請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22908完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳學良 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wan-Chi Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳琬琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:33:04Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻:
莊正民,2006,信任機制與企業聯盟關係之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題(編號:NSC94-2416-H309-005)。 洪志岳,2005,跨足海外-業界盼策略聯盟,營建知訊,273:60-66。 陳家聲,2003,影響國際企業技術移轉之關鍵因素,行政院國家科學委員會專題(編號:NSC91-2416-H002-045)。 余文德,2004,台灣營建專案管理之現況與展望,台灣專案管理雜誌,創刊號:24-33。 英文文獻: Atuahene-Gima, K., 1995, “An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(4):275-293. Beamish, P.W., & Killing, J.P., 1997, Cooperative Strategies, San Francisco: New Lexington Press. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N., 2001, “Unleash Innovation in Foreign Subsidiaries”, Harvard Business Review, 79(3):131-137. Bolton, G.E., Katoka, E., &Ockenfels, A., 2005, “Cooperation among Strangers with Limited Information about Reputation”, Journal of Public Economics, 89(8):1457-1468. Bradley, R.M., 2005, “Survival of International Civil Engineering Consultancies: The Need to Adjust to Reality”, Leadership and Management in Engineering, 5(4):82-86. Bremmer, I., 2005, “Managing Risk in an Unstable World”, Harvard Business Review, 83(6):51-60. Burchell, B., & Wilkinson, F., 1997, “Trust, Business Relationships and the Contractual Environment”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21(2):217-237. Chen, C., 2005, Entry Strategies for International Construction Markets, unpublished doctoral thesis, Pennsylvania State University. Cowan, R., Jonard, N., & Zimmermann, J., 2007, “Bilateral Collaboration and the Emergence of Innovation Networks”, Management Science, 53(7):1051-1067. Coviello, N. E., & Martin, K.A.M., 1999, “Internationalization of Service SMEs: An Integrated Perspective from the Engineering Consulting Sector”, Journal of International Marketing, 7(4):42-66. Crosthwaite, D., 2000, “The Global Construction Market: A Cross -Sectional Analysis”, Construction Management & Economics, 18(5):619-627. Dacin, M.T., Hitt, M.A., & Levitas, E., 1997, “Selecting Partners for Successful International Alliances: Examination of U.S. and Korean Firms”, Journal of World Business, 32(1):3-16. Das, T.K., & Teng, B.S., 2000, “A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances”, Journal of Management, 26(1):31-62. Dunning, J. H., 1988, “The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions”, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1):1-31. Ellis, P., 2000, “Social Ties and Foreign Market Entry”, Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3):443-469. Farrell, D., 2004, “Beyond Offshoring: Assess Your Company’s Global Potential”, Harvard Business Review, 82(12):82-90. Ghemawat, P., 2003, “The Forgotten Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, 81(11):76-84. Goerzen, A., 2007, “Alliance Networks and Firm Performance: the Impact of Repeated Partnerships”, Strategic Management Journal, 28(5):487-509. Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C., 1990, “An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode”, Strategic Management Journal, 11(2):117-128. Hitt, M.A., Dacin, M.T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J., & Borza, A., 2000, “Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives”, Academy of Management Journal, 43(3):449-467. Inkpen, A.C., & Beamish, P.W., 1997, “Knowledge, Bargaining Power, and the Instability of International Joint Ventures”, Academy of Management Review, 22(1):177-202. Jensen, M., & Roy, M., 2008, “Staging Exchange Partner Choices: When do Status and Reputation Matter?”, Academy of Management Journal, 51(3):495-516. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K., 1997, “Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets”, Harvard Business Review, 75(4):41-51. Koehler, J.W., & Pankowski, J.M., 1996, Teams in Government: a Handbook for Team-Based Organizations, Florida: St. Lucie Press. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M., 1998, “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 19(5):461-477. Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M.A., & Ireland, R.D., 2008, “Friends, Acquaintances, or Strangers? Partner Selection in R&D Alliances”, Academy of Management Journal, 51(2):315-334. Li, Y., Nie, X., & Chen, S., 2007, “Fuzzy Approach to Prequalifying Construction Contractors”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(1):40-49. Lu, J.W., & Beamish, P.W., 2001, “The Internationalization and Performance of SMEs”, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7):565-586. Macy, M.W., & Skvoretz, J., 1998, “The Evolution of Trust and Cooperation between Strangers: A Computational Model”, American Sociological Review, 63(5):638-660. Markides, C. C., & Williamson, P. J., 1994, “Related Diversification, Core Competences and Corporate Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 15:149-165. Normann, R, & Ramírez, R., 1993, “From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, 71(4):65-77. Parkhe, A., 1998, “Understanding Trust in International Alliances”, Journal of World Business, 33(3):219-240. Patton, M.Q., 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Method, California: Sage Publication. Porter, M.E., 1980, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: Free Press. Quick, T.L., 1992, Successful Team Building, New York: American Management Association. Shah, R.H., & Swaminathan, V., 2008, “Factors Influencing Partner Selection in Strategic Alliances: the Moderating Role of Alliance Context”, Strategic Management Journal, 29(5):471-494. Sullivan, D., 1994, “Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm”, Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2):325-342. Teece, D.J., 1977, “Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How”, Economic Journal, 87(346):242-261. Wang, W. C., 2002, “SIM-UTILITY: Model for Project Ceiling Price Determination”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(1):76-84. Zucker, L., 1986, “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure 1840-1920”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 6:53-111. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22908 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣工程顧問公司以及營造商,在90年代以後台灣本地公共工程數量大減,國際組織支持開發中國家新興民生工程,新興市場大力推動新建設等,面臨三方壓力下,國內土木營建業踏出了國際大門。在於與歐美日等進步廠商的學習,並思考公司本身國際化策略需求,在面對不同的國際金援資助方(如世界銀行、亞洲開發銀行等)要求國際合作以提升開發中國家之技術水準,國內廠商紛紛祭出不同策略,以應付來自世界各地的合作廠商,須克服來自不同文化背景、管理制度等兩方差異問題,以期達成工程目標,避免本身利潤損失、工期延宕,並希望借由雙方的合作學習成長。
本研究對象為工程營建業廠商,其原因為營建業多以專案型態承包工程,其工程時期長。長時間的合作下,無論是合作內部產生的問題或者外部問題,造成兩方間的摩擦,在於觀察察兩方對於爭議下的處理方式與態度。在於土木營建業,常見之上下游合作外,平行合作的案例亦常見,特別在於互補性學習,因而亦值得探討。世界組織在於注挹於開發中國家,亦希望可以協助開發中國家基礎工程公司提升其工程品質,因而在此一形態下的平行廠商合作扶持成長,是為特有現象。 目前台灣甲級營造廠約有1500家,工程顧問業約有600家廠商。新成立廠商多以國際案件做為努力目標,舊有廠商無論是工程顧問公司(如三中、亞新等)或者營建廠(大陸、達欣等)對於國際市場也躍躍欲試。台灣在於1980年代重大公共建設興建,由歐美日等進步國家廠商帶來新技術和經驗的學習,將此經驗於現今進入開發中新興市場。本研究特別針對剛進入新市場之廠商的行為以及合作模式做一研究,特別對於中小型企業欲進入新市場面對不同的合作對象做一討論。統整台灣廠商於國內外市場案例,以及不同國際廠商經驗,希望為進入國際市場之新廠商做一前車之鑑。 研究以個案研究深入討論找出廠商在國際合作所遇到的問題,其合作經驗找出合作相處造成雙方愉快合作的因素,其中工程合作方式,有策略聯盟、專案合作、合資公司、轉包等等,為來源國不同的廠商合作。本研究依照文獻中提出的信任型態,提出理性信任和感性信任對於合作關係的解釋,並探討其對績效之影響。 研究中發現,外在條件因素之影響,如市場變數:當地競爭、市場風險、差異性等,經由外在整體因素評估,所建立之理性信任;而另外一方面,內部化條件,如策略因素、當地長期發展、技術移轉、整體策略、雙方管理差異等,在於廠商合作互動中,以期建立感性信任。 並發現長期相處建立感性信任下,可以跨越某些外在條件不配適因素造成的問題。而累積國際化經驗公司,在於長期與不同廠商合作經驗下,應歸納出一套理性評估方式,以避免任何不可預知的因素造成合作雙方間不適任發生。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Since 1990, construction firms in Taiwan have become more global in the pursuit of opportunity in emerging countries because of the decline of domestic infrastructure demands, financial support to developing countries of international organizations, new developing in emerging countries, and etc. In the face of different international funding agencies, as World Bank or Asian Developing Bank, firms are called for international cooperation with local firms in developing countries. It is to upgrade of the local technology level. The partner firms with different background encounter a number of problems during the project. All of them search for good performances, as working on schedule, making profit, and learning from each others.
The study of engineering firms, it causes for cooperation with project and long time period of each one. It is different from manufacturing cooperation with short period cooperation and high frequency repeat. The parallel relationship is also regular cooperation type, especially in international aid project. Whether of the two side friction or engineering problem in the project, we observe the dispute and solutions in the period, and hope to find out the key point of the cooperation. There are thousands of construction SMEs in Taiwan, and they are interested in internationalization. They eagerly learned from the developed firms in 1980s, and now they transfer their knowledge to emerging market. We study in cooperation with strangers, and learn from the new international firms with different behavior and cooperation model. Research in case study in depth interviews finds out the successful models and factors. Several patterns in our study are strategy alliance, project cooperation, joint venture company, joint venture project, and etc. The cooperation with firms come from different countries are presented in culture conflicts. We find our two important trust types in cooperation. Cognition-based trust is influenced in outside factors, and affect-based trust is in inside factors. Both of them influence performance in different ways. It is found that good interactive between partners build up affect-based trust, the trust go over unfit of outside factors. Firms with more and more cooperation experience should learn from it, and set up the assessment rule to partners in order to ease the problem in cooperation period. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:33:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96724045-1.pdf: 1095824 bytes, checksum: 8cfbc442f6324d6a9c861a61f500179f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 ii
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 x 第1章 緒論 1 第2章 文獻探討 4 2.1 國際化文獻探討 4 2.2 營造業進軍國際化 7 2.3 合作信任 12 2.4 專案合作和陌生合作 14 第3章 研究方法 16 3.1 研究設計 16 3.2 文獻調查 16 3.3 公司國際化以及整體發展策略 16 3.4 個案研究 18 3.5 個案資料 20 3.6 合作關鍵 29 第4章 探討與實務分析 32 4.1 合作關係的探討 32 4.2 實務討論 35 4.2.1 事前評估 35 4.2.2 合作互動 41 4.2.3 互動學習 45 4.2.4 學習效果 45 第5章 結論與建議 47 5.1 研究結論與命題 47 5.2 未來研究建議 49 參考文獻 51 附錄一 訪談大綱 56 附錄二 個案訪談對象表 59 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 國際合作 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 陌生合作 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 信任類型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 營建業國際化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 專案合作 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | International cooperation | en |
| dc.subject | trust type | en |
| dc.subject | internationalization of construction firm | en |
| dc.subject | unfamiliar cooperation | en |
| dc.subject | project cooperation | en |
| dc.title | 營建業國際合作案之成功因素探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Key Successful Factors of International Cooperation of Taiwanese Construction Firms | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 荷世平,許耀文 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 國際合作,信任類型,陌生合作,專案合作,營建業國際化, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | International cooperation,unfamiliar cooperation,project cooperation,trust type,internationalization of construction firm, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 59 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.07 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
