請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22585
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林嬋娟 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Wei Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林佳薇 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:21:32Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, G. F. Peters, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. The association between audit committee haracteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22(2): 17-32.
Baber, W. R., E. H. Brooks, and W. E. Ricks. 1987. An empirical investigation of the market for audit services in the public sector. Journal of Accounting Research 25(2): 293-305. Blouin, J., B. M. Grein, and B. R. Rountree. 2007. An analysis of forced auditor change: The case of former Arthur Andersen clients. The Accounting Review 82(3): 621-650. Chan, K. H., K. Z. Lin, and P. L. L. Mo. 2006. A political-economic analysis of auditor reporting and auditor switches. Review of Accounting Studies 11(1): 21-48. Chen, C. J. P., X. Su, and X. Wu. 2007. Market competitiveness and Big 5 pricing: Evidence from China's binary market. The International Journal of Accounting 42: 1-24. Chen, C. J. P., X. Su, and X. Wu. 2009. Forced audit firm change, continued partner-client relationship, and financial reporting quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28(2): 227-246. Chen, K. Y. and J. Zhou. 2007. Audit committee, board characteristics, and auditor switch decisions by Andersen's clients. Contemporary Accounting Research 24(4): 1085-1117. Chen, S., S. Y. J. Sun, D. Wu. 2010. Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review 85(1): 127-158. Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting & Economics 20: 297-322. DeFond, M. L., T. J. Wong, and S. Li. 2000. The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28: 269-305. Gregory, A. and P. Collier 1996. Audit fees and auditor change; an investigation of the persistence of fee reduction by type of change. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 23(1): 13-28. Gul, F. A., H. Sami, and H. Zhou. 2009. Auditor disaffiliation program in China and auditor independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28(1): 29-51. Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23(1): 141-191. Kealey, B. T., H. Y. Lee, and M. T. Stein. 2007. The association between audit-firm tenure and audit fees paid to successor auditors: Evidence from Arthur Andersen. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26(2): 95-116. Krishnan, J., K. Raghunandan, and J. S. Yang. 2007. Were former Andersen clients treated more leniently than other clients? Evidence from going-concern modified audit opinions. Accounting Horizons 21(4): 423-435. Landsman, W. R., K. K. Nelson, and B. R. Rountree. 2009. Auditor switches in the preand post-Enron eras: risk or realignment? The Accounting Review 84(2): 531-558. Lin, C. J. and H. L. Lin. 2009. Auditor size, brand name reputation, market competition and audit fees: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Accounting Studies 49: 35-72. (In Chinese) Lin, Z. J. 2004. Auditor's responsibility and independence: Evidence from China. Research in Accounting Regulation 17: 167-190. Roberts, R. W., G. W. Glezen, and T. W. Jones. 1990. Determinants of auditor change in the public sector. Journal of Accounting Research 28(1): 220-228. Simon, D. T. and J. R. Francis 1988. The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery. The Accounting Review 63(2): 255-269. Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18(1): 161-190. Vermeer, T. E., D. V. Rama, and K. Raghunandan. 2008. Partner familiarity and audit fees: Evidence from former Andersen clients. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27(2): 217-229. Walker, P. L., and J. R. Casterella. 2000. The role of auditee profitability in pricing new audit engagements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (1): 157 – 167. Wang, Q., T. J. Wong, and L. Xia. 2008. State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting & Economics 46: 112-134. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22585 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中國市場具有異於西方國家的特性。例如,高比例的國有企業、四大會計師事務所並未在中國審計市場占有領導的地位等。除此之外,會計師事務所必須具備證券期貨相關業務許可證始能審計上市公司。一旦會計師事務所喪失許可證,該客戶將面臨被迫更換會計師事務所。
本文之目的在於探討在中國強制更換會計師事務所的情況下審計公費的決定因素。本研究以 2000 至 2007 年因事務所被迫停業的中國上市公司為樣本,探討強制更換會計師事務所的情況下,跟隨前任會計師的決定及是否為國有企業對於審計公費的影響。實證結果顯示,跟隨前任會計師的客戶及國有企業其更換會計師後之審計公費並沒有顯著減少。進一步實證結果發現,可能因繼任會計師事務所較為保守或是其他原因,而對跟隨前任會計師的國有企業要求顯著較高之審計公費。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This paper investigates the audit fee determinants following forced audit firm changes in China. Specifically, this paper examines the impact of auditor following decision and firm ownership on the audit fees. In China, audit firms need to acquire the license to audit listed companies. Once audit firms lost their licenses, their clients are forced to change audit firms. Analyzing clients that were forced to change audit firm during 2000 to 2007 in China, this paper fails to find the evidence that follower clients and SOEs (State-Owned-Enterprise) have significant relations with audit fees subsequent to forced the auditor switches. However, due to conservatism or other factors, succeeding audit firms charge higher audit fees to SOEs which follow their former auditors. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:21:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97722009-1.pdf: 483766 bytes, checksum: 6a10097bf44b8c980952f086558fa764 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………1
2. Institutional background…………………………………………5 2.1 China audit market………………………………………………5 2.2 Regulation on audit industry in China………………………7 2.3 Audit firms’ licenses’ termination………………………10 3. Literature review and hypotheses development……………12 3.1 Fee determinants…………………………………………………12 3.2 Voluntary auditor change and audit fees…………………14 3.3 Effect of forced audit firm change…………………………15 3.4 Extant SOE Research in China…………………………………17 3.5 Hypotheses Development…………………………………………18 4. Sample selection and research design………………………21 4.1 Sample selection…………………………………………………21 4.2 Research design…………………………………………………21 5. Results………………………………………………………………26 5.1 Descriptive statistics…………………………………………26 5.2 Empirical result…………………………………………………28 5.3 Additional test…………………………………………………32 6. Conclusion………………………………………………………………35 References………………………………………………………………37 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 強制更換會計師事務所情況下之審計公費決定因素-中國之實證 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Fee Determinants Following Forced Audit Firm Changes in China | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 薛敏正,林孝倫 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 強制更換會計師,審計公費,跟隨前任會計師,國有企業, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | forced audit firm change,audit fees,following decision,SOE, | en |
dc.relation.page | 50 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 472.43 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。