請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22565
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇喜 | |
dc.contributor.author | Meng-Hung Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李孟鴻 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:20:58Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-10-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文:
1.中央健康保險局(2011)。100年第1門診透析總額專業醫療服務品質報告。取自http://www.nhi.gov.tw/。 2.行政院衛生署(2011 )。全民健康保險Pre-ESRD預防性計畫及病患衛教計畫。 3.吳姿嫺(2004)。青少年醫療服務利用行為及其影響因素之研究。未出版碩士論文,中山大學人力資源管理研究所,高雄市。 4.巫曉玲(2004)。衛教光碟及單張對冠狀動脈心臟病患者飲食認知與自我效能之成效比較。未出版碩士論文,慈濟大學護理學研究所,花蓮縣。 5.林明珍、顧乃平(1993)。團體衛教對改善心肌梗塞病人認知與壓力之成效探討。護理研究,1(4),341-349。 6.林美伶、葉莉莉、陳清惠(2009)。影響病患參與醫療決定之論述。護理雜誌,56(3),83-86。 7.洪韵婷(2008)。台灣血液透析產業策略聯盟之研究。未出版碩士論文,元智大學管理研究所,桃園市。 8.神奇蠶豆園地。http://www.capd.org.tw/。 9.國民健康局(2010)。99年度腎臟病健康促進機構申請資料。 10.國民健康局(2011)。全民健康保險初期慢性腎臟病醫療給付改善方案。 11.常逸平、錢慶文、楊耿如(2007)。全民健保腹膜透析比血液透析省錢嗎。台灣衛誌,26(5),400-408。 12.梁嘉慧(2008)。慢性腎臟疾病患者選擇腹膜透析模式影響因素之探討。未出版碩士論文,臺北醫學大學護理學研究所,台北市。 13.陳念歆(2009)。末期腎病患者選擇透析模式之決策困擾及其相關因素。未出版碩士論文,國立台北護理學院護理研究所,台北市。 14.黃秀蓁(2008)。末期腎病患者選擇透析方式之相關因素探討—以中部某醫學中心為例。未出版碩士論文,亞洲大學長期照護研究所,台中縣。 15.黃尚志、楊五常(2007)。慢性腎臟病防治手冊。台灣腎臟醫學會,49-50。 16.黃松元(1998)。二十一世紀我國衛生教育之展望。學校衛生,32,1-46。 17.黃秋錦(2010)。國人腹膜透析及血液透析治療效果及成本效果分析比較。行政院衛生署國民健康局「慢性腎臟病防治研究專案管理計畫」。 18.黃智英、楊郁(2004)。慢性腎臟病衛教簡介。台灣腎臟護理學會雜誌,3(2),81-87。 19.蕭菁菁(2011)。慢性腎臟病患衛教介入成效與影響因子之探討。未出版碩士論文,亞洲大學健康產業管理學系長期照護組,台中縣。 20.藺汝平(2007)。台灣地區腎臟專科醫師對於末期腎病患者選擇透析模式的影響因素之看法。未出版碩士論文,國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所,台北市。 英文: Andersen, R. A. ( 1968 ) . A behavioral model of families’ use of health services. Research Series No. 23, Center for health administration studies, Chicago:university of Chicago press. Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 1-10. Covic, A., Bammens, B., Lobbedez, T., Segall, L., Heimburger, O., van Biesen, W., et al. (2010). Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: clinical advice from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 25(6), 1757-1759. Cruz, D. N., Troidle, L., Danguilan, R., Padilla, B., Frando, L., Sebastian, E., et al. (2011). Factors Influencing Dialysis Modality for End-Stage Renal Disease in Developing Countries: A Survey of Filipino Nephrologists. Blood Purification, 32(2), 117-123. Heatley, S. A. (2009a). Optimal referral is early referral. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 29 Suppl 2, S128-131. Heatley, S. A. (2009b). Optimal referral to pre-dialysis services: one center's experience. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 29 Suppl 2, S115-116. Jager, K. J., Korevaar, J. C., Dekker, F. W., Krediet, R. T., & Boeschoten, E. W. (2004). The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 43(5), 891-899. Lameire, N., & Van Biesen, W. (1999). The pattern of referral of patients with end-stage renal disease to the nephrologist--a European survey. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 14 Suppl 6, 16-23. Little, J., Irwin, A., Marshall, T., Rayner, H., & Smith, S. (2001). Predicting a patient's choice of dialysis modality: experience in a United Kingdom renal department. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 37(5), 981-986. Lo, W. K. (2009). Absolute Free Choice for Dialysis Modality Selection - Is It Possible? Peritoneal Dialysis International, 29(2), 142-143. Mechanic, D. ( 1968 ). A selective view. Medical Sociology, 3:269-269. Mehrotra, R., Chiu, Y. W., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Bargman, J., & Vonesh, E. (2010). Similar Outcomes With Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(2), 110-118. Mendelssohn, D. C., Mullaney, S. R., Jung, B., Blake, P. G., & Mehta, R. L. (2001). What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality selection? American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 37(1), 22-29. Rosenstock, I. M. ( 1974 ). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2(4):328-335. Rotter, J. B. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1):609-615. Stack, A. G. (2002). Determinants of modality selection among incident US dialysis patients: results from a national study. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 13(5), 1279-1287. Suchman, E. A. (1965). Stages of illness and medical care. Journal of Health and Human Behavior, 6(3), 114-128. United States Renal Data System(2010, 2006). Annual data report, http://www.usrds.org/ Van Biesen, W., De Vecchi, A., Dombros, N., Dratwa, M., Gokal, R., LaGreca, G., et al. (1999). The referral pattern of end-stage renal disease patients and the initiation of dialysis: a European perspective. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 19 Suppl 2, S273-275. Wen, C. P., Cheng, T. Y., Tsai, M. K., Chang, Y. C., Chan, H. T., Tsai, S. P., et al. (2008). All-cause mortality attributable to chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study based on 462 293 adults in Taiwan. Lancet, 371(9631), 2173-2182. Wuerth, D. B., Finkelstein, S. H., Schwetz, O., Carey, H., Kliger, A. S., & Finkelstein, F. O. (2002). Patients' descriptions of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 22(2), 184-190. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22565 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 根據2011年第一季台灣腎臟醫學會統計資料:台灣有62963位透析患者,其中56718位選擇血液透析、6245位擇腹膜透析。末期腎衰竭替代療法分為三種治療模式:分別為血液透析治療、腹膜透析治療與腎臟移植,台灣地區腎臟移植因受限於法規限制與文化等因素影響,腎臟捐贈者人數偏低。且腹膜透析治療成長率不如預期,以致目前腎臟替代療法以血液透析為主。病患在接受腎臟替代療法前,醫療院所有責任對病患做完整的治療模式衛教。
本研究主要探討末期腎衰竭病患治療模式衛教對於透析模式選擇的影響,研究樣本為台灣北部地區的腎友團體,以回溯性問卷方式,於對病患接受腹膜透析、血液透析與腎臟移植衛教後,探討末期腎衰竭治療模式衛教對於透析模式的影響。本研究發現接受不同程度的治療模式衛教,對透析模式選擇有顯著差異;參與完整的三種衛治療模式衛教,對腹膜透析課程的滿意度越高,願意選擇腹膜透析治療的勝算比增為6.87倍。曾接受腹膜透析衛教者,衛教的次數對透析模式選擇有顯著影響。在接受全部三種衛教模式病患當中:有『購買個人保險』、『覺得收入足夠者』、『家人支持意願』、『醫護人員曾經告知因醫療因素考量不適合選擇腹膜透析或血液透析』會影響對其透析模式選擇;在接受腹膜透析與血液透析兩種衛教模式病患當中:『住家距離醫院車程在30分鐘以內』與『家人或幫傭可以協助日常生活起居』會影響對其透析模式選擇;在接受僅腹膜透析一種衛教模式病患當中,認為『醫護人員能協助您解決末期腎衰竭治療問題』、『家人或幫傭可以協助日常生活起居』、『醫護人員曾經告知因醫療因素考量不適合選擇腹膜透』會影響對其透析模式選擇;在接受僅血液透析一種衛教模式病患當中,認為『交通便利性會影響透析方式』會影響對其透析模式選擇。 本研究結果可提供醫護人員於日後執行慢性腎臟病衛教評估更多參考依據,並能充分協助病患選擇最適透析治療模式。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | According to the data collected from Taiwan Society of Nephrology in the first quarter of 2011, there are 62963 dialysis patients in Taiwan, in which 56718 patients received hemodialysis, and 6245 patients received peritoneal dialysis. Renal replacement therapy ( RRT ) include there modality:hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation. Due to the regulation of organ donation and culture difference in Taiwan, only a small number of people donated their kidney for transplantation. In addition, the growth rate of peritoneal dialysis penetration was not as strong as expected, the majority of patients still choose hemodialysis as their primary treatment option. The healthcare organizations are responsible for delivering a complete patient education program(PDP)for modality selection before deterioration to the end stage renal disease(ESRD).
The aim of this study is to determine the influence of PDP for RRT on dialysis modality selection. The sample was taken from the Association of Dialysis Patients from the Northern Taiwan, in which retrospective questionnaire were conducted. It is found that there exists a significant difference on modality selection depending on the grade of PDP delivered. In the group receiving complete PDP, they were prone to choose the peritoneal dialysis program with high satisfaction rate, and the odds ratio of such selection increase as high as 6.87 times. Among patients who have received PDP for peritoneal dialysis, the frequency of patient education program given has a significant influence on modality selection. For those who received complete PDP, factors that influence patient's modality selection include『purchase personal insurance』、『satisfied income』、『family support』、『Physician or nurse's opinion on not suitable for hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis』、『Physician and nurse can help to resolve the problem during RRT』. In the group receiving PDP for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, factors such as 『distance within 30 minutes 』、『Family or care-giver can help to deal with ordinary task』、『Physician or nurse's opinion on not suitable for peritoneal dialysis』played a significant role on modality selection. In the group receiving PDP for peritoneal dialysis only,『Physician and nurse can help to resolve the problem during RRT』、『Physician or nurse's opinion on not suitable for peritoneal dialysis』 have strong influence on modality selection. In the group receiving PDP for hemodialysis only,『convenience traffic 』has significant influence on modality selection. The result of the study serves as a reference for the physicians and nurses to enhance further education program for patients with chronic kidney disease. This will also help patients to choose the most suitable modality for renal replacement therapy. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:20:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-P93843013-1.pdf: 585180 bytes, checksum: 7755cd5c42c42a76410c70ef5fe55e77 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 表目錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景 1 第二節、研究動機與目的 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節、末期腎臟病替代療法 4 第二節、國內外透析模式影響因素探討 8 第三節、病患醫療服務利用行為模式探討 14 第四節、慢性腎臟病衛教計畫及衛教模式 17 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節、研究架構及假說 20 第二節、研究對象 22 第三節、研究變項及操作型定義 23 第四節、研究對象之資料蒐集 33 第五節、資料處理及統計分析方法 34 第四章 研究結果 36 第一節、樣本特性描述 36 第二節、背景變項與目前使用透析方式分析 42 第三節、醫療服務利用行為模式與目前透析方式之分析 50 第四節、末期腎衰竭治療模式衛教滿意度與透析模式選擇的影響 75 第五節、末期腎衰竭治療模式衛教時間與次數對透析模式選擇的影響 83 第六節、末期腎衰竭治療模式衛教程度與透析模式選擇之影響 87 第五章 討論與建議 89 第一節、不同的個人背景對透析模式選擇 89 第二節、醫療服務利用行為對透析模式選擇 91 第三節、末期腎衰竭治療模式衛教次數、滿意度、程度對透析模式選擇的影響 94 第四節、研究限制 95 第五節、研究建議 96 參考文獻 97 附錄 102 附錄一:透析模式選擇問卷 102 附錄二:末期腎衰竭治療模式衛教表 106 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 末期腎衰竭治療模式衛教對於透析模式選擇之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The influence of patient education program for renal replacement therapy on dialysis modality selection | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃松共,鄭劍廷 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 腎臟替代療法,末期腎衰竭,病患衛教,透析模式,醫療服務利用, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Renal replacement therapy(RRT),End stage renal disease(ESRD),Patient education program(PDP),Dialysis modality,Medical utilization, | en |
dc.relation.page | 107 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 571.46 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。