請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22904完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝德宗(Hsieh Der-Tzon) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wen-Chiun Ing | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 應文逡 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:32:54Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] Ackert, L. F., Y. S. Tina. 1998. “The introduction of Toronto index participation units and arbitrage opportunities in the Toronto 35 index option market.” Journal of Derivatives 5 (4), 44-53.
[2] Berndt, E. K., B. H. Hall, R. E. Hall, and J. A. Hausman. 1974. “Estimation and inference in nonlinear structural models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 4, 53-665. [3] Bhar, R. 2001. “Return and Volatilaty Dynamics in the Spot and Futures Markets in Australia: An Intervention Analysis in a Bivariate EGARCH-X Framework.” Journal of Futures Markets 21, 833-850. [4] Billingsley, R.S., and D.M. Chance. 1985. “Options Market Efficiency and The Box Spread Strategy.” The Financial Review 20, 287-301. [5] Black, F. and M. Scholes. 1973. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy 81, 637-659. [6] Bollerslev, T. 1986. “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Financial Economics 31, 307-327. [7] Brennan, M.J., and E. S. Schwartz. 1990. “Arbitrage in Stock Index Futures,” Journal of Business, 63:S7-S31. [8] Chance, D. M. 1986. “Empirical Tests of the Pricing of Index Call Option.” Advances in Futures and Options Research 1, 141-166. [9] Chance, D. M. 1987. “Parity Tests of The Pricing Index Options,” Advances in Futures and Options Research 2, 47-64. [10] Chatrath A., C. David, K. Dhanda and T. Koch. 2002. ”Index Futures Leadership, Basis Behavior and Trader Selectivity.” The Journal of Futures Market 22, 649-677. [11] Chiang, Raymond, Richard Ho, and Eric Wong. 1993. “Hang Seng Index Option: The Efficiency of a New Market.” working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong. [12] Chung, P.Y. 1991. “A Transactions Data Test of Stock Index Futures Market Efficiency and Index Arbitrage Profitability.” Journal of Finance 46, 1791-1809. [13] Cornell, B., and K. R. French. 1993. “Taxes and the Pricing of Stock Index Futures.” The Journal of Finance 38, 675-694. [14] Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller. 1979. “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427-431. [15] Engle, R. F. 1982. “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation.” Econometrica 50, 987-1007. [16] Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger. 1987. “Co-integration and Error-Correction : Representation, Estimation and Testing.” Econometrica 55, 251-276. [17] Engle, R. F. and K. F. Kroner. 1995 “Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH.” Econometric Theory 11, 122-150. [18] Evnine, J., and A. Rudd. 1985. “Index Option: The Early Evidence.” Journal of Finance 40, 743-758. [19] Fung, J. K. W. and K. C. Chan. 1994. “On the arbitrage-Free Pricing Relationship between Index Futures and Index Option: A note.” Journal of Futures Markets 14, 957-962. [20] Fung, J. K. W. and A. K. W, Fung. 1997. “Mispricing of Index Futures contracts: A Study of Index Futures Versus Index Options.” The Journal of Derivatives, Winter, 37-45. [21] Fung, J. K. W., L. T. W. Cheng and K. C. Chan. 1997. “The Intraday Pricing Efficiency of Hang Seng Index Options and Futures Market.” Journal of Futures Markets 17, 327-331. [22] Fung, J. K. W, and H. M. K. Mok. 2001. “Index Options-Futures Arbitrage: A Comparative Study with Bid/Ask and Transaction Data.” The Financial Review 36 , 71-94. [23] Harris, L., G. Sofianos and J. E. Shapiro. 1994. “Program Trading and Intraday Volatility.” Review of Financial Studies 4, 653-685. [24] Herbst, A. F., J. P. McCormack, and E. N. West. 1987. “Investigation of a Lead-Lag Relationship between Spot Stock Indices and Their Futures Contracts.” The Journal of Futures Markets 7, 4, 373-381. [25] Ho, Y. K., R. Fang, Jimmy Zhenmin and C. K. Woo. 1992. “Intraday Arbitrage Opportunities and Price Behavior of the Hang Seng Index Futures.” The review of Futures Markets 11, 413-430. [26] Johansen, S. 1988. “Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231-254. [27] Johansen, S. 1991. “Estimation and hypotheses in testing of cointegrating vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models.” Econometrica 59, 1551-1580. [28] Kamara, A. and T. W. Miller. 1995. “Daily and Intradaily Tests of European Put-Call Parity.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 4, 519-539. [29] Kawaller, I. G. 1978. “A Note: Debunking the Myth of a Risk-Free Return.” The Journal of Futures Markets 7, 327-331. [30] Kurov A. and D. Lasser. 2004. ”Price Dynamics in the Regular and E-mini Futures Markets.” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis 39, 2, 365-384 [31] Lee, J. H., and N. Nayar. 1993. “A Transactions Data Analysis of Arbitrage between Index Options and Index Futures.” The Journal of Futures Markets 13, 889-902. [32] Lin, Ching-Chung, Shen-Yuan Chen, Dar-yeh Hwang and Chien-Fu Lin. 2002. “Does Index Futures Dominate Index Spot? Evidence from Taiwan Market.” Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies 5, 255-275. [33] MacKinlay, A. C. and Ramaswamy, K. 1998. “Index-Futures Arbitrage and the Behavior of Stock Index Futures Price.” Review of Financial Studies 1, 137-158. [34] Min, J. H. and M. Najand. 1999. 'A Further Investigation of the Lead- Lag Relationship between the Spot Market and Stock Index Futures: Early Evidence from Korea.' The Journal of Futures Markets 19, 217-232. [35] Pizzi, M. A., Economopoulos, A. J. and O'Neill, H. M. 1998. 'An Examination of the Relationship between Stock Index Cash and Futures Markets: A Cointegration Approach.' The Journal of Futures Markets 18, 297-305. [36] Roope, M. and R. Zurbruegg. 2002. ”The Intra-Day Price Discovery Process between the Singapore Exchange and Taiwan Futures Exchange.” The Journal of Futures Market 22, 3, 219-240. [37] Schwarz, T. V. and Laatsch, F. E. 1991. ”Dynamic Efficency and Price Leadership in Stock Index Cash and Futures Markets.” Journal of Futures Markets 14, 2, 147-167. [38] Sofianos, G. 1993. “Index Arbitrage Profitability.” Journal of Derivatives, Fall, 6-20. [39] Sternberg, J. S. 1994. “A Reexamination of Put-Call Parity on Index Futures.” Journal of Futures Markets 14, 79-101. [40] Stoll, H. R. and R. E. Whaley. 1990. “The dynamics of stock index and stock index futures returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, 441-468. [41] Tse, Y. 1999. “Price discovery and volatility spillovers in the DJIA index and futures markets returns.” Journal of Futures Markets 19, 911-930. [42] Tucker, A. L. 1991. Financial Futures, Options, and Swaps. West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN. [43] Yadav, P. K. and Peter F. Pope. 1990. “Stock Index Futures Arbitrage: International Evidence.” The Journal of Futures Markets 10, 573-603. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22904 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究利用台灣卓越 50 指數股票型基金(Taiwan 50 ETF)代替指數現貨作為指數期貨和指數選擇權的套利工具，解決過去使用一籃子股票複製大盤所造成的問題，諸如：高額交易成本、流動性較低等。
本研究實證分析二００九年一月至五月，台指選擇權與台指期貨市場間之套利關係，考量交易成本等因素後，我們發現可套利機會幾乎不存在。 二００三年六月至二００九年六月，ETF 50對指數現貨和ETF 50對指數期貨皆無共整合關係存在。但若取資料二００七年一月至二００九年六月，則存在共整合關係，且ETF 50、指數現貨和指數期貨三者間，除指數期貨對指數現貨外，皆存在Granger因果關係。 最後經由線性迴歸得到1:32的指數期貨對ETF 50 價格變動關係，再取資料二００九年四月至二００九年六月作套利實證得到相當16%年報酬率。若使用財務槓桿，則可得到大約24%年報酬率。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With transaction cost, there’s almost no arbitrage opportunity exists between TAIEX options and futures for non-market makers during the data period of Jan., 2009 to May, 2009.
For ETF 50, futures and TAIEX index, ETF 50-Futures and ETF 50-TAIEX index do not have cointegration relationship for the period of Jun. 30, 2003 to Jun. 30, 2009. However, futures-TAIEX index, ETF 50-Futures and ETF 50-TAIEX index all exist cointegration relationship at 1% significant level for the period of Jan. 1, 2007 to Jun. 30, 2009. ETF 50, futures and TAIEX index all have Granger causality relationship except Future-TAIEX index, Jan. 2007 to Jun. 2009. Linear regression was employed for the best substitute ratio. One unit price of TAIEX futures changes will cause 32 units price change of ETF 50. For arbitrage trade, one contract of futures has to be hedged with 32 contracts of ETF 50. Performing arbitrage trading from Apr. to Jun., 2009, an annual profit rate of around 16% was obtained. If leverage is deployed, then the annual profit rate may go up to ~24%. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:32:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-P93323028-1.pdf: 969789 bytes, checksum: 664760992b5cfdb871eecf4164d13cc0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose of this Study 4 1.3 Thesis Organization 4 Chapter 2 Literature Review 6 Chapter 3 Methodology and Data Source 10 3.1 Data Source 10 3.2 Cost of Carry Model 12 3.3 The Put-Call-Futures Parity Condition 12 3.4 Time series data 14 3.5 Cointegration test 16 3.6 Causality and error correction model 17 3.6.1 Granger causality test 17 3.6.2 Error correction model 18 Chapter 4 Empirical Results 19 4.1 Data Descriptions 19 4.2 Futures vs. Options 21 4.2.1 Transaction Cost 21 4.2.2 Data Analysis 21 4.3 Index vs. Futures 22 4.3.1 Correlations 22 4.3.2 ADF - Unit Root Tests 23 4.3.3 Cointegration 25 4.3.4 Granger causality test 28 4.3.5 ETF 50 substitute ratio for arbitrage 28 4.3.6 Empirical Results for Futures-ETF Arbitrage 30 Chapter 5 Conclusions 33 REFERENCE 35 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 台指現貨、期貨與選擇權之套利研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Arbitrage Study on TAIEX Index, Futures and Options | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何志欽,李顯峰 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 指數,期貨,指數,選擇權,指數,股票型基金,套利, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | index options,index futures,ETF,arbitrage, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 40 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 947.06 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。