請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22867完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林建甫 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shih-Jie Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林士傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:31:21Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-10-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-10-22 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部份
王志誠(2000),「金融控股公司之經營規範與監理機制」,政大法學評論,第64期,153-185。 王甡(1995),「報酬衝擊對條件波動所造成之不對稱效果-臺灣股票市場之實證分析」,證券市場發展季刊,第7卷第1期,125-161。 王毓敏(2004),「台股認購權證交易對於標的股票風險的影響」,台灣金融財務季刊,第五輯第一期,87-103。 李進生與盧陽正(1999),「風險值:觀念與估算方法」,證券金融,第63卷,39-58。 李進生、謝文良、林允永、蔣炤坪、陳達新、盧陽正(2001),《風險管理-風險值(VaR)理論與應用》,清蔚科技股份有限公司出版。 李存修、陳若鈺(2000),「台灣股匯市風險值(VaR)模型之估計、比較與測試」,台灣金融財務季刊,第5期,51-75。 吳淑玲(1997),「漲跌幅限制與不對稱效果對台灣股市波動性之探討-台灣實證分析」,淡江大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。 林建甫(1996),「ARCH族模型估計與檢定的問題」,經濟論文叢刊,第24卷第3期,339-355。 林建甫(2000),「因應金融風暴之風險控管:瞭望公元2000年焦點研究」,國家發展文教基金會。 林建甫、張焯然(1997),「GARCH模型條件變異數結構變動的檢定」,經濟論文,第25卷第2期,201-225。 林華德、王甡(1995),「台灣股市成交量對股價波動的影響:1986-1994 ─ GARCH 修正模型的應用」,企銀季刊,第19卷第2期,40-58。 林楚雄、張簡彰程(2002),「增進歷史模擬法估計風險值準確性之研究」,中山 管理評論,第10卷第3期,497~520。 周大慶、沈大白、張大成、敬永康、柯瓊鳳(2002),《風險管理新標竿-風險值理論與應用》,智勝文化事業有限公司出版。 邱臙珍、莊益源(2005),「亞洲地區風險值模型之績效分析」,風險管理學報,第7卷第1期,5-28。 邱建良、李命志、徐泰瑋(1999),「臺灣股市報酬率波動性行為之探討」,台灣經濟金融月刊,第8卷第2期,24-32。 胥愛琦、吳清豐(2003),「台灣股市報酬與匯率變動之波動性外溢效果-雙變量EGARCH 模型的應用」,台灣金融財務季刊,第4卷第3期,87-103。 徐清俊、林柏宇(2006),「金融控股公司股價報酬波動.性之實證研究」,遠東學報,第20卷第4期,.753-770。 陳春山(1992),「我國推動金融改革及金融控股公司法之成功要素」,台灣經濟金融月刊,第11卷第2期,11-27。 陳文華、王佳貞、吳壽山(1999),「風險值方法之比較」,證券市場發展季刊,第11卷第1期,139-162。 莊益源、林文昌、徐嘉彬、邱臙珍(2003),靜態與動態風險值模型績效之比較,證券市場發展季刊,第15卷第4期,107-159。 張焯然(1994),「財務經濟學實證工具:ARCH 族模型」,國立台灣大學經濟學研 究所未出版論文。 張簡彰程(2001),「增進模擬法估計風險值績效之研究-以台灣股票市場為例」,義守大學管理科學系研究所未出版論文。 許振明(2006),貨幣銀行學(第二版),華泰文化事業股份有限公司。 許振明、黃慕淳(2006),「以因素分析方法對金控銀行與非金控銀行財務之比較」,中央存款保險資訊季刊,第19卷第2期,14-59。 許振明、劉完淳(2002),「近兩年我國銀行的財務績效評估」,存款保險資訊季刊,第16卷第1期,28-35。 彭金隆(2004),《金融控股公司法制監理與經營策略》,台北:智勝文化出版社。 楊育軒 (2003),台、美、日三國股價資訊傳遞之研究,國立台北大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 鍾惠民、吳壽山、周賓凰、范懷文(2002),《財金計量》,台北:雙葉書廊。 英文部份 Andersen, Bollerslev, Diebold, and Ebens, 2001,'The distribution of realized stock return volatility', Journal of Financial Economics, 61 , 43-76 Alexander and Leigh ,1997, 'On the Covariance Metrices Used in Value at Risk Models', Journal of Derivatives, 4 , 50-62. Asch-Haroutounian and Price,2001, 'Volatility in the transition markets of CentralEurope', ,Alied Financial Economics, 93-105. Bailie and DeGennaro,1990, 'Stock Returns and Volatility', Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25, 203-214. Barone-Adesi, Giannopoulos, and Vosper, 1999, 'VaR without Correlations for Portfolios of Derivative Securities', Journal of Futures Markets, 19, 5, 583-602. Beckers,1983, 'Variance of Security Price Return Based on High,Low,and ClosingPrices', Journal of Business,56, 97-112. Beder,1995, 'VAR:Seductive But Dangerous', Financial Analysis Journal, 51,12-24. Bessembinder and Seguin, 1993, 'Price Volatility, Trading Volume, and Market Depth : Evidence from Future Market', Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28, 21-39. Black, 1976,'Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes', Proceeding of the 1976 Meetings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section. American Statistical Association, 177-181. Bollerslev, 1986,'Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity', Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. Bollerslev, Chou and Kroner, 1992, 'ARCH Modeling in Finance', Journal of Econometrics, 52, 5-59. Boudoukh and Whitelaw, 1998, 'Investigation of a Class of Volatility Estimators', Journal of Derivatives, 4, 63-71. Braun, Nelson and Sunier ,1995, 'Good News, Bad News, Volatility, and Betas', Journal of Finance , 50:5, 1575-1603. Christie,1982, 'The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variance: Value,Leverage and Interest Rate Effects', Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 407-432 Danielsson, Jon, and Casper de Vries,1997, 'Value-at-Risk and Extreme Returns',LSE Financial Markets Group Discussion Paper 273,London School of Economics. Dickey and Fuller,1979, 'Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive times series with a unit root', Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431. Dickey and Fuller ,1981, 'Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive timesseries with a unit root', Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072. Duffie and Pan ,1997,'An Overview of Value at Risk', Journal of Derivatives, 4,7-49. Engle,1982, 'Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of theVariance of the United Kingdom Inflation', Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 9,1,27-39. Engle, and Ng ,1993, 'Measuring and Testing the Impact of News onVolatility', Journal of Finance, 48,5, 1749–1778. Engle, Ng, and Rothschild ,1990, 'Asset Pricing with a Factor ARCH Covariance Structure:Empirical Estimates for Treasury Bills', Journal of Econometrics ,45, 213-38. Fornari, and Mele,1997, 'Sign-and volatility-switching ARCH model: Theory and applicational stock markets', Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12 , 49-65. French, Schwert, and Stambaugh,1987, 'Expected Stock Returns and Volatility', Journal of Financial Economics,19, 3-29. Garman and Klass,1980, 'On the Estimation of Security Price Volatility from Historical data', Journal of Business,53,67-78. Golster, Jagannathan and Runkle ,1993,'On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Returns on Stocks', Journal of Finance, 48, 1779-1801. Guermat, and Richerd,2002, 'Robust Conditional Variance Estimation and Value-at-Risk', The Journal of Risk, 4, 2, 25-41. Hafner,1998, 'Estimating High-frequency Foreign Exchange Rate Volatility with Nonparametric ARCH Models', Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 68, 247-69. Hall,1990, 'Using the Bootstrap to Estimate Mean Squared Error and Select Smoothing Nonparametric Problems', Journal of multivariate Analysis, 32, 177-203. Hendricks, 1996,'Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models Using Historical Data', Economic Policy Review, 15,39-70. Hu, Jiang and Tsoukalas,1997, 'The European Exchange Rates Before and After the Establishment of the European Monetary System', Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 7, 235-53. Hull and White, 1998, 'Value at Risk when Daily Changes in Market Variables Are not Normally Distributed', Journal of Derivatives, 5,35-46. Hull, and White, 1998,'Incorporating Volatility Updating into the Historical Simulation Method for Value-at-Risk', Journal of Risk, 1, 5-19. Jackson and Maude,1997, 'Bank Capital and Value at Risk', Journal of Derivatives, 5,73-89. J. P. Morgan, 1996, 'RiskMetrics Technical Document, 4th edition. New York. Jorion ,2000',Value at Risk, The New Benchmark for Controlling Market Risk, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill. Koutmos, G. and M. Tucketr, 1996, 'Temporal Relationships and Dynamices', Journal of Business and Accounting , 26, 227-248 Kupiec,1995, 'Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models', Journal of Derivatives, 3, 73-84. Lamoureux and Lastrapes, 1990, 'Heterskedasticity in Stock Returns Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects', Journal of Finance 45:1, 221-229. Laopodis,1997, 'U.S. Dollar Asymmetry and Exchange Rate Volatility', Journal of Applied Business Research, 13: 1-8. Lobo and Tufte,1998, 'Exchange Rate Volatility:Does Politics Matter? ', Journal of Macroeconomics, 20, 351-365. Mandelbort,1963, 'The variance of Certain Speculative Prices', Journal of Business,36, 394~419. Nelson,1991, 'Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: a new approach', Econometria, 59, 347-370. Ngama,1994, 'Testing for the Presence of Time-Varying Risk Premium Using a Mean-Conditional-Variance Optimization Model', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistic, 56, 189-208. Park, 2001, ' Information Flows Between Non-Deliverable Forward and Spot Markets: Evidence from Korean Currency',Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9, 363-377. Phillips and Perron,1988, 'Testing for a Unit Root in time series regression', Biometrika, 75, 335-346. Poon and Fung , 2000, 'Red chips or H shares which China-backed securities process information the fastest?', Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 10, 315-343. Poon,1994, 'An Empirical Examination of the Return Volatility- Volume Relation in Related Market : The Case of Stock and Options', Financial Review, 29, 473-496. Pritsker ,1997, 'Evaluating Value at Risk Methodologies: Accuracy versus Computational Time', Journal of Financial Services Research, 12, 3, 201-243. Rabemananjara and Zakolin,1993, 'Threshold ARCH Models and Asymmetries in Volatility', Journal of Applied Econometrics ,8, 31-49. Said and Dickey ,1984, 'Testing for Unit Root in Autoregressive- Moving Average Models of Unknown Order', Biometrika, 71, 599-607. Schwert,1989, 'Why does Stock Market Volatility Change over Time?', Journal of Finance, 44, 5, 1115-1153. Schwert, 1990, 'Stock Volatility and the Crash of 87', Review of Financial Studies 3, 77-102. Sentana and Sushil Wadhwani ,1992, 'Feedback Traders and Stock Return Autocorrelations : Evidence From a Century of Daily Data', The Economic Journal, 102, 415-425. Sharpe,1998, ' Morningstar's Risk-Adjusted Ratings', Financial Analyst Journal, , 5,21-33. Vlaar ,2000, 'Value at Risk Models for Dutch Bond Portfolios' , Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 7, 1131-1154. Wang ,2001, 'Equilibrium Adjustment, Basis Risk and Risk:Transmission in Spot and Forward Foreign Exchange Markets', Applied Financial Economics, 11, 127-136. Walsh and Tsou, 1998, 'Forecasting index volatility:sampling interval andnon-trading effects', Alied of the Financial Economics,33, 267-289. Yang and Zhang, 2000,'Drift-independent Volatility Estimation Based on High, Low, Open and Close Prices', Journal of Business, 73,477-491. Yu, 2001, 'Index Futures Trading and Spot Price Volatility', Applied Economics Letters, 8, 183-186. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22867 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 我國自2001年11月1日正式施行「金融控股公司法」及金融控股公司成立以來已將屆8年,目前為止包括台灣金控在內已有15家金融控股公司設立,握有之總資產高達近25兆,已成為我國金融業乃至整個服務業的主流,現階段實應重新檢視金融控股公司之運作情形,以及當初開放設立金融控股公司之目的是否有達成。股市的漲跌通常會領先經濟實質活動的表現, 長期而言金融控股公司整體經營績效最終也將反映在其股價上,展現投資人對該公司的評價.故有別於財務分析方式,本研究選取14家上市櫃金融控股公司之股價為研究樣本,使用波動性不對稱之指數異質變異數模型(EGARCH)模型,並加入近期資訊修正歷史模擬法計算之風險值,以投資人的角度探討金融控股公司風險報酬,提供財務分析以外的決策參考,並試圖對於經營績效加以檢視。主要結論如下:(一)14家金融控股股價報酬具有變異數異質性,可採GARCH-type模型配適之。(二)以指數型GARCH,即EGARCH(1,1)並參考Hull and White (1998)近期波動資訊調整後之歷史模擬法所計算各金控的風險值。研究結果以華南金控、第一金控及兆豐金控較低,開發金控、新光金控及日盛金控偏高,而透過五種指標對EGARCH(1,1)及近期波動資訊修正後報酬率檢視,發現均有不錯之評量能力。(三)以市場風險報酬(Risk-Adjusted Return, RAR)觀點,分析各金融控股公司之經營特性,其中以富邦金控、國泰金控等大型財團金控公司的多角化經營綜效,以及華南金控、第一金控所代表的官股色彩濃厚的金融控股公司的穩健經營,近年來逐漸顯現其成效,較獲得投資人所認同;另外具有業績及金融整併、兩岸MOU概念題材的金融控股公司如國票金控、元大金控等,近期亦獲得投資人所青睞;最後提出結論及後續研究之建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Since Financial Holding Company Law been enacted in Nov 1 2001, there are 15 financial holding companies(FHCs) including Taiwan Financial Holding formed in Taiwan for nearly 8 years with total assets about 25 trillion N.T. Dollars , and they have become the mainstream in the financial service industry. It’s necessary to review their performance to see if they hit the original target.. In the long term, the stock market usually leads to economic real activities , therefore ,our study had been aimed at 14 publicly-listed FHCs’ stock price return with EGARCH model, and incorporate current volatility into hstorical VaR Simulation and find the risk-adjusted stock return to investigate the performance evaluation of the FHCs .The primary conclusions of this study are as follows:(1)The empirical results show that 14 FHCs’ stock returns have volatility clustering and heteroscedasticity, so they can fit GARCH-type model.
(2)We use EGARCH(1,1) and Hull and White’s (1998) method to find the FHCs’ VaR of historical simulation.Empirical results show that Hua Nan, First and Mega have lower VaR, whereas China Development, Shin Kong and Jih Sun have higher VaR. We find that the adjusted rate of return works well by the use of the investigation of 5 indicators.(3)We also use risk-adjusted return to analyze FHCs’ characteristics of management and strategies. Among all, big business with diversification like Fubun, Cathy and sustainable business with higher state-holdings like Hua Nan and First are favored by market. In addition, topics about merger, profitability and MOU are also noticed. Finally, proposes the conclusion and the suggestion for further research. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:31:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-P96323028-1.pdf: 689085 bytes, checksum: 3a34129555ef27816e0fc664e831f78e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 第一章 緒論 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 2.1 金融控股公司的相關理論及演進 6 2.2 有關GARCH-type 模型配適風險值的相關文獻 36 2.3 有關歷史模擬法改良的相關文獻 41 2.4 有關風險值評比的相關文獻. 45 第三章 研究方法與設計 3.1 加入波動率模型的風險值 48 3.2 單根檢定 49 3.3 變異數異質性檢定 50 3.4 指數型波動性不對稱模型(EGARCH)及近期資訊修正報酬率 52 3.5 模式效能評估及評鑑指標 .56 第四章 實證結果與分析 4.1 資料來源與基本統計分析 58 4.2 定態的時間序列檢定 62 4.3 異質性變異數的檢定 65 4.4 報酬率變異數的波動不對稱性檢定 70 4.5 EGARCH 模型的配適及加入近期波動資訊修正風險值 71 4.6 以風險報酬之市場觀點評估金融控股公司的經營績效 75 第五章 結論與建議 5.1 本文研究結果之說明 78 5.2 金融控股公司經營之建議 79 5.3 未來研究方向之建議 80 參考文獻 87 中文部份 87 英文部份 90 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 風險報酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 金融控股公司 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 股價報酬風險值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 指數型GARCH | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 歷史模擬法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | risk-adjusted return | en |
| dc.subject | historical simulation | en |
| dc.subject | EGARCH | en |
| dc.subject | VaR of stock return | en |
| dc.subject | financial holding company(FHC) | en |
| dc.title | 金融控股公司股價風險報酬與績效評估:
加入近期波動調整風險值模擬之應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Risk-Adjusted Stock Return and Performance Evaluation of the Finance Holding Company:The Application of Incorporating Current Volatility into VaR Simulation. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳中書,聶建中,施光訓,盧陽正 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 金融控股公司,股價報酬風險值,指數型GARCH,歷史模擬法,風險報酬, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | financial holding company(FHC),VaR of stock return,EGARCH,historical simulation,risk-adjusted return, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 94 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-10-22 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 672.93 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
