Context and System Dependency. International Journal of Information Management, 16(6), 413-427. Hirschheim, R., & Smithson, S. (1988). A Critical Analysis of Information Systems Evaluation. Paper presented at the IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference on Information Systems Assessment, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 121-142. Hochstrasser, B. (1990). Evaluating IT Investments–Matching Techniques to Projects. Journal of Information Technology, 5(4), 215-221. Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of Technological Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317-341. Hsieh, T. C., Hsieh, C., C., & Hung, M. C. (2007). Research Paradigm Shifts? A Review of the Information Systems Research in Taiwan. Journal of Information Management, 14(4), 1-29. Hsu, W. Y. C. (2002). Online Education On Campus: A Technology Frames Perspective on the Process of Technology Appropriation. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of London. Huerta, E., & Sanchez, P. J. (1999). Evaluation of Information Technology: Strategies in Spanish Firms. European Journal of Information Systems, 8(4), 273-283. Introna, L., & Whittaker, L. (2002). The Phenomenology of Information Systems Evaluation: Overcoming the Subject/Object Dualism. Paper presented at the Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology, IFIP Conference Proceedings, Barcelona, Spain. Irani, Z. (1999). IT/IS Investment Justification: An Interpretivist Case Study. Paper presented at the The 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA. Irani, Z., Ezingeard, J. N., & Grieve, R. J. (1997). Integrating the Costs of an IT/IS Infrastructure into the Investment Decision Making Process. Technovation, 17(11/12), 695-706. Irani, Z., Ezingeard, J. N., & Grieve, R. J. (1999). Investment Justification of Information Technology in Manufacturing. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 12(2), 90-101. Irani, Z., Ezingeard, J.-N., & Grieve, R. J. (1998). Costing the True Costs of IT/IS Investments in Manufacturing: a Focus During Management Decision Making. Logistics Information Management, 11(1), 38-43. Irani, Z., & Fitzgerald, G. (2002). Editorial. Information Systems Journal, 12(4), 263-270. Irani, Z., & Love, P. E. D. (2000). The Propagation of Technology Management Taxonomies for Evaluating Investments in Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 161-177. Irani, Z., & Love, P. E. D. (2002). Developing a Frame of Reference for Ex-ante IT/IS Investment Evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(1), 74-82. Irani, Z., Themistocleous, M., & Love, P. E. D. (2003). The Impact of Enterprise Application Integration on Information System Lifecycles. Information & Management, 41(2), 177-187. Jayasuriya, R. (1999). Managing Information Systems for Health Services in a Developing Country: a Case Study Using a Contextualist framework. International Journal of Information Management, 19(5), 335-349. Kaarst-Brown, M. L., & Robey, D. (1999). More on Myth, Magic and Metaphor: Culture Insights into th eManagement of Information Technology in Organizaitons. Information Technology & People, 12(2), 192-217. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, 71-79. Karyda, M., Kiountouzis, E., & Kokolakis, S. (2005). Information Systems Security Plicies: A Contextual Perspective. Computers & Security, 24(3), 246-260. Karyda, M., Kokolakis, S., & Kiountouzis, E. (2003). Content, Context, Process Analysis of IS Security Policy Formation. Paper presented at the Security and Privacy in the Age of Uncertainty, IFIP TC11 18th International Conference on Information Security, Athens, Greece. Kearns, G. S. (2004). A Multi-objective, Multi-criteria Approach for Evaluating IT Investments: Results from two Case Studies. Information Resources Management Journal, 17(1), 37-62. Klecun, E., & Cornford, T. (2005). A Critical Approach to Evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(3), 229-243. Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-93. Kumar, R. L. (1996). A Note on Project Risk and Option Values of Investments in Information Technologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), 187-193. Kunda, D. (2002). A Social-technical Approach to Selecting Software Supporting COTS-Based Systems. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of York. Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., Pitcher, P., Posada, E., & Sain-Macary, J. (1995). Opening up Decision Making: Teh View from the Black Stool. Organization Science, 6(3), 260-279. Laudon, J., & Laudon, K. (2006). Essentials of Business Information Systems. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ, USA. Lee, A. (1991). Intergrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organziational Research. Organization Science, 2(4), 342-365. Lee, A. S. (1989). A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies. Mis Quarterly, March, 33-50. Lee, A. S. (1994). Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation. Mis Quarterly, 18(2), 143-157. Lee, A. S. (1997). Qualitative Research in Information Systems. MISQ Discovery, June. Lee, C.-P., & Shim, J. P. (2007). An Exploratory Study of Radio Frequency Identificaion (RFID) Adoption in the Healthcare Industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(6), 717-724. Leidner, D. E., & Kayworth, T. (2006). A Review of Culture In Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 357-399. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Lovallo, D., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Delusions of Success: How Optimism Undermines Executives' Decisions. Harvard Business Review, July, 4-12. Love, P. E. D., Irani, Z., & Edwards, D. J. (2005). Researching the Investment of Information Technology in Construction: An Examination of Evaluation Practices. Automation in Construction, 14(4), 569-582. Lubbe, S., & Remenyi, D. (1999). Management of Information Technology Evaluation – the Development of a Managerial Thesis. Logistics Information Management, 12(1/2), 145-156. Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2000). Educational Administration: Concepts and Practices. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co. Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice. Organization Science, 5(4), 502-527. McCredie, J. (2003). Does IT Matter to Higher Education? EDUCAUSE Review, November/December, 15-22. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Milis, K., & Mercken, R. (2004). The Use of the Balanced Scorecard for the Evaluation of Information and Communication Technology Projects. International journal of Project Management, 22(2), 87-97. Miller, S. J., Hickson, D. J., & Wilson, D. C. (1996). Decision-Making in Organizations. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 43-62). London; Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Mintzberg, H., & Westley, F. (2001). Decision Making: It's Not What You Think. MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring, 89-93. Mohammed, T. A., & Richardson, H. J. (2007). Implementation of a Customer Services Information Systems Strategy in a Higher Education Context: An Integrative Perspective. Paper presented at the IFIP TC 8 WG 8.6 International Working Conference, Manchester. Murphy, K. E., & Simon, S. J. (2001). Using Cost Benefit Analysis for Enterprise Resource Planning Project Evaluation: A Case for Including Intangibles Information Technology Evaluation Methods and Management (pp. 154-170). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. Nagm, F., & Kaultz, K. (2008). The Advancement of IS Evaluation: A Literature Review. Paper presented at the Pacis Asia Conference on Information Systems. Nandhakumar, J., & Jones, M. (1997). Too Close for Comfort? Distance and Engagement in Interpretive Information Systems Research. Information Systems Journal, 7(2), 109-131. Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63-92. Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28. Panko, R. R. (1991). Is Office Productivity Stagnant? MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 191-203. Papadakis, V., & Lioukas, S. (1996). Do Early Perceptions of Strategic Decisions Influence Strategic Processes? An Empirical Investigation. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 46-50. Petress, K. (2002). An Alternative Model for Decision-making. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(3), 189-191. Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Pettigrew, A. M. (1987). Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 649-670. Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292. Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Studying Strategic Choice and Strategic Change. A comment on Mintzberg and Waters: 'Does Decision Get in th eWay?' in Deciding: An Exchange of Views between Mintzberg and Waters, Pettigrew, and Butler. Organization Studies, 11(1), 6-11. Pettigrew, A. M. (2003). Strategy as Process, Power and Change. In S. Cummings & D. Wilson (Eds.), Images of Strategy (pp. 301-330). Oxford: Blackwell. Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 149-160. Post, G. V., Kagan, A., & Lau, K. N. (1995). A Modeling Approach to Evaluating Strategic Uses of Information Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 161-188. Powell, P. L. (1992). Information Technology Evaluation: Is It Different? Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(1), 29-42. Powell, T. C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information Technology as Competitive Advantage: the Role of Human, Business, and Technology Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375-405. Rajagopalan, N., Rasheed, A. M. A., & Datta, D. K. (1993). Strategic Decision Processes: Critical Review and Future Directions. Journal of Management, 19(2), 349-384. Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (1990). An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Success of Customer-oriented Strategic Systems. Information Systems Research, 1(3), 325-347. Remenyi, D., Sherwood-Smith, M., & White, T. (1997). Achieving Maximum Benefits from Your Information Systems. Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons. Rose, J. M., Rose, A. M., & Norman, C. S. (2004). The Evaluation of Risky Information Technology Investment Decisions. Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), 53-66. Rosemann, M. (2001). Evaluating the Management of Enterprise Systems with the Balanced Scorecard. In W. V. Grembergen (Ed.), Information Technology Evaluation Methods and Mangement (pp. 171-184). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. Ryan, S., & Gates, M. (2004). Inclusion of Social Subsystem Issues in IT Investment Descision: An Empirical Assessment. Information Resources Management Journal, 17(1), 1-18. Ryan, S. D., & Harrison, D. A. (2000). Considering Social Subsystem Costs and Benefits in information Technology Investment Decisions: A View from the Field on Anticipated Payoffs. Journal ofManagement Information Systems ISpring, 16(4), 11-40. Ryan, S. D., Harrison, D. A., & Schkade, L. L. (2002). Information-technology Investment Decisions: When Do Costs and Benefits in the Social Subsystem Matter? Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 85-127. Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and Technology Centrality in Industry–University Interactions. Research Policy, 31(7), 1163-1180. Scheepers, H., & Scheepers, R. (2008). A Process-focused Decision Framework for Analyzing the Business Value Potential of IT Investments. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(3), 321-330. Schniederjans, M. J., Hamaker, J. L., & Schniederjans, A. M. (2004). Information Technology Investment: Decision-Making Methodology. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. Serafeimidis, V. (1997). Interpreting the Evaluation of Information Systems Investments: Conceptual and Operational Explorations. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Univerysity of London. Serafeimidis, V. (2001). The Institutional Dimensions of Information Systems Evaluation. In W. V. Grembergen (Ed.), Information Technology Evaluation Methods and Management (pp. 99-110). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Serafeimidis, V., & Smithson, S. (1996). The Management of Change for Information Systems Evaluation Practice: Experience From a Case Study. International Journal of Information Management, 16(3), 205-217. Serafeimidis, V., & Smithson, S. (1999). Rethinking the approaches to information systems investment evaluation. Logistics information management, 12, 94-107. Serafeimidis, V., & Smithson, S. (2000). Information Systems Evaluation in Practice: A Case Study of Organizational Change. Journal of Information Technology, 20(2), 93-105. Sharif, A. M., & Irani, Z. (1999). Research Note: Theoretical Optimisation of IT/IS Investments. Logistics Information Management, 12(1/2), 189-196. Sherer, S., Ray, M., & Chowdhury, N. (2002). Assessing information technology investments with an integrative process framework. Paper presented at the The 35th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, USA. Sherer, S. A. (2005). Impact of National Culture on IT Investment Management Processes. Paper presented at the The 12th Annual Cross-Culture Meeting in Information Systems. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129-138. Simon, H. A. (1987). Making Management Decision: the Role of Intuition and Emotion. The Academy of Management Executive, February, 57-64. Sinclair, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005). Intuition: Myth or a Decision-making Tool? Management Learning, 36(3), 353-370. Smallen, D. (2001). Viewpoints: Rationalizing Our IT Investments. EDUCAUSE Review, March/April, 62-63. Stake, R. E. (1994). Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Stein, S., Averitt, S., & Schaffer, H. (2004). Layer 8, A White Paper on Manging Information Technology Investments to Advance NC States Mission. Raleigh, NC: NC State University. Stockdale, R., & Standing, C. (2006). An Interpretive Approach to Evaluating Information Systems: A Content, Context, Process Framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(3), 1090-1102. Symons, V. (1990). Evaluation of information systems: IS development in the Processing Company. Journal of Information Technology, 5(4), 194-204. Symons, V. J. (1991). A Review of Information Systems Evaluation: Content, Context and Process. European Journal of Information Systems, 1(3), 205-212. Tam, K. Y. (1998). The Impact of Information Technology Investments on Firm Performance and Evaluation: Evidence from Newly Industrialized Economies. Information Systems Research, 9(1), 85-98. Toraskar, K. V., & Lee, P. C. B. (2006). A Contextualist Approach to the Development of E-Commerce Education: An Analysis of Key Issues and Challenges. Journal of Information Technology Management, 17(2), 1-12. Trauth, E. M. (2001). The Pursuit of Information Technology in Context. Keynote Address, Australasian Conference on Information Systems Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/g/m/gms/cis/old-cis/oldwebiste/05/eileentrauth/Publications/The%20Pursuit%20of%20Information%20Technology%20in%20Context.pdf Trott, P., Cordey-Hayes, M., & Seaton, R. (1995). Inward Technology Transfer as an Interactive Process. Technovation, 15(1), 25-43. Tuten, E. M. (2006). A Case Study of the Perceived Decision-making Practices and Patterns of Secondary Administrators Using Four Scenarios. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of South Florida. Van Horne, J. C. (1995). Financial Management and Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Waema, T., & Walsham, G. (1990). Information Systems Strategy Formation in a Developing Country Bank. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 38(4), 393-407. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Chichester: John Wille & Sons. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74-81. Walsham, G., & Waema, T. (1994). Information Systems Strategy and Implementation: A Case Study of a Building Society. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 150-173. Weill, P., & Olson, M. H. (1988). Investment in Information Technology and Organizational Performance (Working Paper IS-88-22). Center for Digital Economy Research, Stern School of Business. Willcocks, L., & Lester, S. (1991). Information systems Investments: Evaluation at the Feasibility Stage of Projects. Technovation, 11(5), 283-302. Willcocks, L., & Lester, S. (1994). Evaluating the Feasibility of Information Systems Investments: Recent UK Evidence and New Approach. In L. Willcocks (Ed.), Information Management: The Evaluation of Information Systems Investments (pp. 49-77). London: Chapman & Hall. Wilson, M., & Howcroft, D. (2000). The Politics of IS Evaluation: A Social Shaping Perspective. Paper presented at the The 21th International Conference on Information System, Queensland, Australia. Wu, L. C., & Ong, C. S. (2008). Management of Information Technology Investment: A Framework based on a Real Options and Mean-Variance Theory Perspective. technovation, 28, 122-134. Yamamoto, M. (1997). Strategic Decisions and Corporate Governance in Japan. In V. Papadakis & P. Barwise (Eds.), Strategic Decisions (pp. 145-161). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage. Yorukoglu, M. (1998). The Information Technology Productivity Paradox. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(2), 551-592. Zemsky, R., Wegner, G. R., & MASSY, W. F. (2005). Today’s Colleges Must be Market Smart and Mission Centered. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(45), B6. Zingler, T. (2005). Meet Tony Zingler, Mercury's New President and Chief Operating Officer. Business Technology Optimization (BTO) News. Retrieved from http://us.mercurybtonews.com/e_article000361304.cfm?x=b11,0,w Zona, J. J. (2005). Competitive Strategy: Understanding Investment Decision-making in Higher Education. Unpublishd Ph.D Thesis, Boston College. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23199 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來，企業為了維持與提升競爭優勢，紛紛引進資訊科技。由於投資金額愈來愈高，資訊科技投資決策過程益受學術界與實務界關注。已往資訊科技投資決策文獻強調理性決策，探討如何以投資財務收益做為決策指標。然而，調查文獻指出，約有一半的資訊科技投資決策受到情境因素影響，並未以財務收益為決策主要考量。因此，本研究採用情境架構，以一個教育機構為個案研究對象，探討資訊科技投資決策過程。
本研究發現，資訊科技投資決策之本質係為投資決策團隊，對於資訊科技投資本身之詮釋。此外，本研究顯示資訊科技倡導者和資訊科技文化影響資訊科技投資決策過程，並具有關鍵性影響力。本文理論貢獻在於將情境架構應用於資訊科技投資決策過程；對於實務貢獻則是建議組織應重視資訊科技倡導者和資訊科技文化之孕育，以確保預期之投資決策結果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study endeavors to understand the decision-making process on information technology investment in the context of the educational sector. Much research regarding IT investment emphasizes the financial and operational of decision-making, there has been relatively little research concerning how contextual factors influence the IT investment decision-making process. In attempt to address this research gap, this study employs a contextualist approach to investigate how an educational institution does in practice when making IT investment decisions.
Research findings suggest that the nature of decision-making in an IT investment can be described as an interpretation by project teams. Furthermore, the study revealed the influence of an IT champion and the force of an IT culture during the IT decision-making process. The theoretical contribution arises from extending contextualist approach to the field of decision-making on IT investment. The practical contribution lies in illustrating the importance of IT champions and IT culture in the decision-making. Empirically, this study has significant value for MIS researchers by highlighting the contextual issues that affect the decision-making on IT investments. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:47:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-F86722053-1.pdf: 1335971 bytes, checksum: a7154377fca2988c53fa213119033a21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | APPROVAL FOR SUCCESSFUL DEFENSE I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT V ABSTRACT VII CONTENTS XI LIST OF TABLES XV LIST OF FIGURES XVII CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Motivation and Scope of the Study 3 1.2 Definition of IT Investment 6 1.3 The Significance of Decision-Making on IT Investment 8 1.4 Research of Decision-Making on IT Investment 12 1.5 Objective of the Study 15 1.6 Overview of the Research Design 16 1.7 Organization of the Study 18 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 20 2.1 Rational Perspective 21 2.1.1 Capital Investment Analysis Techniques (CIAT) Approach 21 2.1.2 Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Approach 23 2.1.3 Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Approach 30 2.1.4 Real Options Analysis Approach 32 2.1.5 Instinct Approach 34 2.1.6 A Brief Summary of Rational Perspective 35 2.2 Non-Rational Perspective 36 2.2.1 Act of Faith Approach 37 2.2.2 Contextual Approach 38 2.2.3 A Brief Summary of the Non-Rational Perspective 42 2.3 Limitations of the Rational Perspective 43 2.3.1 Difficulty in Identifying Costs and Benefits 44 2.3.2 Neglect in Interpreting Context 45 2.4 Research Questions 46 2.5 Summary 49 CHAPTER THREE: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 51 3.1 Concept of a Contextualist Framework 52 3.1.1 Context 54 3.1.2 Content 55 3.1.3 Process 56 3.2 Applications of Contextualist Frameworks in MIS 57 3.2.1 Information Technology Strategy 58 3.2.2 Evaluation of Information Technology 59 3.2.3 Implementation of Information Technology 64 3.2.4 Security Policy of Information Technology 65 3.3 Synthesized Conceptual Framework 67 3.4 Summary 69 CHAPTER FOUR: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 71 4.1 Positivist vs. Interpretive Research in Information Systems 72 4.1.1 The Positivist Approach 73 4.1.2 The Interpretive Approach 74 4.1.3 The Choice of Interpretive Approach 76 4.2 Research Strategy 79 4.2.1 Case Studies 81 4.2.2 Research Design 84 4.3 Summary 91 CHAPTER FIVE: CASE STUDY 93 5.1 Case Study Background 94 5.1.1 The Background of CAMELOT 94 5.1.2 A History of IT Investment at CAMELOT 98 5.1.3 Delivery of Integrated Service Systems (ISS) Project 102 5.2 Case Study: ISS Project 105 5.2.1 Subproject One: Learning Service Management System (LSMS) 106 5.2.2 Subproject Two: Membership Management System (MMS) 109 5.2.3 Subproject Three: Virtual Community Management Systems (VCMS) 114 5.2.4 Themes from the Case Study 116 5.3 Summary 121 CHAPTER SIX: DISCUSSION 123 6.1 The Nature of the IT Investment Decision-Making Process 124 6.1.1 A Response to the Nature of the Educational Sector 125 6.1.2 An Effect of Successful Experience in Development of IT Projects 126 6.1.3 An Advocacy of IT Champions 128 6.2 The Force of an IT Culture 132 6.3 Summary 137 CHAPTER SEVEN: CONCLUSION 139 7.1 Overview of the Dissertation 140 7.2 Research Contributions 143 7.2.1 Theoretical Contribution 144 7.2.2 Practical Contribution 145 7.3 Limitations of the Study 145 7.3.1 Research Approach Limitations 146 7.3.2 Research Method Limitations 147 7.4 Suggestions for Further Research 148 7.5 Summary 149 BIBLIOGRAPHY 151 APPENDIX A: INTERVEW PROTOCOL 167 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 詮釋性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊科技決策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊科技投資 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 決策過程 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 個案研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情境架構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Interpretive Approach | en |
| dc.subject | Case Study | en |
| dc.subject | Information Technology Investment | en |
| dc.subject | IT Decisions | en |
| dc.subject | Contextualist Approach | en |
| dc.subject | Decision-making Process | en |
| dc.title | 從情境架構探討一個教育機構資訊科技投資 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Case Study on IT Investment Decision-Making in the Educational Sector: A Contextualist Perspective | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 許瑋元(Carol Hsu) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許士軍(Paul Hsu),陳海鳴(Haiming Chen),沈佩蒂(Pei-Di Shen),翁崇雄(Chorng-Shyong Ong) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資訊科技投資,資訊科技決策,決策過程,情境架構,詮釋性研究,個案研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Information Technology Investment,IT Decisions,Decision-making Process,Contextualist Approach,Interpretive Approach, Case Study, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 169 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。