Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 建築與城鄉研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23087
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳亮全
dc.contributor.authorHui-Jung Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳慧蓉zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T04:41:17Z-
dc.date.copyright2011-08-19
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.submitted2011-08-16
dc.identifier.citation中文部分
張承漢(1994)《社會組織與社會關係》台北,幼獅。
張苙雲(1986)《組織社會學》台北,三民。
吳杰穎等人(2006)《災害管理學辭典》。台北:五南。
高淑清(2008)《質性研究的18堂課─首航初探之旅》高雄:麗文文化。
楊懋春(1983)《鄉村社會學》台北:正中。
蔡宏進(1989)《鄉村社會學》台北:三民。
劉建芳編(2009)《甲仙鄉志》。高雄:甲仙鄉公所。
蔡必焜、王俊豪(2003)《社會資本與永續社區發展:觀念探討與研究議題》〈台灣鄉村社會學會〉,台北:台灣農業推廣學會。
蔡宏進(1993)〈鄉村文化與社區發展台灣農村文化研討會─楊懋春教授九秩冥誕紀念〉,台北:楊懋春貞德紀念基金會。
蔡宏進、林秀雲(2004)〈影響鄉村社區志工參與農業及鄉村建設意願因素之研究(93農科-164-輔-#1(10)):行政院農委會。
蔡明哲(1993)《楊懋春教授的鄉村社會學思想:新人文主義的觀點》台北:楊懋春貞德紀念基金會。
鄭傳貴(2007)《社會資本與農村社區發展:以贛東項村為例》上海:學林出版社。
鄭宗枚(2002)《鄉村社區組織間關係之研究─以新港文教基金會為例》。國立臺灣大學農業推廣學研究所碩士論文。
鍾俊宏(2006)《社區網絡與社會資本形成之探討─以桃米坑生態村為例》。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
魏雅蘭(2001)《本土性防災社區形成要素之探討--以長青、龍安、蜈蚣社區為例》國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
網路資料
陳淑惠(2010)〈災後災民長期心理輔導�災後歷程的心理反應〉。台北:臺灣災害管理學會。[Online]Available:http://www.dmst.org.tw/filemanage/download/9_20100423Lecture.pdf。
行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建委員會(2010)〈公告劃定高雄縣甲仙鄉西安村和南巷(1~5鄰)等14處為莫拉克颱風災後特定區域範圍〉《行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建委員會》。[Online]Available:http://download-88floodwwwgovtw/special_list/special_listhtml。
甲仙區戶政事務所(2009)〈高雄市甲仙區各村里現住人口數按性別及年齡分〉。高雄:甲仙區戶政事務所。
行政院農委會水保局(2010)〈行政院農業委員會公報〉(農授水保字第0991879946號)《行政院公報資訊網》。[Online]Available:http://gazettenatgovtw/EG_FileManager/eguploadpub/eg016092/ch07/type3/gov62/num24/Eghtm。
行政院農委會水保局(2010)。〈重大土石流災情〉《莫拉克風災水土保持防災及農村復健資訊網》[Online]Available:http://88floodswcbgovtw/content/indexasp?m=1&m1=37&m2=385。
經濟部公告(經授水字第09920201370號)(2010)行政院公報資訊網[Online]Available:http://gazettenatgovtw/EG_FileManager/eguploadpub/eg016021/ch04/type3/gov31/num7/Eghtm
行政院主計處(2005)〈農林漁牧普查〉。《行政院主計處》[Online]Available:http://wwwdgbasgovtw/ctasp?xItem=18721&ctNode=3279
謝 佳(2010)〈台灣老化指數創新高 每10人有1老人〉。《大紀元》,[Online]Available:http://wwwepochtimescom/b5/10/1/23/n2796604htm。
甲仙鄉公所(2010)〈大田村〉。[Online]Available:http://www.jiashian.gov.tw/style/front001/bexfront.php?sid=1464997481(2010/4/30)。
甲仙鄉公所(2010)〈和安村〉[Online]Available:http://www.jiashian.gov.tw/style/front001/bexfront.php?sid=1766701076(2010/5/3)。
經濟部(2010)〈經授水字第09920201370號 〉[Online]Available:http://gazette.nat.gov.tw/EG_FileManager/eguploadpub/eg016021/ch04/type3/gov31/num7/Eg.htm(2010/5/1)。
英文部分
Antonucci, T. C. (1985). Personal Characristics, Social Support and Social Behavior. In R. H. Binstock & E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of aging and social science (2nd ed., pp. 94-128). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). Social network in adult life and a preliminary examination of the covoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 519-527.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
Buckle, P. (2006). Assessing Social Resilience. In P. D. J. D. (Ed.), Disaster reilience: an intergrated approach: Charles C. Thomas.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Equity and Achievement in Education. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge,MA: Belknap Press.
Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and Private Schools: the impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
Coleman, J. S., et al. (1982). High School Achievement: public, Catholic and public schools compared. New York: Basic Books.
Dynes, R. R. (2005). Community Social Capital as the Primary Basis for Resilience. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
Eckenrode, J., & Liebkind, K. (1990). The process and outcome of mobilizing social support. In S. Duck & R. C. Silver (Eds.), Personal Relationships and social support (pp. 83-103). London: Sage.
Eranen, L., & Lebkind, K. (1993). Coping with Disaster: the helping behavoir of communities and individuals. In J. P. W. B. Rapheal (Ed.), Internaitonal Handbook of Traumatic Stress Syndroms (pp. 957-964). New York: Plenum Press.
Field, J. (2008). From Metaphor to Concept. Social Capital (pp. 13-47). Abingdon: Routledge.
Foster, K. A. (2006). A case study approach to understanding regional resilience: Institute of urban regional development, University of California.
Green, G. P., & Haines, A. (2008). Social Capital: building trust, norms and network Asset building & community development (pp. 109-112). Los Angeles Sage Publications.
Hayashi, N., Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Reciprocity, Trust and the Sence of Control. Rationality and Society, 11(1), 27-26.
Herreros, F. (2004). The Concept of Social Capital The Problem of Forming Social Capital: why trust? (pp. 5-18). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Homeland Security (2008). National Response Framework. Washington: Homeland Security. [Online]Available: www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-core.pdf (Retrieved August 9, 2011)
House, J., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293-318.
Jones, K. (1996). Trust as an Affective Attitude. Ethics, 107(1), 4-25.
Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. (1995). In Search of Altruistic Community: patterns of social support mobolization after Hurricane Hugo. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(4), 447.
Kessler, R. C., McLeod, J. D., & Wethington, E. (1985). The cost of caring: A perspective on the relationship between sex and psychological distress. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social Support: Theory, research and application (pp. 491-506). The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.
Kimura, R. (2007). Recovery and Reconstruction Calender. Journal of Disaster Research, 2(6), 465-474.
Lanzara, G. F. (1983). Ephemral Organizations in Extreme Environments: Emergence, Strategy, Extinction. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 71-95.
Lin, N., & Erickson, B. H. (2008). Theory, Measurement, and the Research Enterprise on Social Capital. In N. Lin, Erickson, B. H. (Ed.), Social Capital: an International Research Program (pp. 1-24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Altruistic Trust. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayunga, J. S. (2007). Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: A capital-based approach. Paper presented at the the summer academy for social vulnerability and resilience building, 22 - 28 July 2007.
Murphy, B. L. (2007). Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency managment. Nature Hazards, 41, 297-315.
Newman, L., & Dale, A. (2005). Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: a reaponse to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society, 10(1), r2.
Parker, D. J., & Handmer, J. W. (1998). The Role of Unofficial Flood Warning Systems. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6(1), 45-60.
Perry, J., Hawkins, R., & Neal, D. (1983). Giving and Receiving Aid. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1, 171-188.
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001). Social Capital and the Environment. World Development, 29(2), 209-227.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. (1996). Who Killed America. Prospect, 7(24), 66-72.
Quarantelli, E. L. (1995). Emergent behavior and groups in the crisis time of disaster. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
Quarantelli, E. L., & Dynes, R. R. (1977). Response to Social Crisis and Disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 3, 23-49.
Schaefer, R. T. (2004). Social interaction, groups and social structure Sociology matters Boston McGraw-Hill.
Singer, J. E., Baum, C. S., Baum, A., & Thew, B. D. (1982). Mass psychological illness: The case for social comparison. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vaux, A. (1988). Social Support: Theory, research and intervention. New York: Preager.
Weller, J. M., and Quarantelli, E. L. (1973). Neglected characteristics of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 665-685.
World Bank (unknown). Measuring the Dimensions of Social Capital. Social Capital. [Online] Available: http://go.worldbank.org/TC9QT67HG0 (Retrieved July 31, 2011)
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23087-
dc.description.abstract民國九十八年八月的莫拉克颱風引進強勁的西南氣流,連日豪雨使甲仙鄉發生嚴重災情,下游的各村更因為堰塞湖的洪水七個孤島。本研究延續1968年 Quarantelli 與 Dynes對於緊急應變組織類型的探討,研究甲仙的三個村莊在等待外援的過程中,社區臨時發展出的集體行動。研究方法採用深入訪談蒐集社區的緊急應變過程與災前、災後社會資本狀態,以歸納集體行動的模式以及其與社會資本的關聯。
結果發現,在社區的層次上,由於災時的急迫性以及居民對於社會規範(維持秩序與公平性)的遵守與互惠行為的信任,會發展出搜救、開路、共享資源或集中分發物資的集體行動。不過其運作模式可粗分為兩種:第一種是社區組織災前並不強勢,災時的行動並無明顯核心,直接在鄰里中形成零星的臨時型組織。第二種是由社區組織轉變的延伸型組織為核心,向外在鄰里中擴充成為具有核心的臨時型組織。第二種模式的社區由於社區組織居中運作,後期較趨向於制度化,而且災後社區的凝聚力增強。但第一種模式的社區,沒有組織可以承接共患難時累積的社會資本,日久力量就消散了。由此可見集體行動模式受到災前社會資本的影響,同時也往後影響了災後社會資本的累績。
台灣鄉村社會潛藏的價值觀、規範、信任與綿密的社會網絡是珍貴社會資本。它的確對於應變時的動員型態有影響,尤其是社區組織,它不僅在緊急應變時具有應用的潛力,也較能將社會資本繼續累積。由此觀點來看,社區營造活動對於社區防災具有社會性的意義,而防災的準備也應該結合社區組織以利災時集體行動的運作與災後的發展。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractSouthern Taiwan was stroked by the extraordinarily heavy rainfall of Typhoon Morakot in August 2009. A serious problem was when transportation and communication had been cut off, communities were isolated. Conventional response system relies highly on external rescue and relief organizations rather than local groups. However communities did possess some power to cope with emergencies. Moreover, from the reaction of communities, we did see some positive effects on the societal aspect brought by disasters.
According to Quarantelli and Dynes (1968), there are four types of organized behavior in response to disaster, namely established, expanded, extended and emergent. For the sake of getting detailed comprehension of the interaction between the modes of mobilization and social capital in community level, Jiaxian’s experience in Typhoon Morakot is chosen to be the case to study. The collective actions of three villages before, during and after the disaster are invested by interview, second-hand data collection and participatory observation.
The analysis shows that in community level, rescue, path-clearing, resources-sharing and grocery distribution actions were capable. Extended and emergent organizations were the main forms of mobilization. The basic mode is emergent organization composed by neighborhood. More advanced is the mixture of extended and emergent organization- Community Development Association as the center of mobilization with neighborhood’s assistance. Besides the shared values of altruism and solidarity, organization-generated social capital before disaster was also the condition that triggers collective activities. If a village accumulated more social capital before disaster, the chance to develop the advanced mode would be higher. When the mode is formed, the positive societal effect in emergency response would be more likely to maintain while recovering.
This research shows that the hidden value, social norms, trust and compact network are precious social capital in Taiwan’s rural society. It is associated with the mode of mobilization that a community adopts in emergency. Especially the effect of Community Development Association is undeniable. It not only plays an important role in emergency response but helps accumulating social capital afterwards. From this point of view, participatory community empowerment is valuable in a community-based disaster management. It is better to make use of extended organizations for the benefit of emergent mobilization and further development.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:41:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-100-R97544012-1.pdf: 4097001 bytes, checksum: f5ec06a6c63052b69085ddd24b576fbb (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011
en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝誌 i
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 相關文獻 2
第三節 研究問題與研究目的 20
第四節 研究範圍 21
第二章 研究設計與方法 23
第一節 方法論的選擇 23
第二節 研究方法 23
第三節 研究對象的取樣 25
第四節 研究資料分析方法 26
第三章 大田、和安與關山村之社區與災害行動經驗 28
第一節 甲仙鄉概述 28
第二節 大田村之社區與災害行動經驗 31
第三節 和安村之社區與災害行動經驗 48
第四節 關山村之社區與災害行動經驗 62
第五節 小結 76
第四章 社會資本對集體行動之影響及其延續性 84
第一節 社區應變集體行動的社會性正面效果 84
第二節 促成應變集體行動之因素探討 90
第三節 社會資本與集體行動模式的交互作用 99
第四節 小結 110
第五章 結論與建議 112
第一節 結論 112
第二節 後續研究建議 114
參考文獻 117
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject孤島效應zh_TW
dc.subject緊急動員zh_TW
dc.subject社區zh_TW
dc.subject社會資本zh_TW
dc.subject集體行動zh_TW
dc.subjectsocial capitalen
dc.subjectmobilization in emergencyen
dc.subjectcollective behavioren
dc.subjecteffect of islandingen
dc.subjectcommunityen
dc.title災後應變集體行動與社會資本之運作
─八八風災高雄縣甲仙鄉三個社區之經驗
zh_TW
dc.titleInteraction of Collective Behavior and Social Capital in Disaster Response
-The Experiences of Three Communities in Jiaxian Township
Kaohsiung County After Typhoon Morakot
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear99-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉可強,曾旭正
dc.subject.keyword緊急動員,社會資本,集體行動,孤島效應,社區,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordmobilization in emergency,social capital,collective behavior,effect of islanding,community,en
dc.relation.page123
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2011-08-16
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept建築與城鄉研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:建築與城鄉研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-100-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
4 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved