Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 昆蟲學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22655
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃榮南
dc.contributor.authorHsiang-Ting Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃祥庭zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T04:23:37Z-
dc.date.copyright2010-06-30
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-06-25
dc.identifier.citation陸、引用文獻
朱格麟。 1995。 藜科植物的起源、分化和地理分布。 植物分類學報。 34: 486-504。
余志儒。 2005。 植物抽取液防治蟲害研究現況。 產品研討會專刊。 1-12。
余志儒、陳炳輝。 2007。 天然防蟲物質。 農業試驗所【特刊】: 作物蟲害之非農藥防治技術。 130: 19-28。
吳月紅、楊曉虹、劉松豔、陳滴、董雷。 2007。 藜揮發油成份 GC-MS 分析。 特產研究。 1: 63-64。
周瓊、梁廣文、曾玲。 2004。 多種植物提取物對桃蚜和蘿蔔蚜的拒食活性研究。 天然產物研究與開發。 16: 521-524。
周瓊、劉炳榮、舒迎花、何艷。 2006。 蒼耳等藥用植物提取物對小菜蛾的拒食作用和產卵忌避效果。 中國蔬菜。 2: 17-20。
林立。 2008。 菸草浸液防治棉蚜之應用。 花蓮區農業專訊。 63: 9-11。
林建宗、賴婉綺、蕭文鳳、王升陽。 2007。 柳杉心材精油對衣魚之忌避與致死活性之研究。 中華林學季刊。 40: 251-260。
柯季宏。 2005。 台灣肖楠葉子精油及成份抗病媒蚊活性之研究. 國立台灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文.
張芳銘 1997。 台灣食用藜之研究. 國立台灣大學農藝學研究所碩士論文.
郭能成、林萬居。 1997。 民俗作物藜之利用評估-播種密度對植株生質量及籽實產量之影響 (夏秋作). 雜糧作物試驗研究年報 86: 371-378.
陳品方。 2000。 台灣杉與土肉桂精油及其成份之生物活性. 國立台灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文.
葉若鋆。 2008。 植物二次代謝物與病蟲害防治. Taiwan Forestry 34: 33-37.
葉茂生。 1999。 台灣山地作物資源彩色圖鑑. 台灣省政府農林廳編 217 頁.
劉如芸。 2006。 六種化學品系土肉桂葉子精油抗細菌、腐朽菌、病媒蚊幼蟲及室塵蟎活性. 國立台灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文.
譚仁祥,孟軍才,陳道峰,焦慶才。 2002。 植物成分分析。 北京出版社。
Ahmed, A. A. 2000. Highly oxygenated monoterpenes from Chenopodium ambrosioides. J. Nat. Prod. 63: 989-91.
Akhtar, Y., and M. B. Isman. 2004. Comparative growth inhibitory and antifeedant effects of plant extracts and pure allelochemicals on four phytophagous insect species. J. Appl. Ent. 128: 32-38.
Anuradha, A., R. S. Annadurai, and L. S. Shashidhara. 2007. Actin cytoskeleton as a putative target of the neem limonoid Azadirachtin A. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 37: 627-34.
Bagavan, A., C. Kamaraj, A. A. Rahuman, G. Elango, A. A. Zahir, and G. Pandiyan. 2009. Evaluation of larvicidal and nymphicidal potential of plant extracts against Anopheles subpictus Grassi, Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles and Aphis gossypii Glover. Parasitol Res 104: 1109-17.
Beroza, M. 1953. Alkaloids from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. The structure of wilforine, wilfordine, wilforgine and wilfotrine J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 75: 44-49.
Beroza, M., and G. T. Bottger. 1954. The insecticidal value of Tripterygium wilfordii J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 76: 188-199.
Bird, T. G., P. A. Hedin, and M. L. Burks. 1987. Feeding deterrent compounds to the boll weevil, anthonomus grandis boheman in rose-of-sharon, Hibiscus syriacus L. J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 1087-1097.
Cavalli, J. F., F. Tomi, A. F. Bernardini, and J. Casanova. 2004. Combined analysis of the essential oil of Chenopodium ambrosioides by GC, GC-MS and 13C-NMR spectroscopy: quantitative determination of ascaridole, a heat-sensitive compound. Phytochem. Anal. 15: 275-9.
Chen, L., X. Cheng, W. Shi, Q. Lu, V. L. Go, D. Heber, and L. Ma. 2005. Inhibition of growth of Streptococcus mutans, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by kurarinone, a bioactive flavonoid isolated from Sophora flavescens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3574-5.
Chiasson, H., N. J. Bostanian, and C, Vincent. 2004a. Acaricidal properties of a Chenopodium-based botanical. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1373-7.
Chiasson, H., C. Vincent, and N. J. Bostanian. 2004b. Insecticidal properties of a Chenopodium-based botanical. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1378-83.
Cloyd, R. A., and H. Chiasson. 2007. Activity of an essential oil derived from Chenopodium ambrosioides on greenhouse insect pests. J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 459-66.
Duffey, S. S., and M. B. Isman. 1981. Inhibition of insect larval growth by phenolics in glandular trichomes of tomato leaves. Experientia 37: 574-576.
Ganesan, K., M. J. Mendki, M. V. S. Suryanarayana, S. Prakash, and R. C. Malhotra, 2006. Studies of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) ovipositional responses to newly identified semiochemicals from conspecific eggs. Aust. J. Entomol. 45: 75-80.
Holfeder, M. G. A. H., M. Steck, E. Komor, and K. Seifert. 1998. Ricinine in phloem sap of Ricinus communis. Phytochemistry 47: 1461-1463.
Huang, H. C., S. C. Liao, F. R. Chang, Y. H. Kuo, and Y. C. Wu. 2003. Molluscicidal saponins from Sapindus mukorossi, inhibitory agents of golden apple snails, Pomacea canaliculata. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51: 4916-9.
Huang, H. C., L. Zhng, Y. C. Wu, Y. H. Kuo, and Y. H. Kuo. 2009. Studies on chemical constituents and bioactivities of saponins. Chemistry (The Chinese Chemical Society, Taipei) 67: 1-12.
Imai, T., M. Mizutani, and M. Tanaka. 2009. Insecticidal activity of capillin isolated from the herbal medicine Inchinko against the cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 44: 497-500.
Kiuchi, F., Y. Itano, N. Uchiyama, G. Honda, A. Tsubouchi, J. Nakajima-Shimada, and T. Aoki. 2002. Monoterpene hydroperoxides with trypanocidal activity from Chenopodium ambrosioides. J. Nat. Prod. 65: 509-12.
Lowery, D. T., M. B. Isman, and N. L. Brard. 1993. Laboratory and field evaluation of neem for the control of aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 86: 864-870.
Mancebo, F., L. Hilje, A. Mora, and R. Salazar. 2000. Antifeedant activity of Quassia amara (Simaroubaceae) extracts on Hypsipyla grandella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae. Crop Prot. 19: 301-305.
Mordue, A. J., and A. Blackwell. 1993. Azadirachtin: an Update. J. Insect Physiol. 39: 903-924.
Norris, D. M. 1977. Role of Repellents and Deterrents in Feeding of Scolytus Multistriatus pp. 215-230. In: P. A. Hedin ed. Host Plant Resistance to Pests. ACS Symp Ser Am Chem Soc. : United States.
Partap, T., and P. Kapoor. 1985. The Himalayan grain chenopods. I. Distibution and ethnobotany. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 14: 185-199.
Pascual-Villalobos, M. J., and A. Robledo. 1998. Screening for anti-insect activity in Mediterranean plants. Industrial Crops and Products 8: 183-194.
Pavela, R., and G. Herda. 2007. Repellent effects of pongam oil on settlement and oviposition of the common greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum on chrysanthemum. Insect Sci. 14: 219-224.
Prasad, C. S., R. Shukla, A. Kumar, and N. K. Dubey. 2009. In vitro and in vivo antifungal activity of essential oils of Cymbopogon martini and Chenopodium ambrosioides and their synergism against dermatophytes. Mycoses Epub. ahead of print.
Ruales, J., and B. M. Nair. 1992. Nutritional quality of the protein in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa, Willd) seeds. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 42: 1-11.
Scheffrahn, R. H., and M. K. Rust. 1987. Feeding deterrent compounds to the boll weevil, anthonomus grandis boheman in rose-of-sharon, Hibiscus syriacus L. J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 1087-1097.

Simmonds, M. S. J., W. M. Blaney, R. B. Grossman, and S. V. Ley. 1995. Behavioural responses of locusts and Spodoptea littoralis to azadirachtin and azaderachtin analogues containing fluorescent and immunogenic report groups. J. Insect Physiol. 41: 555-564.
Tapondjoua, L. A., C. Adlerb, H. Boudaa, and D. A. Fontem. 2002. Efficacy of powder and essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides leaves as post-harvest grain protectants against six-stored product beetles. J. Stored Prod. Res. 38: 395-402.
Vauzour, D., K. Vafeiadou, A. Rodriguez-Mateos, C. Rendeiro, and J. P. Spencer. 2008. The neuroprotective potential of flavonoids: a multiplicity of effects. Genes Nutr. 3: 115-26.
Vinson, S. B., G. W. Frankie, M. S. Blum, and J. W. Wheeler. 1978. Isolation, identification, and function of the Dufour's gland secretion of Xylocopa virginica texana. J. Chem. Ecol. 4: 315-323.
Warren, B. R., R. L. Rouseff, K. R. Schneider, and M. E. Parish. 2007. Identification of volatile sulfur compounds produced by Shigella sonnei using gas chromatography–olfactometry. Food Control 18: 179-182.
Wei, H., Y. Hou, G. Yang, and M. You. 2004. Repellent and antifeedant effect of secondary metabolites of non-host plants on plutela xylostella. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 15: 473-476.
Wei, S., M. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Qian, Z. Ji, and W. Wu. 2009a. Three novel sesquiterpene esters from Celastrus angulatus. Nat. Prod. Commun. 4: 461-6.
Wei, S. P., Z. Q. Ji, and J. W. Zhang. 2009b. A new insecticidal sesquiterpene ester from Celastrus angulatus. Molecules 14: 1396-403.
Wu, W., M. Wang, J. Zhu, W. Zhou, Z. Hu, and Z. Ji. 2001. Five new insecticidal sesquiterpenoids from Celastrus angulatus. J. Nat. Prod. 64: 364-7.
Xu, H. X., J. M. Chen, Z. X. Lu, L. Z. Chen, and X. P. Yu. 2006. Insecticidal activities of the non-allkaloid extracts from Tripterygium wilfordii against Plutella xylostella. Chinese j. Eco-Agri. 14: 179-181.
Yang, E. C., and E. H. Chio. 2008. A bioassay for natural insect repellents. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 11: 225-227.
Zhiqing, J., Z. Qidong, S. Baojun, W. Shaopeng, W. Mingan, and W. Wenjun. 2009. Three new insecticidal sesquiterpene pyridine alkaloids from Celastrus angulatus. Nat. Prod. Res. 23: 470-8.
Zhiqing, J., W. Wenjun, Y. Hua, S. Baojun, and W. Mingan. 2007. Four novel insecticidal sesquiterpene esters from Celastrus angulatus. Nat. Prod. Res. 21: 334-42.
Zhong, G., M. Hu, X. Wei, Q. Weng, J. Xie, J. Liu, and W. Wang. 2005. Grayanane diterpenoids from the flowers of Rhododendron molle with cytotoxic activity against a Spodoptera frugiperda cell line. J. Nat. Prod. 68: 924-6.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22655-
dc.description.abstract台灣藜 (Chenopodium formosanum) 為台灣南部原住民傳統作物,本研究探討台灣藜粗萃液對溫室蔬菜和花卉害蟲:小菜蛾 (Plutalla xylostella)、桃蚜 (Myzus persicae) 及銀葉粉蝨 (Bemisia tabaci) 之忌避活性。將種子、種皮、葉片的甲醇粗萃液針對三種害蟲進行選擇及非選擇性之忌食與忌產卵試驗。結果顯示,台灣藜的葉子與種皮之粗萃液對小菜蛾幼蟲、桃蚜若蟲及銀葉粉蝨成蟲具忌食活性;對小菜蛾成蟲和銀葉粉蝨成蟲,亦具忌產卵活性。忌食結果顯示葉子的粗萃液於 1% 濃度時,桃蚜和銀葉粉蝨的選擇性忌食率平均為 32.43% 及 37.95%,而非選擇性忌食率平均為 30.13% 及26.55%,對小菜蛾幼蟲選擇性忌避食率平均為 29.73% 而非選擇性忌食率平均為 21.40%;忌產卵選擇性結果顯示,對小菜蛾及銀葉粉蝨平均為 39.31% 和 42.83% 之忌產卵率,而非選擇性試驗則分別為 29.33% 及 32.3% 之忌產卵率;根據試驗結果,葉子粗萃液的忌避活性高於種皮粗萃液,而種子粗萃液則較微弱。進一步將葉子粗萃物進行液-液分離,得到乙酸乙酯層、正丁醇層及水層。忌食結果顯示,1% 水層粗萃液對三種害蟲 (桃蚜、銀葉粉蝨、小菜蛾) 的選擇性忌食率分別平均為21.88%、30.73%、27.53%,非選擇性忌食率平均為 24.33%、23.75%、28.27% 皆高於另兩層萃取物;選擇性忌產卵結果顯示,小菜蛾及銀葉粉蝨的忌產卵率分別平均為 33.89%、35.16%,而非選擇性結果分別平均為 31.26% 及 37.90%。另外,氣相層析質譜儀分析鑑定結果中,在忌避效果最佳的葉子粗萃液發現 15 個化合物,種皮發現 18 個化合物,種子 7 個化合物,再經液-液分離後,由水層鑑定出 16 個化合物,正丁醇層 14 個化合物,乙酸乙酯層 8 個化合物。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractDjulis (Chenopodium formosanum) is the traditional crops in the southern Taiwan. This study aims to investigate the deterrent effect of crude extract from leaves and seeds of djulis to the Plutalla xylostella, Myzus persicae and Bemisia tabaci which are the common agricultural pests in vegetables and flowers in greenhouse. We evaluated the methanol extract of djulis for their anti-feeding and anti-oviposition efficiency by using choice and no-choice bioassay. The results showed that the deterrent efficiency of 1% leaf crude extract for M. persicae and B. tabaci on anti-feeding were 32.43% and 37.95% in choice test;in no-choice test, the deterrent efficiency were 30.13% and 26.55%. The efficiency of anti-feeding on P. xylostella in choice test and no-choice test were 29.73% and 21.40%. For anti-oviposition, the efficiency of leaf extract in choice test were 39.31% and 42.83% on P. xylostella and B. tabaci, however, the efficiency in no-choice test were 29.33% and 32.3%. Overall, the deterrent of methanol leaf extract of djulis for pests was better than testa and seed extract. The methanol leaf extract were further partitioned into ethyl acetate, butanol and water layer. The results showed that anti-feeding efficiency of 1% water layer for M. persicae, B. tabaci and P. xylostella were 21.88%, 30.73% and 27.53% in choice test. However, the deterrent efficiency were 24.33%, 23.75% and 28.27% in no-choice test. The results of choice and no-choice bioassay for water layer were better than butanol layer and ethyl acetate layer. In addition, the efficiency of anti-oviposition for P. xylostella and B. tabaci were both higher than 33% in choice test, however, the efficiency in no-choice test were 31.26% and 37.90%. The gas chromatograms of leaf extract showed the difference from seed and testa extract. Moreover, fifteen components were identified from leaf extract, eighteen components were identified from testa extract and seven components were identified from seed extract by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Similarly, the gas chromatograms of water layer showed the difference from butanol layer and ethyl acetate layer. Moreover, sixteen components were identified from water layer, fourteen components were identified from butanol layer and eight components were identified from ethyl acetate by GC/MS. In conclusion, leaf crude extract of djulis have efficiency of both anti-feeding and anti-oviposition on P. xylostella, M. persicae and B. tabaci, indicating the potential candidacy of the djulis as a new deterrent plant to agricultural pests.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:23:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R96632014-1.pdf: 675682 bytes, checksum: b31872d119434cffacc54a680538a37f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要..............................ii
英文摘要..............................iii
目錄.................................v
表目錄...............................vii
圖目錄...............................viii
壹、緒言..............................1
貳、往昔研究..........................3
一、天然抗蟲物質......................3
(一) 抗蟲植物.........................3
(二) 抗蟲植物抽出物之成份.............8
二、藜科植物.........................10
(一) 藜科藜屬植物簡介................10
(二) 台灣藜簡介......................10
(三) 藜屬植物成份與應用之研究........11
参、材料與方法
一、試驗材料.........................13
(一) 供試蟲來源......................13
(二) 供試蟲飼育......................13
(三) 台灣藜甲醇粗萃液製備............13
(四) 台灣藜甲醇粗萃液有效部位之再分離14
二、試驗方法.........................14
(一) 殺蟲活性試驗 ...................14
(二) 忌避活性試驗 ...................15
(三) 氣相質譜層析儀鑑定 .............16
(四) 結果與統計分析..................18
肆、結果
一、台灣藜粗萃後各層乾重.............19
二、台灣藜甲醇粗萃液殺蟲活性試驗.....19
三、台灣藜甲醇粗萃液忌避活性.........19
四、台灣藜葉片乙酸乙酯層、正丁醇層、水層粗萃液忌避活性試驗...................................20
五、氣相質譜層析儀分析結果...........21
伍、討論.............................23
陸、引用文獻.........................28
柒、附錄.............................58
表目錄
表一、紅藜葉子甲醇粗萃液殺蟲活性……………………………………………...………………..53
表二、台灣藜的葉子甲醇粗萃物鑑定結果………………………………….................................…53
表三、台灣藜的種皮甲醇粗萃物鑑定結果………………………………...……………………..…54
表四、台灣藜的種子甲醇粗萃物鑑定結果…………………………………...……………………..54
表五、乙酸乙酯層粗萃物鑑定結果………………………………………..…………………………55
表六、正丁醇層粗萃物鑑定結果…………………………………………….………………………55
表七、台灣藜葉子水層粗萃物鑑定結果………………………………….…………………………56

圖目錄
圖一、台灣藜野生植株…………………………………………………………………………….….34
圖二、實驗萃取之紅藜部位……………………………………………………................................34
圖三、殺蟲活性試驗和忌避測試裝置前處理…………………………………................................35
圖四、台灣藜萃取分離流程……………………………………………………................................36
圖五、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對桃蚜之選擇性忌食率………................................37
圖六、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對桃蚜之非選擇性忌食率……................................38
圖七、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對銀葉粉蝨之選擇性忌食率….……………………39
圖八、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對銀葉粉蝨之非選擇性忌食率…………………....40
圖九、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對小菜蛾幼蟲之選擇性忌食率…………………….41
圖十、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對小菜蛾幼蟲之非選擇性忌食率………………….42
圖十一、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對小菜蛾之選擇性忌產卵率…………………....43
圖十二、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對小菜蛾之非選擇性忌產卵率………………….44
圖十三、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對銀葉粉蝨之選擇性忌產卵率………………….45
圖十四、台灣藜種子、種皮、葉子甲醇粗萃液對銀葉粉蝨之非選擇性忌產卵率……………….46
圖十五、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對桃蚜之選擇性忌食率………………………………….47
圖十六、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對桃蚜之非選擇性忌食率……….……………………...48
圖十七、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對銀葉粉蝨之選擇性忌食率…………………………....49
圖十八、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對銀葉粉蝨之非選擇性忌食率………………………….50
圖十九、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對小菜蛾幼蟲之選擇性忌食率………………………...51
圖二十、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對小菜蛾幼蟲之非選擇性忌食率……………………....52
圖二十一、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對小菜蛾之選擇性忌產卵率…………………………53
圖二十二、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對小菜蛾之非選擇性忌產卵率……………………….54
圖二十三、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對銀葉粉蝨選擇性忌產卵率…………………….…...55
圖二十四、水層、正丁醇層、乙酸乙酯層對銀葉粉蝨非選擇性忌產卵率……………………..56
圖二十五、台灣藜的葉子甲醇粗萃物之氣相層析圖譜…………………………………………..57
圖二十六、台灣藜的種皮甲醇粗粹物之氣相層析圖譜…………………………………………..58
圖二十七、台灣藜的種子甲醇粗粹物之氣相層析圖譜…………………………………………..59
圖二十八、台灣藜葉子甲醇粗萃物經液-液分離後,乙酸乙酯層之氣相層析圖譜……………………………………………………………………………………………………..60
圖二十九、台灣藜葉子甲醇粗萃物經液-液分離後,正丁醇層之氣相層析圖譜……………….61
圖三十、灣藜葉子甲醇粗萃物經液-液分離後,水層之氣相層析圖譜………………………….62









附錄
頁數
附錄一 藥品試劑與儀器…………………………………………………………..57
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject氣相層析質譜儀zh_TW
dc.subject台灣藜zh_TW
dc.subject選擇及非選擇性zh_TW
dc.subject忌食zh_TW
dc.subject忌產卵zh_TW
dc.subjectchoice and no-choiceen
dc.subjectGC/MSen
dc.subjectanti-ovipositionen
dc.subjectanti-feedingen
dc.subjectdjulisen
dc.title台灣藜對三種植食性害蟲之忌避效果zh_TW
dc.titleDeterrent of Taiwanese indigenous djulis (Chenopodium formosanum) on three phytophagous insect pestsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee吳文哲,許如君,陳建忠,黃紹毅
dc.subject.keyword台灣藜,選擇及非選擇性,忌食,忌產卵,氣相層析質譜儀,zh_TW
dc.subject.keyworddjulis,choice and no-choice,anti-feeding,anti-oviposition,GC/MS,en
dc.relation.page67
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2010-06-28
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept昆蟲學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:昆蟲學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
659.85 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved