Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 工業工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22697
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳文方
dc.contributor.authorTsu-Yi Chuangen
dc.contributor.author莊子逸zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T04:24:59Z-
dc.date.copyright2010-06-08
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-05-31
dc.identifier.citation行政院衛生署藥物食品檢驗局-基因改造食品資訊網http://gmo.doh.gov.tw/Web/default.aspx
Nownews網路追追追 http://examine.nownews.com/
宋明哲(2001) 現代風險管理。台北:五南
吳明隆(2007) SPSS操作與應用-變異數分析實務。台北:五南
邱皓政(2006) 量化硏究與統計分析 : SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南
陳順宇(2004)多變量分析。台北:華泰
鄧家駒(2002)風險管理。台北:華泰
鄭燦堂(1995)風險管理-理論與實務。台北:五南
Breakwell, G. M. (2007). The Psychology of Risk. Cambridge :: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, P., Fischhoff, B., Gerrard, S., Niewohner, J., Pidgeon, N., & Riley, D. (2001). Developing a Methodology for Designing Messages about Chemical Risks in the Workplace Using the Mental Models Approach: Health and Safety Executive.
Dholakia, U. M. (2000). A motivational process model of product involvement
and consumer risk perception. European Journal of Marketing, 35(1340-1360).
Edwards, A., & Elwyn, G. (2001). Understanding Risk and Lessons for Clinical Risk Communication about Treatment Preferences. Quality in Health Care, 10, 9-13.
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs. Risk Analysis, 16, 473-486.
Gordon-Lubitz, R. J. (2003). Risk Communication: Problems of Presentation and Understanding. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(1), 95.
Hammond, S. (2000). Using Psychometric tests. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond & C. Fife-Schaw (Eds.), Research Methods in Psychology (2 ed., pp. 182-109). London: Sage.
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss , W. (1952). The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.
Huber, O., Wider, R., & Huber, O., W. (1997). Active Information Search and Complete Information Presetation in Naturalistic Risky Decision Tasks. Acta Psychologia, 95, 15-29.
Itoh, M. (2008). Toward Information Management for Reducing Damage Caused by Rumors. Paper presented at the PSAM9.
Jungermann, H., Pfister, H., & Fischer, K. (1996). Credibility, Information Preferences, and Information Interests. Risk Analysis, 16, 251-262.
Kasperson, R. E. (1992). The Social Amplification of Risk: Progress in Developing an Integrative Framework of Risk. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk (pp. 119-132). CT: Praeger.
Lion, R., Meertens, R., M,, & Bot, I. (2002). Priorities in Information Desire about Unknown Rusks. Risk Analysis, 22(4), 765-776.
Lirtzman, S. I., & Shuv-Ami, A. (1986). Credibility of Sources of Communication on Product Safety Hazard. Psychological Reports, 58, 707-718.
Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567-574.
Papastavrou, J. D., & Lehto, M. R. (1996). Improving the Effectiveness of Warning by Increasing the Appropriateness of their Information Content: some Hypotheses about Human Compliance. Safety Science, 21(3), 175-189.
Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T., & McCallum, D. B. (1997). The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: an Empirical Study. Risk Analysis, 17(1), 43-54.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Attitudes and Persuasion-Classic and Contemporary Approaches Boulder, Colo. :: Westview Press.
Redmill, F. (2002). Some Dimensions of Risk not often by Engineers. Computing & Control Engineering Journal, 13(6), 268-272.
Sherif, M. (1967). Attitude, ego-involvement, and change. New York: Wiley.
Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Gutscher, H. (2001). Shared Values, Social Trust, and the Perception of Geographic Cancer Clusters. Risk Analysis, 21(1), 189-198.
Sjoberg, L. (2001). Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust. Risk Analysis, 21(1), 189-198.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Rating the Risks. Environment, 21(3), 14.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1985). Chracterizing Perceived Risk. In R. W. Kates, D. Hohenemser & J. Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous Progress: Technology as Hazard (pp. 91-123). Boulder: Co: Westview.
Trumbo, C. W., & McComas, K. A. (2003). The Function of Credibility in Information Processing for Risk Perception. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 23, 343-353.
Vaughan, E. J. (1997). RIsk Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Venkatraman, M. P. (1989). Involvement and risk. Psychology and Marketing, 6, 229-247.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Conceptualizing Involvement. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 4-15.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22697-
dc.description.abstractNowadays, firms or government often need to send the accurate risk information to people who are related with the risk. The risk information is sent via effective risk communication, to help people establish the correct risk perception. According to past literature, it is known that the credibility of risk information source is one of the variables that affect the efficiency of risk communication. The credible information source, the contact of the risk communication will be more effective. Furthermore, the information also plays an important role in risk communication as one of the variables. If more detailed information is disclosed, the risk communication will be more efficient. In addition, previous studies indicated that the message recipients will change their behavior when face different levels of issue involvement. However, in past study of risk communication, these three variables are rarely considered at the same time. This study attempts to explore this issue by investigating the effect of source credibility and message information on risk perception, adding issue involvement as the moderated variable.
After a series of experiments and analyses, there are several findings in this study. (1)Under low level of issue involvement, the impact of source credibility on risk perception is more evident than that under high level of issue involvement. (2)Under high level of issue involvement, the impact of message information on risk perception is much than that under low level of issue involvement. (3)Under high level of source credibility, the impact of message information on risk perception is more evident that under low level of issue involvement.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:24:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R96546006-1.pdf: 936924 bytes, checksum: 52b46fcb57b9f599c062c140f34e2f1a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 V
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的與問題 3
1.3 研究步驟 4
第二章 相關文獻與理論探討 5
2.1風險 5
2.2風險知覺 6
2.3風險溝通 7
2.4訊息來源可信度 9
2.5訊息內容 11
2.6個人涉入 12
2.7小結 13
第三章 研究設計與方法 14
3.1 研究架構 14
3.2 研究假設 15
3.3變數之定義與衡量尺度 17
3.4 研究對象 18
3.5 實驗設計 18
3.6 前測 19
3.7正式實驗 20
3.8資料分析方法 21
第四章 研究結果 25
4.1 前測結果 25
4.2效度分析 26
4.3信度分析 28
4.4樣本組成 28
4.5 共變數分析之假設檢定 29
4.6 操弄變數的檢定 32
4.7假設檢定 35
第五章 結論與建議 42
5.1 結論 42
5.2 實務建議 44
5.3 研究限制 45
5.4後續研究建議 46
參考文獻 47
附錄一:前測問卷 50
附錄二:正式問卷 53
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject來源可信度zh_TW
dc.subject知覺風險zh_TW
dc.subject議題涉入zh_TW
dc.subjectIssue Involvementen
dc.subjectSource Credibilityen
dc.subjectRisk Perceptionen
dc.title訊息來源可信度與訊息內容對風險知覺影響之研究-以議題涉入為干擾zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effect of Source Credibility and Message Information on Risk Perception-Under Moderation of Issue Involvementen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王銘宗,徐堯
dc.subject.keyword知覺風險,議題涉入,來源可信度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordRisk Perception,Issue Involvement,Source Credibility,en
dc.relation.page45
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2010-06-06
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept工業工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:工業工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
914.96 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved