Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22522
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor謝明慧(Ming-Huei Hsieh)
dc.contributor.authorShu-Ling Wuen
dc.contributor.author吳淑玲zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T04:19:50Z-
dc.date.copyright2010-07-21
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-07-21
dc.identifier.citationAaker, J.(1997). Dimension of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347-357.
Aarsand, P. A.(2008). Frame switches and identity performances: Alternating between online and offline. Text & Talk, 28, 147-165.
Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S.W.(2002).Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management, 27,14-40.
Ahuvia, A.(2005). Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers’ identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 171-184.
Allen, D.E. (2002). Toward a Theory of Consumer Choice as Sociohistorically Shaped Practical Experience: The Fits-Like-a-Glove (FLAG) Framework. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 28, 515-532.
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 868-882.
Bailenson, J.N.K. et al. (2005). The Idependent and Interactive Effects of Embodied-agent Appearance and Behavior on Self-Report, Cogntive, and Behavioral Markers of Copresence in Immersive Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 14, 379-393.
Bajde, D.(2006).Other-centered behavior and the dialectics of self and other. Consumption. Markets and Culture, 9, 301-316.
Bargh, J.A., & Mckenna, K.Y.A.(2004).The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55,573-590.
Belk, R.W.(1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.
Belk, R.W. et al.(1989). The Sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 1-38.
Belk, R.W.,& Costa J.A.(1998). The mountain myth: a contemporary consuming fantasy. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 218-240.
Belk, R.W.,& Coon. G.S.(1993). Gift giving as agapic love: an alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 218-240.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brakus, J.J., Schmitt, B.H., & Zarantonello, L.(2009). Brand Experience: What Is It? How Is It Measured? Does It Affect Loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 73, 52-68.
Broncker, J., Wiesenfeld, B.M. & Raskas, D.F. (1993). Self-esteem and Expectacy-Valu Discrepancy: The Effects of Believing That You Can (or Can’t) Get What You Want. R. F. Baumeister (Ed.)
Brown, S., Kozinets, R.V. & Sherry Jr, J.F. (2003). Teaching Old Brands New Tricks: Retro Branding and the Revival of Brand Meaning. Journal of Marketing, 67, 19-33.
Callero, P. L.(2003. The sociology of the self. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 115-133.
Chandler, D., & Roberts-Young, D. (1998). The construction of identity in the personal home pages of adolescents: http://users.aber.ac.uk/dgc/strasbourg. html.
Clark et al.(1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship types, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94-103.
Clark, M.S. & Mills, J.(1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684-691.
Clark, M.S.(1986). Evidence for the effectiveness of manipulations of communal and exchange relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 414-425.
Constant, D., Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1996). The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Eletronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science, 1, 119-135.
Davis, A. et al. (2009). Avatars, People, an Virtual Worlds: Foundations for Research in Metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 91-117.
Dominick, J.R.(1999). Who do you think you are? Personal home pages and self-presentation on the world wide web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 646-658.
Ellemers et al. (2002). Self and social Identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
Fiske, A.P.(1991a). Structures of social life: the four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.
Fiske, A.P.(1991b). The cultural relativity of selfish individualism: Anthropological evidence that humans are inherently sociable. Review of Personality and Social Psychology,12, 176-214.
Fiske, A.P.(1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99,4,689-723.
Fournier, S. (1991). A meaning-based framework for the study of consumer-object relations. Advances in Consumer Research, 18,736-742.
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24,343-373.
Foxall. G. Hackeet. P.(1994). Consumer Satisfaction with Birmingham's International Convention Centre. Service Industries Review, 14, 369-380.
Gibbs, J.L. et al.(2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-discolsure, and perceived success in internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152-177.
Gilmore, G.W. (1919), Animism or Thought Currents of Primitive Peoples, Boston: Jones.
Goodwin, C.(1996). Communality as a dimension of service relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5,387-415.
Grayson, K., & Martinec, R.(2004). Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings. Journal of Consumer Research, 31,296-313.
Hardey, M. (2002). Life beyond the screen: embodiment and identity through the internet. The Sociological Review, 50, 570-585.
Harre, R. & Van Langenhove, L.(1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21, 393-407.
Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: the meaning of style. Methuen, London. Brake M.
Hermans , H.J.M.(2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture Psychology, 7, 243-280.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement . San Diego: Academic Press.
Hinde, R.A.(1976). On describing relationships.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17,1-19.
Hindmarsh, J. et al. (2006). (Im)materiality, virtual reality and interaction: grounding the ‘virtual’ in studies of technology in action. The Sociological Review,54,795-816.
Holbrook et al.(1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132-140.
Holt, D. B.(1995). How consumers consumer: a typology of consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1-16.
Holt, D. B.(1997). Poststructuralist Lifestyle Analysis: Conceptualizing the Social Patterning of Consumption in Postmodernity. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 326-350.
Holt, D. B.(1998). Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption? Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 1-25.
Ligas, M. (2000). People, products, and pursuits: Exploring the relationship between consumer goals and product meanings. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 983-1003.
Kates, S. M. (2002). The protean quality of subcultural consumption: An ethnographic account of gay consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 383-399.
King, A.Y.C. & Bond M.H. (1985).The Confucian paradigm of man: A sociological view. Chinese culture and mental health, Academic Press.
Krau, R., et al.(1998). Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being? American Psychologist, 53, 1001-1031.
Mathwick, C. et al.(2007). Social capital production in a virtual P3 community. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 823-849.
Kinsella, S.(1998). Japanese subculture in the 1990s: Otaku and the amateur manga movement. Journal of Japanese Studies, 24, 289-316.
Kitabayashi, K.(2004). The Otaku Group from a Business Perspective: Revaluation of Enthusiastic Consumers. Tokyo: Nomura Research Institute.
Kozinets, R. V.(2001). Utopian enterprise: articulating the meaning of star trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28,67-88.
Kozinets, R.V. et al.(2008). The wisdom of consumer crowds collective innovation in the age of networked marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 28, 339-354.
Levinger, G.(1983).Development and Change. In Close Relationships, ed. Harold H. Kelley et al., New York: W.H. Freeman, 315-359.
Levy, M.R. & Windahl, S.(1985). Audience Activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11, 51-78.
Lincoln Y.S. & Guba E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hill: Sage Publications.
Long, S.(1996). Nurturing and femininity: the idea of caregiving in postwar Japan. In Re-imaging Japanese Women. Berkely: University of California Press.
Lydon, J.E. et al.(1997). The meaning of social interactions in the transition from acquaintanceship to friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 536-548.
Macias, P.(2007). Toyko international anime fair. The Big Report. Otaku USA, 1, 128-131.
Markus, H., & Wurf, E.(1987). The dynamic self-concept: a social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38,299-337.
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
Mathwick, C., Wiertz, C. & Ruyter, K.D. (2008). Social Capital Production in a Virtual P3 Community. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 832-849.
Mescallado, R.(2000). Otaku Nation. Science Fiction Studies, 27,1.
McDougall, W.(1911). Body and mind: A history and defense of animism. New York: Macmillan.
McGill, Ann L. (1998), “Relative use of necessity and sufficiency information in causal judgments about natural categories,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 , 70–81.
Mckenna, K.Y.A. et al.(2002).Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.
McVeigh, P.(2007). Wearing Ideology. State, Schooling and Self-Presentation in Japan. Oxford: Berg.
Michaelson, K.L. (1996). Information, Community and Access. Social Science Computer Review, 14, 57-59.
Minoff, D.C. (1997). Producing Social Capital. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 606-619.
Moon, Youngme (2000), Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (March), 323–39.
Muniz, A. M., Jr., & O’Guinn, T.C..(2001). Brand Community, Journal of Consumer Researvh, 27, 412-32.
Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research: Issues, methods and process (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Nida, E. A. & Smalley, W.A.(1959). Introducing Animism. New York: Friendship.
Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. The Sociological Review, 45, 420-435.
Ohen, H.(2006). Akihabara @ Deep. Toyko: TBS.
Papacharissi, Z.(2002). The presentation of self in virtual life: characteristics of personal home page. Journalism of Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 643-658.
Paxton, P. (1999). Is Social Capital Declining in the Uited States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment. American Journal Of Sociology, 105, 88-127.
Pena, J.L.(2006). Otaku: Images and Identity in Flux. East Asian Language and Civilization: http:// repository.upenn.edu/curej/9.
Pettigrew, S. (2006). Symbolic double-coding: the case of Australian pubs. Qualitative Market Research, 9, 157-169.
Pichler, E.A., & Hemesberger, A. (2008). Driven by devotion-how consumers interact with their objects of devotion. Advances in consumer research, 35,439-444.
Plummer, J.(1985). How personality makes a difference. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 27-31.
Portes, A.(1998). Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review Sociology, 24,1-24.
Putman, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York.
Schau, H.J., & Gilly, M.C.(2003).What are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 385-404.
Schouten, J.W., & McAlexander, J.H.(1995). Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 43-61.
Sher, N.(1994). Knowledge societies. London and Thousand Oaks. CA:Sage.
Steinfield, C. et al.(2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network site: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434-445.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1999). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Swidler, A.(1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286.
Tago, Y.(2006). Maid in Akihabara. Tokyo: BBMC.
Takeuchi, H. et al.(2006). Densha Otaku. Toyko:Fuji TV.
Tomiuk, D. & Pinsonneault, A.(2008).Applying relationship theories to web site design: development and validation of a site-communality scale. Information Systems Journal, 19,413-435.
Tylor, E.(1874). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, language, art, and customs. New York: Holt.
Wallendorf, M., & Arnould, E.J.(1988). My favorite things: A cross-cultural inquiry into object attachment, possessiveness, and social linkage. Journal of Consumer Research, 14,531-547.
Zwick, D., & Dholakia, N. (2006). The epistemic consumption object and postsocial consumption: expanding consumer-object theory in consumer research. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 9, 12-43.
Zwick, D., & Dholakia, N. (2006). Bringing the market to life: Screen aesthetics and the epistemic consumption object. Marketing Theory, 6, 41-62.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22522-
dc.description.abstract在消費者研究中,發現消費者與物件的關係建構擬似於人際間關係之建構,惟於宅經濟中的消費者與物件關係之建構,更為多元,本研究發現,消費者與物件關係的建構並非是單向且靜態的,應為多元且動態的,消費者對物建之情感,將可延伸至其人際互動關係之培養zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn consumption researches, consumers-objects relations are protrated as quasi interpersonal relationship. In stay-at-home economics, relationship constructions on consumers-objects are diversity and dynamical, that is , consumers will extend their emotions through objects to others.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:19:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-D94724013-1.pdf: 7181720 bytes, checksum: 38316c5808a27fffbc7a71e5b8f7bd6d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Research Methodology. . . . . . . . . 20
Data Analysis.........................28
Reference.............................61
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject消費者與物件關係zh_TW
dc.subject關係建構zh_TW
dc.subjectsubjects-objects relationshipen
dc.subjectrelationship constructionsen
dc.title解放或是囚禁? 宅消費者的關係建構zh_TW
dc.titleRelease or Prison? Stay-at-Home Consumers’ Relations Construction: Interactions between Object (s) and Subject (s)en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee周子銓(Tzu-Chuan Chou),佘日新(Peter, J. Sher),陳厚銘(Ho-Min Chen),任立中(Li-Chung Jen)
dc.subject.keyword關係建構,消費者與物件關係,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordrelationship constructions,subjects-objects relationship,en
dc.relation.page72
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2010-07-21
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
7.01 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved