請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22756
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 盧信昌(Hsin-Chang Lu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Liang-De Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳亮德 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:27:02Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-03-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-02-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
曲威光(2004)。高科技產業技術實務-奈米科技產業篇。台北市;新陸。 吳思華(2000)。策略九說。台北市;臉譜。 吳傑棕(2005)。產業之專利應用與專利策略研究-以電腦散熱產業為例。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。 李明勳(2005)。技術追趕與專利引證-以台灣平面顯示產業為例。台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。 李佩縈、陳玲君(2009)。半導體工業年鑑。台北市;工業技術研究院電子工業研究所 曾維茂(2005)。高科技產業專利策略之探討。台灣大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。 黃宗德(2006)。知識探索與專利績效關係之研究-以TFT-LCD產業。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。 鄭秀玲、張淑卿(2005)。專利引證和國際知識外溢:以電子業為例。經濟論文,33,103-140 鄭欣宜(2007)。專利績效對公司規模影響之研究-以美國IC設計產業為例。國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,雲林縣。 英文文獻 Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2004). Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 887-907. Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation,16(9), 451-468. Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., & Hatfield, D. E. (2003). Firm performance:A longitudinal study of R&D,patents,and product innovation. Academy of Management Proceedings, pB1-B6. Basberg, B. L. (1983). Foreign patenting in the U.S. as a technology indicator : The case of Norway. Research Policy, 12(4), 227-237. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Reenen, J. V. (1999). Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms. Review of Economic Studies, 66, 529-554. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552. Davis, L., & Kjær, K. ( 2003). Patent Strategies of Small Danish High-Tech Firms. DRUID Summer Conference 2003. Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge-The Role of Geographical Configurations,Institutional Settings and Organizational Contexts,Copenhagen,Denmark. Ernst, H. (1998). Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. J. Eng. Technol. Manage, 15 (4), 279-308. Ernst, H. (1999). Evaluation of dynamic technological developments by means of patent data, in: K. Brockhoff, A.K. Chakrabarti, J. Hauschildt (Eds.)The Dynamics of Innovation: Strategic and Managerial Implications, Springer Corporation, Berlin. Granstrand, O. (1999). The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multitechnology corporations: why they have distributed rather than distinctive core competencies. Calif. Manage. Rev., 39 (4), 8-25. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric Analysis. 4th edition: Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, U.S.A. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707. Grupp, H., & Schmoch, U. (1999). Patent statistics in the age of globalization: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation. Research Policy, 28, 377-396. Guellec, D., & Potterie, B. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of patent. Economics Letters, 69, 109-114. Hall, R. (1992). The Strategiv Analysis of Intangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135-144. Hall, B. H. (1993). The Stock Market’s Valuation of Research and Development Investment During the 1980s. American Economic Review, 83, 259-264. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 119-127. Hsiao, C. (1989). Analysis of Panel Data: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1996). Flows of Knowledge from Universities and Federal Labs: Modeling the Flow of Patent Citations over Time and across Institutional and Geographic Boundaries. NBER Working Paper, No.5712. Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 8(1-2), 105-136. Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. NBER Working Paper, no. 7741. Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. S. (2000). Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors. American Economic Review, 90 (2), 215-218. Knight, H. J. (2001). Patent Strategy for Researchers and Research Managers (2nd ed.): New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Lanjouw, J., Pakes, A., & Putnam, J. (1996). How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data. NBER Working Paper, no. 5741. Miele, A. (2001). Patent Strategy-The Manager’s Guide to Profiting form Patent Portfolios: New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data. Econometrica, 46, 69-85. Narin, F., & Perry, E. N. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16, 143-155. Olsson, H., & McQueen, D. H. (2000). Factors influencing patenting in small computer software producing companies. Technovation, 20(10), 563-576. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1991). Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: an important case of non-globalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 1-21. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competency of theworld's largest firms: complex path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 6(2), 141-156. Petty, R., & J. Guthrie (2000). Intellectual Capital Literature Review-Measurement, Reporting and Management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(2), 155-176 Rivette, K. G., & Kline, D. (2000). Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents: Boston, Mass: Harvard University Press. Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in Europen countries during the post-1950 period. The Economic Journal, 96(384), 1052-1076. Scherer, F. M. (1965). Corporate Inventive Output, Profits, and Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 73(3), 190-197. Smyth, D. J., Samuels, J. M., & Tzoannos, J. (1972). Patents, Profitability, Liquidity and Firm Size. Applied Economics, 4, 77-86. Soete, L., & Wyatt, S. (1983). The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator. Scientometrics 5(1), 31-54. Somaya, D. (2002). Patent strategy viewed through the lens of patent litigation: doctoral dissertation,University of California.Berkeley. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187. Verspagen, B., & Schoenmakers, W. (2000). The Spatial dimension of Knowledge Spillovers in Europe:Evidence From Firm Patenting Data. AEA Conference. Intellectual Property Econometrics,Alicante,Spain. Ziedonis, R. H. (2001). The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-95. Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1), 101-128. 網路資源 公開資訊觀測站http://newmops.tse.com.tw/ 冠亞智財股份有限公司(2006)。專利佈局,到底是什麼?。2010年1月5日,取自http://www.gainia.com/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=101-8.1 財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2005)。聯發科專利佈局初探。2009年12月27日,取自http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/analysis/pat085.htm 經濟部智慧財產局(2008)。國際專利分類(第8版)。2009年11月12日,取自http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ch/Download_DownloadPage.aspx?path=2789&Language=1&UID=7&ClsID=55&ClsTwoID=125&ClsThreeID=0 Shumaker & Sieffert(2002). Building a Patent Portfolio that Supports Your Business Objectives.2009年11月27日,取自http://www.ssiplaw.com/files/strategy.pdf Willy Manfroy(2005). Intellectual Assets Management North American Best practices.2009年11月18日,取自http://www.ryutu.inpit.go.jp/seminar_a/2005/pdf/25/B3/Manfroy.pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22756 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究在探討台灣IC設計公司專利對企業營收的影響,以及跨國申請專利對企業營收是否有價值。本研究先將企業申請的專利,以四種專利相對專利地位、相對技術異質性、賀芬達指數、加權引證數來衡量其專利的價值,再搭配台灣專利資料和美國專利資料,來探討跨國專利和企業營收的關聯。本研究採用台灣IC設計產業的上市公司,共23家,1999年到2008年的縱橫段面資料。
實證結果顯示,跨國專利對企業營收有顯著影響,但是專利指標上的表現,和台灣專利有不同程度的影響。台灣專利顯著的指標是相對專利地位、相對技術異質性和加權引證數;而美國專利顯著的指標是相對專利地位和賀芬達指數。 實務上最重要的發現,就是在美國申請專利成功代表的是企業的高技術水平,即使企業客戶都不在美國,對企業營收仍有顯著幫助。企業在申請專利上,確實會依照不同國別做不同的策略考量。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study is to discuss the impacts of IC design house patenting to enterprises’ revenues, and whether foreign patenting has value-added on enterprises’ revenues. This study will first derive the enterprises’ patent applications by using three patent indicators-relative patent position; relative technology advantage; Herfindahl -Hirschman index; and weighted patent counts to evaluate the values of patents, and then collocate with Taiwanese patent data and USA patent data to investigate the relationship of foreign patenting and enterprises’ revenues. This study uses Taiwanese IC designed listed companies (total of 23 companies and between year 1999 to 2008 Panel data).
As the result indicates that: The foreign patenting has strong correlation on enterprises’ revenues, but different between Taiwanese patent data in patent indicators. Taiwanese patent data has significantly high correlation in relative patent position; relative technology advantage; and weighted patent counts, but USA patent data has significantly high correlation in relative patent position; and Herfindahl -Hirschman index. As the evidences show that the success of patent applications in USA are due to enterprises’ high standard of technology, even if those enterprises’ customers are not in USA, the useful patents still contribute to the enterprises’ revenues. According to patenting different countries, enterprises indeed have their different strategy. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:27:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96724059-1.pdf: 1432235 bytes, checksum: 2d1c773a5cca86700cb1d30224b90bac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究動機與目的1 第二節 研究問題4 第三節 研究流程5 第二章 文獻探討6 第一節 無形資產的相關研究6 第二節 專利策略的內涵與相關研究7 第三節 專利表現與企業經營績效的相關研究17 第三章 研究設計26 第一節 架構圖26 第二節 IC產業之介紹26 第三節 樣本資料介紹36 第四節 研究變數42 第五節 計量分析方法46 第四章 實證結果與分析50 第一節 樣本分析及敘述性統計 50 第二節 台灣專利對企業營收之關聯分析50 第三節 美國專利對企業營收之關聯分析53 第四節 台灣、美國專利綜合分析56 第五章 結論與建議61 第一節 研究結論61 第二節 研究貢獻62 第三節 研究限制與建議63 參考文獻64 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | IC設計業之跨國專利及其企業營收之關聯分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Analysis of the Relationships between Foreign Patents and Revenues in IC Design Industry | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳學良(Hsueh-Liang Wu),簡明哲(Ming-Che Chien) | |
dc.subject.keyword | IC設計,專利,跨國申請專利,專利指標, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | IC design,Patent,Foreign Patenting,Patent Indicators, | en |
dc.relation.page | 69 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-02-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.4 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。