請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22478
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許圳塗 | |
dc.contributor.author | Che-Han Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張哲瀚 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:18:43Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 江舒君. 1994. 流蘇細胞懸浮培養之體胚發生及植株再生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
2. 何錦玟. 1989. 馬拉巴栗(Pachira aquatica Aubl.)之組織培養. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 3. 李阿嬌. 1992. 流蘇體外培養之體胚發生及植株再生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 4. 林文鎮. 1992. 臺灣名花木解說. 中華林學叢刊926號. p.46-47. 5. 吳淑華. 2001. 基因型、滲透壓劑、ABA及Fluridone對百合無體繁殖小鱗片葉形態發育之影響. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 6. 邱寶玲. 1971. 低溫及GA處理打破流蘇上胚軸休眠之試驗. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 7. 高景輝. 1994. 植物荷爾蒙生理. 華香園出版社. p.95-108. 台北. 8. 馬溯軒、許圳塗. 1991. 植物再生與繁殖及改良. 園藝作物組織培養之應用研討會專集. p.1-18. 國立台灣大學農學院園藝學系編印. 9. 許圳塗、馬溯軒、蔡幸玲、李阿嬌. 1998. 流蘇胚發育期胚芽與胚根之不同步休眠與克服. 植物種苗 1:19-34. 10. 廖欣怡. 2002. 流蘇芽體培養不定根發生及幼花序培養體胚發生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 11. 蔡幸玲、李阿嬌、馬溯軒、許圳塗. 流蘇未成熟胚培養及上胚軸休眠之克服. 科學農業 40:331-332. 12. 劉信良. 2000. 流蘇細胞懸浮培養生長發育及其pH變化之特性. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 13. 劉堂瑞. 1991. 台灣木本植物圖誌(卷下). 國立臺灣大學農學院. p.1061. 14. 羅靜琪. 2004. 流蘇幼花衍生胚性細胞懸浮培養及體胚發生誘導. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 15. Barnes, H. W. 1988. Rooting responses and possibilities of Franxinus, Osmanthus, Chionanthus. Plant Propagation 34(2):5-6. 16. Bartels, P. G. and C. W. Watson. 1978. Inhibition of carotenoid synthesis by fluridone and norflurazon. Weed Sci. 26:198-203. 17. Bates, S., J. E. Preece, N. E. Navarrete, J. W. Van Sambeek, and G. R. Gaffney. 1992. Thidiazuron stimulates shoot organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in white ash (Fraxinus americana L.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 31:21-29. 18. Beck, S. L., R. Dunlop, and J. V. Staden. 2000. Meristem culture of Acacia mearnsii. Plant Growth Regulat. 32:49-58. 19. Beck, S. L., R. Dunlop, and J. V. Staden. 1998. Rejuvanation and micropropagation of adult Acacia mearnsii using coppice material. Plant Growth Regulat. 26:149-153. 20. Chan, C. R. and R. D. Marquard. 1999. Acceletated propagation of Chionanthus virginicus via embryo culture. HortScience 34:140-141. 21. Cuenca, B., M. C. San-Jose, M. T. Martinez, A. Ballester, and A. M. Vieitez. 1999. Somatic embryogenesis from stem and leaf explant of Quercus robur L. Plant Cell Rep. 18:538-543. 22. Dirr, M. A. 1990. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants: Their Identification, Ornamental Characteristics, Culture, Propagation and Uses. Stipes Publ. Co., Champaign, III. (cited from Chan and Marquard). 23. Dirr, M. A. and C. W. Heaser, Jr. 1987. The reference manual of woody plant propagation. Athen, Ga, univ. Press. 24. Dodeman, V. L., G. Ducreux and M. Kreis. 1997. Zygotic embryogenesis versus somatic embryogenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 48:1493-1509. 25. Dolcet-Sanjuan, R., E. Claveria, A. Camprubi, V. Estaun, and C. Calvet. 1996. Micropropagation of walnut trees (Juglans regia L.) and respond to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation. Agronomie 16:639-645. 26. Dumas, E. and O. Monteuuis. 1995. In vitro rooting of micropropagated shoots from juvenile and mature Pinus pinaster explants: influence of activated charcoal. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 40:231-235. 27. Feher, A., T. P. Pasternak and D. Dudits. 2003. Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 74:201-228. 28. Finer, J. J. 1994. Plant regeneration via embryogenic suspension culture. In: Dixon, R. A. and R. A. Gonzales.(eds) Plant Cell Culture: A Practical Approach second edition. Oxford, New York, p.99-125. 29. Fiola, J. A., M. A. Hassan, H. J. Swartz, R. H. Bors, and R. McNicols. 1990. Effect of thidiazuron, light fluence rates and kanamycin on in vitro shoot organogenesis from excised Rubus cotyledons and leaves. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 20:223–228. 30. Franclet, A. 1991. Biotechnology in “rejuvenation”: Hope for the micropropagation of difficult woody plants. Acta Horticulturae. 289:273-282. 31. Gaj, M. D. 2004. Factors influencing somatic embryogenesis induction and plant regeneration with particular reference to Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Growth Regulat. 43: 27-47. 32. Gary, D. J., M. E. Compton, and G. W. Elmstrom. 1993. A simple protocol for micropropagating diploid and tetraploid watermelon using shoot-tip explants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 33:211-217. 33. Gill, J. D. and F. L. Pogge. 1974. Chionanthus virginicus. L. In: Seeds of Woody Plants in the United States. USDA Agri. Handbook, No. 450, p.323-325. 34. Gupta, P. K. and D. J. Durzan. 1987. Microprapagation and phase specificity in mature, Elite Douglas. fir. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112:969-971. 35. Hackett, W. P. 1983. Phase change and intra-clonal variability. HortScience 18:12-16. 36. Hartmann, H. T., D. E. Kester, F. T. Davies, and R. L. Geneve. 1997. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. sixth edition. Prentice-Hall. New Jersey. P.251-257 37. Harvey, B. M. R., G. Bowden, C. Reavey, and C. Selby. 1994. Stimulation of in vitro root and shoot growth of potato by increasing sucrose concentration in the presence of fluridone, and inhibitor of abscisic acid synthesis. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 37:271-276. 38. Huang, L. C., S. Luis, B. L. Huang, T. Murashige, E. F. M. Mahdi, and R. V. Gundy. 1992 a. Rejuvenation of Sequoia sempervirens by repeated grafting of shoot tips onto juvenile rootstocks in vitro. Plant Physiol. 98:166-173. 39. Huang, L. C., C. K. Hsiao, S. H. Lee, B. C. Huang, and T. Murashige. 1992 b. Restoration of vigor and rooting competence in stem tissue of mature citrus by repeated grafting of their shoot apices onto freshly germinated seeding in vitro. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 28P:30-32. 40. Hutteman, C. A. and J. E. Preece. 1993. Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 33:105–119. 41. Jain, S. M., P. K. Gupta, and R. J. Newton. 1995. Somatic embryogenesis in woody plants, Vol. 1: Histroy, molecular and biochemicall aspect, and applications. Kluwer Academic, Boston. p.99-118. 42. Jayasanker, S., D. J. Gray, and R. E. Litz. 1999. High-efficiency somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from suspension cultures of grapevine. Plant Cell Rep. 18:533-537. 43. Jimenez, V. M. 2005. Involvment of plant hormones and plant growth regulators on in vitro somatic embryogenesis. Plant Growth Regulation. 47:91-110. 44. Kantharajah, A. S. and P. G. Golegaonkar. 2004. Somatic embryogenesis in eggplant. Sci. Hortic. 99:107-117. 45. Kevers, C., T. Franck, R. J. Strasser, J. Dommes, and T. Gaspar. 2004. Hyperhydricity of micropropagated shoots: a typically stress-induced change of physiological state. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 77: 181–191. 46. Komamine, A. 2001. Machnisms somatic embryogenesis in carrot suspension cultures. Phytomorphology Golden Jubilee Issue:277-287. 47. Lall, S., Z. Mandegaran, and A.V. Roberts. 2005. Shoot multiplication in cultures of mature Alnus glutinosa. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 83: 347–350 48. Lloyd, G. and B. McCown. 1980. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Proc. Inter. Plant Prop. Soc. 30:421-427. 49. Lu, C. Y. 1992. The use of thidiazuron in tissue culture. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 29:92-96. 50. Martinez, V. M. and J. R. Whitaker. 1995. The biochemistry and control of enzymatic browning. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 6:195-200. 51. Merkle, S. A. and P. J. Battle. 2000. Enhancement of embryogenic culture initiation from tissues of mature sweetgum trees. Plant Cell Rep. 19:268-273. 52. Merkle, S. A., K. A. Neu, P. J. Battle, and R. L. Bailey. 1998. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from immature and mature tissue of sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Plant Sci. 132:169-178. 53. Mneney, E. E. and S. H. Mantell. 2001. In vitro micrografting of cashew. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 66:49-58. 54. Monteuuis, O. 1991. Rejuvenation of a 100-year-old Sequoiadaendron giganteum through in vitro meristem culture. I. Organogenic and morphological arguments. Physiol. Plant. 81:111-115. 55. Onay, A., V. Pirinç, H. Yıldırım, and D. Basaran. 2004. In vitro micrografting of mature pistachio (Pistacia vera var. Siirt). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 77:215-219. 56. Pattnaik, S. K., and P. K. Chand. 1997. Rapid clonal propagation of three mulberrys, Morus cathayana Hemsl., M. lhou Koiz. and M. serrata Roxb., through in vitro culture of apical shoot buds and nodal explants from mature trees. Plant Cell Rep. 16:503-508. 57. Perrin, Y., P. Doumas, L. Lardet, and M. P. Carron. 1997. Endogenous cytokinins as biochemical markers of rubber-tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clone rejuvenation. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 47:239-245. 58. Perrin, Y., L. Lardet, F. Enjalric, and M. P. Carron. 1994. Rejuvenation of mature of Heavea brasiliensis (Mull. Arg.) by in vitro micrografting. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:623-630. 59. Poethig, R. S. 1990. Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science 250:923-930. 60. Pinto, G., S. Silva, Y. S. Park, L. Neves, C. Araújo, and C. Santos. 2008. Factors influencing somatic embryogenesis indction in Eucalyptus globulus Labill.: basal medium and anti-browning agents. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 95:79-88. 61. Rao, K. S. and R. Venkateswara. 1985. Tissue culture of forest trees: Clonal multiplication of Eucalyptus grandis L. Plant Sci. 40:51-55. 62. Revilla, M. A., J. Pacheco, A. Casares, and R. Rodriguez. 1996. In vitro reinvigoration of mature olive trees (Olea europaea L.) through micrografting. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 32:257-261. 63. Rogler, C. E. and W. P. Hackett. 1975 a. Phase change in Hedera helix: Induction of the mature to juvenile phase change by gibberllin A3. Physiol. Plant. 34:141-147. 64. Rogler, C. E. and W. P. Hackett. 1975 b. Phase change in Hedera helix: Stabilization of the mature form with abscisic acid and growth retardants. Physiol. Plant. 34:148-152. 65. Shekhawat, N. S., T. S. Rathore, R. P. Singh, N. S. Deora, and S. R. Rao. 1993. Factors affecting in vitro clonal propagation of Prosopis cineraria. Plant Growth Regulat. 12:273-280. 66. Suttle, J. C. 1985. Involvement of ethylene in the action of the cotton defoliant thidiazuron. Plant Physiol. 78:272-276. 67. Thomas, J. C. and F. R. Katterman. 1986. Cytokinin activity induced by thidiazuron. Plant Physiol. 81:681-683. 68. Tulecke, W. 1987. Somatic embryogenesis in woody perennials. In: J. M. bonga et al.,(eds.) Cell and Tissue Culture in Foresty 2:62-91. 69. Tranvan, H., F. Bardat, M. Jacques, and Y. Arnaud. 1991. Rejeunissement chez le Sequoia sempervirens: Effects du microgreffage in vitro. Can. J. Bot. 69:1772-1779. 70. Trindade, H. and M. S. Pais. 1997. In vitro studies on Eucalyptus globulus rooting ability. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 33:1-5. 71. Verdeil, J. L., C. Huet, F. Grosdemsnge, and J. Buffard-Morel. 1994. Plant regeneration from cultured immature inflorescences of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.): Evidence for somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Rep. 13:218-221. 72. Wilhelm, E. 2000. Somatic embryogenesis in oak (Quercus spp.). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 36:9-15. 73. Williams, E. G. and G. Maheswaran. 1986. Somatic embryogenesis: Factors influencing coordinated behaviour of cells as an embryogenic group. Ann. Bot. 57-443-462. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22478 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 以流蘇基部所抽出之復勢枝條(invigorated shoot)為培植體,其汙染率和培植體成活率隨著採樣季節時間而有所不同,以6月採集消毒後汙染率20%為最底。由於流蘇為木本植物,植體內部含有大量的酚類物質,培養初期會造成培植體大量褐化,之後隨著繼代次數增加,酚類物質逐漸消褪,褐化的情況也會逐漸減少。進瓶後的復勢枝條所抽出的枝梢具有絨毛,葉緣為鋸齒狀,顯示具有幼年期性。培養初代的培植體發根率只有2.5%,經過連續11個月的繼代培養,到了第四代培植體發根率可達32.5%,顯示逐漸復幼的趨勢。為加速復勢枝條枝條的增殖效率,將培植體培養於含有TDZ和Kinetin 1、2或5 mg/L的WPM培養基中四週後,結果顯示Kinetin 2 mg/L的增殖效率最高,平均每個培植體可誘導出3.33個不定芽的生長,而TDZ 1 mg/L所誘導的不定芽數雖然只有1.67個,但平均枝梢長度為2.6 cm較Kinetin 2 mg/L的處理(平均1.1 cm)為佳。在不定芽增殖試驗中培植體同時會誘導出綠色硬質的癒傷組織,然而繼代培養後無法繼續分化再生,最後褐化死亡。
連續培養四至五個月後(約10~11月左右)培植體會出現生長停滯、落葉等芽體休眠的現象。將培植體培養於含有fluridone 0.5 mg/L的WPM培養基6週後可誘導11個不定芽的生長,新梢有白化的現象,移至不含fluridone的培養基一到兩週後可轉回綠色,但生長速度仍然相當緩慢,直到隔年二、三月左右開始才會逐漸恢復生長活力。 另外為增加發根率,將第五代培植體培養於含NAA或IBA 1、2或5 mg/L的WPM培養基四週後,NAA 1 mg/L、IBA 1 mg/L及IBA 2 mg/L發根率均可達到100%。將根系外觀異常粗大肥短的培植體移至不含任何生長調節劑的WPM培養基一到兩週後,根系可以正常伸長。平均根長達1 cm以上的培植體可出瓶,套袋健化四週後可移至溫室正常生長。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | We used the invigorated shoots sprouted from the basal part of mature fringe tree and the in vitro contaminant rate and servived rate varied with the culture season, as we found the lowest contaminant rate 20% in June. As a woody plant, fringe tree had a great amount of phenolic substance which caused serious browning in the beginning of microcutting. As the phenolic substance decreasing with the times of subculture, the browning of explants got less and less. The sprouted shoots were hariy with serrated leaves showed the juvenile character. The rooting rate of the fisrt microcutting was only 2.5% and after 11 months of serial microcutting, the rooting rate of 4th generational explants reached to 32.5%, showed the tendency to rejuvenation. To increase the shoot proliferation, we used WPM supplemented wth 1~5 mg/L TDZ or kinetin, and the greatest result showed on kinetin 2 mg/L with 3.33 shoots per explant. TDZ 1 mg/L showed 1.67 shoots but the shoot length (2.6 cm) was longer than kinetin 2 mg/L (1.1 cm). The callus induced from invigorated shoots was green and compact but could not regenerate or proliferate and turned browned in the end.
The explants entered dormancy after 4-5 months (around October to November) of serial microcutting. Transferred the dormant explants to WPM supplemented with 0.5 mg/L fluridone, explants can grew 11 etiolated bud after 6 weeks. The etiolated shoot would trun green after 1-2 weeks of subculturing on WPM without fluridone but the vigor and the proliferation didnot get back as usual until February to March the following year. In order to accelerate and increase the rooting rate, the 5th generational explants were transferred on WPM supplemented with 1~5 mg/L NAA or IBA. The best result showed 100% rooting on NAA 1 mg/L, IBA 1 mg/L and IBA 2 mg/L after 4 weeks of culture. The explants with abnormal shorter and fat roots was transferred onto WPM without any plant growth regulator and grew longer and normal after 1~2 weeks. The explants with average root length over 1 cm were successfully transferred in plug cell with plastic bag for 4 weeks and move to green house with the plastic bag. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:18:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96628137-1.pdf: 1476927 bytes, checksum: 89508964bc61f55772adef440f1a9f6b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書............................................................................................................i
誌謝...................................................................................................................................ii 縮寫字..............................................................................................................................iii 中文摘要..........................................................................................................................iv 英文摘要...........................................................................................................................v 一、前言 .........................................................................................................................1 二、前人研究 .................................................................................................................3 (一)木本植物體外復幼之研究概況.............................................................................3 1、植物之幼年性......................................................................................................3 2、培植體之選擇......................................................................................................4 3、微嫁接..................................................................................................................5 4、連續繼代培養......................................................................................................6 5、重覆微扦插..........................................................................................................6 6、體胚發生..............................................................................................................7 7、荷爾蒙的使用......................................................................................................7 (二)體胚發生.................................................................................................................8 1、木本植物之體胚發生..........................................................................................8 2、體胚發生之調控因子..........................................................................................8 (1)培植體特性.......................................................................................................9 (2)植物生長調節劑對胚性誘導的影響...............................................................9 3、體胚發生之過程................................................................................................11 (三)流蘇組織培養之發展現況...................................................................................12 1、流蘇胚芽與胚根之不同步休眠.........................................................................12 2、胚體組織的體胚誘導及細胞培養.....................................................................12 3、生殖組織的體胚誘導及細胞培養.....................................................................13 三、材料與方法...............................................................................................................14 (一)材料消毒與處理...................................................................................................14 (二)芽體增殖試驗.......................................................................................................14 (三)重複扦插...............................................................................................................15 (四)Fluridone與暗處理對發根之影響.......................................................................15 (五)瓶內發根試驗.......................................................................................................16 (六)瓶苗健化與移植...................................................................................................16 四、結果……..................................................................................................................17 (一)材料消毒與處理...................................................................................................17 (二)芽體增殖試驗.......................................................................................................17 (三)重複扦插...............................................................................................................18 (四)Fluridone與暗處理對發根之影響......................................................................19 (五)瓶內發根試驗.......................................................................................................21 五、討論...........................................................................................................................46 (一)培植體的汙染和成活率之探討...........................................................................46 (二)復勢芽體之增殖...................................................................................................47 (三)復幼現象之探討...................................................................................................48 (四)Fluridone對發根作用之影響...............................................................................49 參考文獻.........................................................................................................................51 附錄一、流蘇季節生長特性與芽體培養成活率之關係..............................................59 附錄二、WPM培養基組成成份...................................................................................60 附錄三、流蘇芽體培養不定根發生試驗流程.............................................................61 附錄四、流蘇芽體培養不定根發生試驗流程及增殖率.............................................62 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 流蘇重複微扦插之體外復幼作用與不定根發生 | zh_TW |
dc.title | In Vitro Rejuvenation and Rooting in Repetitive Microcutting of Fringe Tree (Chionanthus retusus Lindl.) | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張祖亮,黃怡菁 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 流蘇,微扦插,復幼作用,瓶內發根,木本植物培養基, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Chionanthus restusus,microcutting,rejuvenation,in vitro rooting,WPM, | en |
dc.relation.page | 62 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.44 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。