請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22824完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡政文 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Der-Yang Chia | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 賈德揚 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:29:37Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-01-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-01-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
中文部份 書籍 王承宗，2006。《烏克蘭史—西方的梁山泊》。台北：三民書局。 吳玉山，1997。《抗衡或扈從—兩岸關係新詮：從前蘇聯看》。台北：正中。 肯尼思．華爾茲著，信強譯，2003。《國際政治理論》（Theory of International Politics）。上海：人民出版社。 高大政法系編輯委員會主編，2007。《全球化趨勢下的世界、區域與國家建構》。臺北：翰蘆圖書。 張亞中主編，2006。《歐盟全球戰略與對外關係》。台北：國立台灣大學政治學系歐洲研究中心。 斯蒂芬．范埃弗拉著，陳琪譯，2006。《政治學研究方法指南》（Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science）。北京：北京大學出版社。 蔡政文，1989。《當前國際關係理論發展及其評估》。台北：三民書局。 蔡政文主編，2008。《當今歐盟—中國—臺灣關係的演變與未來》。台北：遠景基金會。 鄭羽主編，2007。《俄羅斯東歐中亞國家的對外關係》。北京：中國社會科學出版社。 戴萬欽主編，2007。《俄羅斯、普丁與2008前夕》。台北：時英。 學術期刊 甘逸驊， 2003/9-10。〈冷戰結束後的北約與國際關係理論〉，《問題與研究》，第42卷第5期，頁1-23。 甘逸驊， 2003/7-8。〈北約東擴－軍事聯盟的變遷與政治意涵〉，《問題與研究》，第42卷第4期，頁1-23。 吳玉山，2007/6。〈顏色革命的許諾與侷限〉，《台灣民主季刊》，第4卷第2期，頁67-112。 明居正，2007/3。〈橙色革命在烏克蘭〉，《台灣民主季刊》，第4卷第1期，頁205-212。 郭武平、劉蕭翔，2008/7。〈烏俄天然氣之爭對烏克蘭政局影響之探析〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第9卷第3期，頁35-79。 許海雲，2008/2。〈從北約對烏克蘭政策看北約東擴進程〉，《教學與研究》，2008年第2期。 黃嘉諒、郭秋慶，1998/1。〈波羅的海三國申請加入北約俄羅斯的安全爭議〉，《問題與研究》，第37卷第1期，頁41-55。 楊三億，2006/7-8。〈冷戰結束後波蘭外交政策走向分析〉，《問題與研究》，第45卷第4期，頁91-122。 楊三億，2008/9。〈歐盟睦鄰政策與其對烏克蘭政策實踐 〉，《問題與研究》，第47卷第3期，頁105-134。 蘇武，2000/5。〈從北約東擴看俄羅斯與烏克蘭關係的發展〉，《歷史月刊》，第148期，頁75-80。 外文部份 官方文件 Charter on a Distinctive Partnership Between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Ukraine. EU/Ukraine Action Plan 2005 Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security Between NATO and the Russian Federation. NATO Bucharest Summit Declaration, Bucharest, 3 April 2008. NATO Riga Summit Declaration, Riga, 29 November 2006. NATO Study on Enlargement, Brussels, September 1995. The North Atlantic Treaty, Washington DC, 4 April 1949. Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Woehrel, Steven, 1998. “NATO Enlargement and Russia.” Congressional Research Service Reports, 97-477 F. Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine. 書籍 Ambrosio, Thomas, 2005. Challenging America’s Global Preeminence: Russia’s Quest for Multipolarity. Hampshire: Ashgate. Åslund, Anders and Marek Dąbrowski eds., 2007. Europe After Enlargement, New York: Cambridge University Press. Asmus, Ronald D., 2002. Opening NATO’s Door: How the Alliance Remade Itself for a New Era. New York: Columbia University Press. Clark, Ian, 2001. The Post-Cold War Order: The Spoils of Peace. New York: Oxford University Press. Coppieters, Bruno and Robert Legvold eds., 2005. Statehood and Security: Georgia after the Rose Revolution. Cambridge: The MIT Press. David, Charles-Philippe and Jacques Lévesque eds., 1999. The Future of NATO: Enlargement, Russia, and European Security. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Deyermond, Ruth, 2008. Security and Sovereignty in the Former Soviet Union. London: Lynne Rienner. Goldman, Marshall I, 2008. Petrostate: Putin, Power and the New Russia. New York: Oxford University Press. Gulick, Edward Vose, 1955. Europe’s Classical Balance of Power. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Harrison, Ewan, 2004. The Post-Cold War International System: Strategies, Institutions and Reflexivity. London: Routledge. Herd, Graeme P. & Jennifer D.P. Moroney eds., 2003. Security Dynamics in the Former Soviet Bloc. London: RoutledgeCurzon. Kapstein, Ethan B. and Michael Mastanduno eds., 1999. Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press. Judt, Tony, 2005. Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. New York: Penguin Press. Kennedy, Paul, 1987. The Rise and Fall of Great Powers. New York: Random House. Kissinger, Henry, 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster. Krupnick, Charles, 2003. Almost NATO: Partners and Players in Central and Eastern European Security. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. Kuzio, Taras, 2007. Ukraine-Crimea-Russia: Triangle of Conflict. Stuttgart: Ibidem. Lansford, Tom and Blagovest Tashev eds., 2005. Old Europe, New Europe and the US: Renegotiating Transatlantic Security in the Post 9/11 Era. Hampshire: Ashgate. Larrabee, F. Stephen, 2003. NATO’s Eastern Agenda in a New Strategic Era. Santa Monica: RAND. Lo, Bobo, 2002. Russian Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Mattox, Gale A. and Arthur R. Rachwald eds., 2001. Enlarging NATO: The National Debates. London: Lynne Rienner. Mearsheimer, John J., 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton. Moore, Rebecca R., 2007. NATO’s New Mission: Projecting Stability in a Post-Cold War World. Westport: Praeger Security International. Mouritzen, Hans and Anders Wivel eds., 2005. The Geopolitics of Euro-Atlantic Integration. London: Routledge. Ponsard, Lionel, 2007. Russia, NATO and Cooperative Security: Bridging the Gap. New York: Routledge. Rumer, Eugene B., 2007. Russian Foreign Policy Beyond Putin. Adelphi Paper 390, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxon: Routledge. Rupp Richard E., 2006. NATO after 9/11: An Alliance in Continuing Decline. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Trenin, Dmitri, 2002. The end of Eurasia: Russia on the Border between Geopolitics and Globalization. Moscow: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Trenin, Dmitri, 2007. Getting Russia Right. Moscow: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Tsygankov, Andrei P., 2006. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. Waltz, Kenneth, 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill. Wilson, Andrew, 2005. Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press. Wolczuk, Roman, 2003. Ukraine’s Foreign and Security Policy 1990-2000. England: Curzon Press. Velychenko, Stephen, 2007. Ukraine, The EU and Russia: History, Culture and International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Yekelchyk, Serhy, 2007. Ukraine: Birth of a Modern Nation. New York: Oxford University Press. Yost, David S. 1998. NATO Transformed: The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security. Washington: United States Institute of Peace. 期刊論文 D’Anieri, Paul, 2005. “The last hurrah: The 2004 Ukrainian presidential elections and the limits of machine politics.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Issue 38, pp. 231-249. D’Anieri, Paul, 2006. “Explaining the success and failure of post-communist revolutions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Issue 39, pp. 331-350. Armstrong, John A, 2004. “Ukraine: Evolving Foreign Policy in a New State.” World Affairs, Vol. 167, No. 1, pp. 31-39. Asmus, Ronald D., Richard L. Kugler and F. Stephen Larrabee, 1995. “NATO expansion: The Next Steps,” Survival, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 7-33. Asmus, Ronald D., 2008. “Europe’s Eastern Promise: Rethinking NATO and EU Enlargement.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 95-106. Daalder, Ivo and James Goldgeier, 2006/9-10. “Global NATO.” Foreign Affairs, Vol.85, No. 5, pp. 105-113. Dupré, Pierre-Marie, Victor Fèvre, Alix Leclainche et Ricarda Wagner, 2008/4. “Les enjeux de Bucarest,” Défense Nationale et Sécurité Collective, Vol. 64, No. 4, avril 2008, pp. 45-54. Emerson, Michael, 2008/5. “Time to think of a strategic bargain with Russia.” Center for European Policy Briefs, No. 160, pp. 1-6. Eisenberg, Carolyn, 2005. “The New Cold War,” Diplomatic History, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 423-427. Goldgeier, James M., 1998. “NATO Expansion: The Anatomy of a Decision,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 85-102. Guicherd, Catherine, 2002/3. “Ukraine, Biélorussie et Moldavie: entre l’Union élargie et la Russie.” Politique Étrangère, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 683-696. Facon, Isabelle, 2009/3-4. “Les relations Russie-Otan vues de Moscou : l’impossible conciliation?” Défense, No. 138, pp. 27-29. Harries, Owen, 1993/9-10. “The Collapse of ‘The West,’” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 41-53. Hale, Henry E., 2006. “Democracy or autocracy on the march? The colored revolutions as normal dynamics of patronal presidentialism.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Issue 39, pp. 305-329. Hart, Gary and Dimitri K. Simes, 2009/5-6. “The Road to Moscow.” The National Interest. Huntington, Samuel P., 1991. “America's Changing Strategic Interests,” Survival, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 3-17. de Grossouvre, Henri, 2008/11. “Sommet de l'Otan de Bucarest : Europe/États-Unis,” Défense Nationale et Sécurité Collective, Vol. 64, No. 11, nov 2008, pp. 19-28. Irondelle, Bastien et Ronja Kempin, 2008/8-9. “La coopération franco-allemande à l'épreuve,” Défense Nationale et Sécurité Collective, Vol. 64, No. 8/9, août-septembre 2008, pp. 29-36. Jervis, Robert, 1999. “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate,” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 42-63. Karatnycky, Adrian, 2001/5-6. “Meltdown in Ukraine.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 73-86. Karatnycky, Adrian, 2009/5-6. “The Key to Kiev.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 106-120. King, Charles, 2008/11-12. “The Five-Day War: Managing Moscow After the Georgia Crisis.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 2-11. Korostelina, Karina V., 2008. “Identity, autonomy and conflict in republics of Russia and Ukraine.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Issue 41, pp. 79-91. Kramer, Mark, 2009/4, ““The Myth of a No-NATO-Enlargement Pledge to Russia.” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 39-61. Kuzio, Taras and Jennifer D.P. Monroney, 2001. “Ukraine and the West: Moving From Stability to Strategic Engagement.” European Security, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 111-126. Kuzio, Taras, 2003. “Ukraine’s Relations with the West: Disinterest, Partnership, Disillusionment.” European Security, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 21-44. Kuzio, Taras, 2005. “Ukraine’s Orange Revolution: The Opposition’s Road to Success.” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 117-130. Kuzio, Taras, 2005. “Neither East Nor West: Ukraine’s Security Policy Under Kuchma.” Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 59-68. Kuzio, Taras, 2006. “Is Ukraine Part of Europe’s Future?” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 89-108. Larrabee, F. Stephen, 2006/11-12. “Danger and Opportunity in Eastern Europe.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 6, pp. 117-131. Larrabee, F. Stephen, 2007. “Ukraine at the Crossroads.” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 45-61. Lasas, Ainius, 2008/1. “Restituting victims: EU and NATO enlargements through the lenses of collective guilt,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 98-116. Lebow, Richard Ned, 1994. “The long peace, the end of the cold war, and the failure of realism.” International Organization, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 249-277. Legro, Jeffrey W. and Andrew Moravscik, 1999. “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 5-55. Lieven, Anatol, 1997. “Restraining NATO: Ukraine, Russia, and the West,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 55-77. Light, Margot, Stephen White and John Löwenhardt, 2000. “A Wider Europe: The View from Moscow and Kyiv,” International Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 77-88. Lugar, Richard, 2002. “Redefining NATO’s Mission: WMD Terrorism.” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.7-13. Lynch, Allen C., 2001. “The Realism of Russia’s Foreign Policy.” Europe Asia Studies, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 7-31. Mankoff, Jeffery, 2007. “Russia and the West: Taking the Longer View,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 123-135. Mastanduno, Michael, 1997. “Preserving the Unipolar Moment.” International Security, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 49-88 Matlock, Jack F. Jr., 1996/5-6. “Dealing with a Russia in Turmoil.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 38-51. McCalla, Robert B, 1996. “NATO’s persistence after the cold war.” International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 445-475. Mearsheimer, John, 1990. “Why We Will Soon Miss the Cold War.” The Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 266, No. 2, pp. 35-50. Mearsheimer, John, 1990. “Back to the Future.” International Security, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 5-56. Mearsheimer, John, 1993/5-6. “The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 50-66. Mroz, John Edwin and Oleksandr Pavliuk, 1996/5-6. “Ukraine: Europe’s Linchpin,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 52-62. Odom, William E., 1995/3. “NATO’s expansion: why the critics are wrong,” The National Interest, Spring 1995. Pascual, Carlos and Steven Pifer, 2002. “Ukraine’s Bid for a Decisive Place in History,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 175-192. Rumer., Eugene and Angela Stent, 2009/4-5. “Russia and the West,” Survival, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 91-104. Sestanovich, Stephen, 2008/11-12. “What Has Moscow Done?” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 12-28. Shea, Jamie, 2007, “A NATO for the 21st Century: Toward a New Strategic Concept.” World Affairs, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 43-55. Shlapentokh, Vladimir, 2002. “Is the ‘Greatness Syndrome’ Eroding?” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 131.-146. Shulman, Stephen, 2006. “Cultural comparisons and their consequences for nationhood in Ukraine.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Issue 39, pp. 247-263. Simon, Jeffrey, 2009/2. “Ukraine Against Herself: To Be Euro-Atlantic, Eurasian, or Neutral?” Strategic Forum, No. 238, pp. 1-11. Snyder, Glenn H, 2002. “Mearsheimer’s World – Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security.” International Security, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 149-173. Tarasyuk, Borys, 2007. “Distinctive Partner with Distinctive Performance: Peculiarities of Ukraine’s Approach to NATO.” Crossroad – The Macedonian Foreign Policy Journal, Issue 3, pp. 204-210. Thomann, Pierre-Emmanuel, 2008/10. “Russie-Géorgie : première guerre du monde multipolaire,” Défense Nationale et Sécurité Collective, Vol. 64, No. 10, octobre 2008, pp. 34-40. Tolz, Vera, 2002. “Rethinking Russian-Ukrainian relations: a new trend in nation-building in post-communist Russia?” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 235-253. Trenin, Dmitri V., 2006/7-8. “Russia Leaves the West.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp.87-96. Trenin, Dmitri V., 2007. “Russia Redefines Itself and Its Relations with the West.” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 95-105. Trzeciak, Serguisz, 2005. “Ukraine: a part of Europe or apart from Europe.” Analizy natolinskie, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 1-30. Tudoroiu, Theodor, 2007. “Rose, Orange, and Tulip: The failed post-Soviet revolutions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Issue 40, pp. 315-342. Tymoshenko, Yulia, 2007/5-6. “Containing Russia.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 69-82. Walt, Stephen M., 1985. “Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power,” International Security, Vol. 9, No.4, pp. 3-43. Walt, Stephen M., 1998. “The Ties That Fray: Why Europe and America are Drifting Apart,” The National Interest, No. 54, Winter 1998/1999. Waltz, Kenneth N., 1993. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics.” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 44-79. Waltz, Kenneth N., 2000. “Structural Realism after the Cold War.” International Security, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 5-41. Waltz, Kenneth N., 2000. “NATO Expansion: A Realist’s View,” Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 23-38. Way, Lucan A., 2005. “Rapacious individualism and political competition in Ukraine, 1992-2004.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Issue 38, pp. 191-205. White, Stephen, Julia Korosteleva and Roy Allison. 2006. “NATO: The View from the East.” European Security, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 165-190. 學位論文 Cramer, Clarke S., 2005. The Great Orange Hope: Ukraine, NATO, and the Dilemma of European Integration After the Orange Revolution. Master Dissertation. Department of National Security Affairs, Naval Postgraduate School. Monterey, California. Long, Jennifer E., 2002. A Constructivist View of Post-Soviet Russian Foreign Policy: Case Studies of the Russia-NATO Relationship and IFOR. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Government, Georgetown University. Washington DC. Millet, Alison Therese, 2000. Neorealist Claims and Post-Cold War Realities: The Case of German-Polish Relations, 1989-1999. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Government and Foreign Affairs, University of Virginia, Virginia. 研討會論文 Schneider, Jiří and Alexandr Vondra, 2004/2/20-21. “Ukraine: Near Abroad of the European Union? – Overcoming a Curse of Dual-Periphery.” PASS Policy Paper No.2 presented at the “Ukraine in Europe and the World” Conference. Kiev: Borys Tarasyuk. 報紙 Agence France Presse, 2008/4/1. “Ukraine-Géorgie/OTAN: Fillon contre,” Le Figaro. Agence France Presse, 2008/5/27. “OTAN: l’appui du Canada à l’Ukraine ne se dément pas,” Le Devoir, A3. Baker, Peter, 2005/4/5. “Bush Promises More Help to Ukraine,” The Washington Post. Barluet, Alain, 2008/4/3. “La France amorce son grand retour dans l'Otan,” Le Figaro. Barluet, Alain et Pierre Rousselin, 2008/4/4. “L'Otan hésite face à la nouvelle Russie,” Le Figaro. Castle, Stephen, 2002/11/18. “Kuchma says he will attend summit in defiance of NATO,” The Independent. Dejevsky, Mary, 2009/3/5. “Ukraine in new gas showdown with Russia,” The Independent. Evans, Michael and Francis Elliot, 2008/4/3. “Nato summit: George Bush abandoned over Ukraine and Georgia,” The Times. Fedusachak, Natalia, 2009/4/16. “Ukraine’s Orange Revolution fades into disillusion,” Washington Times. Finn, Peter, 2008/2/13. “Putin Threatens Ukraine On NATO Russian Raises Issue Of U.S. Missile Shield,” The Washington Post, p. A08. Futey, Bohdan A., 2009/5/29. “Constitutional changes needed, but Yushchenko's plan is misguided,” Kyiv Post. Gomart, Thomas, 2008/8/22. “La Russie est-elle plus isolée depuis le conflit géorgien?” La Croix. Gorbulin, Volodymyr and Oleksandr Lytvynenko, 2009/10/1. “Dismantling Ukraine remains Kremlin goal,” Kyiv Post. Gluckman, André et Bernard-Henri Lévy, 2008/4/2. “Lettre à Angela Merkel et Nicolas Sarkozy,” Le Monde. Jégo, Marie, 2008/4/17. “Pourquoi la Russie a peur de l’OTAN,” Le Monde, p. 2. Joffe, Josef, 2009/3/19. “NATO: Soldiering On,” Time. Kagan, Robert, 2008/2/6. “New Europe, Old Russia,” Washington Post. Kamp, Karl-Heinz, 1995/3. “The folly of rapid NATO expansion,” Foreign Policy, Issue 98, pp. 116-129. Kaplan, Robert D., 2008/3/27. “Equal Alliance, Unequal Roles,” The New York Times. Kennan, George, 1997/2/5. “A Fateful Error,” The New York Times. Korduban, Pavel, 2008/3/12. “Ukrainian Parliament Unblocked, NATO Dispute Off Agenda,” Eurasia Daily Monitor Vol. 5, Issue 47. Kupchan, Charles A., 2008/4/9. “NATO Divided,” International Herald Tribune. Kuzio, Taras, 2003/3/13. “U.S.-Ukraine relations will not revive under Kuchma,” Kyiv Post. Kuzio, Taras, 2004/6/30. “Ukraine Turns Down Early Membership Prospect in NATO,” Eurasian Daily Monitor, Vol. 1, Issue 43. Kuzio, Taras, 2006/3/7. “Poor Strategy, The Elections and Ukraine’s NATO Ambitions,” Ukrayinska Pravda. Kuzio, Taras, 2007/7/22. “Yushchenko's Multi-Vector Election Strategy,” The Ukrainian Weekly, Vol. LXXV, No. 29, p. 2. Kyiv Post, 2004/6/17. “Kuchma endorses new military doctrine,” Kyiv Post. Kyiv Post, 2008/3/4. “Naftogaz raided in fight over who owns billions of dollars in natural gas,” Kyiv Post. Labunka, Illya M., 2008/2/17. “Opposition Forces Continue to Block Verkhovna Rada,” The Ukrainian Weekly, Vol. LXXVI, No. 7, p. 1. Liberation （avec source AFP）, 2008/4/3. “L'Otan accueillera la Géorgie et l'Ukraine... plus tard,” Liberation. Mandelbaum, Michael, 2008/12/31. “Stop Baiting the Bear,” Newsweek. Marples, David, 2008/9/8. “Ukraine: Divide and Conquer,” The New York Times. Mitchell, Allison, 1998/3/20. “NATO Debate: From Big Risk To Sure Thing,” The New York Times, A1. Osborn, Andrew, 2004/11/23. “The chess piece that Russia desires for its new great game,” The Independent. Rousselin, Pierre, 2008/9/17. “Ukraine, le mystère de la ‘tsarine’ Timochenko,” Le Figaro. Rumer, Eugene B., 1994/Fall. “Eurasia Letter: Will Ukraine return to Russia?” Foreign Policy, Issue 96, pp. 129-144. Schwirtz, Michael, 2008/10/30, “Ukraine opposition alleges improper arms sales,” The New York Times. Socor, Vladimir, 2008/4/4. “NATO debates on Ukraine and Georgia add clarity about Russia,” Eurasia Daily Monitor, Volume 5, Issue 64. Varfolomeyev, Oleg, 2002/6/20. “Ukraine Turns to NATO,” Time. Wines, Michael, 2002/4/1. “Leader's Party Seems to Slip In Ukraine,” The New York Times, A5. Yushchenko, Victor, 2008/8/25. “Georgia and the Stakes for Ukraine,” The Washington Post, A17. 網際網路 Arbatov, Alexei, 2005/5/31. “Color Revolutions and Greater Europe,”Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Moscow Center, http://www.carnegie.ru/en/ pubs/media/72692.htm. Åslund, Anders, 2004/5/20. “What the United States Should Do in Ukraine,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Moscow Center, http://www.carnegie.ru/en/ print/70453-print.htm. Braun, Aurel, 2009/5. “NATO and Russia: Post-Georgia Threat Perceptions,” Russie.Nei.Visions No. 40, Ifri Russia/NIS Center, http://www.ifri.org/files/ Russie/IFRI_RussiaNATO_Braun_ENG_avril_09.pdf. Bugajski, Janusz, Steven Pifer, Keith Smith and Celeste A. Wallander, 2008/2. “Ukraine: A Net Assessment of 16 Years of Independence,” Center for Strategic & International Studies （CSIS）, http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/080213-bugajski-ukraine.pdf. Constant, Amelie, Martin Kahanec, Klaus F. Zimmermann, 2006/12. “The Russian-Ukrainian Political Divide,” Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2530, http://ftp.iza.org/dp2530.pdf. Durandin, Catherine, 2008/4/17. “France – OTAN: précisions sur un malentendu,” Contre-Feux.com, http://www.contre-feux.com/international/ france-otan-precisions-sur-un-malentendu.php. Eland, Ivan, 2009/5/18. “Don’t Admit the Ukraine into NATO,” The Independent Institute, http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=2502. Freedom House, 2006. “Table of Independent Countries – Freedom in the World 2006,” http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/WoW/2006/TableofIndependentCountries2006.pdf. Goanec, Mathilde, 2008/6. “Après son échec au sommet de l’OTAN, l’Ukraine frappe à la porte de l’Europe,” Le Monde diplomatique, http://www.mondediplomatique. fr/2008/06/GOANEC/15967. Hanson, Margus, 2006. “Transition in Ukraine,” NATO Parliamentary Assembly Committee Report 065 ESCEW 06 E, http://www.nato-pa.int/default.asp? CAT2=0&CAT1=18&CAT0=576&SHORTCUT=915. Kuzio, Taras, 2003. “EU and Ukraine: A turning point in 2004?” EU-ISS Occasional Paper No. 47, University of Pittsburgh: Archieve of European Integration （AEI）, http://aei.pitt.edu/1611/01/occ47.pdf. Kuzio, Taras, 2006/3/28. “Ukraine's Free Elections & Kamikaze President,” Open Democracy, http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-ukraine/kamikazee_3398. jsp. Kuzio, Taras, 2008/7/17. “Ukraine: Beyond the Orange Revolution,” Open Democracy, http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/ukraine-beyond-the-orange-coalition. Landru, Nicolas, 2007/5/30. “Georgia: The Evacuation of the Russian Military Base at Akhalkalaki Comes to a Close,” Caucaz Europenews, http://www.caucaz.com/ home_eng/breve_contenu.php?id=314. Maksymiuk, Jan, 2005/11/15. “Ukraine: Government Faces Uphill Battle In Achieving NATO Aspirations,” Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty, http://www.rferl.org/ content/article/1062966.html. Pavliuk, Oleksandr, 2000/6. “Enlargement and Ukraine’s Relations with Other Central and Eastern European Countries,” Final Report of 1998-2000 NATO-EAPC Fellowship at EastWest Institute, Kyiv Centre, June 2000. Pifer, Steven, 2009/3. “Engaging Ukraine in 2009.” Foreign Policy at Brookings. Policy Paper Number 13, March 2009. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/ 2009/03_ukraine_pifer/03_ukraine_pifer.pdf. Socor, Vladimir, 2008/5/15. “Analysis: Moscow questions territorial status quo in the Crimea,” Moldova.org, http://politicom.moldova.org/news/analysis-moscow-questions-territorial-status-quo-in-the-crimea-119267-eng.html. Sokov, Nikolai, 2005/6. “The Withdrawal of Russian Military Bases from Georgia: Not Solving Anything,” PONARS Policy Memo 363, Monterey Institute of International Studies, http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/pm_0363.pdf. The School of Russian and Asian Studies, 2008/10/29. “Ukraine threatens Russia with unilateral land border demarcation,” SRAS News Archives, http://www.sras.org/ ukraine_may_demarcate_boarder_without_russia. Today’s Zaman, 2008/1/7. “Military expenditure of NATO members surges,” http:// www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=131004. Trenin, Dmitri, 2006/3/29. “Russia-Ukraine: Problems Will Remain,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Moscow Center, http://www.carnegie.ru/en/ print/73992-print.htm. Xinhua News, 2009/3/18, “France rejoins NATO on strategic concerns,” Xinhua, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-03/18/content_11031070.htm. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22824 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 烏克蘭從古至今皆處於政治中心的邊陲地帶。烏克蘭在1991年重獲獨立後，一方面仍然受到俄羅斯的影響，另一方面也受到歐盟和北約的引力，烏克蘭的外交走向儼然成為西方國家和俄國之間的競技場，在2004年的橙色革命達到最高點。2004年之前的庫其馬政府有意推動烏克蘭入盟，但礙於與俄國關係和政治理念，最後仍無息而終。橙色革命後，新上任的尤先科政府將入盟北約定為國策，但卻不徹底執行入盟所必須的改革，使北約無意也無力通過烏克蘭的會員行動計畫案。同時面對俄國壓力和烏克蘭內部凝結力的缺乏，使得尤先科政府的外交政策與其選舉承諾不符。
本文主旨在於說明烏克蘭在2008年申請入盟北約失敗的過程。烏克蘭申請會員行動計畫失敗的主因可分為內在和外在因素，前者包括人民對入盟北約的反對、政局不穩和改革失敗；外在因素則以俄國和西歐國家的反對為主，使烏克蘭無法在2008年的布加勒斯特高峰會上獲得MAP資格。 本文最終將檢討烏克蘭入盟失敗的主因，以及未來讓烏克蘭加入北約的必要條件。烏克蘭必須在達成國內共識和與俄國改善關係，同時西方與俄國重新交好的情況下，方能再度叩關北約大門。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Ukraine, formerly the Ukrainian SSR, declared independence in 1991 but has yet to achieve integration with either the CIS or the EU. The author considers recent developments concerning its efforts to join the NATO alliance to be crucial in deciding the country’s future and the geopolitics of Eastern Europe and beyond. This thesis seeks to assess the conception and implementation of Ukrainian policy and the ultimate failure to obtain a NATO Membership Action Plan in 2008.
Since the end of the Cold War, NATO has been transforming itself from a purely defensive alliance to a regional security organization that operates “out of area” and promotes western ideas such as democracy and market economy. NATO operations in conflict areas such as Kosovo and Afghanistan and its enlargement since the incorporation of the former GDR have challenged relations between Moscow and Washington as well as Paris and Berlin. The Ukrainian bid for membership in NATO not only strained relations between Russia and the US, but also divided NATO as most Western European countries blocked its application in Bucharest in 2008. What caused the failure was not only Ukraine’s position as an ill-prepared country with considerable political and economic problems, but also its security environment and its position as the bulwark between NATO and Russia. The author will attempt to analyze the reasons behind the failed 2008 bid and assess the future possibilities of Ukrainian membership in NATO. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:29:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R95322030-1.pdf: 2030358 bytes, checksum: 630a9b13b0602a1340c0f3062bb34489 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭…………………………………………………………………………………..Ⅰ
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………….III 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………….IV 目錄…………………………………………………………………………………...V 第一章 緒論.................................................................................................................1 第一節 研究動機及目的.....................................................................................1 第二節 研究途徑與方法.....................................................................................5 第三節 研究範圍.................................................................................................7 第四節 理論.........................................................................................................7 壹、現實主義與冷戰的結束.......................................................................8 貳、從古典現實到結構現實主義...............................................................9 參、新現實主義的核心命題......................................................................11 肆、攻勢現實主義與守勢現實主義..........................................................12 伍、權力平衡與威脅平衡..........................................................................14 陸、其他理論的解釋..................................................................................15 第五節 資料來源................................................................................................16 第六節 章節安排................................................................................................17 第二章庫其馬政府的北約政策.................................................................................21 第一節 初期：北約牌........................................................................................22 壹、與俄國的關係......................................................................................22 貳、與北約關係：延續克拉夫丘克的政策..............................................23 第二節 中期：從孤立到決定入盟....................................................................25 第三節 後期：合作與關係惡化........................................................................26 第四節 影響因素................................................................................................29 壹、內在因素..............................................................................................29 貳、外在因素..............................................................................................31 一、俄羅斯..........................................................................................32 二、北約東擴的影響..........................................................................38 三、歐盟的影響..................................................................................39 庫其馬的挑戰......................................................................................................42 第三章 尤先科政府的北約政策..............................................................................45 第一節 尤先科政府的北約政策.......................................................................46 壹、前期：蜜月期間.................................................................................46 貳、中期：亞努科維奇任總理時期.........................................................48 參、後期：從失敗到失去興趣.................................................................50 第二節 影響因素...............................................................................................51 壹、內在因素.............................................................................................51 一、對西方的期望.............................................................................51 二、橙色政府的崩潰.........................................................................52 貳、外在因素.............................................................................................52 一、俄國.............................................................................................52 二、北約、歐盟.................................................................................76 三、美國的政策.................................................................................58 四、波蘭.............................................................................................59 尤先科政府的失敗.............................................................................................61 第四章 尤先科政府申請加入北約過程.................................................................63 第一節 表明立場及申請 ................................................................................64 壹、表明立場............................................................................................64 貳、申請....................................................................................................65 第二節 北約處理過程......................................................................................67 壹、北約東擴的政策................................................................................68 貳、布加勒斯特高峰會與外長級會議....................................................72 第三節 美國的政策..........................................................................................77 壹、美國的北約政策................................................................................77 貳、對烏克蘭入盟的政策........................................................................80 參、布希政府在2008年的政策..............................................................81 第四節 喬治亞戰爭對烏克蘭的影響..............................................................82 壹、戰爭背景............................................................................................83 貳、戰爭過程和對烏克蘭的影響............................................................85 申請結果............................................................................................................88 第五章 烏克蘭加入北約失敗的因素.....................................................................89 第一節 內在因素..............................................................................................89 壹、民意支持度低....................................................................................89 貳、內政問題............................................................................................90 參、橙色革命的失敗................................................................................92 第二節 外在因素..............................................................................................94 壹、俄國....................................................................................................95 貳、北約內部反對..................................................................................104 大國政治下的權力平衡..................................................................................112 第六章 評估與展望...............................................................................................113 第一節 事實評估............................................................................................113 壹、2008年的失敗.................................................................................113 貳、美國政府態度的轉變......................................................................115 參、烏克蘭與其他北約新會員國之不同..............................................116 第二節 理論評估............................................................................................117 第三節 展望....................................................................................................120 壹、北約前兩波東擴的經驗..................................................................120 貳、烏克蘭歐洲大西洋整合的希望......................................................122 參、各國未來政策預測..........................................................................123 第七章 結論...........................................................................................................127 總結.................................................................................................................127 國際結構的重要性.........................................................................................131 對北約未來東擴的效應.................................................................................132 結語.................................................................................................................134 參考文獻..................................................................................................................135 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 烏克蘭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 北約 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 北約東擴 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 俄羅斯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地緣政治 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Geopolitics | en |
| dc.subject | NATO | en |
| dc.subject | NATO Enlargement | en |
| dc.subject | Russia | en |
| dc.subject | Ukraine | en |
| dc.title | 烏克蘭加入北約的問題研究(1994-2009) | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Ukraine's NATO Aspirations (1994-2009) | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳世民,戴萬欽 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 北約,烏克蘭,北約東擴,俄羅斯,地緣政治, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | NATO,Ukraine,NATO Enlargement,Russia,Geopolitics, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 150 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-01-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.98 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。